qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma

Background Interim FDG-PET is used for treatment tailoring in lymphoma. Deauville response criteria consist of five ordinal categories based on visual comparison of residual tumor uptake to physiological reference uptakes. However, PET-response is a continuum and visual assessments can be distorted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2014-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1301-1308
Hauptverfasser: Hasenclever, Dirk, Kurch, Lars, Mauz-Körholz, Christine, Elsner, Andreas, Georgi, Thomas, Wallace, Hamish, Landman-Parker, Judith, Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina, Cepelová, Michaela, Karlén, Jonas, Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana, Attarbaschi, Andishe, Fosså, Alexander, Pears, Jane, Hraskova, Andrea, Bergsträsser, Eva, Beishuizen, Auke, Uyttebroeck, Anne, Schomerus, Eckhard, Sabri, Osama, Körholz, Dieter, Kluge, Regine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1308
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1301
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 41
creator Hasenclever, Dirk
Kurch, Lars
Mauz-Körholz, Christine
Elsner, Andreas
Georgi, Thomas
Wallace, Hamish
Landman-Parker, Judith
Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina
Cepelová, Michaela
Karlén, Jonas
Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana
Attarbaschi, Andishe
Fosså, Alexander
Pears, Jane
Hraskova, Andrea
Bergsträsser, Eva
Beishuizen, Auke
Uyttebroeck, Anne
Schomerus, Eckhard
Sabri, Osama
Körholz, Dieter
Kluge, Regine
description Background Interim FDG-PET is used for treatment tailoring in lymphoma. Deauville response criteria consist of five ordinal categories based on visual comparison of residual tumor uptake to physiological reference uptakes. However, PET-response is a continuum and visual assessments can be distorted by optical illusions. Objectives With a novel semi-automatic quantification tool we eliminate optical illusions and extend the Deauville score to a continuous scale. Patients and methods SUV peak of residual tumors and average uptake of the liver is measured with standardized volumes of interest. The qPET value is the quotient of these measurements. Deauville scores and qPET-values were determined in 898 pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients after two OEPA chemotherapy cycles. Results Deauville categories translate to thresholds on the qPET scale: Categories 3, 4, 5 correspond to qPET values of 0.95, 1.3 and 2.0, respectively. The distribution of qPET values is unimodal with a peak representing metabolically normal responses and a tail of clearly abnormal outliers. In our patients, the peak is at qPET = 0.95 coinciding with the border between Deauville 2 and 3. qPET cut values of 1.3 or 2 (determined by fitting mixture models) select abnormal metabolic responses with high sensitivity, respectively, specificity. Conclusions qPET methodology provides semi-automatic quantification for interim FDG-PET response in lymphoma extending ordinal Deauville scoring to a continuous scale. Deauville categories correspond to certain qPET cut values. Thresholds between normal and abnormal response can be derived from the qPET-distribution without need for follow-up data. In our patients, qPET < 1.3 excludes abnormal response with high sensitivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540230922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1540230922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-faa305a01a3bb64f81e9c01db976222e77ffbb84f491f62c4647965ac64999003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2K1jAUhoMozjh6AW4k4MZN9SRNk2Yp86cwoItxHdLOidOhTfr1pIOz8x68Q6_ElG8cRBCEkATOc95D8jD2UsBbAWDeEYBsbAVCVdKIprKP2KHQwlYGWvv44W7ggD0jugEQrWztU3YglQbVWHnI5t3n00v-8_sP7vlu9TEP2efhFjl-yxhpSJGnwPM18hP06-0wjsip92XPiXsiJOIL0pwiIR9iWRmXYeJnJ-fVllzYSFthvJvm6zT55-xJ8CPhi_vziH05O708_lBdfDr_ePz-ouqVaXIVvK-h8SB83XVahVag7UFcddZoKSUaE0LXtSooK4KWvdLKWN34XitrLUB9xN7sc-cl7Vak7KaBehxHHzGt5ESjQNZgpfwPtG6kkEbpgr7-C71J6xLLQzZKKWVaaQol9lS_JKIFg5vLn_jlzglwmzm3N-eKObeZc7b0vLpPXrsJrx46fqsqgNwDVErxKy5_jP5n6i9AyaKW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534447827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hasenclever, Dirk ; Kurch, Lars ; Mauz-Körholz, Christine ; Elsner, Andreas ; Georgi, Thomas ; Wallace, Hamish ; Landman-Parker, Judith ; Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina ; Cepelová, Michaela ; Karlén, Jonas ; Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana ; Attarbaschi, Andishe ; Fosså, Alexander ; Pears, Jane ; Hraskova, Andrea ; Bergsträsser, Eva ; Beishuizen, Auke ; Uyttebroeck, Anne ; Schomerus, Eckhard ; Sabri, Osama ; Körholz, Dieter ; Kluge, Regine</creator><creatorcontrib>Hasenclever, Dirk ; Kurch, Lars ; Mauz-Körholz, Christine ; Elsner, Andreas ; Georgi, Thomas ; Wallace, Hamish ; Landman-Parker, Judith ; Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina ; Cepelová, Michaela ; Karlén, Jonas ; Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana ; Attarbaschi, Andishe ; Fosså, Alexander ; Pears, Jane ; Hraskova, Andrea ; Bergsträsser, Eva ; Beishuizen, Auke ; Uyttebroeck, Anne ; Schomerus, Eckhard ; Sabri, Osama ; Körholz, Dieter ; Kluge, Regine</creatorcontrib><description>Background Interim FDG-PET is used for treatment tailoring in lymphoma. Deauville response criteria consist of five ordinal categories based on visual comparison of residual tumor uptake to physiological reference uptakes. However, PET-response is a continuum and visual assessments can be distorted by optical illusions. Objectives With a novel semi-automatic quantification tool we eliminate optical illusions and extend the Deauville score to a continuous scale. Patients and methods SUV peak of residual tumors and average uptake of the liver is measured with standardized volumes of interest. The qPET value is the quotient of these measurements. Deauville scores and qPET-values were determined in 898 pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients after two OEPA chemotherapy cycles. Results Deauville categories translate to thresholds on the qPET scale: Categories 3, 4, 5 correspond to qPET values of 0.95, 1.3 and 2.0, respectively. The distribution of qPET values is unimodal with a peak representing metabolically normal responses and a tail of clearly abnormal outliers. In our patients, the peak is at qPET = 0.95 coinciding with the border between Deauville 2 and 3. qPET cut values of 1.3 or 2 (determined by fitting mixture models) select abnormal metabolic responses with high sensitivity, respectively, specificity. Conclusions qPET methodology provides semi-automatic quantification for interim FDG-PET response in lymphoma extending ordinal Deauville scoring to a continuous scale. Deauville categories correspond to certain qPET cut values. Thresholds between normal and abnormal response can be derived from the qPET-distribution without need for follow-up data. In our patients, qPET &lt; 1.3 excludes abnormal response with high sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24604592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological Transport ; Cardiology ; Child ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism ; Hodgkin Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Hodgkin Disease - metabolism ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging ; Liver ; Lymphoma ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Radiology ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1301-1308</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-faa305a01a3bb64f81e9c01db976222e77ffbb84f491f62c4647965ac64999003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-faa305a01a3bb64f81e9c01db976222e77ffbb84f491f62c4647965ac64999003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hasenclever, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurch, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauz-Körholz, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman-Parker, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cepelová, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlén, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attarbaschi, Andishe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fosså, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pears, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraskova, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergsträsser, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beishuizen, Auke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttebroeck, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomerus, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabri, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körholz, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluge, Regine</creatorcontrib><title>qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Background Interim FDG-PET is used for treatment tailoring in lymphoma. Deauville response criteria consist of five ordinal categories based on visual comparison of residual tumor uptake to physiological reference uptakes. However, PET-response is a continuum and visual assessments can be distorted by optical illusions. Objectives With a novel semi-automatic quantification tool we eliminate optical illusions and extend the Deauville score to a continuous scale. Patients and methods SUV peak of residual tumors and average uptake of the liver is measured with standardized volumes of interest. The qPET value is the quotient of these measurements. Deauville scores and qPET-values were determined in 898 pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients after two OEPA chemotherapy cycles. Results Deauville categories translate to thresholds on the qPET scale: Categories 3, 4, 5 correspond to qPET values of 0.95, 1.3 and 2.0, respectively. The distribution of qPET values is unimodal with a peak representing metabolically normal responses and a tail of clearly abnormal outliers. In our patients, the peak is at qPET = 0.95 coinciding with the border between Deauville 2 and 3. qPET cut values of 1.3 or 2 (determined by fitting mixture models) select abnormal metabolic responses with high sensitivity, respectively, specificity. Conclusions qPET methodology provides semi-automatic quantification for interim FDG-PET response in lymphoma extending ordinal Deauville scoring to a continuous scale. Deauville categories correspond to certain qPET cut values. Thresholds between normal and abnormal response can be derived from the qPET-distribution without need for follow-up data. In our patients, qPET &lt; 1.3 excludes abnormal response with high sensitivity.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological Transport</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism</subject><subject>Hodgkin Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hodgkin Disease - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2K1jAUhoMozjh6AW4k4MZN9SRNk2Yp86cwoItxHdLOidOhTfr1pIOz8x68Q6_ElG8cRBCEkATOc95D8jD2UsBbAWDeEYBsbAVCVdKIprKP2KHQwlYGWvv44W7ggD0jugEQrWztU3YglQbVWHnI5t3n00v-8_sP7vlu9TEP2efhFjl-yxhpSJGnwPM18hP06-0wjsip92XPiXsiJOIL0pwiIR9iWRmXYeJnJ-fVllzYSFthvJvm6zT55-xJ8CPhi_vziH05O708_lBdfDr_ePz-ouqVaXIVvK-h8SB83XVahVag7UFcddZoKSUaE0LXtSooK4KWvdLKWN34XitrLUB9xN7sc-cl7Vak7KaBehxHHzGt5ESjQNZgpfwPtG6kkEbpgr7-C71J6xLLQzZKKWVaaQol9lS_JKIFg5vLn_jlzglwmzm3N-eKObeZc7b0vLpPXrsJrx46fqsqgNwDVErxKy5_jP5n6i9AyaKW</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Hasenclever, Dirk</creator><creator>Kurch, Lars</creator><creator>Mauz-Körholz, Christine</creator><creator>Elsner, Andreas</creator><creator>Georgi, Thomas</creator><creator>Wallace, Hamish</creator><creator>Landman-Parker, Judith</creator><creator>Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina</creator><creator>Cepelová, Michaela</creator><creator>Karlén, Jonas</creator><creator>Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</creator><creator>Attarbaschi, Andishe</creator><creator>Fosså, Alexander</creator><creator>Pears, Jane</creator><creator>Hraskova, Andrea</creator><creator>Bergsträsser, Eva</creator><creator>Beishuizen, Auke</creator><creator>Uyttebroeck, Anne</creator><creator>Schomerus, Eckhard</creator><creator>Sabri, Osama</creator><creator>Körholz, Dieter</creator><creator>Kluge, Regine</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma</title><author>Hasenclever, Dirk ; Kurch, Lars ; Mauz-Körholz, Christine ; Elsner, Andreas ; Georgi, Thomas ; Wallace, Hamish ; Landman-Parker, Judith ; Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina ; Cepelová, Michaela ; Karlén, Jonas ; Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana ; Attarbaschi, Andishe ; Fosså, Alexander ; Pears, Jane ; Hraskova, Andrea ; Bergsträsser, Eva ; Beishuizen, Auke ; Uyttebroeck, Anne ; Schomerus, Eckhard ; Sabri, Osama ; Körholz, Dieter ; Kluge, Regine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-faa305a01a3bb64f81e9c01db976222e77ffbb84f491f62c4647965ac64999003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological Transport</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism</topic><topic>Hodgkin Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hodgkin Disease - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hasenclever, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurch, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauz-Körholz, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgi, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landman-Parker, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cepelová, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlén, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attarbaschi, Andishe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fosså, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pears, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraskova, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergsträsser, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beishuizen, Auke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttebroeck, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomerus, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabri, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körholz, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluge, Regine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hasenclever, Dirk</au><au>Kurch, Lars</au><au>Mauz-Körholz, Christine</au><au>Elsner, Andreas</au><au>Georgi, Thomas</au><au>Wallace, Hamish</au><au>Landman-Parker, Judith</au><au>Moryl-Bujakowska, Angelina</au><au>Cepelová, Michaela</au><au>Karlén, Jonas</au><au>Álvarez Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana</au><au>Attarbaschi, Andishe</au><au>Fosså, Alexander</au><au>Pears, Jane</au><au>Hraskova, Andrea</au><au>Bergsträsser, Eva</au><au>Beishuizen, Auke</au><au>Uyttebroeck, Anne</au><au>Schomerus, Eckhard</au><au>Sabri, Osama</au><au>Körholz, Dieter</au><au>Kluge, Regine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1301</spage><epage>1308</epage><pages>1301-1308</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Background Interim FDG-PET is used for treatment tailoring in lymphoma. Deauville response criteria consist of five ordinal categories based on visual comparison of residual tumor uptake to physiological reference uptakes. However, PET-response is a continuum and visual assessments can be distorted by optical illusions. Objectives With a novel semi-automatic quantification tool we eliminate optical illusions and extend the Deauville score to a continuous scale. Patients and methods SUV peak of residual tumors and average uptake of the liver is measured with standardized volumes of interest. The qPET value is the quotient of these measurements. Deauville scores and qPET-values were determined in 898 pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients after two OEPA chemotherapy cycles. Results Deauville categories translate to thresholds on the qPET scale: Categories 3, 4, 5 correspond to qPET values of 0.95, 1.3 and 2.0, respectively. The distribution of qPET values is unimodal with a peak representing metabolically normal responses and a tail of clearly abnormal outliers. In our patients, the peak is at qPET = 0.95 coinciding with the border between Deauville 2 and 3. qPET cut values of 1.3 or 2 (determined by fitting mixture models) select abnormal metabolic responses with high sensitivity, respectively, specificity. Conclusions qPET methodology provides semi-automatic quantification for interim FDG-PET response in lymphoma extending ordinal Deauville scoring to a continuous scale. Deauville categories correspond to certain qPET cut values. Thresholds between normal and abnormal response can be derived from the qPET-distribution without need for follow-up data. In our patients, qPET &lt; 1.3 excludes abnormal response with high sensitivity.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>24604592</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1301-1308
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1540230922
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Biological Transport
Cardiology
Child
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism
Hodgkin Disease - diagnostic imaging
Hodgkin Disease - metabolism
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging
Liver
Lymphoma
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Original Article
Orthopedics
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Radiology
Tumors
title qPET – a quantitative extension of the Deauville scale to assess response in interim FDG-PET scans in lymphoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A13%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=qPET%20%E2%80%93%20a%20quantitative%20extension%20of%20the%20Deauville%20scale%20to%20assess%20response%20in%20interim%20FDG-PET%20scans%20in%20lymphoma&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Hasenclever,%20Dirk&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1301&rft.epage=1308&rft.pages=1301-1308&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-014-2715-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1540230922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534447827&rft_id=info:pmid/24604592&rfr_iscdi=true