Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff
This study compares the performance of a field bioretention cell with and without an internal water storage (IWS) layer for treating highway runoff. Both synthetic and natural runoff tests were conducted. Hydraulic performances on peak discharge reduction and detention time extension were measured....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water environment research 2014-05, Vol.86 (5), p.387-397 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 397 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 387 |
| container_title | Water environment research |
| container_volume | 86 |
| creator | Li, Ming-Han Swapp, Mark Hee Kim, Myung Chu, Kung-Hui Sung, Chan Yong |
| description | This study compares the performance of a field bioretention cell with and without an internal water storage (IWS) layer for treating highway runoff. Both synthetic and natural runoff tests were conducted. Hydraulic performances on peak discharge reduction and detention time extension were measured. Pollutant removal efficiencies were evaluated for total suspended solids (TSS), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonia, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate phosphorus. Pollutants in soil media were measured. Results reveal that both IWS and non-IWS designs reduced peak discharge and extended detention time, while the IWS design performed better. For water quality performance, the non-IWS design removed TSS, Cu, Pb, Zn, and total phosphorus to varying degrees of efficiency, but total nitrogen removal was minimal. The IWS layer significantly improved removal efficiencies for TSS, Cu, Zn, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Soil media accumulated some metals over time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2175/106143013X13789303501920 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540705425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24585648</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24585648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-a0eed4ce17482520966caae996eb0e5bdb28b0fbe6103c784ee6a2bbc6149d053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9rFDEUxYMotlY_ghLwxZfRm__Jgw-6VltYEGplfRsyM3e2WWcnazJD2W9v1q0igtCnnJDfOeHeQwhl8Jozo94w0EwKYOIbE8Y6AUIBcxwekFOmlKyMEuxh0QWrCidOyJOcNwCMc5CPyQmXTpdHdUq-L-J251MY1_R9iAknHKcQR_oBc1iPma7CdEP92P0ScZ6KppfjhGn0A135IuiXKSa_Rrr0-3LrY6LXCf10iLwI65tbv6dX8xj7_il51Psh47O784x8_Xh-vbiolp8_XS7eLatWWmcqD4idbJEZabni4LRuvUfnNDaAqukabhvoGywjiNZYiag9b5q27MR1oMQZeXXM3aX4Y8Y81duQWxwGP2Kcc82UBANK8vugQlqhhHIFffkPuonzYQ0HikvtNBhbKHuk2hRzTtjXuxS2Pu1rBvWhu_p_3RXri7sP5maL3R_j77IK8PYI3IYB9_cOrlfnVyCsKf7nR_8ml8r-yldW6TLmTwUprm4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524696078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Ming-Han ; Swapp, Mark ; Hee Kim, Myung ; Chu, Kung-Hui ; Sung, Chan Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Ming-Han ; Swapp, Mark ; Hee Kim, Myung ; Chu, Kung-Hui ; Sung, Chan Yong</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the performance of a field bioretention cell with and without an internal water storage (IWS) layer for treating highway runoff. Both synthetic and natural runoff tests were conducted. Hydraulic performances on peak discharge reduction and detention time extension were measured. Pollutant removal efficiencies were evaluated for total suspended solids (TSS), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonia, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate phosphorus. Pollutants in soil media were measured. Results reveal that both IWS and non-IWS designs reduced peak discharge and extended detention time, while the IWS design performed better. For water quality performance, the non-IWS design removed TSS, Cu, Pb, Zn, and total phosphorus to varying degrees of efficiency, but total nitrogen removal was minimal. The IWS layer significantly improved removal efficiencies for TSS, Cu, Zn, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Soil media accumulated some metals over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143013X13789303501920</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24961065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: THE WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION</publisher><subject>Bioretention areas ; Comparative analysis ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; event mean concentration ; Filtration ; Freshwater ; highway ; hot and semi‐arid climate ; low‐impact development ; Phosphorus ; Pollutants ; Rainfall ; Roads & highways ; Runoff ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil analysis ; Soil nitrogen ; Soil pollution ; Storage ; Storms ; Stormwater ; Water ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification ; Water pollution ; Water Quality</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2014-05, Vol.86 (5), p.387-397</ispartof><rights>2014 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION</rights><rights>2014 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>Copyright Water Environment Federation May 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-a0eed4ce17482520966caae996eb0e5bdb28b0fbe6103c784ee6a2bbc6149d053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-a0eed4ce17482520966caae996eb0e5bdb28b0fbe6103c784ee6a2bbc6149d053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24585648$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24585648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24961065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Ming-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swapp, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hee Kim, Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Kung-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chan Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>This study compares the performance of a field bioretention cell with and without an internal water storage (IWS) layer for treating highway runoff. Both synthetic and natural runoff tests were conducted. Hydraulic performances on peak discharge reduction and detention time extension were measured. Pollutant removal efficiencies were evaluated for total suspended solids (TSS), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonia, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate phosphorus. Pollutants in soil media were measured. Results reveal that both IWS and non-IWS designs reduced peak discharge and extended detention time, while the IWS design performed better. For water quality performance, the non-IWS design removed TSS, Cu, Pb, Zn, and total phosphorus to varying degrees of efficiency, but total nitrogen removal was minimal. The IWS layer significantly improved removal efficiencies for TSS, Cu, Zn, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Soil media accumulated some metals over time.</description><subject>Bioretention areas</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>event mean concentration</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>highway</subject><subject>hot and semi‐arid climate</subject><subject>low‐impact development</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil nitrogen</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9rFDEUxYMotlY_ghLwxZfRm__Jgw-6VltYEGplfRsyM3e2WWcnazJD2W9v1q0igtCnnJDfOeHeQwhl8Jozo94w0EwKYOIbE8Y6AUIBcxwekFOmlKyMEuxh0QWrCidOyJOcNwCMc5CPyQmXTpdHdUq-L-J251MY1_R9iAknHKcQR_oBc1iPma7CdEP92P0ScZ6KppfjhGn0A135IuiXKSa_Rrr0-3LrY6LXCf10iLwI65tbv6dX8xj7_il51Psh47O784x8_Xh-vbiolp8_XS7eLatWWmcqD4idbJEZabni4LRuvUfnNDaAqukabhvoGywjiNZYiag9b5q27MR1oMQZeXXM3aX4Y8Y81duQWxwGP2Kcc82UBANK8vugQlqhhHIFffkPuonzYQ0HikvtNBhbKHuk2hRzTtjXuxS2Pu1rBvWhu_p_3RXri7sP5maL3R_j77IK8PYI3IYB9_cOrlfnVyCsKf7nR_8ml8r-yldW6TLmTwUprm4</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Li, Ming-Han</creator><creator>Swapp, Mark</creator><creator>Hee Kim, Myung</creator><creator>Chu, Kung-Hui</creator><creator>Sung, Chan Yong</creator><general>THE WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION</general><general>Water Environment Federation</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff</title><author>Li, Ming-Han ; Swapp, Mark ; Hee Kim, Myung ; Chu, Kung-Hui ; Sung, Chan Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4897-a0eed4ce17482520966caae996eb0e5bdb28b0fbe6103c784ee6a2bbc6149d053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bioretention areas</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>event mean concentration</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>highway</topic><topic>hot and semi‐arid climate</topic><topic>low‐impact development</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil nitrogen</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Ming-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swapp, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hee Kim, Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Kung-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chan Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Ming-Han</au><au>Swapp, Mark</au><au>Hee Kim, Myung</au><au>Chu, Kung-Hui</au><au>Sung, Chan Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>387-397</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>This study compares the performance of a field bioretention cell with and without an internal water storage (IWS) layer for treating highway runoff. Both synthetic and natural runoff tests were conducted. Hydraulic performances on peak discharge reduction and detention time extension were measured. Pollutant removal efficiencies were evaluated for total suspended solids (TSS), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonia, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate phosphorus. Pollutants in soil media were measured. Results reveal that both IWS and non-IWS designs reduced peak discharge and extended detention time, while the IWS design performed better. For water quality performance, the non-IWS design removed TSS, Cu, Pb, Zn, and total phosphorus to varying degrees of efficiency, but total nitrogen removal was minimal. The IWS layer significantly improved removal efficiencies for TSS, Cu, Zn, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Soil media accumulated some metals over time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>THE WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION</pub><pmid>24961065</pmid><doi>10.2175/106143013X13789303501920</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1061-4303 |
| ispartof | Water environment research, 2014-05, Vol.86 (5), p.387-397 |
| issn | 1061-4303 1554-7531 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540705425 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Bioretention areas Comparative analysis Conservation of Natural Resources event mean concentration Filtration Freshwater highway hot and semi‐arid climate low‐impact development Phosphorus Pollutants Rainfall Roads & highways Runoff Soil - chemistry Soil analysis Soil nitrogen Soil pollution Storage Storms Stormwater Water Water Movements Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification Water pollution Water Quality |
| title | Comparing Bioretention Designs With and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Bioretention%20Designs%20With%20and%20Without%20an%20Internal%20Water%20Storage%20Layer%20for%20Treating%20Highway%20Runoff&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Ming-Han&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=387-397&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143013X13789303501920&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24585648%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524696078&rft_id=info:pmid/24961065&rft_jstor_id=24585648&rfr_iscdi=true |