The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion

Anthropological theorizing about 'potentiality' should include an understanding of the contemporary legacy of Aristotle's potentiality principle. This paper approaches potentiality as an object of anthropological scrutiny to show how it is evoked, presented, debated, and circulated am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current anthropology 2013-10, Vol.54 (Supp.7), p.S15-S25
1. Verfasser: Morgan, Lynn M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S25
container_issue Supp.7
container_start_page S15
container_title Current anthropology
container_volume 54
creator Morgan, Lynn M
description Anthropological theorizing about 'potentiality' should include an understanding of the contemporary legacy of Aristotle's potentiality principle. This paper approaches potentiality as an object of anthropological scrutiny to show how it is evoked, presented, debated, and circulated among people interacting in a social realm. The potentiality principle, I argue, has been kept alive by Catholic moral philosophers who argue that embryos should not be killed because they possess the attributes that they will have later in life. Catholic moral philosophers and their feminist critics and interlocutors emerge in this paper as active agents who condition and shape the contemporary uses of the concept of potentiality. By looking at how potentiality debates are intellectually and historically situated, I argue for reflexive ethnographic attention to the politics of potentiality. Adapted from the source document. Reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago Press. © All rights reserved
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536009170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1536009170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15360091703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjUsKwjAQQLNQsH7ukKUbYWKtxaWI4gG6L7FMcSTNxMx04e3twgu4ejx48GamAHBuV-7hsDBLkRcAnCpXF6ZqnmgTK0YlH0g_NmWKHaWAts882HMmUdZJla1_cFbiuDbz3gfBzY8rs71dm8t9lzK_RxRtB5IOQ_AReZTWVeVxOroayj_SL7JMOOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536009170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Morgan, Lynn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Lynn M</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropological theorizing about 'potentiality' should include an understanding of the contemporary legacy of Aristotle's potentiality principle. This paper approaches potentiality as an object of anthropological scrutiny to show how it is evoked, presented, debated, and circulated among people interacting in a social realm. The potentiality principle, I argue, has been kept alive by Catholic moral philosophers who argue that embryos should not be killed because they possess the attributes that they will have later in life. Catholic moral philosophers and their feminist critics and interlocutors emerge in this paper as active agents who condition and shape the contemporary uses of the concept of potentiality. By looking at how potentiality debates are intellectually and historically situated, I argue for reflexive ethnographic attention to the politics of potentiality. Adapted from the source document. Reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago Press. © All rights reserved</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Abortion ; Anthropological theory ; Catholics ; Conceptualization ; Discourse ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Philosophers ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2013-10, Vol.54 (Supp.7), p.S15-S25</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Lynn M</creatorcontrib><title>The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>Anthropological theorizing about 'potentiality' should include an understanding of the contemporary legacy of Aristotle's potentiality principle. This paper approaches potentiality as an object of anthropological scrutiny to show how it is evoked, presented, debated, and circulated among people interacting in a social realm. The potentiality principle, I argue, has been kept alive by Catholic moral philosophers who argue that embryos should not be killed because they possess the attributes that they will have later in life. Catholic moral philosophers and their feminist critics and interlocutors emerge in this paper as active agents who condition and shape the contemporary uses of the concept of potentiality. By looking at how potentiality debates are intellectually and historically situated, I argue for reflexive ethnographic attention to the politics of potentiality. Adapted from the source document. Reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago Press. © All rights reserved</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Anthropological theory</subject><subject>Catholics</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjUsKwjAQQLNQsH7ukKUbYWKtxaWI4gG6L7FMcSTNxMx04e3twgu4ejx48GamAHBuV-7hsDBLkRcAnCpXF6ZqnmgTK0YlH0g_NmWKHaWAts882HMmUdZJla1_cFbiuDbz3gfBzY8rs71dm8t9lzK_RxRtB5IOQ_AReZTWVeVxOroayj_SL7JMOOI</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Morgan, Lynn M</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion</title><author>Morgan, Lynn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15360091703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Anthropological theory</topic><topic>Catholics</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Lynn M</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Lynn M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>Supp.7</issue><spage>S15</spage><epage>S25</epage><pages>S15-S25</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><abstract>Anthropological theorizing about 'potentiality' should include an understanding of the contemporary legacy of Aristotle's potentiality principle. This paper approaches potentiality as an object of anthropological scrutiny to show how it is evoked, presented, debated, and circulated among people interacting in a social realm. The potentiality principle, I argue, has been kept alive by Catholic moral philosophers who argue that embryos should not be killed because they possess the attributes that they will have later in life. Catholic moral philosophers and their feminist critics and interlocutors emerge in this paper as active agents who condition and shape the contemporary uses of the concept of potentiality. By looking at how potentiality debates are intellectually and historically situated, I argue for reflexive ethnographic attention to the politics of potentiality. Adapted from the source document. Reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago Press. © All rights reserved</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3204
ispartof Current anthropology, 2013-10, Vol.54 (Supp.7), p.S15-S25
issn 0011-3204
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536009170
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Abortion
Anthropological theory
Catholics
Conceptualization
Discourse
Ethics
Ethnography
Feminism
Philosophers
Politics
title The potentiality principle from Aristotle to abortion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20potentiality%20principle%20from%20Aristotle%20to%20abortion&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Morgan,%20Lynn%20M&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=Supp.7&rft.spage=S15&rft.epage=S25&rft.pages=S15-S25&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1536009170%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536009170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true