Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods
Abstract We present a prospective randomized experimental study comparing bone regeneration obtained in 60 post-traumatic frontal sinuses obliterated with either calvarial bone dust ( n = 30, group I) or calvarial bone and demineralized bone matrix (DBM; n = 30, group II). Radiological follow-up inc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2014-07, Vol.43 (7), p.827-833 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 833 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 827 |
container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Zubillaga Rodríguez, I Lora Pablos, D Falguera Uceda, M.I Díez Lobato, R Sánchez Aniceto, G |
description | Abstract We present a prospective randomized experimental study comparing bone regeneration obtained in 60 post-traumatic frontal sinuses obliterated with either calvarial bone dust ( n = 30, group I) or calvarial bone and demineralized bone matrix (DBM; n = 30, group II). Radiological follow-up included high-resolution computed tomography with quantitative micro-density analysis in Hounsfield units (HU), together with a volumetric evaluation of the ossification at 6 and 24 months after surgical treatment. Epidemiological information and potential drawbacks were analysed. Bone volume and density data (HU) for the regenerated areas were subjected to statistical analysis at 6 and 24 months for both groups. Results were compared with reference values obtained from frontal and temporal bone in every patient. Complications developed for 10% of operated sinuses. The resulting bone formation (HU) in group I patients was significantly better than that obtained in group II. Ossification progressed in a statistically significant manner in both groups when compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. The use of DBM as a biomaterial associated with calvarial bone dust for sinus obliteration shows long-term safe results, similar to autogenous bone, but with a lower final bone density. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539467038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502714000939</els_id><sourcerecordid>1539467038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-18d2c1f1481d2440d175a113f56c1268cfce9fd435f28f6494189be4caed4fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTggH7kkeBwnGyOEhCraIlXiAJwtrz0GB8cudgLat8dhWw4cOHkO3z_yfD8hz4G1wGB4NbV-SnPLGYiW8ZYBf0B20EnZMMbZQ7JjkkHTM74_I09KmRhjshv3j8kZF0M_CNnviLrMKS460OLjWmg6BL9g1otPkWpXR7pkvc76NdVRh2PxlXH0kCLSjF8x3rMuVfJXogUDmgUtnXH5lmx5Sh45HQo-u3vPyZfL958vrpubj1cfLt7dNEYALA2MlhtwIEawXAhmYd9rgM71gwE-jMYZlM6Krnd8dPXrAkZ5QGE0WuFM352Tl6e9tzn9WLEsavbFYAg6YlqLgr6TYtizbqwoP6Emp1IyOnWb_azzUQFTm1g1qU2s2sQqxlUVW0Mv7vavhxnt38i9yQq8OQFYr_zpMatiPEaD1udqRNnk_7__7T9xE3z0RofveMQypTVX__UOVWpAfdqq3ZoF8adV2f0Gr7yfkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1539467038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I ; Lora Pablos, D ; Falguera Uceda, M.I ; Díez Lobato, R ; Sánchez Aniceto, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I ; Lora Pablos, D ; Falguera Uceda, M.I ; Díez Lobato, R ; Sánchez Aniceto, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We present a prospective randomized experimental study comparing bone regeneration obtained in 60 post-traumatic frontal sinuses obliterated with either calvarial bone dust ( n = 30, group I) or calvarial bone and demineralized bone matrix (DBM; n = 30, group II). Radiological follow-up included high-resolution computed tomography with quantitative micro-density analysis in Hounsfield units (HU), together with a volumetric evaluation of the ossification at 6 and 24 months after surgical treatment. Epidemiological information and potential drawbacks were analysed. Bone volume and density data (HU) for the regenerated areas were subjected to statistical analysis at 6 and 24 months for both groups. Results were compared with reference values obtained from frontal and temporal bone in every patient. Complications developed for 10% of operated sinuses. The resulting bone formation (HU) in group I patients was significantly better than that obtained in group II. Ossification progressed in a statistically significant manner in both groups when compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. The use of DBM as a biomaterial associated with calvarial bone dust for sinus obliteration shows long-term safe results, similar to autogenous bone, but with a lower final bone density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24656495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biocompatible Materials ; Bone Density ; Bone Matrix - transplantation ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; calvarial bone dust ; demineralized bone matrix (DBM) ; Dentistry ; Female ; frontal sinus ; Frontal Sinus - diagnostic imaging ; Frontal Sinus - injuries ; Frontal Sinus - surgery ; Hounsfield units (HU) ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; subcranial approach ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-07, Vol.43 (7), p.827-833</ispartof><rights>International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-18d2c1f1481d2440d175a113f56c1268cfce9fd435f28f6494189be4caed4fc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-18d2c1f1481d2440d175a113f56c1268cfce9fd435f28f6494189be4caed4fc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502714000939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24656495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lora Pablos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falguera Uceda, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez Lobato, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Aniceto, G</creatorcontrib><title>Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract We present a prospective randomized experimental study comparing bone regeneration obtained in 60 post-traumatic frontal sinuses obliterated with either calvarial bone dust ( n = 30, group I) or calvarial bone and demineralized bone matrix (DBM; n = 30, group II). Radiological follow-up included high-resolution computed tomography with quantitative micro-density analysis in Hounsfield units (HU), together with a volumetric evaluation of the ossification at 6 and 24 months after surgical treatment. Epidemiological information and potential drawbacks were analysed. Bone volume and density data (HU) for the regenerated areas were subjected to statistical analysis at 6 and 24 months for both groups. Results were compared with reference values obtained from frontal and temporal bone in every patient. Complications developed for 10% of operated sinuses. The resulting bone formation (HU) in group I patients was significantly better than that obtained in group II. Ossification progressed in a statistically significant manner in both groups when compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. The use of DBM as a biomaterial associated with calvarial bone dust for sinus obliteration shows long-term safe results, similar to autogenous bone, but with a lower final bone density.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Matrix - transplantation</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>calvarial bone dust</subject><subject>demineralized bone matrix (DBM)</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>frontal sinus</subject><subject>Frontal Sinus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Frontal Sinus - injuries</subject><subject>Frontal Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Hounsfield units (HU)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>subcranial approach</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTggH7kkeBwnGyOEhCraIlXiAJwtrz0GB8cudgLat8dhWw4cOHkO3z_yfD8hz4G1wGB4NbV-SnPLGYiW8ZYBf0B20EnZMMbZQ7JjkkHTM74_I09KmRhjshv3j8kZF0M_CNnviLrMKS460OLjWmg6BL9g1otPkWpXR7pkvc76NdVRh2PxlXH0kCLSjF8x3rMuVfJXogUDmgUtnXH5lmx5Sh45HQo-u3vPyZfL958vrpubj1cfLt7dNEYALA2MlhtwIEawXAhmYd9rgM71gwE-jMYZlM6Krnd8dPXrAkZ5QGE0WuFM352Tl6e9tzn9WLEsavbFYAg6YlqLgr6TYtizbqwoP6Emp1IyOnWb_azzUQFTm1g1qU2s2sQqxlUVW0Mv7vavhxnt38i9yQq8OQFYr_zpMatiPEaD1udqRNnk_7__7T9xE3z0RofveMQypTVX__UOVWpAfdqq3ZoF8adV2f0Gr7yfkw</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I</creator><creator>Lora Pablos, D</creator><creator>Falguera Uceda, M.I</creator><creator>Díez Lobato, R</creator><creator>Sánchez Aniceto, G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods</title><author>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I ; Lora Pablos, D ; Falguera Uceda, M.I ; Díez Lobato, R ; Sánchez Aniceto, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-18d2c1f1481d2440d175a113f56c1268cfce9fd435f28f6494189be4caed4fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Matrix - transplantation</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>calvarial bone dust</topic><topic>demineralized bone matrix (DBM)</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>frontal sinus</topic><topic>Frontal Sinus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Frontal Sinus - injuries</topic><topic>Frontal Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Hounsfield units (HU)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>subcranial approach</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lora Pablos, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falguera Uceda, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez Lobato, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Aniceto, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zubillaga Rodríguez, I</au><au>Lora Pablos, D</au><au>Falguera Uceda, M.I</au><au>Díez Lobato, R</au><au>Sánchez Aniceto, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>827</spage><epage>833</epage><pages>827-833</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Abstract We present a prospective randomized experimental study comparing bone regeneration obtained in 60 post-traumatic frontal sinuses obliterated with either calvarial bone dust ( n = 30, group I) or calvarial bone and demineralized bone matrix (DBM; n = 30, group II). Radiological follow-up included high-resolution computed tomography with quantitative micro-density analysis in Hounsfield units (HU), together with a volumetric evaluation of the ossification at 6 and 24 months after surgical treatment. Epidemiological information and potential drawbacks were analysed. Bone volume and density data (HU) for the regenerated areas were subjected to statistical analysis at 6 and 24 months for both groups. Results were compared with reference values obtained from frontal and temporal bone in every patient. Complications developed for 10% of operated sinuses. The resulting bone formation (HU) in group I patients was significantly better than that obtained in group II. Ossification progressed in a statistically significant manner in both groups when compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. The use of DBM as a biomaterial associated with calvarial bone dust for sinus obliteration shows long-term safe results, similar to autogenous bone, but with a lower final bone density.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24656495</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.012</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-07, Vol.43 (7), p.827-833 |
issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539467038 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biocompatible Materials Bone Density Bone Matrix - transplantation Bone Regeneration Bone Transplantation - methods calvarial bone dust demineralized bone matrix (DBM) Dentistry Female frontal sinus Frontal Sinus - diagnostic imaging Frontal Sinus - injuries Frontal Sinus - surgery Hounsfield units (HU) Humans Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies subcranial approach Surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Frontal sinus obliteration after trauma: analysis of bone regeneration for two selected methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frontal%20sinus%20obliteration%20after%20trauma:%20analysis%20of%20bone%20regeneration%20for%20two%20selected%20methods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Zubillaga%20Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20I&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=827&rft.epage=833&rft.pages=827-833&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1539467038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1539467038&rft_id=info:pmid/24656495&rft_els_id=S0901502714000939&rfr_iscdi=true |