Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV

AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied microbiology 2014-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1418-1426
Hauptverfasser: Matos, P.D.M, Sedaca, S, Ferreira, D.C, Iorio, N.L, Toledo, V.C.S, Freitas, A.I.C, Coelho, F.L, Sousa, C, Santos, K.R.N, Pereira, M.O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1426
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1418
container_title Journal of applied microbiology
container_volume 116
creator Matos, P.D.M
Sedaca, S
Ferreira, D.C
Iorio, N.L
Toledo, V.C.S
Freitas, A.I.C
Coelho, F.L
Sousa, C
Santos, K.R.N
Pereira, M.O
description AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and related genes. Biofilm/biomass susceptibility to gentamicin (G), linezolid (L), rifampicin (R) and vancomycin (V) was determined for six isolates from three lineages prevalent in Rio de Janeiro hospitals in concentrations ranging from 0·25 to 64 μg ml⁻¹. Biomass was evaluated by microtitre plate test and number of viable cells (CFU cm⁻²) and inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. All isolates presented the icaA and sasG genes, but only 38% were biofilm producers. There were 50 and 45% biomass reductions when concentrations ≥4 μg ml⁻¹of R or L and ≥16 μg ml⁻¹of G or V, respectively, were used. Synergism tests produced a 55% biomass reduction with R2μgml−1 + G16μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1, and L2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. Number of viable cells was reduced from 2 to 3 logs with R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1 and R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. CONCLUSIONS: Synergisms involving R plus L and R plus V caused important reductions in biofilm/biomass and the number of viable cells. Drug combinations should be considered in the chemotherapies of MRSA‐SCCmec IV infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Biofilms in MRSA infections restrict the clinical choice of antimicrobials. Thus, knowledge of the best options for monotherapy and drug synergisms could improve clinical results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jam.12472
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534825990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1526129071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f3982-408f7ac2c3e94a164d1cccb1ee4619e6fbe7155cc6ee6e690c35d4cd28f9e9843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxyMEoqVw4AXAFyQuaW3HduLjalWgqIjDUq7W7GSSusrHYidFufEIPCNPgru7wJW5zGjmNx-af5a9FPxcJLu4g_5cSFXKR9mpKIzOpSnl432scs1LeZI9i_GOc1FwbZ5mJ1JpqYyyp9n9aph87zGMWw8di8tAofWxZ9CCH-LEat80FGiYWOcHgpYiGxvW03Tr0Xcp9-vHz0DRxwkSs5lgd7t0I46Ic2QwB0oOIYTFDy3brNc9Ibv6-jx70kAX6cXRn2U37y6_rD_k15_fX61X13lT2ErmildNCSixIKtAGFULRNwKImWEJdNsqRRaIxoiQ8ZyLHStsJZVY8lWqjjL3h7m7sL4baY4ud5HpK6DgcY5OqELVUltLf8PVBohLS9FQl8d0XnbU-12wfcQFvfnrQl4cwQgInRNgAF9_MdVSmtrdOIuDtx339Hyty64e9DVJV3dXlf3cfVpH6QOdugICLBzge4fPp-uq6R0hahsmZDXB6SB0UEb0uKbjeRCJ_21LtP9vwGDUKsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1526129071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Matos, P.D.M ; Sedaca, S ; Ferreira, D.C ; Iorio, N.L ; Toledo, V.C.S ; Freitas, A.I.C ; Coelho, F.L ; Sousa, C ; Santos, K.R.N ; Pereira, M.O</creator><creatorcontrib>Matos, P.D.M ; Sedaca, S ; Ferreira, D.C ; Iorio, N.L ; Toledo, V.C.S ; Freitas, A.I.C ; Coelho, F.L ; Sousa, C ; Santos, K.R.N ; Pereira, M.O</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and related genes. Biofilm/biomass susceptibility to gentamicin (G), linezolid (L), rifampicin (R) and vancomycin (V) was determined for six isolates from three lineages prevalent in Rio de Janeiro hospitals in concentrations ranging from 0·25 to 64 μg ml⁻¹. Biomass was evaluated by microtitre plate test and number of viable cells (CFU cm⁻²) and inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. All isolates presented the icaA and sasG genes, but only 38% were biofilm producers. There were 50 and 45% biomass reductions when concentrations ≥4 μg ml⁻¹of R or L and ≥16 μg ml⁻¹of G or V, respectively, were used. Synergism tests produced a 55% biomass reduction with R2μgml−1 + G16μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1, and L2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. Number of viable cells was reduced from 2 to 3 logs with R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1 and R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. CONCLUSIONS: Synergisms involving R plus L and R plus V caused important reductions in biofilm/biomass and the number of viable cells. Drug combinations should be considered in the chemotherapies of MRSA‐SCCmec IV infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Biofilms in MRSA infections restrict the clinical choice of antimicrobials. Thus, knowledge of the best options for monotherapy and drug synergisms could improve clinical results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jam.12472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24524649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Published for the Society for Applied Bacteriology by Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Acetamides - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; anti-infective properties ; antibiotic resistance ; Biofilm ; Biofilms - drug effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; combination drug therapy ; Drug Synergism ; drugs ; fluorescence microscopy ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genes ; gentamicin ; Gentamicins - pharmacology ; hospitals ; Humans ; Linezolid ; mec ; methicillin ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbial Viability ; Microbiology ; MRSA ; Oxazolidinones - pharmacology ; rifampicin ; Rifampin - pharmacology ; SCC ; SCC mec IV ; Science &amp; Technology ; Staphylococcus aureus ; synergism ; vancomycin ; Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied microbiology, 2014-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1418-1426</ispartof><rights>2014 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjam.12472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjam.12472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28455965$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24524649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matos, P.D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedaca, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, N.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, V.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, A.I.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, K.R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, M.O</creatorcontrib><title>Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV</title><title>Journal of applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and related genes. Biofilm/biomass susceptibility to gentamicin (G), linezolid (L), rifampicin (R) and vancomycin (V) was determined for six isolates from three lineages prevalent in Rio de Janeiro hospitals in concentrations ranging from 0·25 to 64 μg ml⁻¹. Biomass was evaluated by microtitre plate test and number of viable cells (CFU cm⁻²) and inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. All isolates presented the icaA and sasG genes, but only 38% were biofilm producers. There were 50 and 45% biomass reductions when concentrations ≥4 μg ml⁻¹of R or L and ≥16 μg ml⁻¹of G or V, respectively, were used. Synergism tests produced a 55% biomass reduction with R2μgml−1 + G16μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1, and L2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. Number of viable cells was reduced from 2 to 3 logs with R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1 and R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. CONCLUSIONS: Synergisms involving R plus L and R plus V caused important reductions in biofilm/biomass and the number of viable cells. Drug combinations should be considered in the chemotherapies of MRSA‐SCCmec IV infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Biofilms in MRSA infections restrict the clinical choice of antimicrobials. Thus, knowledge of the best options for monotherapy and drug synergisms could improve clinical results.</description><subject>Acetamides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>anti-infective properties</subject><subject>antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>combination drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Synergism</subject><subject>drugs</subject><subject>fluorescence microscopy</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>gentamicin</subject><subject>Gentamicins - pharmacology</subject><subject>hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linezolid</subject><subject>mec</subject><subject>methicillin</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbial Viability</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>MRSA</subject><subject>Oxazolidinones - pharmacology</subject><subject>rifampicin</subject><subject>Rifampin - pharmacology</subject><subject>SCC</subject><subject>SCC mec IV</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>synergism</subject><subject>vancomycin</subject><subject>Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><issn>1364-5072</issn><issn>1365-2672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxyMEoqVw4AXAFyQuaW3HduLjalWgqIjDUq7W7GSSusrHYidFufEIPCNPgru7wJW5zGjmNx-af5a9FPxcJLu4g_5cSFXKR9mpKIzOpSnl432scs1LeZI9i_GOc1FwbZ5mJ1JpqYyyp9n9aph87zGMWw8di8tAofWxZ9CCH-LEat80FGiYWOcHgpYiGxvW03Tr0Xcp9-vHz0DRxwkSs5lgd7t0I46Ic2QwB0oOIYTFDy3brNc9Ibv6-jx70kAX6cXRn2U37y6_rD_k15_fX61X13lT2ErmildNCSixIKtAGFULRNwKImWEJdNsqRRaIxoiQ8ZyLHStsJZVY8lWqjjL3h7m7sL4baY4ud5HpK6DgcY5OqELVUltLf8PVBohLS9FQl8d0XnbU-12wfcQFvfnrQl4cwQgInRNgAF9_MdVSmtrdOIuDtx339Hyty64e9DVJV3dXlf3cfVpH6QOdugICLBzge4fPp-uq6R0hahsmZDXB6SB0UEb0uKbjeRCJ_21LtP9vwGDUKsQ</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Matos, P.D.M</creator><creator>Sedaca, S</creator><creator>Ferreira, D.C</creator><creator>Iorio, N.L</creator><creator>Toledo, V.C.S</creator><creator>Freitas, A.I.C</creator><creator>Coelho, F.L</creator><creator>Sousa, C</creator><creator>Santos, K.R.N</creator><creator>Pereira, M.O</creator><general>Published for the Society for Applied Bacteriology by Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV</title><author>Matos, P.D.M ; Sedaca, S ; Ferreira, D.C ; Iorio, N.L ; Toledo, V.C.S ; Freitas, A.I.C ; Coelho, F.L ; Sousa, C ; Santos, K.R.N ; Pereira, M.O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f3982-408f7ac2c3e94a164d1cccb1ee4619e6fbe7155cc6ee6e690c35d4cd28f9e9843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acetamides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>anti-infective properties</topic><topic>antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>combination drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Synergism</topic><topic>drugs</topic><topic>fluorescence microscopy</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>gentamicin</topic><topic>Gentamicins - pharmacology</topic><topic>hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linezolid</topic><topic>mec</topic><topic>methicillin</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbial Viability</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>MRSA</topic><topic>Oxazolidinones - pharmacology</topic><topic>rifampicin</topic><topic>Rifampin - pharmacology</topic><topic>SCC</topic><topic>SCC mec IV</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>synergism</topic><topic>vancomycin</topic><topic>Vancomycin - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matos, P.D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedaca, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, N.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, V.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, A.I.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, F.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, K.R.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, M.O</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matos, P.D.M</au><au>Sedaca, S</au><au>Ferreira, D.C</au><au>Iorio, N.L</au><au>Toledo, V.C.S</au><au>Freitas, A.I.C</au><au>Coelho, F.L</au><au>Sousa, C</au><au>Santos, K.R.N</au><au>Pereira, M.O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1418</spage><epage>1426</epage><pages>1418-1426</pages><issn>1364-5072</issn><eissn>1365-2672</eissn><abstract>AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and related genes. Biofilm/biomass susceptibility to gentamicin (G), linezolid (L), rifampicin (R) and vancomycin (V) was determined for six isolates from three lineages prevalent in Rio de Janeiro hospitals in concentrations ranging from 0·25 to 64 μg ml⁻¹. Biomass was evaluated by microtitre plate test and number of viable cells (CFU cm⁻²) and inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. All isolates presented the icaA and sasG genes, but only 38% were biofilm producers. There were 50 and 45% biomass reductions when concentrations ≥4 μg ml⁻¹of R or L and ≥16 μg ml⁻¹of G or V, respectively, were used. Synergism tests produced a 55% biomass reduction with R2μgml−1 + G16μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1, R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1, and L2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. Number of viable cells was reduced from 2 to 3 logs with R2μgml−1 + L2μgml−1 and R2μgml−1 + V4μgml−1. CONCLUSIONS: Synergisms involving R plus L and R plus V caused important reductions in biofilm/biomass and the number of viable cells. Drug combinations should be considered in the chemotherapies of MRSA‐SCCmec IV infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Biofilms in MRSA infections restrict the clinical choice of antimicrobials. Thus, knowledge of the best options for monotherapy and drug synergisms could improve clinical results.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Published for the Society for Applied Bacteriology by Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>24524649</pmid><doi>10.1111/jam.12472</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-5072
ispartof Journal of applied microbiology, 2014-06, Vol.116 (6), p.1418-1426
issn 1364-5072
1365-2672
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534825990
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acetamides - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
anti-infective properties
antibiotic resistance
Biofilm
Biofilms - drug effects
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
combination drug therapy
Drug Synergism
drugs
fluorescence microscopy
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genes
gentamicin
Gentamicins - pharmacology
hospitals
Humans
Linezolid
mec
methicillin
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - genetics
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microbial Viability
Microbiology
MRSA
Oxazolidinones - pharmacology
rifampicin
Rifampin - pharmacology
SCC
SCC mec IV
Science & Technology
Staphylococcus aureus
synergism
vancomycin
Vancomycin - pharmacology
title Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antimicrobial%20synergism%20against%20different%20lineages%20of%20methicillin%E2%80%90resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20carrying%20SCCmec%20IV&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Matos,%20P.D.M&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1418&rft.epage=1426&rft.pages=1418-1426&rft.issn=1364-5072&rft.eissn=1365-2672&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jam.12472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1526129071%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1526129071&rft_id=info:pmid/24524649&rfr_iscdi=true