Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation

A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585
Hauptverfasser: Mössner, M., Heinrich, D., Schindelwig, K., Kaps, P., Schretter, H., Nachbauer, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 585
container_issue 3
container_start_page 577
container_title Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
container_volume 24
creator Mössner, M.
Heinrich, D.
Schindelwig, K.
Kaps, P.
Schretter, H.
Nachbauer, W.
description A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sms.12035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534819067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3304521921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2zKIq0v8W2JRnQA9SK1INhZjuNQTzN2sBPKvD1OZ9oFEhLe-Fy-80vn_AC8xugYl3eSN_kYE0TZE7DAHKEKSSqfggVSiFUCS3kAXuS8RggLVbPn4IBQIpUSeAHW57F1vQ8_4HjjYL71VQ7xDtoYRmNH6MNcu29PKWQ45Tk28GY7xKE3efQW_srQBOj2WReTddXgghuTGX0MMJXWHLwEzzrTZ_dq_x-Cr6cfviw_VmeXq0_L92eVrZliFaGWIE44bzC3RFqrWqWINV0njHCtsRQrSmslGtvyhjEpeE2k7AzpTNs1LT0ERzvdIcWfk8uj3vhsXd-b4OKUNWa0llghLv4DJUxwrmpc0Ld_oetYTlIWmalaEE4EKtS7HWVTzDm5Tg_Jb0zaaoz07JUuXul7rwr7Zq84NRvXPpIP5hTgZAfc-d5t_62kr8-vHySr3YTPo_v9OGHSrS7bCqa_Xaz0laT8Yrn6rL_TP4iwrW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524726270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><description>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.12035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23289971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation ; Elasticity ; forward dynamic simulation ; Friction ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; Shear Strength ; Simulation ; ski-snow contact ; Skiing ; skiing turns ; Snow ; Sports Equipment</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports, 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.12035$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.12035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindelwig, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaps, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schretter, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</description><subject>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>forward dynamic simulation</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>ski-snow contact</subject><subject>Skiing</subject><subject>skiing turns</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Sports Equipment</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2zKIq0v8W2JRnQA9SK1INhZjuNQTzN2sBPKvD1OZ9oFEhLe-Fy-80vn_AC8xugYl3eSN_kYE0TZE7DAHKEKSSqfggVSiFUCS3kAXuS8RggLVbPn4IBQIpUSeAHW57F1vQ8_4HjjYL71VQ7xDtoYRmNH6MNcu29PKWQ45Tk28GY7xKE3efQW_srQBOj2WReTddXgghuTGX0MMJXWHLwEzzrTZ_dq_x-Cr6cfviw_VmeXq0_L92eVrZliFaGWIE44bzC3RFqrWqWINV0njHCtsRQrSmslGtvyhjEpeE2k7AzpTNs1LT0ERzvdIcWfk8uj3vhsXd-b4OKUNWa0llghLv4DJUxwrmpc0Ld_oetYTlIWmalaEE4EKtS7HWVTzDm5Tg_Jb0zaaoz07JUuXul7rwr7Zq84NRvXPpIP5hTgZAfc-d5t_62kr8-vHySr3YTPo_v9OGHSrS7bCqa_Xaz0laT8Yrn6rL_TP4iwrW0</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Mössner, M.</creator><creator>Heinrich, D.</creator><creator>Schindelwig, K.</creator><creator>Kaps, P.</creator><creator>Schretter, H.</creator><creator>Nachbauer, W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</title><author>Mössner, M. ; Heinrich, D. ; Schindelwig, K. ; Kaps, P. ; Schretter, H. ; Nachbauer, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-23c206266b16c28cc9d992caff7a7edac31933497bcd6b558764288fa2fadfbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>forward dynamic simulation</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>ski-snow contact</topic><topic>Skiing</topic><topic>skiing turns</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Sports Equipment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mössner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindelwig, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaps, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schretter, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nachbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mössner, M.</au><au>Heinrich, D.</au><au>Schindelwig, K.</au><au>Kaps, P.</au><au>Schretter, H.</au><au>Nachbauer, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>577-585</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>A ski–snow interaction model is presented. The force between ski and snow is decomposed into a penetration force normal to the snow surface, a shear force parallel to it, and friction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of a hypoplastic vs an elastic contact for penetration in the simulation of skiing turns. To reduce the number of influencing factors, a sledge equipped with skis was considered. A forward dynamic simulation model for the sledge was implemented. For the evaluation of both contact models, the deviation between simulated trajectories and experimental track data was computed for turns of 67 and 42 m. Maximum deviations for these turns were 0.44 and 0.14 m for the hypoplastic contact, and 0.6 and 7.5 m for the elastic contact, respectively. In the hypoplastic contact, the penetration depth of the ski's afterbody maintained nearly the same value as the part under maximum load, whereas it decreased in the elastic contact. Because the shear force is proportional to the penetration depth, the hypoplastic contact resulted in a higher shearing resistance. By replacing the sledge with a skier model, one may investigate more complex skier actions, skiing performance, or accident‐prone skiing maneuvers.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23289971</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.12035</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7188
ispartof Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2014-06, Vol.24 (3), p.577-585
issn 0905-7188
1600-0838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534819067
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects elastic vs hypoplastic force-penetration relation
Elasticity
forward dynamic simulation
Friction
Models, Theoretical
Motion
Shear Strength
Simulation
ski-snow contact
Skiing
skiing turns
Snow
Sports Equipment
title Modeling the ski-snow contact in skiing turns using a hypoplastic vs an elastic force-penetration relation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20the%20ski-snow%20contact%20in%20skiing%20turns%20using%20a%20hypoplastic%20vs%20an%20elastic%20force-penetration%20relation&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=M%C3%B6ssner,%20M.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=577-585&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.12035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3304521921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524726270&rft_id=info:pmid/23289971&rfr_iscdi=true