Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island

Dokdo, located east of the mainland of South Korea, is a volcanic island designated as a natural monument of South Korea due to its ecological value. Dokdo is divided into Dongdo and Seodo, islands with geological differences. The soil bacterial communities on Dokdo (Dongdo and Seodo) were analyzed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general and applied microbiology 2014, Vol.60(2), pp.65-74
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Ye-Eun, Yoon, Hyeokjun, Kim, Miae, Nam, Yoon-Jong, Kim, Hyun, Seo, Yeonggyo, Lee, Gyeong-Min, Kim, Young Ja, Kong, Won-Sik, Kim, Jong-Guk, Seu, Young-Bae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 2
container_start_page 65
container_title Journal of general and applied microbiology
container_volume 60
creator Kim, Ye-Eun
Yoon, Hyeokjun
Kim, Miae
Nam, Yoon-Jong
Kim, Hyun
Seo, Yeonggyo
Lee, Gyeong-Min
Kim, Young Ja
Kong, Won-Sik
Kim, Jong-Guk
Seu, Young-Bae
description Dokdo, located east of the mainland of South Korea, is a volcanic island designated as a natural monument of South Korea due to its ecological value. Dokdo is divided into Dongdo and Seodo, islands with geological differences. The soil bacterial communities on Dokdo (Dongdo and Seodo) were analyzed using the pyrosequencing method. There were 1,693 and 1,408 operational taxonomic units (OTU) from Dongdo and Seodo, respectively. The statistical analyses (rarefaction curves as well as Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) showed that bacterial diversity was slightly higher in Dongdo than Seodo. From results of a BLASTN search against the EzTaxon-e database, the validated reads (obtained after sequence preprocessing) were almost all classified at the phylum level. From the phylum level down to the species level, the number of classified reads considerably decreased due to the absence of information concerning unculturable or unidentified bacteria to date. Among the 36 phyla identified, three phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria) accounted for around 74.64%. The taxonomic composition was similar at the higher ranks (family and above) between Dongdo and Seodo, but a little different at the genus level. There were also various differences in the relative abundance of taxonomic ranks between Dongdo and Seodo. In particular, the proportion of the genus Acidobacterium (of the phylum Acidobacteria) was about six times higher in Seodo than Dongdo. In addition, the percentage of the genus Mycobacterium (of the phylum Actinobacteria) was nearly three times higher in Seodo than Dongdo, and the proportion of the genus Gaiella was about 3.7 times higher in Dongdo than Seodo. Overall, through the metagenomic analysis, the number of species identified in Dongdo and Seodo was 1,239 and 1,055, respectively. This information on the numerous culturable and unculturable bacteria is expected to help in the screening of new species in Dokdo.
doi_str_mv 10.2323/jgam.60.65
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540236082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1540236082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c1e32f0a13abc25b035448d96b228958aa2823d4ab9a76cc5f7b22f99a596a4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8ANQJBaElOL4q87QAZWvSkUsMFsXxykpSVzsZOi_x1EgA9NJd4-eu3sRukzwnFBC73ZbqOcCzwU_QtOEsjSWmC6O0RRjQuKECDxBZ97vMKaCSHaKJoRJnkrBpmj5alrYmsbWpY6ggergSx_ZIspAt8aVUEXa1nXXlG1pwqCJHuxXbqO1r6DJz9FJAZU3F791hj6eHt9XL_Hm7Xm9ut_EmhPZxjoxlBQYEgqZJjzDlDMm81RkhMiUSwAiCc0ZZCkshNa8WIRJkabAUwEM6AzdDN69s9-d8a2qS69NFW4wtvMq4QwTKnCwzND1P3RnOxce6yka1i0oFoG6HSjtrPfOFGrvyhrcQSVY9aGqPlQlsBI8wFe_yi6rTT6ifykGYDkAO9-HOQLg2lJXZnSRQTj29Sc4ZRr6A-zSh4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1532897306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kim, Ye-Eun ; Yoon, Hyeokjun ; Kim, Miae ; Nam, Yoon-Jong ; Kim, Hyun ; Seo, Yeonggyo ; Lee, Gyeong-Min ; Kim, Young Ja ; Kong, Won-Sik ; Kim, Jong-Guk ; Seu, Young-Bae</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ye-Eun ; Yoon, Hyeokjun ; Kim, Miae ; Nam, Yoon-Jong ; Kim, Hyun ; Seo, Yeonggyo ; Lee, Gyeong-Min ; Kim, Young Ja ; Kong, Won-Sik ; Kim, Jong-Guk ; Seu, Young-Bae</creatorcontrib><description>Dokdo, located east of the mainland of South Korea, is a volcanic island designated as a natural monument of South Korea due to its ecological value. Dokdo is divided into Dongdo and Seodo, islands with geological differences. The soil bacterial communities on Dokdo (Dongdo and Seodo) were analyzed using the pyrosequencing method. There were 1,693 and 1,408 operational taxonomic units (OTU) from Dongdo and Seodo, respectively. The statistical analyses (rarefaction curves as well as Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) showed that bacterial diversity was slightly higher in Dongdo than Seodo. From results of a BLASTN search against the EzTaxon-e database, the validated reads (obtained after sequence preprocessing) were almost all classified at the phylum level. From the phylum level down to the species level, the number of classified reads considerably decreased due to the absence of information concerning unculturable or unidentified bacteria to date. Among the 36 phyla identified, three phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria) accounted for around 74.64%. The taxonomic composition was similar at the higher ranks (family and above) between Dongdo and Seodo, but a little different at the genus level. There were also various differences in the relative abundance of taxonomic ranks between Dongdo and Seodo. In particular, the proportion of the genus Acidobacterium (of the phylum Acidobacteria) was about six times higher in Seodo than Dongdo. In addition, the percentage of the genus Mycobacterium (of the phylum Actinobacteria) was nearly three times higher in Seodo than Dongdo, and the proportion of the genus Gaiella was about 3.7 times higher in Dongdo than Seodo. Overall, through the metagenomic analysis, the number of species identified in Dongdo and Seodo was 1,239 and 1,055, respectively. This information on the numerous culturable and unculturable bacteria is expected to help in the screening of new species in Dokdo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-8037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2323/jgam.60.65</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24859864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Applied Microbiology, Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Acidobacterium ; Actinobacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; bacterial community ; Biota ; Cluster Analysis ; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry ; DNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Dokdo Island ; Geography ; Islands ; Metagenomics ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Mycobacterium ; Phylogeny ; Proteobacteria ; Republic of Korea ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Soil Microbiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 2014, Vol.60(2), pp.65-74</ispartof><rights>2014, Applied Microbiology, Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Research Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c1e32f0a13abc25b035448d96b228958aa2823d4ab9a76cc5f7b22f99a596a4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c1e32f0a13abc25b035448d96b228958aa2823d4ab9a76cc5f7b22f99a596a4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1884,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24859864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ye-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hyeokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Miae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Yoon-Jong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Yeonggyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gyeong-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Won-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Guk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seu, Young-Bae</creatorcontrib><title>Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island</title><title>Journal of general and applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.</addtitle><description>Dokdo, located east of the mainland of South Korea, is a volcanic island designated as a natural monument of South Korea due to its ecological value. Dokdo is divided into Dongdo and Seodo, islands with geological differences. The soil bacterial communities on Dokdo (Dongdo and Seodo) were analyzed using the pyrosequencing method. There were 1,693 and 1,408 operational taxonomic units (OTU) from Dongdo and Seodo, respectively. The statistical analyses (rarefaction curves as well as Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) showed that bacterial diversity was slightly higher in Dongdo than Seodo. From results of a BLASTN search against the EzTaxon-e database, the validated reads (obtained after sequence preprocessing) were almost all classified at the phylum level. From the phylum level down to the species level, the number of classified reads considerably decreased due to the absence of information concerning unculturable or unidentified bacteria to date. Among the 36 phyla identified, three phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria) accounted for around 74.64%. The taxonomic composition was similar at the higher ranks (family and above) between Dongdo and Seodo, but a little different at the genus level. There were also various differences in the relative abundance of taxonomic ranks between Dongdo and Seodo. In particular, the proportion of the genus Acidobacterium (of the phylum Acidobacteria) was about six times higher in Seodo than Dongdo. In addition, the percentage of the genus Mycobacterium (of the phylum Actinobacteria) was nearly three times higher in Seodo than Dongdo, and the proportion of the genus Gaiella was about 3.7 times higher in Dongdo than Seodo. Overall, through the metagenomic analysis, the number of species identified in Dongdo and Seodo was 1,239 and 1,055, respectively. This information on the numerous culturable and unculturable bacteria is expected to help in the screening of new species in Dokdo.</description><subject>Acidobacterium</subject><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>bacterial community</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Dokdo Island</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Mycobacterium</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><issn>0022-1260</issn><issn>1349-8037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWw8ANQJBaElOL4q87QAZWvSkUsMFsXxykpSVzsZOi_x1EgA9NJd4-eu3sRukzwnFBC73ZbqOcCzwU_QtOEsjSWmC6O0RRjQuKECDxBZ97vMKaCSHaKJoRJnkrBpmj5alrYmsbWpY6ggergSx_ZIspAt8aVUEXa1nXXlG1pwqCJHuxXbqO1r6DJz9FJAZU3F791hj6eHt9XL_Hm7Xm9ut_EmhPZxjoxlBQYEgqZJjzDlDMm81RkhMiUSwAiCc0ZZCkshNa8WIRJkabAUwEM6AzdDN69s9-d8a2qS69NFW4wtvMq4QwTKnCwzND1P3RnOxce6yka1i0oFoG6HSjtrPfOFGrvyhrcQSVY9aGqPlQlsBI8wFe_yi6rTT6ifykGYDkAO9-HOQLg2lJXZnSRQTj29Sc4ZRr6A-zSh4s</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Kim, Ye-Eun</creator><creator>Yoon, Hyeokjun</creator><creator>Kim, Miae</creator><creator>Nam, Yoon-Jong</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun</creator><creator>Seo, Yeonggyo</creator><creator>Lee, Gyeong-Min</creator><creator>Kim, Young Ja</creator><creator>Kong, Won-Sik</creator><creator>Kim, Jong-Guk</creator><creator>Seu, Young-Bae</creator><general>Applied Microbiology, Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Research Foundation</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island</title><author>Kim, Ye-Eun ; Yoon, Hyeokjun ; Kim, Miae ; Nam, Yoon-Jong ; Kim, Hyun ; Seo, Yeonggyo ; Lee, Gyeong-Min ; Kim, Young Ja ; Kong, Won-Sik ; Kim, Jong-Guk ; Seu, Young-Bae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-c1e32f0a13abc25b035448d96b228958aa2823d4ab9a76cc5f7b22f99a596a4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acidobacterium</topic><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>bacterial community</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Dokdo Island</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Mycobacterium</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ye-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Hyeokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Miae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Yoon-Jong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Yeonggyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gyeong-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Ja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Won-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong-Guk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seu, Young-Bae</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of general and applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Ye-Eun</au><au>Yoon, Hyeokjun</au><au>Kim, Miae</au><au>Nam, Yoon-Jong</au><au>Kim, Hyun</au><au>Seo, Yeonggyo</au><au>Lee, Gyeong-Min</au><au>Kim, Young Ja</au><au>Kong, Won-Sik</au><au>Kim, Jong-Guk</au><au>Seu, Young-Bae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general and applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>65-74</pages><issn>0022-1260</issn><eissn>1349-8037</eissn><abstract>Dokdo, located east of the mainland of South Korea, is a volcanic island designated as a natural monument of South Korea due to its ecological value. Dokdo is divided into Dongdo and Seodo, islands with geological differences. The soil bacterial communities on Dokdo (Dongdo and Seodo) were analyzed using the pyrosequencing method. There were 1,693 and 1,408 operational taxonomic units (OTU) from Dongdo and Seodo, respectively. The statistical analyses (rarefaction curves as well as Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) showed that bacterial diversity was slightly higher in Dongdo than Seodo. From results of a BLASTN search against the EzTaxon-e database, the validated reads (obtained after sequence preprocessing) were almost all classified at the phylum level. From the phylum level down to the species level, the number of classified reads considerably decreased due to the absence of information concerning unculturable or unidentified bacteria to date. Among the 36 phyla identified, three phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria) accounted for around 74.64%. The taxonomic composition was similar at the higher ranks (family and above) between Dongdo and Seodo, but a little different at the genus level. There were also various differences in the relative abundance of taxonomic ranks between Dongdo and Seodo. In particular, the proportion of the genus Acidobacterium (of the phylum Acidobacteria) was about six times higher in Seodo than Dongdo. In addition, the percentage of the genus Mycobacterium (of the phylum Actinobacteria) was nearly three times higher in Seodo than Dongdo, and the proportion of the genus Gaiella was about 3.7 times higher in Dongdo than Seodo. Overall, through the metagenomic analysis, the number of species identified in Dongdo and Seodo was 1,239 and 1,055, respectively. This information on the numerous culturable and unculturable bacteria is expected to help in the screening of new species in Dokdo.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Applied Microbiology, Molecular and Cellular Biosciences Research Foundation</pub><pmid>24859864</pmid><doi>10.2323/jgam.60.65</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1260
ispartof The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 2014, Vol.60(2), pp.65-74
issn 0022-1260
1349-8037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540236082
source J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Acidobacterium
Actinobacteria
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
bacterial community
Biota
Cluster Analysis
DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Ribosomal - chemistry
DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
Dokdo Island
Geography
Islands
Metagenomics
Molecular Sequence Data
Mycobacterium
Phylogeny
Proteobacteria
Republic of Korea
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Soil Microbiology
title Metagenomic analysis of bacterial communities on Dokdo Island
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A14%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metagenomic%20analysis%20of%20bacterial%20communities%20on%20Dokdo%20Island&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20and%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Ye-Eun&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=65-74&rft.issn=0022-1260&rft.eissn=1349-8037&rft_id=info:doi/10.2323/jgam.60.65&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1540236082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1532897306&rft_id=info:pmid/24859864&rfr_iscdi=true