Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories

Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a sec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language learning journal 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253
Hauptverfasser: Liyanage, Indika, Bartlett, Brendan John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 237
container_title Language learning journal
container_volume 40
creator Liyanage, Indika
Bartlett, Brendan John
description Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09571736.2011.574818
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536164645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ968532</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.193103</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1536164645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EEkvhH_SQI5csnowdJ1wQVG0BVeICZ8uxJ6khGy-2V9X-exxSOMLJkt83b948xi6B74F3_A3vpQKF7b7hAHupRAfdE7YDJbFuoFVP2W5F6pV5zl6k9J1zKbHFHbu5pcVRrMziqtks08lMVM1k4uKXqUo5mkyTp_S2mkP4sf4NdA4FzvdU2VUMscgv2bPRzIlePb4X7NvN9derj_Xdl9tPV-_vaisk5rrHfiCFIw4SQTRiHAVJp9xAJQz0SKOTDiy4oekst4OVwonGNaS4HGzf4QV7vfkeY_h5opT1wSdLc4lO4ZQ0lKugFW3Z9l8UG0QhlWwKKjbUxpBSpFEfoz-YeNbA9dqw_tOwXhvWW8Nl7HIbo-jt35Hrz33bSVxdP2xyPPisDflj1vc5H5N2JhvtlzH8VkKctAt-3YUI7SNZ2gCOxeTdZrLh5iHE2elsznOIYzSL9UnjP1P-Ap2bovE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323345752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</creator><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><description>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-1736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-2167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2011.574818</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LLEJED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Affective Behavior ; Classification ; Classroom Environment ; Correlation ; English (Second language) ; Ethnicity ; Females ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; High School Students ; Learning Strategies ; Listening ; Males ; Metacognition ; Reading ; Second Language Learning ; Secondary education ; Secondary school students ; Speech Communication ; Sri Lanka ; Writing (Composition)</subject><ispartof>Language learning journal, 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ968532$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><title>Language learning journal</title><description>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</description><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classroom Environment</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>English (Second language)</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Secondary education</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Sri Lanka</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><issn>0957-1736</issn><issn>1753-2167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EEkvhH_SQI5csnowdJ1wQVG0BVeICZ8uxJ6khGy-2V9X-exxSOMLJkt83b948xi6B74F3_A3vpQKF7b7hAHupRAfdE7YDJbFuoFVP2W5F6pV5zl6k9J1zKbHFHbu5pcVRrMziqtks08lMVM1k4uKXqUo5mkyTp_S2mkP4sf4NdA4FzvdU2VUMscgv2bPRzIlePb4X7NvN9derj_Xdl9tPV-_vaisk5rrHfiCFIw4SQTRiHAVJp9xAJQz0SKOTDiy4oekst4OVwonGNaS4HGzf4QV7vfkeY_h5opT1wSdLc4lO4ZQ0lKugFW3Z9l8UG0QhlWwKKjbUxpBSpFEfoz-YeNbA9dqw_tOwXhvWW8Nl7HIbo-jt35Hrz33bSVxdP2xyPPisDflj1vc5H5N2JhvtlzH8VkKctAt-3YUI7SNZ2gCOxeTdZrLh5iHE2elsznOIYzSL9UnjP1P-Ap2bovE</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Liyanage, Indika</creator><creator>Bartlett, Brendan John</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><author>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classroom Environment</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>English (Second language)</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Secondary education</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Sri Lanka</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Language learning journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liyanage, Indika</au><au>Bartlett, Brendan John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ968532</ericid><atitle>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</atitle><jtitle>Language learning journal</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>237-253</pages><issn>0957-1736</issn><eissn>1753-2167</eissn><coden>LLEJED</coden><abstract>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09571736.2011.574818</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-1736
ispartof Language learning journal, 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253
issn 0957-1736
1753-2167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536164645
source EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Affective Behavior
Classification
Classroom Environment
Correlation
English (Second language)
Ethnicity
Females
Foreign Countries
Gender Differences
High School Students
Learning Strategies
Listening
Males
Metacognition
Reading
Second Language Learning
Secondary education
Secondary school students
Speech Communication
Sri Lanka
Writing (Composition)
title Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20and%20language%20learning%20strategies:%20looking%20beyond%20the%20categories&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning%20journal&rft.au=Liyanage,%20Indika&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=237-253&rft.issn=0957-1736&rft.eissn=1753-2167&rft.coden=LLEJED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09571736.2011.574818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E1536164645%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323345752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ968532&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.193103&rfr_iscdi=true