Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina]
The components of hardwood forest regeneration on a southern Appalachian watershed were assessed during the 1st yr following clear-cutting. First-year net primary production (NPP) on the clear-cut was 1955 kg/ha, representing 22% of the NPP of a nearby undisturbed hardwood forest. First-year nutrien...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 1981-10, Vol.62 (5), p.1244-1253 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1253 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1244 |
| container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Boring, Lindsay R. Monk, Carl D. Swank, Wayne T. |
| description | The components of hardwood forest regeneration on a southern Appalachian watershed were assessed during the 1st yr following clear-cutting. First-year net primary production (NPP) on the clear-cut was 1955 kg/ha, representing 22% of the NPP of a nearby undisturbed hardwood forest. First-year nutrient pools in NPP for N, P, K, Mg, and Ca were estimated at 29-44% of those in the NPP of the control. The greatest NPP and nutrient pools were represented in descending order by hardwood sprouts, herbs, vines, and seedlings. Woody successional species (Robinia pseudo-acacia, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Vitis aestivalis var. argentifolia) and herbs (Aster spp., Solidago spp., and Erechtites hieracifolia) were important in revegetation due to competitive advantages in growth rates, growth forms, and propagative capacities. The woody successional species had higher tissue concentrations of N and P than most other woody species. Herbs as a group had significantly higher foliar concentrations of K than woody species. Woody successional and herbaceous species collectively had higher biomass and elemental pools than other woody species. Following forest disturbance, these fast-growing species conserve substantial pools of nutrients in their biomass and initiate a rapid recovery of forest elemental cycling processes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1937289 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15380052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1937289</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1937289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3724-11da318917f8fb17d32c6daf71cb2efd8b782bbd530a752c12a554ae93c47bbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2L1EAQxRtxwXEV754aFL2YtT_Sk85xGcYPWHYPugcRaSqd6p0MmXTsSlzy39uSPQlalyqoXz3qPcZeSHGhtKjey1pXytaP2CZPdVHLSjxmGyGkKuqtsU_YU6KjyCVLu2G_9pD6hSe8wwETTF0ceAwcuO8RUuHniVOcpwOmgV-OI_TgDx0MPMSENPHvex9poQlP9I7fx9gunGbvkSgLQc9pRN9h3l3HNB34DlLsuwF-PGNnAXrC5w_9nN1-2H_dfSqubj5-3l1eFT6bKAspW9DSZg_BhkZWrVZ-20KopG8UhtY2lVVN0xotoDLKSwXGlIC19mXVNKjP2ZtVd0zx55w_dqeOPPY9DBhnctJoK4RRGXz1F3iMc8oWMqPqbamVUiZTb1fKp0iUMLgxdSdIi5PC_UnfPaSfSb2S912Py78wt999k7WVW2WkKst89Xq9OtIU03_EX65YgOjgLnXkbr9YqUuZNX4DMyGaGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296432225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina]</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Boring, Lindsay R. ; Monk, Carl D. ; Swank, Wayne T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boring, Lindsay R. ; Monk, Carl D. ; Swank, Wayne T.</creatorcontrib><description>The components of hardwood forest regeneration on a southern Appalachian watershed were assessed during the 1st yr following clear-cutting. First-year net primary production (NPP) on the clear-cut was 1955 kg/ha, representing 22% of the NPP of a nearby undisturbed hardwood forest. First-year nutrient pools in NPP for N, P, K, Mg, and Ca were estimated at 29-44% of those in the NPP of the control. The greatest NPP and nutrient pools were represented in descending order by hardwood sprouts, herbs, vines, and seedlings. Woody successional species (Robinia pseudo-acacia, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Vitis aestivalis var. argentifolia) and herbs (Aster spp., Solidago spp., and Erechtites hieracifolia) were important in revegetation due to competitive advantages in growth rates, growth forms, and propagative capacities. The woody successional species had higher tissue concentrations of N and P than most other woody species. Herbs as a group had significantly higher foliar concentrations of K than woody species. Woody successional and herbaceous species collectively had higher biomass and elemental pools than other woody species. Following forest disturbance, these fast-growing species conserve substantial pools of nutrients in their biomass and initiate a rapid recovery of forest elemental cycling processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1937289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn, N.Y., etc: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Appalachian ; Aster ; Biomass ; clear-cut ; disturbance ; Forest ecology ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest regeneration ; Hardwood forests ; Herbs ; Liriodendron tulipifera ; net primary production ; nutrient conservation ; nutrient cycling ; Plants ; Robinia pseudoacacia ; Robinia pseudo‐acacia ; Seedlings ; Solidago ; Sprouts ; succession ; Vitis aestivalis ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1981-10, Vol.62 (5), p.1244-1253</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1981 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1981 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3724-11da318917f8fb17d32c6daf71cb2efd8b782bbd530a752c12a554ae93c47bbe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1937289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1937289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boring, Lindsay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monk, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swank, Wayne T.</creatorcontrib><title>Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina]</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>The components of hardwood forest regeneration on a southern Appalachian watershed were assessed during the 1st yr following clear-cutting. First-year net primary production (NPP) on the clear-cut was 1955 kg/ha, representing 22% of the NPP of a nearby undisturbed hardwood forest. First-year nutrient pools in NPP for N, P, K, Mg, and Ca were estimated at 29-44% of those in the NPP of the control. The greatest NPP and nutrient pools were represented in descending order by hardwood sprouts, herbs, vines, and seedlings. Woody successional species (Robinia pseudo-acacia, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Vitis aestivalis var. argentifolia) and herbs (Aster spp., Solidago spp., and Erechtites hieracifolia) were important in revegetation due to competitive advantages in growth rates, growth forms, and propagative capacities. The woody successional species had higher tissue concentrations of N and P than most other woody species. Herbs as a group had significantly higher foliar concentrations of K than woody species. Woody successional and herbaceous species collectively had higher biomass and elemental pools than other woody species. Following forest disturbance, these fast-growing species conserve substantial pools of nutrients in their biomass and initiate a rapid recovery of forest elemental cycling processes.</description><subject>Appalachian</subject><subject>Aster</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>clear-cut</subject><subject>disturbance</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest regeneration</subject><subject>Hardwood forests</subject><subject>Herbs</subject><subject>Liriodendron tulipifera</subject><subject>net primary production</subject><subject>nutrient conservation</subject><subject>nutrient cycling</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Robinia pseudoacacia</subject><subject>Robinia pseudo‐acacia</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Solidago</subject><subject>Sprouts</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Vitis aestivalis</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM2L1EAQxRtxwXEV754aFL2YtT_Sk85xGcYPWHYPugcRaSqd6p0MmXTsSlzy39uSPQlalyqoXz3qPcZeSHGhtKjey1pXytaP2CZPdVHLSjxmGyGkKuqtsU_YU6KjyCVLu2G_9pD6hSe8wwETTF0ceAwcuO8RUuHniVOcpwOmgV-OI_TgDx0MPMSENPHvex9poQlP9I7fx9gunGbvkSgLQc9pRN9h3l3HNB34DlLsuwF-PGNnAXrC5w_9nN1-2H_dfSqubj5-3l1eFT6bKAspW9DSZg_BhkZWrVZ-20KopG8UhtY2lVVN0xotoDLKSwXGlIC19mXVNKjP2ZtVd0zx55w_dqeOPPY9DBhnctJoK4RRGXz1F3iMc8oWMqPqbamVUiZTb1fKp0iUMLgxdSdIi5PC_UnfPaSfSb2S912Py78wt999k7WVW2WkKst89Xq9OtIU03_EX65YgOjgLnXkbr9YqUuZNX4DMyGaGw</recordid><startdate>198110</startdate><enddate>198110</enddate><creator>Boring, Lindsay R.</creator><creator>Monk, Carl D.</creator><creator>Swank, Wayne T.</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198110</creationdate><title>Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina]</title><author>Boring, Lindsay R. ; Monk, Carl D. ; Swank, Wayne T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3724-11da318917f8fb17d32c6daf71cb2efd8b782bbd530a752c12a554ae93c47bbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Appalachian</topic><topic>Aster</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>clear-cut</topic><topic>disturbance</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest regeneration</topic><topic>Hardwood forests</topic><topic>Herbs</topic><topic>Liriodendron tulipifera</topic><topic>net primary production</topic><topic>nutrient conservation</topic><topic>nutrient cycling</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Robinia pseudoacacia</topic><topic>Robinia pseudo‐acacia</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Solidago</topic><topic>Sprouts</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Vitis aestivalis</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boring, Lindsay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monk, Carl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swank, Wayne T.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boring, Lindsay R.</au><au>Monk, Carl D.</au><au>Swank, Wayne T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina]</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1981-10</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1244</spage><epage>1253</epage><pages>1244-1253</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>The components of hardwood forest regeneration on a southern Appalachian watershed were assessed during the 1st yr following clear-cutting. First-year net primary production (NPP) on the clear-cut was 1955 kg/ha, representing 22% of the NPP of a nearby undisturbed hardwood forest. First-year nutrient pools in NPP for N, P, K, Mg, and Ca were estimated at 29-44% of those in the NPP of the control. The greatest NPP and nutrient pools were represented in descending order by hardwood sprouts, herbs, vines, and seedlings. Woody successional species (Robinia pseudo-acacia, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Vitis aestivalis var. argentifolia) and herbs (Aster spp., Solidago spp., and Erechtites hieracifolia) were important in revegetation due to competitive advantages in growth rates, growth forms, and propagative capacities. The woody successional species had higher tissue concentrations of N and P than most other woody species. Herbs as a group had significantly higher foliar concentrations of K than woody species. Woody successional and herbaceous species collectively had higher biomass and elemental pools than other woody species. Following forest disturbance, these fast-growing species conserve substantial pools of nutrients in their biomass and initiate a rapid recovery of forest elemental cycling processes.</abstract><cop>Brooklyn, N.Y., etc</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1937289</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
| ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 1981-10, Vol.62 (5), p.1244-1253 |
| issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15380052 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Appalachian Aster Biomass clear-cut disturbance Forest ecology Forest ecosystems Forest regeneration Hardwood forests Herbs Liriodendron tulipifera net primary production nutrient conservation nutrient cycling Plants Robinia pseudoacacia Robinia pseudo‐acacia Seedlings Solidago Sprouts succession Vitis aestivalis Watersheds |
| title | Early regeneration of a clear-cut southern Appalachian forest [Ecosystems, woody successional species, North Carolina] |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A15%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20regeneration%20of%20a%20clear-cut%20southern%20Appalachian%20forest%20%5BEcosystems,%20woody%20successional%20species,%20North%20Carolina%5D&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Boring,%20Lindsay%20R.&rft.date=1981-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1244&rft.epage=1253&rft.pages=1244-1253&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1937289&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1937289%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296432225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1937289&rfr_iscdi=true |