Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish
Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine fisheries review 2013-09, Vol.75 (4), p.27-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Marine fisheries review |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Eiler, John H Grothues, Thomas M Dobarro, Joseph A Masuda, Michele M |
description | Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20-500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7755/MFR.75.4.2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540231440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A364199658</galeid><sourcerecordid>A364199658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-cb82cee564713347c9b2a84488ab8cdac5ff03024d81b45aa2c1338b7d6ba5543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0sGO0zAQBuAIgURZuPAEkbjsIhJsx26SY1VRWKlo0dL2ak2cSWpI7GI7gr49LuVApR6QD7ZG3z-y5UmS15TkZSnE-8-rx7wUOc_Zk2RG66LOGOH8aTIjpCYZrQryPHnh_TdCCGclnSXHpR0P4LTp08UUrLGjnXy6NS26nxDQpTvcazVgervY7u5SMG2seI9D1oDHNt04UN9P6S_oOutGMArTeEjXVkH401bFjkErGIZjuoG-j6mV9vuXybMOBo-v_u43yXb1YbP8lK0fPt4vF-tMcSZYppqKKUQx5yUtCl6qumFQcV5V0FSqBSW6jhSE8baiDRcATEVXNWU7b0AIXtwkt-e-B2d_TOiDHLVXOAxgMN5MUsEJKyjnJNI3Z9rDgFKbzob4vBOXi2LOaV3PRRVVdkX1aNDBYA12OpYvfH7Fx9XiqNXVwN1FIJqAv0IPk_fy_uvj_9uH3aV9949tJq9N_EptvO73wZ8jF_ztmStnvXfYyYPTI7ijpESepk3GaZOlkFyy4jcWf8Qr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1540231440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish</title><source>US Government Documents</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Eiler, John H ; Grothues, Thomas M ; Dobarro, Joseph A ; Masuda, Michele M</creator><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H ; Grothues, Thomas M ; Dobarro, Joseph A ; Masuda, Michele M</creatorcontrib><description>Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20-500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-1830</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7755/MFR.75.4.2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Superintendent of Documents</publisher><subject>Anoplopoma fimbria ; Decapoda ; Environmental aspects ; Marine ; Marine sciences ; Paralithodes ; Remote submersibles ; Species ; Technology application ; Telemetry</subject><ispartof>Marine fisheries review, 2013-09, Vol.75 (4), p.27-42</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Superintendent of Documents</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-cb82cee564713347c9b2a84488ab8cdac5ff03024d81b45aa2c1338b7d6ba5543</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grothues, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobarro, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Michele M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish</title><title>Marine fisheries review</title><description>Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20-500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use.</description><subject>Anoplopoma fimbria</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine sciences</subject><subject>Paralithodes</subject><subject>Remote submersibles</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><issn>0090-1830</issn><issn>1939-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0sGO0zAQBuAIgURZuPAEkbjsIhJsx26SY1VRWKlo0dL2ak2cSWpI7GI7gr49LuVApR6QD7ZG3z-y5UmS15TkZSnE-8-rx7wUOc_Zk2RG66LOGOH8aTIjpCYZrQryPHnh_TdCCGclnSXHpR0P4LTp08UUrLGjnXy6NS26nxDQpTvcazVgervY7u5SMG2seI9D1oDHNt04UN9P6S_oOutGMArTeEjXVkH401bFjkErGIZjuoG-j6mV9vuXybMOBo-v_u43yXb1YbP8lK0fPt4vF-tMcSZYppqKKUQx5yUtCl6qumFQcV5V0FSqBSW6jhSE8baiDRcATEVXNWU7b0AIXtwkt-e-B2d_TOiDHLVXOAxgMN5MUsEJKyjnJNI3Z9rDgFKbzob4vBOXi2LOaV3PRRVVdkX1aNDBYA12OpYvfH7Fx9XiqNXVwN1FIJqAv0IPk_fy_uvj_9uH3aV9949tJq9N_EptvO73wZ8jF_ztmStnvXfYyYPTI7ijpESepk3GaZOlkFyy4jcWf8Qr</recordid><startdate>20130922</startdate><enddate>20130922</enddate><creator>Eiler, John H</creator><creator>Grothues, Thomas M</creator><creator>Dobarro, Joseph A</creator><creator>Masuda, Michele M</creator><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130922</creationdate><title>Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish</title><author>Eiler, John H ; Grothues, Thomas M ; Dobarro, Joseph A ; Masuda, Michele M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4252-cb82cee564713347c9b2a84488ab8cdac5ff03024d81b45aa2c1338b7d6ba5543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anoplopoma fimbria</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine sciences</topic><topic>Paralithodes</topic><topic>Remote submersibles</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eiler, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grothues, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobarro, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Michele M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine fisheries review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eiler, John H</au><au>Grothues, Thomas M</au><au>Dobarro, Joseph A</au><au>Masuda, Michele M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish</atitle><jtitle>Marine fisheries review</jtitle><date>2013-09-22</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>27-42</pages><issn>0090-1830</issn><eissn>1939-2044</eissn><abstract>Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV's) are increasingly used to collect physical, chemical, and biological information in the marine environment. Recent efforts include merging AUV technology with acoustic telemetry to provide information on the distribution and movements of marine fish. We compared surface vessel and AUV tracking capabilities under rigorous conditions in coastal waters near Juneau, Alaska. Tracking surveys were conducted with a REMUS 100 AUV equipped with an integrated acoustic receiver and hydrophone. The AUV was programmed to navigate along predetermined routes to detect both reference transmitters at 20-500 m depths and tagged fish and crabs in situ. Comparable boat surveys were also conducted. Transmitter depth had a major impact on tracking performance. The AUV was equally effective or better than the boat at detecting reference transmitters in shallow water, and significantly better for transmitters at deeper depths. Similar results were observed for tagged animals. Red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus, at moderate depths were recorded by both tracking methods, while only the AUV detected Sablefish, Anoplopoma fimbria, at depths exceeding 500 m. Strong currents and deep depths caused problems with AUV navigation, position estimation, and operational performance, but reflect problems encountered by other AUV applications that will likely diminish with future advances, enhanced methods, and increased use.</abstract><pub>Superintendent of Documents</pub><doi>10.7755/MFR.75.4.2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-1830 |
ispartof | Marine fisheries review, 2013-09, Vol.75 (4), p.27-42 |
issn | 0090-1830 1939-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540231440 |
source | US Government Documents; Business Source Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Anoplopoma fimbria Decapoda Environmental aspects Marine Marine sciences Paralithodes Remote submersibles Species Technology application Telemetry |
title | Comparing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) and Vessel-based Tracking Performance for Locating Acoustically Tagged Fish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A05%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Autonomous%20Underwater%20Vehicle%20(AUV)%20and%20Vessel-based%20Tracking%20Performance%20for%20Locating%20Acoustically%20Tagged%20Fish&rft.jtitle=Marine%20fisheries%20review&rft.au=Eiler,%20John%20H&rft.date=2013-09-22&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=27-42&rft.issn=0090-1830&rft.eissn=1939-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.7755/MFR.75.4.2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA364199658%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1540231440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A364199658&rfr_iscdi=true |