Comparison of biogas production from wild and cultivated varieties of reed canary grass

•Effect of habitat of reed canary grass on biogas yield was investigated.•Wild variety had greater indigestible lignocellulose content than cultivated one.•High indigestible fraction of crude fiber reduce biogas quantity and quality.•Frequent mowing and fertilization helps to keep lignification at a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2014-03, Vol.156, p.303-306
Hauptverfasser: Oleszek, Marta, Król, Aleksandra, Tys, Jerzy, Matyka, Mariusz, Kulik, Mariusz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Effect of habitat of reed canary grass on biogas yield was investigated.•Wild variety had greater indigestible lignocellulose content than cultivated one.•High indigestible fraction of crude fiber reduce biogas quantity and quality.•Frequent mowing and fertilization helps to keep lignification at a low level. The chemical composition and efficiency of biogas production in the methane fermentation process of silages of wild and cultivated varieties of reed canary grass were compared. An attempt was made to answer the question on how the habitat and the way of utilization of plants affect chemical composition and biogas yield. Physicochemical properties such as dry matter, organic dry matter, protein, fat, crude fiber fraction, macro- and microelements content were considered. The anaerobic digestion process and FTIR analysis were also carried out. The results showed that the two varieties differ essentially in their physical and chemical properties. The cultivated variety was characterized by higher biogas yield (406Ndm3kg−1 VS) than the wild one (120Ndm3kg−1 VS). This was probably related to the chemical composition of plants, especially the high content of indigestible crude fiber fractions and ash. These components could reduce biogas quantity and quality.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.055