Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment
•Income is analysed for autonomous and integrated hog, beef and forage farms.•A key benefit of integration is the supply of nutrients from hog manure to forage.•At average prices, single-enterprise beef and forage operations are not profitable.•Analysis shows integrated profits increase under a wide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural systems 2014-05, Vol.127, p.1-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Agricultural systems |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Brewin, Derek G. Undi, Michael Kulshreshtha, Suren Wittenberg, Karin Tenuta, Mario Ominski, Kimberly H. |
description | •Income is analysed for autonomous and integrated hog, beef and forage farms.•A key benefit of integration is the supply of nutrients from hog manure to forage.•At average prices, single-enterprise beef and forage operations are not profitable.•Analysis shows integrated profits increase under a wide range of prices and yields.•Highest increase in net income is realized from the integration of hogs and beef.
This study was conducted to evaluate the economic sustainability of single enterprise farming operations when compared to integrated operations. The single operations consisted of either a hog only production system, a forage-based production system or beef cattle on pasture and the integrated operations were either a hog–forage or hog–beef production system. The hypothesized benefit of integration was the relatively inexpensive supply of nutrients from the hog facilities which may be applied to forage land used in both hay and beef cattle production, resulting in improved forage yield and cattle stocking rates. Net income from a 500-sow farrow-to-finish operation was analysed along with net income from a 349-ha forage production system and a 349-ha cattle production system. The 349-ha land area was an estimate of the forage area needed to spread the manure from the hog operation at nutrient removal rates governed by provincial (Manitoba, Canada) legislation. At ten year average prices, the single-enterprise beef and forage operations were not profitable, losing $2838/year and $34,169/year, respectively. Integration of single-enterprise operations with the hog operation made integrated operations viable, with additional profits of $50,935/year (beef) and $9894/year (forage), over and above the profit of the hog portion of the operation, as a consequence of the additional nutrients provided in the form of manure. Annual net income of the integrated hog–forage operation was 2% greater than the hog only operation that treats manure as a waste. Further, the integrated hog–beef operation realized a 10% increase in net income as a consequence of integration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540240789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308521X13001613</els_id><sourcerecordid>1540240789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-71e3ce760ad4cd5eb6f0d6ac144c9ef4248b519d66ccd11c1dc02e8e3661b7d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomgAeKmfYFOHDtE6h0pUXKRJTCSNECALg2SjaCPJ5eGRSakXMBvH7nu3Olu-L_Df58QXxBqBDTftrXblEOtAHWNqgZoz8QC-05XSpnug1iAhr5qFb5ciI-lbAFgidAvhHuIE2-ym0KKMg1ySNlt-EqumYcr6aKXv9NGvubk9_Q3Uw5l4rHIEOUzz2uOcuWi8-67vImSKcU0BpKuFC5l5Dh9EueD2xX-_G9eiqe721-rH9Xjz_uH1c1jRVrrqeqQNXFnwPmGfMtrM4A3jrBpaMlDo5p-3eLSG0PkEQk9geKetTG47nyjL8XX09257Nt-rmbHUIh3Oxc57YvFtgHVQNcv56g6RSmnUjIP9jWH0eWDRbBHn3Zrjz7t0adFZWefM3R9gnh-4k_gbAsFjsQ-ZKbJ-hT-h78D6e1_tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540240789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brewin, Derek G. ; Undi, Michael ; Kulshreshtha, Suren ; Wittenberg, Karin ; Tenuta, Mario ; Ominski, Kimberly H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brewin, Derek G. ; Undi, Michael ; Kulshreshtha, Suren ; Wittenberg, Karin ; Tenuta, Mario ; Ominski, Kimberly H.</creatorcontrib><description>•Income is analysed for autonomous and integrated hog, beef and forage farms.•A key benefit of integration is the supply of nutrients from hog manure to forage.•At average prices, single-enterprise beef and forage operations are not profitable.•Analysis shows integrated profits increase under a wide range of prices and yields.•Highest increase in net income is realized from the integration of hogs and beef.
This study was conducted to evaluate the economic sustainability of single enterprise farming operations when compared to integrated operations. The single operations consisted of either a hog only production system, a forage-based production system or beef cattle on pasture and the integrated operations were either a hog–forage or hog–beef production system. The hypothesized benefit of integration was the relatively inexpensive supply of nutrients from the hog facilities which may be applied to forage land used in both hay and beef cattle production, resulting in improved forage yield and cattle stocking rates. Net income from a 500-sow farrow-to-finish operation was analysed along with net income from a 349-ha forage production system and a 349-ha cattle production system. The 349-ha land area was an estimate of the forage area needed to spread the manure from the hog operation at nutrient removal rates governed by provincial (Manitoba, Canada) legislation. At ten year average prices, the single-enterprise beef and forage operations were not profitable, losing $2838/year and $34,169/year, respectively. Integration of single-enterprise operations with the hog operation made integrated operations viable, with additional profits of $50,935/year (beef) and $9894/year (forage), over and above the profit of the hog portion of the operation, as a consequence of the additional nutrients provided in the form of manure. Annual net income of the integrated hog–forage operation was 2% greater than the hog only operation that treats manure as a waste. Further, the integrated hog–beef operation realized a 10% increase in net income as a consequence of integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-521X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beef ; Forage ; Hogs ; Hog–beef integration ; Hog–forage integration ; Manure management</subject><ispartof>Agricultural systems, 2014-05, Vol.127, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-71e3ce760ad4cd5eb6f0d6ac144c9ef4248b519d66ccd11c1dc02e8e3661b7d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-71e3ce760ad4cd5eb6f0d6ac144c9ef4248b519d66ccd11c1dc02e8e3661b7d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X13001613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brewin, Derek G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulshreshtha, Suren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenberg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenuta, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ominski, Kimberly H.</creatorcontrib><title>Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment</title><title>Agricultural systems</title><description>•Income is analysed for autonomous and integrated hog, beef and forage farms.•A key benefit of integration is the supply of nutrients from hog manure to forage.•At average prices, single-enterprise beef and forage operations are not profitable.•Analysis shows integrated profits increase under a wide range of prices and yields.•Highest increase in net income is realized from the integration of hogs and beef.
This study was conducted to evaluate the economic sustainability of single enterprise farming operations when compared to integrated operations. The single operations consisted of either a hog only production system, a forage-based production system or beef cattle on pasture and the integrated operations were either a hog–forage or hog–beef production system. The hypothesized benefit of integration was the relatively inexpensive supply of nutrients from the hog facilities which may be applied to forage land used in both hay and beef cattle production, resulting in improved forage yield and cattle stocking rates. Net income from a 500-sow farrow-to-finish operation was analysed along with net income from a 349-ha forage production system and a 349-ha cattle production system. The 349-ha land area was an estimate of the forage area needed to spread the manure from the hog operation at nutrient removal rates governed by provincial (Manitoba, Canada) legislation. At ten year average prices, the single-enterprise beef and forage operations were not profitable, losing $2838/year and $34,169/year, respectively. Integration of single-enterprise operations with the hog operation made integrated operations viable, with additional profits of $50,935/year (beef) and $9894/year (forage), over and above the profit of the hog portion of the operation, as a consequence of the additional nutrients provided in the form of manure. Annual net income of the integrated hog–forage operation was 2% greater than the hog only operation that treats manure as a waste. Further, the integrated hog–beef operation realized a 10% increase in net income as a consequence of integration.</description><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hog–beef integration</subject><subject>Hog–forage integration</subject><subject>Manure management</subject><issn>0308-521X</issn><issn>1873-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomgAeKmfYFOHDtE6h0pUXKRJTCSNECALg2SjaCPJ5eGRSakXMBvH7nu3Olu-L_Df58QXxBqBDTftrXblEOtAHWNqgZoz8QC-05XSpnug1iAhr5qFb5ciI-lbAFgidAvhHuIE2-ym0KKMg1ySNlt-EqumYcr6aKXv9NGvubk9_Q3Uw5l4rHIEOUzz2uOcuWi8-67vImSKcU0BpKuFC5l5Dh9EueD2xX-_G9eiqe721-rH9Xjz_uH1c1jRVrrqeqQNXFnwPmGfMtrM4A3jrBpaMlDo5p-3eLSG0PkEQk9geKetTG47nyjL8XX09257Nt-rmbHUIh3Oxc57YvFtgHVQNcv56g6RSmnUjIP9jWH0eWDRbBHn3Zrjz7t0adFZWefM3R9gnh-4k_gbAsFjsQ-ZKbJ-hT-h78D6e1_tg</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Brewin, Derek G.</creator><creator>Undi, Michael</creator><creator>Kulshreshtha, Suren</creator><creator>Wittenberg, Karin</creator><creator>Tenuta, Mario</creator><creator>Ominski, Kimberly H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment</title><author>Brewin, Derek G. ; Undi, Michael ; Kulshreshtha, Suren ; Wittenberg, Karin ; Tenuta, Mario ; Ominski, Kimberly H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-71e3ce760ad4cd5eb6f0d6ac144c9ef4248b519d66ccd11c1dc02e8e3661b7d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hog–beef integration</topic><topic>Hog–forage integration</topic><topic>Manure management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brewin, Derek G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulshreshtha, Suren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenberg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenuta, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ominski, Kimberly H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brewin, Derek G.</au><au>Undi, Michael</au><au>Kulshreshtha, Suren</au><au>Wittenberg, Karin</au><au>Tenuta, Mario</au><au>Ominski, Kimberly H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural systems</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>127</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0308-521X</issn><eissn>1873-2267</eissn><abstract>•Income is analysed for autonomous and integrated hog, beef and forage farms.•A key benefit of integration is the supply of nutrients from hog manure to forage.•At average prices, single-enterprise beef and forage operations are not profitable.•Analysis shows integrated profits increase under a wide range of prices and yields.•Highest increase in net income is realized from the integration of hogs and beef.
This study was conducted to evaluate the economic sustainability of single enterprise farming operations when compared to integrated operations. The single operations consisted of either a hog only production system, a forage-based production system or beef cattle on pasture and the integrated operations were either a hog–forage or hog–beef production system. The hypothesized benefit of integration was the relatively inexpensive supply of nutrients from the hog facilities which may be applied to forage land used in both hay and beef cattle production, resulting in improved forage yield and cattle stocking rates. Net income from a 500-sow farrow-to-finish operation was analysed along with net income from a 349-ha forage production system and a 349-ha cattle production system. The 349-ha land area was an estimate of the forage area needed to spread the manure from the hog operation at nutrient removal rates governed by provincial (Manitoba, Canada) legislation. At ten year average prices, the single-enterprise beef and forage operations were not profitable, losing $2838/year and $34,169/year, respectively. Integration of single-enterprise operations with the hog operation made integrated operations viable, with additional profits of $50,935/year (beef) and $9894/year (forage), over and above the profit of the hog portion of the operation, as a consequence of the additional nutrients provided in the form of manure. Annual net income of the integrated hog–forage operation was 2% greater than the hog only operation that treats manure as a waste. Further, the integrated hog–beef operation realized a 10% increase in net income as a consequence of integration.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-521X |
ispartof | Agricultural systems, 2014-05, Vol.127, p.1-8 |
issn | 0308-521X 1873-2267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540240789 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Beef Forage Hogs Hog–beef integration Hog–forage integration Manure management |
title | Integration of forage, beef, and hog production systems in Western Canada: An economic assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20of%20forage,%20beef,%20and%20hog%20production%20systems%20in%20Western%20Canada:%20An%20economic%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20systems&rft.au=Brewin,%20Derek%20G.&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=127&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0308-521X&rft.eissn=1873-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1540240789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540240789&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308521X13001613&rfr_iscdi=true |