Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa

This paper describes the first step in developing an approach to fire risk assessment aimed at balancing the reduction of risks to lives and livelihoods and maintaining fire regimes which protect ecosystem biodiversity and function in fire‐prone ecosystems. Wildfires pose a major hazard to people�...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Austral ecology 2014-06, Vol.39 (4), p.424-436
Hauptverfasser: Le Maitre, David C, Kruger, Fred J, Forsyth, Greg G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 4
container_start_page 424
container_title Austral ecology
container_volume 39
creator Le Maitre, David C
Kruger, Fred J
Forsyth, Greg G
description This paper describes the first step in developing an approach to fire risk assessment aimed at balancing the reduction of risks to lives and livelihoods and maintaining fire regimes which protect ecosystem biodiversity and function in fire‐prone ecosystems. Wildfires pose a major hazard to people's lives, livelihoods and ecosystems in South Africa with poor communities generally being highly exposed and vulnerable. Although general information exists, an adequate understanding of the fire regimes, how they vary spatially, and the related vegetation management requirements is lacking. This study resolves the environmental variation in fire regimes across South Africa into a systematic framework for wildfire risk assessment and ecologically sound ecosystem management. The available descriptions of fire regimes, vegetation classifications, and fire occurrence data from remote sensing are synthesized to derive a set of 13 distinct fire‐ecology types, that is, sets of vegetation units which experience distinct fire regimes. Fuel dynamics, fire‐dependence, ecologically acceptable fire regimes, and guidelines for fire management are described for each of these fire‐ecology types and they are grouped into three categories: fire dependent, fire independent and fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent ecosystems comprise more than 60% of South Africa and fire‐independent ones 32%, the latter mainly in the arid west and northwest, while the remainder are fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent systems require fires and generally coincide with the greatest rural population densities. The outputs from this framework can be used to analyse wildfire risk and translate the risk into practical management measures which are responsive to local ecological, social and institutional settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aec.12100
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534832275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1534832275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-b72fc953434173c71f85c5e48e6f0cd87202156812ac74a9567089ff77eb11353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9vEzEQxVcIpJbSQz8Blrhw2dZ_12tuUWhLUQWV0gpuluOMg9tde7F3W3Lmi-MkVQ_MZUaa33ua0auqE4JPSakzA_aUUILxq-qQcE5rpRR7_TK34qB6m_M9xrhtFDms_l6FEZIz1oc1Ahu7uN4gE1ZoiJ23m0_oMzxCF4ft2oRnwlvTIZdMD08xPexwePQrCBbQ0mRAY0R5GoaYRvTku5XzCVBvgllDD2FEPqBFnMZfaOZS8XpXvXGmy3D83I-qu4vz2_mX-vr75dV8dl1bJlpcLyV1VgnGGSeSWUlcK6wA3kLjsF21kmJKRNMSaqzkRolG4lY5JyUsCWGCHVUf975Dir8nyKPufbbQdSZAnLImxbtllMot-uE_9D5OKZTrCkWFwo2QvFBne6o8CRs9JN-btNEE620WumShd1no2fl8NxRFvVf4PMKfF4VJD7qRTAr949ul_ikWF-q2-apvCv9-zzsTtVknn_XdgmLCMSaYMi7YP37OlkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525906574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Le Maitre, David C ; Kruger, Fred J ; Forsyth, Greg G</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Maitre, David C ; Kruger, Fred J ; Forsyth, Greg G</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the first step in developing an approach to fire risk assessment aimed at balancing the reduction of risks to lives and livelihoods and maintaining fire regimes which protect ecosystem biodiversity and function in fire‐prone ecosystems. Wildfires pose a major hazard to people's lives, livelihoods and ecosystems in South Africa with poor communities generally being highly exposed and vulnerable. Although general information exists, an adequate understanding of the fire regimes, how they vary spatially, and the related vegetation management requirements is lacking. This study resolves the environmental variation in fire regimes across South Africa into a systematic framework for wildfire risk assessment and ecologically sound ecosystem management. The available descriptions of fire regimes, vegetation classifications, and fire occurrence data from remote sensing are synthesized to derive a set of 13 distinct fire‐ecology types, that is, sets of vegetation units which experience distinct fire regimes. Fuel dynamics, fire‐dependence, ecologically acceptable fire regimes, and guidelines for fire management are described for each of these fire‐ecology types and they are grouped into three categories: fire dependent, fire independent and fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent ecosystems comprise more than 60% of South Africa and fire‐independent ones 32%, the latter mainly in the arid west and northwest, while the remainder are fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent systems require fires and generally coincide with the greatest rural population densities. The outputs from this framework can be used to analyse wildfire risk and translate the risk into practical management measures which are responsive to local ecological, social and institutional settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aec.12100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Ecology ; ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; fire dependent vegetation ; fire regime ; fire risk ; Forest &amp; brush fires ; guidelines ; issues and policy ; livelihood ; people ; population density ; Remote sensing ; risk ; risk assessment ; rural population ; science policy interface ; Vegetation ; wildfire ; wildfires ; wildland fire management</subject><ispartof>Austral ecology, 2014-06, Vol.39 (4), p.424-436</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors. Austral Ecology © 2013 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><rights>2014 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-b72fc953434173c71f85c5e48e6f0cd87202156812ac74a9567089ff77eb11353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faec.12100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faec.12100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Maitre, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Fred J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Greg G</creatorcontrib><title>Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa</title><title>Austral ecology</title><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><description>This paper describes the first step in developing an approach to fire risk assessment aimed at balancing the reduction of risks to lives and livelihoods and maintaining fire regimes which protect ecosystem biodiversity and function in fire‐prone ecosystems. Wildfires pose a major hazard to people's lives, livelihoods and ecosystems in South Africa with poor communities generally being highly exposed and vulnerable. Although general information exists, an adequate understanding of the fire regimes, how they vary spatially, and the related vegetation management requirements is lacking. This study resolves the environmental variation in fire regimes across South Africa into a systematic framework for wildfire risk assessment and ecologically sound ecosystem management. The available descriptions of fire regimes, vegetation classifications, and fire occurrence data from remote sensing are synthesized to derive a set of 13 distinct fire‐ecology types, that is, sets of vegetation units which experience distinct fire regimes. Fuel dynamics, fire‐dependence, ecologically acceptable fire regimes, and guidelines for fire management are described for each of these fire‐ecology types and they are grouped into three categories: fire dependent, fire independent and fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent ecosystems comprise more than 60% of South Africa and fire‐independent ones 32%, the latter mainly in the arid west and northwest, while the remainder are fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent systems require fires and generally coincide with the greatest rural population densities. The outputs from this framework can be used to analyse wildfire risk and translate the risk into practical management measures which are responsive to local ecological, social and institutional settings.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>fire dependent vegetation</subject><subject>fire regime</subject><subject>fire risk</subject><subject>Forest &amp; brush fires</subject><subject>guidelines</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>livelihood</subject><subject>people</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>rural population</subject><subject>science policy interface</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><subject>wildfires</subject><subject>wildland fire management</subject><issn>1442-9985</issn><issn>1442-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU9vEzEQxVcIpJbSQz8Blrhw2dZ_12tuUWhLUQWV0gpuluOMg9tde7F3W3Lmi-MkVQ_MZUaa33ua0auqE4JPSakzA_aUUILxq-qQcE5rpRR7_TK34qB6m_M9xrhtFDms_l6FEZIz1oc1Ahu7uN4gE1ZoiJ23m0_oMzxCF4ft2oRnwlvTIZdMD08xPexwePQrCBbQ0mRAY0R5GoaYRvTku5XzCVBvgllDD2FEPqBFnMZfaOZS8XpXvXGmy3D83I-qu4vz2_mX-vr75dV8dl1bJlpcLyV1VgnGGSeSWUlcK6wA3kLjsF21kmJKRNMSaqzkRolG4lY5JyUsCWGCHVUf975Dir8nyKPufbbQdSZAnLImxbtllMot-uE_9D5OKZTrCkWFwo2QvFBne6o8CRs9JN-btNEE620WumShd1no2fl8NxRFvVf4PMKfF4VJD7qRTAr949ul_ikWF-q2-apvCv9-zzsTtVknn_XdgmLCMSaYMi7YP37OlkM</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Le Maitre, David C</creator><creator>Kruger, Fred J</creator><creator>Forsyth, Greg G</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa</title><author>Le Maitre, David C ; Kruger, Fred J ; Forsyth, Greg G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-b72fc953434173c71f85c5e48e6f0cd87202156812ac74a9567089ff77eb11353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>fire dependent vegetation</topic><topic>fire regime</topic><topic>fire risk</topic><topic>Forest &amp; brush fires</topic><topic>guidelines</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>livelihood</topic><topic>people</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>rural population</topic><topic>science policy interface</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><topic>wildfires</topic><topic>wildland fire management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Maitre, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Fred J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Greg G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Maitre, David C</au><au>Kruger, Fred J</au><au>Forsyth, Greg G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Austral Ecology</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>424-436</pages><issn>1442-9985</issn><eissn>1442-9993</eissn><abstract>This paper describes the first step in developing an approach to fire risk assessment aimed at balancing the reduction of risks to lives and livelihoods and maintaining fire regimes which protect ecosystem biodiversity and function in fire‐prone ecosystems. Wildfires pose a major hazard to people's lives, livelihoods and ecosystems in South Africa with poor communities generally being highly exposed and vulnerable. Although general information exists, an adequate understanding of the fire regimes, how they vary spatially, and the related vegetation management requirements is lacking. This study resolves the environmental variation in fire regimes across South Africa into a systematic framework for wildfire risk assessment and ecologically sound ecosystem management. The available descriptions of fire regimes, vegetation classifications, and fire occurrence data from remote sensing are synthesized to derive a set of 13 distinct fire‐ecology types, that is, sets of vegetation units which experience distinct fire regimes. Fuel dynamics, fire‐dependence, ecologically acceptable fire regimes, and guidelines for fire management are described for each of these fire‐ecology types and they are grouped into three categories: fire dependent, fire independent and fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent ecosystems comprise more than 60% of South Africa and fire‐independent ones 32%, the latter mainly in the arid west and northwest, while the remainder are fire sensitive. Fire‐dependent systems require fires and generally coincide with the greatest rural population densities. The outputs from this framework can be used to analyse wildfire risk and translate the risk into practical management measures which are responsive to local ecological, social and institutional settings.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><doi>10.1111/aec.12100</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-9985
ispartof Austral ecology, 2014-06, Vol.39 (4), p.424-436
issn 1442-9985
1442-9993
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534832275
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects biodiversity
Ecology
ecosystem management
Ecosystems
fire dependent vegetation
fire regime
fire risk
Forest & brush fires
guidelines
issues and policy
livelihood
people
population density
Remote sensing
risk
risk assessment
rural population
science policy interface
Vegetation
wildfire
wildfires
wildland fire management
title Interfacing ecology and policy: Developing an ecological framework and evidence base to support wildfire management in South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interfacing%20ecology%20and%20policy:%20Developing%20an%20ecological%20framework%20and%20evidence%20base%20to%20support%20wildfire%20management%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Austral%20ecology&rft.au=Le%20Maitre,%20David%20C&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=424-436&rft.issn=1442-9985&rft.eissn=1442-9993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aec.12100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1534832275%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525906574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true