Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds
•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infant behavior & development 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 129 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | Infant behavior & development |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Baker, Rachel K. Pettigrew, Tamara L. Poulin-Dubois, Diane |
description | •By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy.
The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534838476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0163638313001161</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534838476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EoqXwBghlQWJJsGMndpdKqOKnEhILzJZjO6pDYpfYBXXjNXg9ngRXKbAhprt8556jD4BTBDMEUXnZZMbWlV5mOUQ4Q3kGYbEHxojRaQpJgffBOGI4LTHDI3DkfQMjwQp4CEY5IaykbDoGs4WthQ3-8_0jEZVpTdgkwSXCeyeNCDrpXDDOJisRlj55M2GZuKrRMiTPxip_DA5q0Xp9srsT8HRz_Ti_S-8fbhfzq_tUkoKFlCkKRS5LjOIASWhJIRFUVSLHbKoLVIscYQWRLJiqakQVZYQSyhTWNRVY4wm4GP6uevey1j7wznip21ZY7daeowIThmOo_AeKSlrAaCWiZEBl77zvdc1XvelEv-EI8q1k3vBBMt9K5ijnUWGMne0a1lWn1U_o22oEzneA8FK0dS-sNP6Xi9UU5dups4HTUd2r0T330mgrtTJ9VMyVM38v-QKdjZt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516750383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy.
The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-6383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24486789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IBDEDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animacy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Categorization ; Child development ; Cognitive development ; Concept Formation - physiology ; Developmental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habituation ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Male ; Motion ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Newborn. Infant ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><ispartof>Infant behavior & development, 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28337126$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24486789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><title>Infant behavior & development</title><addtitle>Infant Behav Dev</addtitle><description>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy.
The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</description><subject>Animacy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Categorization</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Concept Formation - physiology</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habituation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><issn>0163-6383</issn><issn>1879-0453</issn><issn>1934-8800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EoqXwBghlQWJJsGMndpdKqOKnEhILzJZjO6pDYpfYBXXjNXg9ngRXKbAhprt8556jD4BTBDMEUXnZZMbWlV5mOUQ4Q3kGYbEHxojRaQpJgffBOGI4LTHDI3DkfQMjwQp4CEY5IaykbDoGs4WthQ3-8_0jEZVpTdgkwSXCeyeNCDrpXDDOJisRlj55M2GZuKrRMiTPxip_DA5q0Xp9srsT8HRz_Ti_S-8fbhfzq_tUkoKFlCkKRS5LjOIASWhJIRFUVSLHbKoLVIscYQWRLJiqakQVZYQSyhTWNRVY4wm4GP6uevey1j7wznip21ZY7daeowIThmOo_AeKSlrAaCWiZEBl77zvdc1XvelEv-EI8q1k3vBBMt9K5ijnUWGMne0a1lWn1U_o22oEzneA8FK0dS-sNP6Xi9UU5dups4HTUd2r0T330mgrtTJ9VMyVM38v-QKdjZt8</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Baker, Rachel K.</creator><creator>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creator><creator>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><author>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animacy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Categorization</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Concept Formation - physiology</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habituation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Infant behavior & development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Rachel K.</au><au>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</au><au>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</atitle><jtitle>Infant behavior & development</jtitle><addtitle>Infant Behav Dev</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>119-129</pages><issn>0163-6383</issn><eissn>1879-0453</eissn><eissn>1934-8800</eissn><coden>IBDEDP</coden><abstract>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy.
The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24486789</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-6383 |
ispartof | Infant behavior & development, 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129 |
issn | 0163-6383 1879-0453 1934-8800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534838476 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animacy Biological and medical sciences Categorization Child development Cognitive development Concept Formation - physiology Developmental psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habituation Humans Infant Infants Male Motion Motion Perception - physiology Movement - physiology Newborn. Infant Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Psychology) - physiology |
title | Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A46%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infants%E2%80%99%20ability%20to%20associate%20motion%20paths%20with%20object%20kinds&rft.jtitle=Infant%20behavior%20&%20development&rft.au=Baker,%20Rachel%20K.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=119-129&rft.issn=0163-6383&rft.eissn=1879-0453&rft.coden=IBDEDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534838476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516750383&rft_id=info:pmid/24486789&rft_els_id=S0163638313001161&rfr_iscdi=true |