Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories
Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a sec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Language learning journal 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Language learning journal |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Liyanage, Indika Bartlett, Brendan John |
description | Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09571736.2011.574818 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536164645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ968532</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.193103</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1536164645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EEkvhH_SQI5csnowdJ1wQVG0BVeICZ8uxJ6khGy-2V9X-exxSOMLJkt83b948xi6B74F3_A3vpQKF7b7hAHupRAfdE7YDJbFuoFVP2W5F6pV5zl6k9J1zKbHFHbu5pcVRrMziqtks08lMVM1k4uKXqUo5mkyTp_S2mkP4sf4NdA4FzvdU2VUMscgv2bPRzIlePb4X7NvN9derj_Xdl9tPV-_vaisk5rrHfiCFIw4SQTRiHAVJp9xAJQz0SKOTDiy4oekst4OVwonGNaS4HGzf4QV7vfkeY_h5opT1wSdLc4lO4ZQ0lKugFW3Z9l8UG0QhlWwKKjbUxpBSpFEfoz-YeNbA9dqw_tOwXhvWW8Nl7HIbo-jt35Hrz33bSVxdP2xyPPisDflj1vc5H5N2JhvtlzH8VkKctAt-3YUI7SNZ2gCOxeTdZrLh5iHE2elsznOIYzSL9UnjP1P-Ap2bovE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323345752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</creator><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><description>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-1736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-2167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2011.574818</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LLEJED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Affective Behavior ; Classification ; Classroom Environment ; Correlation ; English (Second language) ; Ethnicity ; Females ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; High School Students ; Learning Strategies ; Listening ; Males ; Metacognition ; Reading ; Second Language Learning ; Secondary education ; Secondary school students ; Speech Communication ; Sri Lanka ; Writing (Composition)</subject><ispartof>Language learning journal, 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ968532$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><title>Language learning journal</title><description>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</description><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classroom Environment</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>English (Second language)</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Secondary education</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Sri Lanka</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><issn>0957-1736</issn><issn>1753-2167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EEkvhH_SQI5csnowdJ1wQVG0BVeICZ8uxJ6khGy-2V9X-exxSOMLJkt83b948xi6B74F3_A3vpQKF7b7hAHupRAfdE7YDJbFuoFVP2W5F6pV5zl6k9J1zKbHFHbu5pcVRrMziqtks08lMVM1k4uKXqUo5mkyTp_S2mkP4sf4NdA4FzvdU2VUMscgv2bPRzIlePb4X7NvN9derj_Xdl9tPV-_vaisk5rrHfiCFIw4SQTRiHAVJp9xAJQz0SKOTDiy4oekst4OVwonGNaS4HGzf4QV7vfkeY_h5opT1wSdLc4lO4ZQ0lKugFW3Z9l8UG0QhlWwKKjbUxpBSpFEfoz-YeNbA9dqw_tOwXhvWW8Nl7HIbo-jt35Hrz33bSVxdP2xyPPisDflj1vc5H5N2JhvtlzH8VkKctAt-3YUI7SNZ2gCOxeTdZrLh5iHE2elsznOIYzSL9UnjP1P-Ap2bovE</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Liyanage, Indika</creator><creator>Bartlett, Brendan John</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</title><author>Liyanage, Indika ; Bartlett, Brendan John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-939be73f3b531424ff4e5d7dbe363193efd5d1c1db28c0cbc54d42d2e705bc983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classroom Environment</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>English (Second language)</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Secondary education</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Sri Lanka</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liyanage, Indika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Brendan John</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Language learning journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liyanage, Indika</au><au>Bartlett, Brendan John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ968532</ericid><atitle>Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories</atitle><jtitle>Language learning journal</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>237-253</pages><issn>0957-1736</issn><eissn>1753-2167</eissn><coden>LLEJED</coden><abstract>Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N = 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09571736.2011.574818</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-1736 |
ispartof | Language learning journal, 2012-07, Vol.40 (2), p.237-253 |
issn | 0957-1736 1753-2167 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536164645 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Affective Behavior Classification Classroom Environment Correlation English (Second language) Ethnicity Females Foreign Countries Gender Differences High School Students Learning Strategies Listening Males Metacognition Reading Second Language Learning Secondary education Secondary school students Speech Communication Sri Lanka Writing (Composition) |
title | Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20and%20language%20learning%20strategies:%20looking%20beyond%20the%20categories&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning%20journal&rft.au=Liyanage,%20Indika&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=237-253&rft.issn=0957-1736&rft.eissn=1753-2167&rft.coden=LLEJED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09571736.2011.574818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E1536164645%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323345752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ968532&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.193103&rfr_iscdi=true |