Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities
Evaluating relationships between poverty and dog health, we find that dogs in poor communities are sicker and more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens. •We compare dog health in three rural communities with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation.•We measured dog condition, hematol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta tropica 2014-07, Vol.135, p.67-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Acta tropica |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Fung, H.L. Calzada, J. Saldaña, A. Santamaria, A.M. Pineda, V. Gonzalez, K. Chaves, L.F. Garner, B. Gottdenker, N. |
description | Evaluating relationships between poverty and dog health, we find that dogs in poor communities are sicker and more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens.
•We compare dog health in three rural communities with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation.•We measured dog condition, hematology, immunity, endoparasites, and infectious agent exposure.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were less healthy and more likely to harbor zoonoses.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were more likely to be exposed to canine distemper.•Human poverty may negatively influence dog health, posing disease risks to humans and wildlife.
Dogs play an important role in infectious disease transmission as reservoir hosts of many zoonotic and wildlife pathogens. Nevertheless, unlike wildlife species involved in the life cycle of pathogens, whose health status might be a direct reflection of their fitness and competitive abilities, dog health condition could be sensitive to socio-economic factors impacting the well-being of their owners. Here, we compare several dog health indicators in three rural communities of Panama with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation. From a total of 78 individuals, we collected blood and fecal samples, and assessed their body condition. With the blood samples, we performed routine hematologic evaluation (complete blood counts) and measured cytokine levels (Interferon-γ and Interleukin-10) through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. With the fecal samples we diagnosed helminthiases. Dogs were also serologically tested for exposure to Trypanosoma cruzi and canine distemper virus, and molecular tests were done to assess T. cruzi infection status. We found significant differences between dog health measurements, pathogen prevalence, parasite richness, and economic status of the human communities where the dogs lived. We found dogs that were less healthy, more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens, and more likely to be seropositive to canine distemper virus in the communities with lower economic status. This study concludes that isolated communities of lower economic status in Panama may have less healthy dogs that could become major reservoirs in the transmission of diseases to humans and sympatric wildlife. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534851358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001706X1400093X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534851358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-1cbe3cbdea4d8b6eeb462edae46bb877020753357e5a6a9cb2d625ffae0ea1313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EoqXwF1C4cUnwI3bSIypPqRIXKnGzHGdDXDVxsZ1W_HtctSCOPa1G-nZXM4PQDcEZwUTcLTOlgwrOro1WGcUkzzDLMMEnaEzKgqWC8vwUjTHGJC2w-BihC--XUdGC03M0orkoCaVkjBYPtgMfjE5q-5m0oFahTbbWeeh9sjVReKuNTUHb3nY7DNbObFQwtk9sk4QWjEvaeCTRtuuG3gQD_hKdNWrl4eowJ2jx9Pg-e0nnb8-vs_t5qjnmISW6AqarGlRel5UAqHJBoVaQi6oqiwJTXHDGeAFcCTXVFa2js6ZRgEERRtgE3e7vrp39GqIP2RmvYbVSPdjBS8JZXnLCeHkESnMiqBA8otM9qp313kEjo-VOuW9JsNwVIJfyXwFyV4DETMYC4u714c1QdVD_bf4mHoHZHoCYy8aAk14b6DXUxoEOsrbmiDc_fLGeyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524162665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fung, H.L. ; Calzada, J. ; Saldaña, A. ; Santamaria, A.M. ; Pineda, V. ; Gonzalez, K. ; Chaves, L.F. ; Garner, B. ; Gottdenker, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fung, H.L. ; Calzada, J. ; Saldaña, A. ; Santamaria, A.M. ; Pineda, V. ; Gonzalez, K. ; Chaves, L.F. ; Garner, B. ; Gottdenker, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating relationships between poverty and dog health, we find that dogs in poor communities are sicker and more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens.
•We compare dog health in three rural communities with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation.•We measured dog condition, hematology, immunity, endoparasites, and infectious agent exposure.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were less healthy and more likely to harbor zoonoses.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were more likely to be exposed to canine distemper.•Human poverty may negatively influence dog health, posing disease risks to humans and wildlife.
Dogs play an important role in infectious disease transmission as reservoir hosts of many zoonotic and wildlife pathogens. Nevertheless, unlike wildlife species involved in the life cycle of pathogens, whose health status might be a direct reflection of their fitness and competitive abilities, dog health condition could be sensitive to socio-economic factors impacting the well-being of their owners. Here, we compare several dog health indicators in three rural communities of Panama with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation. From a total of 78 individuals, we collected blood and fecal samples, and assessed their body condition. With the blood samples, we performed routine hematologic evaluation (complete blood counts) and measured cytokine levels (Interferon-γ and Interleukin-10) through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. With the fecal samples we diagnosed helminthiases. Dogs were also serologically tested for exposure to Trypanosoma cruzi and canine distemper virus, and molecular tests were done to assess T. cruzi infection status. We found significant differences between dog health measurements, pathogen prevalence, parasite richness, and economic status of the human communities where the dogs lived. We found dogs that were less healthy, more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens, and more likely to be seropositive to canine distemper virus in the communities with lower economic status. This study concludes that isolated communities of lower economic status in Panama may have less healthy dogs that could become major reservoirs in the transmission of diseases to humans and sympatric wildlife.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-706X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24681221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blood Chemical Analysis ; Canine distemper virus ; Chagas Disease - epidemiology ; Chagas Disease - veterinary ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Distemper - epidemiology ; Distemper Virus, Canine - immunology ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dogs ; Domestic dog ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; Health assessment ; Health Status ; Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Panama ; Panama - epidemiology ; Pets - physiology ; Poverty-disease ; Rural Population ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Trypanosoma cruzi ; Trypanosoma cruzi - genetics ; Trypanosoma cruzi - immunology ; Wildlife diseases ; Zoonotic diseases</subject><ispartof>Acta tropica, 2014-07, Vol.135, p.67-74</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-1cbe3cbdea4d8b6eeb462edae46bb877020753357e5a6a9cb2d625ffae0ea1313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-1cbe3cbdea4d8b6eeb462edae46bb877020753357e5a6a9cb2d625ffae0ea1313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001706X1400093X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fung, H.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzada, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saldaña, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottdenker, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities</title><title>Acta tropica</title><addtitle>Acta Trop</addtitle><description>Evaluating relationships between poverty and dog health, we find that dogs in poor communities are sicker and more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens.
•We compare dog health in three rural communities with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation.•We measured dog condition, hematology, immunity, endoparasites, and infectious agent exposure.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were less healthy and more likely to harbor zoonoses.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were more likely to be exposed to canine distemper.•Human poverty may negatively influence dog health, posing disease risks to humans and wildlife.
Dogs play an important role in infectious disease transmission as reservoir hosts of many zoonotic and wildlife pathogens. Nevertheless, unlike wildlife species involved in the life cycle of pathogens, whose health status might be a direct reflection of their fitness and competitive abilities, dog health condition could be sensitive to socio-economic factors impacting the well-being of their owners. Here, we compare several dog health indicators in three rural communities of Panama with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation. From a total of 78 individuals, we collected blood and fecal samples, and assessed their body condition. With the blood samples, we performed routine hematologic evaluation (complete blood counts) and measured cytokine levels (Interferon-γ and Interleukin-10) through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. With the fecal samples we diagnosed helminthiases. Dogs were also serologically tested for exposure to Trypanosoma cruzi and canine distemper virus, and molecular tests were done to assess T. cruzi infection status. We found significant differences between dog health measurements, pathogen prevalence, parasite richness, and economic status of the human communities where the dogs lived. We found dogs that were less healthy, more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens, and more likely to be seropositive to canine distemper virus in the communities with lower economic status. This study concludes that isolated communities of lower economic status in Panama may have less healthy dogs that could become major reservoirs in the transmission of diseases to humans and sympatric wildlife.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis</subject><subject>Canine distemper virus</subject><subject>Chagas Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chagas Disease - veterinary</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Distemper - epidemiology</subject><subject>Distemper Virus, Canine - immunology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Domestic dog</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health assessment</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Panama</subject><subject>Panama - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pets - physiology</subject><subject>Poverty-disease</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Trypanosoma cruzi</subject><subject>Trypanosoma cruzi - genetics</subject><subject>Trypanosoma cruzi - immunology</subject><subject>Wildlife diseases</subject><subject>Zoonotic diseases</subject><issn>0001-706X</issn><issn>1873-6254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EoqXwF1C4cUnwI3bSIypPqRIXKnGzHGdDXDVxsZ1W_HtctSCOPa1G-nZXM4PQDcEZwUTcLTOlgwrOro1WGcUkzzDLMMEnaEzKgqWC8vwUjTHGJC2w-BihC--XUdGC03M0orkoCaVkjBYPtgMfjE5q-5m0oFahTbbWeeh9sjVReKuNTUHb3nY7DNbObFQwtk9sk4QWjEvaeCTRtuuG3gQD_hKdNWrl4eowJ2jx9Pg-e0nnb8-vs_t5qjnmISW6AqarGlRel5UAqHJBoVaQi6oqiwJTXHDGeAFcCTXVFa2js6ZRgEERRtgE3e7vrp39GqIP2RmvYbVSPdjBS8JZXnLCeHkESnMiqBA8otM9qp313kEjo-VOuW9JsNwVIJfyXwFyV4DETMYC4u714c1QdVD_bf4mHoHZHoCYy8aAk14b6DXUxoEOsrbmiDc_fLGeyg</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Fung, H.L.</creator><creator>Calzada, J.</creator><creator>Saldaña, A.</creator><creator>Santamaria, A.M.</creator><creator>Pineda, V.</creator><creator>Gonzalez, K.</creator><creator>Chaves, L.F.</creator><creator>Garner, B.</creator><creator>Gottdenker, N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities</title><author>Fung, H.L. ; Calzada, J. ; Saldaña, A. ; Santamaria, A.M. ; Pineda, V. ; Gonzalez, K. ; Chaves, L.F. ; Garner, B. ; Gottdenker, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-1cbe3cbdea4d8b6eeb462edae46bb877020753357e5a6a9cb2d625ffae0ea1313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis</topic><topic>Canine distemper virus</topic><topic>Chagas Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chagas Disease - veterinary</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Distemper - epidemiology</topic><topic>Distemper Virus, Canine - immunology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Domestic dog</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health assessment</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Panama</topic><topic>Panama - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pets - physiology</topic><topic>Poverty-disease</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Trypanosoma cruzi</topic><topic>Trypanosoma cruzi - genetics</topic><topic>Trypanosoma cruzi - immunology</topic><topic>Wildlife diseases</topic><topic>Zoonotic diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fung, H.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzada, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saldaña, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaves, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottdenker, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Acta tropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fung, H.L.</au><au>Calzada, J.</au><au>Saldaña, A.</au><au>Santamaria, A.M.</au><au>Pineda, V.</au><au>Gonzalez, K.</au><au>Chaves, L.F.</au><au>Garner, B.</au><au>Gottdenker, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities</atitle><jtitle>Acta tropica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Trop</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>135</volume><spage>67</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>67-74</pages><issn>0001-706X</issn><eissn>1873-6254</eissn><abstract>Evaluating relationships between poverty and dog health, we find that dogs in poor communities are sicker and more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens.
•We compare dog health in three rural communities with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation.•We measured dog condition, hematology, immunity, endoparasites, and infectious agent exposure.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were less healthy and more likely to harbor zoonoses.•Dogs in communities with low economic status were more likely to be exposed to canine distemper.•Human poverty may negatively influence dog health, posing disease risks to humans and wildlife.
Dogs play an important role in infectious disease transmission as reservoir hosts of many zoonotic and wildlife pathogens. Nevertheless, unlike wildlife species involved in the life cycle of pathogens, whose health status might be a direct reflection of their fitness and competitive abilities, dog health condition could be sensitive to socio-economic factors impacting the well-being of their owners. Here, we compare several dog health indicators in three rural communities of Panama with different degrees of socio-economic deprivation. From a total of 78 individuals, we collected blood and fecal samples, and assessed their body condition. With the blood samples, we performed routine hematologic evaluation (complete blood counts) and measured cytokine levels (Interferon-γ and Interleukin-10) through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. With the fecal samples we diagnosed helminthiases. Dogs were also serologically tested for exposure to Trypanosoma cruzi and canine distemper virus, and molecular tests were done to assess T. cruzi infection status. We found significant differences between dog health measurements, pathogen prevalence, parasite richness, and economic status of the human communities where the dogs lived. We found dogs that were less healthy, more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens, and more likely to be seropositive to canine distemper virus in the communities with lower economic status. This study concludes that isolated communities of lower economic status in Panama may have less healthy dogs that could become major reservoirs in the transmission of diseases to humans and sympatric wildlife.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24681221</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-706X |
ispartof | Acta tropica, 2014-07, Vol.135, p.67-74 |
issn | 0001-706X 1873-6254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534851358 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Blood Chemical Analysis Canine distemper virus Chagas Disease - epidemiology Chagas Disease - veterinary Cross-Sectional Studies Distemper - epidemiology Distemper Virus, Canine - immunology Dog Diseases - epidemiology Dogs Domestic dog Feces - parasitology Female Health assessment Health Status Helminthiasis, Animal - epidemiology Humans Male Panama Panama - epidemiology Pets - physiology Poverty-disease Rural Population Socioeconomic Factors Trypanosoma cruzi Trypanosoma cruzi - genetics Trypanosoma cruzi - immunology Wildlife diseases Zoonotic diseases |
title | Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domestic%20dog%20health%20worsens%20with%20socio-economic%20deprivation%20of%20their%20home%20communities&rft.jtitle=Acta%20tropica&rft.au=Fung,%20H.L.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=135&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=67-74&rft.issn=0001-706X&rft.eissn=1873-6254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534851358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524162665&rft_id=info:pmid/24681221&rft_els_id=S0001706X1400093X&rfr_iscdi=true |