Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods
This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban design 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Journal of urban design |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lee, Sungduck Talen, Emily |
description | This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1535619249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3260948601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouK7-Aw8FL166ZvLVxIssi1-wqxfFY0ibRLt2mzVpkf33tlQvHsTTDMzzvjBPkpwCmgES6AIIy6lAcoYR0JmQCFG0l0yAcplJzul-v_dINjCHyVGMa4SQACknCaysjl2omtf0Rdfvuqjqqt1dpvP0wbc29U0670zVDveVbd-8icfJgdN1tCffc5o831w_Le6y5ePt_WK-zEqKoM0YExa0pYWzDmtunMGEFQxxzI0QxJTWgQFsRYFxDlZKoUsAlmNBGMotJdPkfOzdBv_R2diqTRVLW9e6sb6LChhhHCSm8h8oCEyZkLxHz36ha9-Fpn9koIASYFL0FB2pMvgYg3VqG6qNDjsFSA3K1Y9yNShXo_I-djXGqsb5sNGfPtRGtXpX--CCbsoqKvJnwxcg_4SC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511431598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-4809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nottingham: Routledge</publisher><subject>Auditing ; Geographic information systems ; Geographical information systems ; Methodology ; Objectivity ; Observation ; Pedestrians ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban design, 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><title>Journal of urban design</title><description>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</description><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Pedestrians</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>1357-4809</issn><issn>1469-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouK7-Aw8FL166ZvLVxIssi1-wqxfFY0ibRLt2mzVpkf33tlQvHsTTDMzzvjBPkpwCmgES6AIIy6lAcoYR0JmQCFG0l0yAcplJzul-v_dINjCHyVGMa4SQACknCaysjl2omtf0Rdfvuqjqqt1dpvP0wbc29U0670zVDveVbd-8icfJgdN1tCffc5o831w_Le6y5ePt_WK-zEqKoM0YExa0pYWzDmtunMGEFQxxzI0QxJTWgQFsRYFxDlZKoUsAlmNBGMotJdPkfOzdBv_R2diqTRVLW9e6sb6LChhhHCSm8h8oCEyZkLxHz36ha9-Fpn9koIASYFL0FB2pMvgYg3VqG6qNDjsFSA3K1Y9yNShXo_I-djXGqsb5sNGfPtRGtXpX--CCbsoqKvJnwxcg_4SC</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Lee, Sungduck</creator><creator>Talen, Emily</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>F29</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><author>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Pedestrians</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sungduck</au><au>Talen, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban design</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>368-388</pages><issn>1357-4809</issn><eissn>1469-9664</eissn><abstract>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</abstract><cop>Nottingham</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13574809.2014.890040</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1357-4809 |
ispartof | Journal of urban design, 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388 |
issn | 1357-4809 1469-9664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1535619249 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Auditing Geographic information systems Geographical information systems Methodology Objectivity Observation Pedestrians Urban planning |
title | Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Walkability:%20A%20Note%20on%20Auditing%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20design&rft.au=Lee,%20Sungduck&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=368-388&rft.issn=1357-4809&rft.eissn=1469-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3260948601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511431598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |