Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles
In spite of the projected therapeutic potentials of gold nanoparticles (GNP) and silver nanoparticles (SNP), very limited data are available on the interaction of nanoparticles with the biological systems. The present investigation was designed to evaluate as well as compare the subacute toxicity of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology 2014-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1-12, Article 2338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rathore, Mansee Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray Maheswari, Ujjwala Dayal, Navami Suman, Rajesh Joshi, D. S. |
description | In spite of the projected therapeutic potentials of gold nanoparticles (GNP) and silver nanoparticles (SNP), very limited data are available on the interaction of nanoparticles with the biological systems. The present investigation was designed to evaluate as well as compare the subacute toxicity of GNP and SNP. Stable suspensions of GNP and SNP with mean particle diameter 10 and 25 nm, respectively, were prepared. Wistar rats were orally fed SNP (3 mg/kg) or GNP (20 μg/kg), once a day for 21 days. Biochemical indices (creatinine phosphokinase-MB, urea, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate transaminase, alkaline alanine transferase) and histopathological features of the liver, heart, brain, lungs, and kidney were evaluated for signs of toxicity. A significant decline in hepatic and renal function in the GNP treated group was observed as compared to SNP. GNP was found to be relatively more toxic on the lungs and SNP on the myocardial tissue as compared to SNP and GNP treatments, respectively. Interestingly, neither SNP nor GNP adversely affected the basal architecture of the brain as compared to sham. The present study demonstrated that GNP was significantly more noxious on the liver and kidney as compared with SNP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541450993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1541450993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-78eba3d227ee4387e1941680922350779dfe9cf90aab4fd4d44674ab952d3abc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtrHDEQhAeTQBwnPyA3QQj4Mraeo9HRLPEDDL4k4JvQaHpsmVlpo9Ys638fLWuMMfjUDfV1VVNN84PRM0apPkfGqGItZbLlQvTt7qg5Zkrztjfd_ae6i75vqe7kl-Yr4hOlrOOGHzf3q7TeuOxK2AIJkWzDNhGHCIhriIWkiZRHILgMzi8FSEm74EN53gsPaR6JiyPBMG8hk-hiql4l-BnwW_N5cjPC95d50vy9_P1ndd3e3l3drC5uWy-0Ka3uYXBi5FwDSNFrYEayrqeGc6Go1macwPjJUOcGOY1ylLLT0g1G8VG4wYuT5vTgu8np3wJY7Dqgh3l2EdKClinJpKLGiIr-fIc-pSXH-l2lmNQ1Ve0pdqB8TogZJrvJYe3ys2XU7ru2h65t7druu7a7evPrxdmhd_OUXfQBXw95L2q8UpXjBw6rFB8gv_ngQ_P_QbOPTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1514780953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Rathore, Mansee ; Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray ; Maheswari, Ujjwala ; Dayal, Navami ; Suman, Rajesh ; Joshi, D. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mansee ; Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray ; Maheswari, Ujjwala ; Dayal, Navami ; Suman, Rajesh ; Joshi, D. S.</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of the projected therapeutic potentials of gold nanoparticles (GNP) and silver nanoparticles (SNP), very limited data are available on the interaction of nanoparticles with the biological systems. The present investigation was designed to evaluate as well as compare the subacute toxicity of GNP and SNP. Stable suspensions of GNP and SNP with mean particle diameter 10 and 25 nm, respectively, were prepared. Wistar rats were orally fed SNP (3 mg/kg) or GNP (20 μg/kg), once a day for 21 days. Biochemical indices (creatinine phosphokinase-MB, urea, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate transaminase, alkaline alanine transferase) and histopathological features of the liver, heart, brain, lungs, and kidney were evaluated for signs of toxicity. A significant decline in hepatic and renal function in the GNP treated group was observed as compared to SNP. GNP was found to be relatively more toxic on the lungs and SNP on the myocardial tissue as compared to SNP and GNP treatments, respectively. Interestingly, neither SNP nor GNP adversely affected the basal architecture of the brain as compared to sham. The present study demonstrated that GNP was significantly more noxious on the liver and kidney as compared with SNP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-0764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-896X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Brain ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science; rheology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gold ; Inorganic Chemistry ; Kidneys ; Lasers ; Liver ; Materials Science ; Nanocrystalline materials ; Nanoparticles ; Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization ; Nanotechnology ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Photonics ; Physical Chemistry ; Physics ; Renal function ; Research Paper ; Silver ; Subacute toxicity ; Toxicity ; Urea</subject><ispartof>Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 2014-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1-12, Article 2338</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-78eba3d227ee4387e1941680922350779dfe9cf90aab4fd4d44674ab952d3abc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-78eba3d227ee4387e1941680922350779dfe9cf90aab4fd4d44674ab952d3abc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28393355$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mansee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswari, Ujjwala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayal, Navami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suman, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, D. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles</title><title>Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology</title><addtitle>J Nanopart Res</addtitle><description>In spite of the projected therapeutic potentials of gold nanoparticles (GNP) and silver nanoparticles (SNP), very limited data are available on the interaction of nanoparticles with the biological systems. The present investigation was designed to evaluate as well as compare the subacute toxicity of GNP and SNP. Stable suspensions of GNP and SNP with mean particle diameter 10 and 25 nm, respectively, were prepared. Wistar rats were orally fed SNP (3 mg/kg) or GNP (20 μg/kg), once a day for 21 days. Biochemical indices (creatinine phosphokinase-MB, urea, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate transaminase, alkaline alanine transferase) and histopathological features of the liver, heart, brain, lungs, and kidney were evaluated for signs of toxicity. A significant decline in hepatic and renal function in the GNP treated group was observed as compared to SNP. GNP was found to be relatively more toxic on the lungs and SNP on the myocardial tissue as compared to SNP and GNP treatments, respectively. Interestingly, neither SNP nor GNP adversely affected the basal architecture of the brain as compared to sham. The present study demonstrated that GNP was significantly more noxious on the liver and kidney as compared with SNP.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science; rheology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Inorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Nanocrystalline materials</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Silver</subject><subject>Subacute toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Urea</subject><issn>1388-0764</issn><issn>1572-896X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtrHDEQhAeTQBwnPyA3QQj4Mraeo9HRLPEDDL4k4JvQaHpsmVlpo9Ys638fLWuMMfjUDfV1VVNN84PRM0apPkfGqGItZbLlQvTt7qg5Zkrztjfd_ae6i75vqe7kl-Yr4hOlrOOGHzf3q7TeuOxK2AIJkWzDNhGHCIhriIWkiZRHILgMzi8FSEm74EN53gsPaR6JiyPBMG8hk-hiql4l-BnwW_N5cjPC95d50vy9_P1ndd3e3l3drC5uWy-0Ka3uYXBi5FwDSNFrYEayrqeGc6Go1macwPjJUOcGOY1ylLLT0g1G8VG4wYuT5vTgu8np3wJY7Dqgh3l2EdKClinJpKLGiIr-fIc-pSXH-l2lmNQ1Ve0pdqB8TogZJrvJYe3ys2XU7ru2h65t7druu7a7evPrxdmhd_OUXfQBXw95L2q8UpXjBw6rFB8gv_ngQ_P_QbOPTw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Rathore, Mansee</creator><creator>Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray</creator><creator>Maheswari, Ujjwala</creator><creator>Dayal, Navami</creator><creator>Suman, Rajesh</creator><creator>Joshi, D. S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles</title><author>Rathore, Mansee ; Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray ; Maheswari, Ujjwala ; Dayal, Navami ; Suman, Rajesh ; Joshi, D. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-78eba3d227ee4387e1941680922350779dfe9cf90aab4fd4d44674ab952d3abc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science; rheology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Inorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Nanocrystalline materials</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Silver</topic><topic>Subacute toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Urea</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mansee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswari, Ujjwala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayal, Navami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suman, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, D. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rathore, Mansee</au><au>Mohanty, Ipseeta Ray</au><au>Maheswari, Ujjwala</au><au>Dayal, Navami</au><au>Suman, Rajesh</au><au>Joshi, D. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology</jtitle><stitle>J Nanopart Res</stitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><artnum>2338</artnum><issn>1388-0764</issn><eissn>1572-896X</eissn><abstract>In spite of the projected therapeutic potentials of gold nanoparticles (GNP) and silver nanoparticles (SNP), very limited data are available on the interaction of nanoparticles with the biological systems. The present investigation was designed to evaluate as well as compare the subacute toxicity of GNP and SNP. Stable suspensions of GNP and SNP with mean particle diameter 10 and 25 nm, respectively, were prepared. Wistar rats were orally fed SNP (3 mg/kg) or GNP (20 μg/kg), once a day for 21 days. Biochemical indices (creatinine phosphokinase-MB, urea, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate transaminase, alkaline alanine transferase) and histopathological features of the liver, heart, brain, lungs, and kidney were evaluated for signs of toxicity. A significant decline in hepatic and renal function in the GNP treated group was observed as compared to SNP. GNP was found to be relatively more toxic on the lungs and SNP on the myocardial tissue as compared to SNP and GNP treatments, respectively. Interestingly, neither SNP nor GNP adversely affected the basal architecture of the brain as compared to sham. The present study demonstrated that GNP was significantly more noxious on the liver and kidney as compared with SNP.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1388-0764 |
ispartof | Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 2014-04, Vol.16 (4), p.1-12, Article 2338 |
issn | 1388-0764 1572-896X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541450993 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biocompatibility Brain Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemistry and Materials Science Cross-disciplinary physics: materials science rheology Exact sciences and technology Gold Inorganic Chemistry Kidneys Lasers Liver Materials Science Nanocrystalline materials Nanoparticles Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization Nanotechnology Optical Devices Optics Photonics Physical Chemistry Physics Renal function Research Paper Silver Subacute toxicity Toxicity Urea |
title | Comparative in vivo assessment of the subacute toxicity of gold and silver nanoparticles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A19%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20in%20vivo%20assessment%20of%20the%20subacute%20toxicity%20of%20gold%20and%20silver%20nanoparticles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nanoparticle%20research%20:%20an%20interdisciplinary%20forum%20for%20nanoscale%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Rathore,%20Mansee&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.artnum=2338&rft.issn=1388-0764&rft.eissn=1572-896X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11051-014-2338-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541450993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1514780953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |