Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds

•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infant behavior & development 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Rachel K., Pettigrew, Tamara L., Poulin-Dubois, Diane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 119
container_title Infant behavior & development
container_volume 37
creator Baker, Rachel K.
Pettigrew, Tamara L.
Poulin-Dubois, Diane
description •By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534838476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0163638313001161</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534838476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EoqXwBghlQWJJsGMndpdKqOKnEhILzJZjO6pDYpfYBXXjNXg9ngRXKbAhprt8556jD4BTBDMEUXnZZMbWlV5mOUQ4Q3kGYbEHxojRaQpJgffBOGI4LTHDI3DkfQMjwQp4CEY5IaykbDoGs4WthQ3-8_0jEZVpTdgkwSXCeyeNCDrpXDDOJisRlj55M2GZuKrRMiTPxip_DA5q0Xp9srsT8HRz_Ti_S-8fbhfzq_tUkoKFlCkKRS5LjOIASWhJIRFUVSLHbKoLVIscYQWRLJiqakQVZYQSyhTWNRVY4wm4GP6uevey1j7wznip21ZY7daeowIThmOo_AeKSlrAaCWiZEBl77zvdc1XvelEv-EI8q1k3vBBMt9K5ijnUWGMne0a1lWn1U_o22oEzneA8FK0dS-sNP6Xi9UU5dups4HTUd2r0T330mgrtTJ9VMyVM38v-QKdjZt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1516750383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-6383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24486789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IBDEDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animacy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Categorization ; Child development ; Cognitive development ; Concept Formation - physiology ; Developmental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habituation ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Male ; Motion ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Newborn. Infant ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><ispartof>Infant behavior &amp; development, 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28337126$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24486789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><title>Infant behavior &amp; development</title><addtitle>Infant Behav Dev</addtitle><description>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</description><subject>Animacy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Categorization</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Concept Formation - physiology</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habituation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><issn>0163-6383</issn><issn>1879-0453</issn><issn>1934-8800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EoqXwBghlQWJJsGMndpdKqOKnEhILzJZjO6pDYpfYBXXjNXg9ngRXKbAhprt8556jD4BTBDMEUXnZZMbWlV5mOUQ4Q3kGYbEHxojRaQpJgffBOGI4LTHDI3DkfQMjwQp4CEY5IaykbDoGs4WthQ3-8_0jEZVpTdgkwSXCeyeNCDrpXDDOJisRlj55M2GZuKrRMiTPxip_DA5q0Xp9srsT8HRz_Ti_S-8fbhfzq_tUkoKFlCkKRS5LjOIASWhJIRFUVSLHbKoLVIscYQWRLJiqakQVZYQSyhTWNRVY4wm4GP6uevey1j7wznip21ZY7daeowIThmOo_AeKSlrAaCWiZEBl77zvdc1XvelEv-EI8q1k3vBBMt9K5ijnUWGMne0a1lWn1U_o22oEzneA8FK0dS-sNP6Xi9UU5dups4HTUd2r0T330mgrtTJ9VMyVM38v-QKdjZt8</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Baker, Rachel K.</creator><creator>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creator><creator>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</title><author>Baker, Rachel K. ; Pettigrew, Tamara L. ; Poulin-Dubois, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-8d70a2c631585c476704a7dba2389e51fa213d01c58dbf17d7847478d3ef7a3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animacy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Categorization</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Concept Formation - physiology</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habituation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Infant behavior &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Rachel K.</au><au>Pettigrew, Tamara L.</au><au>Poulin-Dubois, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds</atitle><jtitle>Infant behavior &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Infant Behav Dev</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>119-129</pages><issn>0163-6383</issn><eissn>1879-0453</eissn><eissn>1934-8800</eissn><coden>IBDEDP</coden><abstract>•By 10 months, infants associate a rebounding motion path with vehicles.•By 10 months, infants associate jumping and rebounding motion paths with animals.•By 10 months, infants restrict jumping to animals.•Supports the view that path is a motion cue associated with object kinds in infancy. The goal of the present research was to examine whether infants associate different paths of motion with animate beings and inanimate objects. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used to examine 10–20-month-old infants’ ability to associate a non-linear motion path (jumping) with animals and a linear (rebounding) motion path with vehicles (Experiment 1) and furniture (Experiment 2). During the habituation phase, infants saw a dog jumping over a barrier and either a vehicle or a piece of furniture rebounding off the barrier. In the test phase, infants looked longer when another inanimate object jumped rather than rebounded, but showed no such differential looking in the case of another animate object. The ability to restrict the animate motion path of jumping to animate beings was present by 10 months of age. The present findings support the hypothesis that motion path is associated with the animate–inanimate distinction early in infancy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24486789</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-6383
ispartof Infant behavior & development, 2014-02, Vol.37 (1), p.119-129
issn 0163-6383
1879-0453
1934-8800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534838476
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animacy
Biological and medical sciences
Categorization
Child development
Cognitive development
Concept Formation - physiology
Developmental psychology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habituation
Humans
Infant
Infants
Male
Motion
Motion Perception - physiology
Movement - physiology
Newborn. Infant
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
title Infants’ ability to associate motion paths with object kinds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A46%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infants%E2%80%99%20ability%20to%20associate%20motion%20paths%20with%20object%20kinds&rft.jtitle=Infant%20behavior%20&%20development&rft.au=Baker,%20Rachel%20K.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=119-129&rft.issn=0163-6383&rft.eissn=1879-0453&rft.coden=IBDEDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534838476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1516750383&rft_id=info:pmid/24486789&rft_els_id=S0163638313001161&rfr_iscdi=true