Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.209-215
Hauptverfasser: Melsaether, Amy, McDermott, Meredith, Gupta, Dipti, Pysarenko, Kristine, Shaylor, Sara D, Moy, Linda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 1
container_start_page 209
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 203
creator Melsaether, Amy
McDermott, Meredith
Gupta, Dipti
Pysarenko, Kristine
Shaylor, Sara D
Moy, Linda
description Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BPE assessments and no data as to whether training improves agreement. Therefore, for this study, we sought to assess interreader agreement for BPE at baseline and after dedicated training. This study included 119 breast MRI examinations performed in 119 patients (mean age, 47 years; age range, 25-79 years) in 2008. One week before training, four fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2-12 years' experience independently recorded BPE on a 4-point scale as follows: 1 (minimal, ≤ 25%), 2 (mild, 26-50%), 3 (moderate, 51-75%), or 4 (marked, > 75%). The same 119 cases were reread in a new random order within 1 week and at least 3 weeks after training. Interreader agreement and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa coefficients. With training, interreader agreement increased from fair (κ = 0.36) to moderate (κ = 0.48). Improvement was sustained at 3 weeks after training (κ = 0.45). Intrareader agreement between time points 2 and 3 (κ: mean, 0.79; range, 0.56-0.98) was greater than between time points 1 and 2 (κ: mean, 0.62; range, 0.45-0.84), indicating readers learned and retained. Initial interreader agreement for BPE was fair among breast radiologists but achieved sustained improvement with training, highlighting the importance of education and inclusion of standardized BPE categories in a reference atlas.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.13.10952
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539464955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1539464955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-6c51faacd2b64b7220596e96e9c69e45f8249de164495a47963718410bd2a463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EglK4cUY-ciDFaztOc6wqnkJCQj1wizbOpgQSp9ipRPn1mBaQVtrLNzOaYewMxERK0Fezh-cJqAmIPJV7bASpNokCDftsJJSBZCrUyxE7DuFNCJFN8-yQHUmdpyAhG7HPezeQTzi6ijdu8OgJK_Icl56oIzfwuvfc4kDL3jdfODS9433NS7TvS9-vo2wVNc6-bjpsOblXdHYnxCFSgdrG0dYe65jEY0TjGrc8YQc1toFOf_-YLW6uF_O75PHp9n4-e0yszGFIjE2hRrSVLI0uMylFmhv6OWty0mk9jV0qAqNjJdRZblQGUw2irCRqo8bsYme78v3HmsJQdE2w1LboqF-HAlKVaxO1aUQvd6j1fQie6mLlmw79pgBR_ExdxKkLUMV26oif_zqvy46qf_hvW_UNu_B6qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1539464955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Melsaether, Amy ; McDermott, Meredith ; Gupta, Dipti ; Pysarenko, Kristine ; Shaylor, Sara D ; Moy, Linda</creator><creatorcontrib>Melsaether, Amy ; McDermott, Meredith ; Gupta, Dipti ; Pysarenko, Kristine ; Shaylor, Sara D ; Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><description>Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BPE assessments and no data as to whether training improves agreement. Therefore, for this study, we sought to assess interreader agreement for BPE at baseline and after dedicated training. This study included 119 breast MRI examinations performed in 119 patients (mean age, 47 years; age range, 25-79 years) in 2008. One week before training, four fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2-12 years' experience independently recorded BPE on a 4-point scale as follows: 1 (minimal, ≤ 25%), 2 (mild, 26-50%), 3 (moderate, 51-75%), or 4 (marked, &gt; 75%). The same 119 cases were reread in a new random order within 1 week and at least 3 weeks after training. Interreader agreement and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa coefficients. With training, interreader agreement increased from fair (κ = 0.36) to moderate (κ = 0.48). Improvement was sustained at 3 weeks after training (κ = 0.45). Intrareader agreement between time points 2 and 3 (κ: mean, 0.79; range, 0.56-0.98) was greater than between time points 1 and 2 (κ: mean, 0.62; range, 0.45-0.84), indicating readers learned and retained. Initial interreader agreement for BPE was fair among breast radiologists but achieved sustained improvement with training, highlighting the importance of education and inclusion of standardized BPE categories in a reference atlas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10952</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24951217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Contrast Media ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.209-215</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-6c51faacd2b64b7220596e96e9c69e45f8249de164495a47963718410bd2a463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-6c51faacd2b64b7220596e96e9c69e45f8249de164495a47963718410bd2a463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4106,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melsaether, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dipti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pysarenko, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaylor, Sara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BPE assessments and no data as to whether training improves agreement. Therefore, for this study, we sought to assess interreader agreement for BPE at baseline and after dedicated training. This study included 119 breast MRI examinations performed in 119 patients (mean age, 47 years; age range, 25-79 years) in 2008. One week before training, four fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2-12 years' experience independently recorded BPE on a 4-point scale as follows: 1 (minimal, ≤ 25%), 2 (mild, 26-50%), 3 (moderate, 51-75%), or 4 (marked, &gt; 75%). The same 119 cases were reread in a new random order within 1 week and at least 3 weeks after training. Interreader agreement and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa coefficients. With training, interreader agreement increased from fair (κ = 0.36) to moderate (κ = 0.48). Improvement was sustained at 3 weeks after training (κ = 0.45). Intrareader agreement between time points 2 and 3 (κ: mean, 0.79; range, 0.56-0.98) was greater than between time points 1 and 2 (κ: mean, 0.62; range, 0.45-0.84), indicating readers learned and retained. Initial interreader agreement for BPE was fair among breast radiologists but achieved sustained improvement with training, highlighting the importance of education and inclusion of standardized BPE categories in a reference atlas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EglK4cUY-ciDFaztOc6wqnkJCQj1wizbOpgQSp9ipRPn1mBaQVtrLNzOaYewMxERK0Fezh-cJqAmIPJV7bASpNokCDftsJJSBZCrUyxE7DuFNCJFN8-yQHUmdpyAhG7HPezeQTzi6ijdu8OgJK_Icl56oIzfwuvfc4kDL3jdfODS9433NS7TvS9-vo2wVNc6-bjpsOblXdHYnxCFSgdrG0dYe65jEY0TjGrc8YQc1toFOf_-YLW6uF_O75PHp9n4-e0yszGFIjE2hRrSVLI0uMylFmhv6OWty0mk9jV0qAqNjJdRZblQGUw2irCRqo8bsYme78v3HmsJQdE2w1LboqF-HAlKVaxO1aUQvd6j1fQie6mLlmw79pgBR_ExdxKkLUMV26oif_zqvy46qf_hvW_UNu_B6qQ</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Melsaether, Amy</creator><creator>McDermott, Meredith</creator><creator>Gupta, Dipti</creator><creator>Pysarenko, Kristine</creator><creator>Shaylor, Sara D</creator><creator>Moy, Linda</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training</title><author>Melsaether, Amy ; McDermott, Meredith ; Gupta, Dipti ; Pysarenko, Kristine ; Shaylor, Sara D ; Moy, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-6c51faacd2b64b7220596e96e9c69e45f8249de164495a47963718410bd2a463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melsaether, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Dipti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pysarenko, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaylor, Sara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melsaether, Amy</au><au>McDermott, Meredith</au><au>Gupta, Dipti</au><au>Pysarenko, Kristine</au><au>Shaylor, Sara D</au><au>Moy, Linda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>203</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>209-215</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) refers to enhancing fibroglandular tissue on initial contrast-enhanced MR images. BPE appears to impact the rate of abnormal MRI interpretation and may correlate with breast cancer risk. There are now minimal data as to the uniformity of radiologists' BPE assessments and no data as to whether training improves agreement. Therefore, for this study, we sought to assess interreader agreement for BPE at baseline and after dedicated training. This study included 119 breast MRI examinations performed in 119 patients (mean age, 47 years; age range, 25-79 years) in 2008. One week before training, four fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2-12 years' experience independently recorded BPE on a 4-point scale as follows: 1 (minimal, ≤ 25%), 2 (mild, 26-50%), 3 (moderate, 51-75%), or 4 (marked, &gt; 75%). The same 119 cases were reread in a new random order within 1 week and at least 3 weeks after training. Interreader agreement and intrareader agreement were assessed using kappa coefficients. With training, interreader agreement increased from fair (κ = 0.36) to moderate (κ = 0.48). Improvement was sustained at 3 weeks after training (κ = 0.45). Intrareader agreement between time points 2 and 3 (κ: mean, 0.79; range, 0.56-0.98) was greater than between time points 1 and 2 (κ: mean, 0.62; range, 0.45-0.84), indicating readers learned and retained. Initial interreader agreement for BPE was fair among breast radiologists but achieved sustained improvement with training, highlighting the importance of education and inclusion of standardized BPE categories in a reference atlas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24951217</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.13.10952</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.209-215
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539464955
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Contrast Media
Female
Gadolinium DTPA
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
title Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-%20and%20intrareader%20agreement%20for%20categorization%20of%20background%20parenchymal%20enhancement%20at%20baseline%20and%20after%20training&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Melsaether,%20Amy&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=203&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=209-215&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.13.10952&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1539464955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1539464955&rft_id=info:pmid/24951217&rfr_iscdi=true