Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation
A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 585 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 577 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Mössner, M. Heinrich, D. Schindelwig, K. Kaps, P. Schretter, H. Nachbauer, W. |
description | A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/sms.12035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534819067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3304521921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2zKIq0v8W2JRnQA9SK1INhZjuNQTzN2sBPKvD1OZ9oFEhLe-Fy-80vn_AC8xugYl3eSN_kYE0TZE7DAHKEKSSqfggVSiFUCS3kAXuS8RggLVbPn4IBQIpUSeAHW57F1vQ8_4HjjYL71VQ7xDtoYRmNH6MNcu29PKWQ45Tk28GY7xKE3efQW_srQBOj2WReTddXgghuTGX0MMJXWHLwEzzrTZ_dq_x-Cr6cfviw_VmeXq0_L92eVrZliFaGWIE44bzC3RFqrWqWINV0njHCtsRQrSmslGtvyhjEpeE2k7AzpTNs1LT0ERzvdIcWfk8uj3vhsXd-b4OKUNWa0llghLv4DJUxwrmpc0Ld_oetYTlIWmalaEE4EKtS7HWVTzDm5Tg_Jb0zaaoz07JUuXul7rwr7Zq84NRvXPpIP5hTgZAfc-d5t_62kr8-vHySr3YTPo_v9OGHSrS7bCqa_Xaz0laT8Yrn6rL_TP4iwrW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524726270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><description>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.12035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23289971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation ; Elasticity ; forward dynamic simulation ; Friction ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; Shear Strength ; Simulation ; ski-snow contact ; Skiing ; skiing turns ; Snow ; Sports Equipment</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.12035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.12035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindelwig, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaps, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schretter, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</description><subject>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>forward dynamic simulation</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>ski-snow contact</subject><subject>Skiing</subject><subject>skiing turns</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Sports Equipment</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2zKIq0v8W2JRnQA9SK1INhZjuNQTzN2sBPKvD1OZ9oFEhLe-Fy-80vn_AC8xugYl3eSN_kYE0TZE7DAHKEKSSqfggVSiFUCS3kAXuS8RggLVbPn4IBQIpUSeAHW57F1vQ8_4HjjYL71VQ7xDtoYRmNH6MNcu29PKWQ45Tk28GY7xKE3efQW_srQBOj2WReTddXgghuTGX0MMJXWHLwEzzrTZ_dq_x-Cr6cfviw_VmeXq0_L92eVrZliFaGWIE44bzC3RFqrWqWINV0njHCtsRQrSmslGtvyhjEpeE2k7AzpTNs1LT0ERzvdIcWfk8uj3vhsXd-b4OKUNWa0llghLv4DJUxwrmpc0Ld_oetYTlIWmalaEE4EKtS7HWVTzDm5Tg_Jb0zaaoz07JUuXul7rwr7Zq84NRvXPpIP5hTgZAfc-d5t_62kr8-vHySr3YTPo_v9OGHSrS7bCqa_Xaz0laT8Yrn6rL_TP4iwrW0</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Mössner, M.</creator><creator>Heinrich, D.</creator><creator>Schindelwig, K.</creator><creator>Kaps, P.</creator><creator>Schretter, H.</creator><creator>Nachbauer, W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><author>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>forward dynamic simulation</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>ski-snow contact</topic><topic>Skiing</topic><topic>skiing turns</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Sports Equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindelwig, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaps, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schretter, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mössner, M.</au><au>Heinrich, D.</au><au>Schindelwig, K.</au><au>Kaps, P.</au><au>Schretter, H.</au><au>Nachbauer, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>577-585</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23289971</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.12035</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7188 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585 |
issn | 0905-7188 1600-0838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534819067 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation Elasticity forward dynamic simulation Friction Models, Theoretical Motion Shear Strength Simulation ski-snow contact Skiing skiing turns Snow Sports Equipment |
title | Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20the%20ski-snow%20contact%20in%20skiing%20turns%20using%20a%20hypoplastic%20vs%20an%20elastic%20force-penetration%20relation&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=M%C3%B6ssner,%20M.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=577-585&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.12035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3304521921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524726270&rft_id=info:pmid/23289971&rfr_iscdi=true |