Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance

(1) Changes in the absolute abundance of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) at Lake Ngezi, Zimbabwe, were followed in 1979-82 by mark-recapture in three size-classes (< 1.2 m, 1.2-2.5 m, > 2.5 m total length). (2) Throughout the study period, there were twenty-eight crocodiles >...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 1989-08, Vol.26 (2), p.381-395
Hauptverfasser: Hutton, J. M., Woolhouse, M. E. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 395
container_issue 2
container_start_page 381
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 26
creator Hutton, J. M.
Woolhouse, M. E. J.
description (1) Changes in the absolute abundance of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) at Lake Ngezi, Zimbabwe, were followed in 1979-82 by mark-recapture in three size-classes (< 1.2 m, 1.2-2.5 m, > 2.5 m total length). (2) Throughout the study period, there were twenty-eight crocodiles > 2.5 m long and forty crocodiles of 1.2-2.5 m in the population, but the number of animals < 1.2 m long declined from fifty-four in 1979 to eleven in 1982. (3) Over the same period, forty-six spotlight counts, standardized with respect to observer, route, speed and time of night, were conducted. Twelve environmental variables of probable importance to crocodile activity or visibility were measured during each count. These were included in a multiple regression analysis to quantify the effect of the environment on the proportion of the population seen during counts. (4) The proportion of the population counted by spotlight ranged from 0.10 to 0.63 with a mean of 0.36 ± 0.13 (S.D.) over the study period. (5) Two environmental variables, water-level and the difference between water and air temperatures, accounted for 64% of the variation in the proportion of the total population seen during counts. (6) Correction factors to convert spotlight counts to absolute numbers were calculated for the whole population and separately for each size-class. (7) Analysis shows that uncorrected counts undertaken in October/November at the time of lowest water and highest temperatures would have been useful indices of abundance at Ngezi. The use of simple standardized spotlight counts to monitor crocodile abundance is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2404068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15405852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2404068</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2404068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-69561b09343ee8198780cbc08c35528e814f89becc22a4f10a932474b5bb56e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1uEzEQhS0EEqEgXsESP73pgv-zexmlLUVqS0XpDTcr25lNHTb2YntVwRPyWPU2kUAgrmx5vjnnjAehl5S8Y5zM3zNBBFH1IzSjXMmKKSUeoxkhjFZ1Q-hT9CylDSGkkZzP0K8LHb9Vn8HqIY8RcA54kRKkhE-1zSEmvOg6sNn5Nc63gK9iGELMLngcOqzxpesBL2OwYTXdrsIw9vqhfA3g8fEYp87rIeTerW8zXobR54R1xpdr-OmO8Fe3NdrcwRHWfvVgcZNg0v6np0S7CN6VUH8YLszoV9pbeI6edLpP8GJ_HqCb05Mvy7Pq_NOHj8vFeWW5oLlSjVTUkIYLDlDTpp7XxBpLasulZHV5El3dGLCWMS06SnTDmZgLI42RCgg_QG93ukMM30dIud26ZKHvtYcwppZKQWQtWQFf_QVuwhh9ydZSTqkqi1HzQh3uKBtDShG6dohuq-OPlpJ22me732ch3-z1dLK672KZ2qXfeCPLMHzyfb3jNql81X_l7gEbxatO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311626667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Hutton, J. M. ; Woolhouse, M. E. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutton, J. M. ; Woolhouse, M. E. J.</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Changes in the absolute abundance of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) at Lake Ngezi, Zimbabwe, were followed in 1979-82 by mark-recapture in three size-classes (&lt; 1.2 m, 1.2-2.5 m, &gt; 2.5 m total length). (2) Throughout the study period, there were twenty-eight crocodiles &gt; 2.5 m long and forty crocodiles of 1.2-2.5 m in the population, but the number of animals &lt; 1.2 m long declined from fifty-four in 1979 to eleven in 1982. (3) Over the same period, forty-six spotlight counts, standardized with respect to observer, route, speed and time of night, were conducted. Twelve environmental variables of probable importance to crocodile activity or visibility were measured during each count. These were included in a multiple regression analysis to quantify the effect of the environment on the proportion of the population seen during counts. (4) The proportion of the population counted by spotlight ranged from 0.10 to 0.63 with a mean of 0.36 ± 0.13 (S.D.) over the study period. (5) Two environmental variables, water-level and the difference between water and air temperatures, accounted for 64% of the variation in the proportion of the total population seen during counts. (6) Correction factors to convert spotlight counts to absolute numbers were calculated for the whole population and separately for each size-class. (7) Analysis shows that uncorrected counts undertaken in October/November at the time of lowest water and highest temperatures would have been useful indices of abundance at Ngezi. The use of simple standardized spotlight counts to monitor crocodile abundance is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2404068</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science Publications</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Censuses ; Crocodiles ; Crocodylus niloticus ; Demecology ; Estimation methods ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mark release recapture ; Population estimates ; Regression analysis ; Reptilia. Amphibia ; Spotlights ; Vertebrata ; Water temperature ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 1989-08, Vol.26 (2), p.381-395</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-69561b09343ee8198780cbc08c35528e814f89becc22a4f10a932474b5bb56e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2404068$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2404068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19598732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutton, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolhouse, M. E. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>(1) Changes in the absolute abundance of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) at Lake Ngezi, Zimbabwe, were followed in 1979-82 by mark-recapture in three size-classes (&lt; 1.2 m, 1.2-2.5 m, &gt; 2.5 m total length). (2) Throughout the study period, there were twenty-eight crocodiles &gt; 2.5 m long and forty crocodiles of 1.2-2.5 m in the population, but the number of animals &lt; 1.2 m long declined from fifty-four in 1979 to eleven in 1982. (3) Over the same period, forty-six spotlight counts, standardized with respect to observer, route, speed and time of night, were conducted. Twelve environmental variables of probable importance to crocodile activity or visibility were measured during each count. These were included in a multiple regression analysis to quantify the effect of the environment on the proportion of the population seen during counts. (4) The proportion of the population counted by spotlight ranged from 0.10 to 0.63 with a mean of 0.36 ± 0.13 (S.D.) over the study period. (5) Two environmental variables, water-level and the difference between water and air temperatures, accounted for 64% of the variation in the proportion of the total population seen during counts. (6) Correction factors to convert spotlight counts to absolute numbers were calculated for the whole population and separately for each size-class. (7) Analysis shows that uncorrected counts undertaken in October/November at the time of lowest water and highest temperatures would have been useful indices of abundance at Ngezi. The use of simple standardized spotlight counts to monitor crocodile abundance is discussed.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Crocodiles</subject><subject>Crocodylus niloticus</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mark release recapture</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reptilia. Amphibia</subject><subject>Spotlights</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1uEzEQhS0EEqEgXsESP73pgv-zexmlLUVqS0XpDTcr25lNHTb2YntVwRPyWPU2kUAgrmx5vjnnjAehl5S8Y5zM3zNBBFH1IzSjXMmKKSUeoxkhjFZ1Q-hT9CylDSGkkZzP0K8LHb9Vn8HqIY8RcA54kRKkhE-1zSEmvOg6sNn5Nc63gK9iGELMLngcOqzxpesBL2OwYTXdrsIw9vqhfA3g8fEYp87rIeTerW8zXobR54R1xpdr-OmO8Fe3NdrcwRHWfvVgcZNg0v6np0S7CN6VUH8YLszoV9pbeI6edLpP8GJ_HqCb05Mvy7Pq_NOHj8vFeWW5oLlSjVTUkIYLDlDTpp7XxBpLasulZHV5El3dGLCWMS06SnTDmZgLI42RCgg_QG93ukMM30dIud26ZKHvtYcwppZKQWQtWQFf_QVuwhh9ydZSTqkqi1HzQh3uKBtDShG6dohuq-OPlpJ22me732ch3-z1dLK672KZ2qXfeCPLMHzyfb3jNql81X_l7gEbxatO</recordid><startdate>19890801</startdate><enddate>19890801</enddate><creator>Hutton, J. M.</creator><creator>Woolhouse, M. E. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Publications</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890801</creationdate><title>Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance</title><author>Hutton, J. M. ; Woolhouse, M. E. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-69561b09343ee8198780cbc08c35528e814f89becc22a4f10a932474b5bb56e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Crocodiles</topic><topic>Crocodylus niloticus</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mark release recapture</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reptilia. Amphibia</topic><topic>Spotlights</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutton, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolhouse, M. E. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutton, J. M.</au><au>Woolhouse, M. E. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>1989-08-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>381-395</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>(1) Changes in the absolute abundance of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus Laurenti) at Lake Ngezi, Zimbabwe, were followed in 1979-82 by mark-recapture in three size-classes (&lt; 1.2 m, 1.2-2.5 m, &gt; 2.5 m total length). (2) Throughout the study period, there were twenty-eight crocodiles &gt; 2.5 m long and forty crocodiles of 1.2-2.5 m in the population, but the number of animals &lt; 1.2 m long declined from fifty-four in 1979 to eleven in 1982. (3) Over the same period, forty-six spotlight counts, standardized with respect to observer, route, speed and time of night, were conducted. Twelve environmental variables of probable importance to crocodile activity or visibility were measured during each count. These were included in a multiple regression analysis to quantify the effect of the environment on the proportion of the population seen during counts. (4) The proportion of the population counted by spotlight ranged from 0.10 to 0.63 with a mean of 0.36 ± 0.13 (S.D.) over the study period. (5) Two environmental variables, water-level and the difference between water and air temperatures, accounted for 64% of the variation in the proportion of the total population seen during counts. (6) Correction factors to convert spotlight counts to absolute numbers were calculated for the whole population and separately for each size-class. (7) Analysis shows that uncorrected counts undertaken in October/November at the time of lowest water and highest temperatures would have been useful indices of abundance at Ngezi. The use of simple standardized spotlight counts to monitor crocodile abundance is discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Publications</pub><doi>10.2307/2404068</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 1989-08, Vol.26 (2), p.381-395
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15405852
source Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Censuses
Crocodiles
Crocodylus niloticus
Demecology
Estimation methods
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Mark release recapture
Population estimates
Regression analysis
Reptilia. Amphibia
Spotlights
Vertebrata
Water temperature
Wildlife management
title Mark-Recapture to Assess Factors Affecting the Proportion of a Nile Crocodile Population Seen During Spotlight Counts at Ngezi, Zimbabwe, and the Use of Spotlight Counts to Monitor Crocodile Abundance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mark-Recapture%20to%20Assess%20Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Proportion%20of%20a%20Nile%20Crocodile%20Population%20Seen%20During%20Spotlight%20Counts%20at%20Ngezi,%20Zimbabwe,%20and%20the%20Use%20of%20Spotlight%20Counts%20to%20Monitor%20Crocodile%20Abundance&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Hutton,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=1989-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=381-395&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2404068&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2404068%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311626667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2404068&rfr_iscdi=true