Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez

A thesis in medicine is a scientific work which allows a medical student to acquire a Doctor of Medicine degree. It is therefore recommended that theses presented by students fulfill essential methodological criteria in order to obtain scientifically credible results and recommendations. The aim of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eastern Mediterranean health journal 2014-06, Vol.20 (5), p.340-346
Hauptverfasser: Boly, A, Tachfouti, N, Zohoungbogbo, I S S, Achhab, Y El, Nejjari, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 346
container_issue 5
container_start_page 340
container_title Eastern Mediterranean health journal
container_volume 20
creator Boly, A
Tachfouti, N
Zohoungbogbo, I S S
Achhab, Y El
Nejjari, C
description A thesis in medicine is a scientific work which allows a medical student to acquire a Doctor of Medicine degree. It is therefore recommended that theses presented by students fulfill essential methodological criteria in order to obtain scientifically credible results and recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodology of thesis presented to the Faculty of Medicine in Fez in 2008. We developed an evaluation table containing questions on the different sections of the IMRAD structure on which these theses were based and we estimated the proportion of theses that conformed to each criterion. There were 160 theses on various specialties presented in 2008. The majority of the theses (79.3%) were case series. Research questions were clearly expressed in 62.0% but the primary objectives were pertinent in only 52.0%. Our study shows that there were important deficiencies in the methodological rigor of the theses and very little representation of the theses in publications.
doi_str_mv 10.26719/2014.20.5.340
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539714328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1539714328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-dacca25f6bb15e7fafbf3f84a95aef8542681537cffa87553022d32345408c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kDFPwzAQRj2AaCmsjCgjS4J9thtnrCpakIpYYGKIHOdMjZy6jZ2h_HoiWqZPuu-9k-4IuWO0gHnJqkegTBRAC1lwQS_IlFGgOedVOSHXMX5TCkoJuCITEJUEqGBKPhcxYowd7lIWbJa2mHWYtqENPnw5o312GLR36XhuRziLQ9O5lLDNUvgzVtoM_oS8YuuM240z_Lkhl1b7iLfnnJGP1dP78jnfvK1flotNvmeCpbzVxmiQdt40TGJptW0st0roSmq0SgqYKyZ5aazVqpSSU4CWAxdSUGUE5TPycNq778NhwJjqzkWD3usdhiHWo1yVTHBQI3p_RscbsK33vet0f6z_H8J_AdqRYH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1539714328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Boly, A ; Tachfouti, N ; Zohoungbogbo, I S S ; Achhab, Y El ; Nejjari, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Boly, A ; Tachfouti, N ; Zohoungbogbo, I S S ; Achhab, Y El ; Nejjari, C</creatorcontrib><description>A thesis in medicine is a scientific work which allows a medical student to acquire a Doctor of Medicine degree. It is therefore recommended that theses presented by students fulfill essential methodological criteria in order to obtain scientifically credible results and recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodology of thesis presented to the Faculty of Medicine in Fez in 2008. We developed an evaluation table containing questions on the different sections of the IMRAD structure on which these theses were based and we estimated the proportion of theses that conformed to each criterion. There were 160 theses on various specialties presented in 2008. The majority of the theses (79.3%) were case series. Research questions were clearly expressed in 62.0% but the primary objectives were pertinent in only 52.0%. Our study shows that there were important deficiencies in the methodological rigor of the theses and very little representation of the theses in publications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1020-3397</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26719/2014.20.5.340</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24952292</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>Egypt</publisher><subject>Academic Dissertations as Topic ; Education, Medical ; Humans ; Peer Review, Research ; Schools, Medical ; Writing - standards</subject><ispartof>Eastern Mediterranean health journal, 2014-06, Vol.20 (5), p.340-346</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boly, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachfouti, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohoungbogbo, I S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achhab, Y El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nejjari, C</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez</title><title>Eastern Mediterranean health journal</title><addtitle>East Mediterr Health J</addtitle><description>A thesis in medicine is a scientific work which allows a medical student to acquire a Doctor of Medicine degree. It is therefore recommended that theses presented by students fulfill essential methodological criteria in order to obtain scientifically credible results and recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodology of thesis presented to the Faculty of Medicine in Fez in 2008. We developed an evaluation table containing questions on the different sections of the IMRAD structure on which these theses were based and we estimated the proportion of theses that conformed to each criterion. There were 160 theses on various specialties presented in 2008. The majority of the theses (79.3%) were case series. Research questions were clearly expressed in 62.0% but the primary objectives were pertinent in only 52.0%. Our study shows that there were important deficiencies in the methodological rigor of the theses and very little representation of the theses in publications.</description><subject>Academic Dissertations as Topic</subject><subject>Education, Medical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Peer Review, Research</subject><subject>Schools, Medical</subject><subject>Writing - standards</subject><issn>1020-3397</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kDFPwzAQRj2AaCmsjCgjS4J9thtnrCpakIpYYGKIHOdMjZy6jZ2h_HoiWqZPuu-9k-4IuWO0gHnJqkegTBRAC1lwQS_IlFGgOedVOSHXMX5TCkoJuCITEJUEqGBKPhcxYowd7lIWbJa2mHWYtqENPnw5o312GLR36XhuRziLQ9O5lLDNUvgzVtoM_oS8YuuM240z_Lkhl1b7iLfnnJGP1dP78jnfvK1flotNvmeCpbzVxmiQdt40TGJptW0st0roSmq0SgqYKyZ5aazVqpSSU4CWAxdSUGUE5TPycNq778NhwJjqzkWD3usdhiHWo1yVTHBQI3p_RscbsK33vet0f6z_H8J_AdqRYH0</recordid><startdate>20140609</startdate><enddate>20140609</enddate><creator>Boly, A</creator><creator>Tachfouti, N</creator><creator>Zohoungbogbo, I S S</creator><creator>Achhab, Y El</creator><creator>Nejjari, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140609</creationdate><title>Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez</title><author>Boly, A ; Tachfouti, N ; Zohoungbogbo, I S S ; Achhab, Y El ; Nejjari, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-dacca25f6bb15e7fafbf3f84a95aef8542681537cffa87553022d32345408c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic Dissertations as Topic</topic><topic>Education, Medical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Peer Review, Research</topic><topic>Schools, Medical</topic><topic>Writing - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boly, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachfouti, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohoungbogbo, I S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achhab, Y El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nejjari, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eastern Mediterranean health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boly, A</au><au>Tachfouti, N</au><au>Zohoungbogbo, I S S</au><au>Achhab, Y El</au><au>Nejjari, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez</atitle><jtitle>Eastern Mediterranean health journal</jtitle><addtitle>East Mediterr Health J</addtitle><date>2014-06-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>340-346</pages><issn>1020-3397</issn><abstract>A thesis in medicine is a scientific work which allows a medical student to acquire a Doctor of Medicine degree. It is therefore recommended that theses presented by students fulfill essential methodological criteria in order to obtain scientifically credible results and recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodology of thesis presented to the Faculty of Medicine in Fez in 2008. We developed an evaluation table containing questions on the different sections of the IMRAD structure on which these theses were based and we estimated the proportion of theses that conformed to each criterion. There were 160 theses on various specialties presented in 2008. The majority of the theses (79.3%) were case series. Research questions were clearly expressed in 62.0% but the primary objectives were pertinent in only 52.0%. Our study shows that there were important deficiencies in the methodological rigor of the theses and very little representation of the theses in publications.</abstract><cop>Egypt</cop><pmid>24952292</pmid><doi>10.26719/2014.20.5.340</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1020-3397
ispartof Eastern Mediterranean health journal, 2014-06, Vol.20 (5), p.340-346
issn 1020-3397
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539714328
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Academic Dissertations as Topic
Education, Medical
Humans
Peer Review, Research
Schools, Medical
Writing - standards
title Assessment of the methodological quality of theses submitted to the Faculty of Medicine Fez
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20methodological%20quality%20of%20theses%20submitted%20to%20the%20Faculty%20of%20Medicine%20Fez&rft.jtitle=Eastern%20Mediterranean%20health%20journal&rft.au=Boly,%20A&rft.date=2014-06-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=340-346&rft.issn=1020-3397&rft_id=info:doi/10.26719/2014.20.5.340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1539714328%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1539714328&rft_id=info:pmid/24952292&rfr_iscdi=true