Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods

This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of urban design 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Sungduck, Talen, Emily
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 368
container_title Journal of urban design
container_volume 19
creator Lee, Sungduck
Talen, Emily
description This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1535619249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3260948601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouK7-Aw8FL166ZvLVxIssi1-wqxfFY0ibRLt2mzVpkf33tlQvHsTTDMzzvjBPkpwCmgES6AIIy6lAcoYR0JmQCFG0l0yAcplJzul-v_dINjCHyVGMa4SQACknCaysjl2omtf0Rdfvuqjqqt1dpvP0wbc29U0670zVDveVbd-8icfJgdN1tCffc5o831w_Le6y5ePt_WK-zEqKoM0YExa0pYWzDmtunMGEFQxxzI0QxJTWgQFsRYFxDlZKoUsAlmNBGMotJdPkfOzdBv_R2diqTRVLW9e6sb6LChhhHCSm8h8oCEyZkLxHz36ha9-Fpn9koIASYFL0FB2pMvgYg3VqG6qNDjsFSA3K1Y9yNShXo_I-djXGqsb5sNGfPtRGtXpX--CCbsoqKvJnwxcg_4SC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511431598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-4809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nottingham: Routledge</publisher><subject>Auditing ; Geographic information systems ; Geographical information systems ; Methodology ; Objectivity ; Observation ; Pedestrians ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban design, 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><title>Journal of urban design</title><description>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</description><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Pedestrians</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>1357-4809</issn><issn>1469-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhosouK7-Aw8FL166ZvLVxIssi1-wqxfFY0ibRLt2mzVpkf33tlQvHsTTDMzzvjBPkpwCmgES6AIIy6lAcoYR0JmQCFG0l0yAcplJzul-v_dINjCHyVGMa4SQACknCaysjl2omtf0Rdfvuqjqqt1dpvP0wbc29U0670zVDveVbd-8icfJgdN1tCffc5o831w_Le6y5ePt_WK-zEqKoM0YExa0pYWzDmtunMGEFQxxzI0QxJTWgQFsRYFxDlZKoUsAlmNBGMotJdPkfOzdBv_R2diqTRVLW9e6sb6LChhhHCSm8h8oCEyZkLxHz36ha9-Fpn9koIASYFL0FB2pMvgYg3VqG6qNDjsFSA3K1Y9yNShXo_I-djXGqsb5sNGfPtRGtXpX--CCbsoqKvJnwxcg_4SC</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Lee, Sungduck</creator><creator>Talen, Emily</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>F29</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</title><author>Lee, Sungduck ; Talen, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-558e1ae4bfef2a6dfd235b50626d883dcef1d12e8b2271e998ac1157283507e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Pedestrians</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sungduck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talen, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Sungduck</au><au>Talen, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban design</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>368-388</pages><issn>1357-4809</issn><eissn>1469-9664</eissn><abstract>This study contributes to the literature on walkability measurement by proposing a hybrid auditing method that combines the efficiency of a GIS-based approach with the pedestrian perspective possible with Google Street View. The paper first reviews the various in-person and secondary source auditing methods that have been developed over the past decade. It then tests the feasibility of a GIS/Google Street View hybrid method against an in-person auditing method. The approach here is based on the Irvine-Minnesota Inventory (IMI), selecting 94 objectively measured items that were available and accessible using a combination of GIS and Google Street View. The goal was to test the degree to which some of the measures employed in IMI could be streamlined using GIS and Google Street View as data sources. It is concluded that the combination of information from Google Street View and updated GIS layers can be an effective way of obtaining physical environment data that is very comparable to in-person observation.</abstract><cop>Nottingham</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13574809.2014.890040</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1357-4809
ispartof Journal of urban design, 2014-05, Vol.19 (3), p.368-388
issn 1357-4809
1469-9664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1535619249
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Auditing
Geographic information systems
Geographical information systems
Methodology
Objectivity
Observation
Pedestrians
Urban planning
title Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Walkability:%20A%20Note%20on%20Auditing%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20design&rft.au=Lee,%20Sungduck&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=368-388&rft.issn=1357-4809&rft.eissn=1469-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3260948601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511431598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true