Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?

The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Great Lakes research 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223
Hauptverfasser: Seilheimer, Titus S., Zimmerman, Patrick L., Stueve, Kirk M., Perry, Charles H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
container_title Journal of Great Lakes research
container_volume 39
creator Seilheimer, Titus S.
Zimmerman, Patrick L.
Stueve, Kirk M.
Perry, Charles H.
description The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality. •Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534807097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0380133013000452</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534807097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhXNQcF39A55y9NKaNO02FUFkUVeoeFDPIU2mu6ndppu0Lnvzp5ulnoVhHgzzPWYeQleUxJTQxU0TN-vWxQmhLCahaHKCZoRxElHGyBk6974hhKVFns3QTyk77ZXsIQq9Bby1GlrTrbGt8V4O4PBulK0ZDth0uJRfgN_HHpyxDgdymrwatTFr2U2A34D2t3hl93j0UI8tlg5wbR34IaqkBx2stFFysM7fX6DTWrYeLv90jj6fHj-Wq6h8e35ZPpSRYowFLi2KioAq0iJVleQ1Z1pmGlRa1cBzzhRPYJFwSougSuX1Qlc8S2ku8yzPGJuj68m3d3Y3hlPE1ngFbSs7sKMXNGMpJzkp8rCaTKvKWe8d1KJ3ZivdQVAijhGLRhwjFseIBQlFkwDdTRCEJ74NOOGVgU6BNg7UILQ1_-G_0d6I-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534807097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality. •Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0380-1330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Forest disturbance ; Freshwater ; Great Lakes ; Landscape ; Mixed effects model ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of Great Lakes research, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueve, Kirk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><title>Journal of Great Lakes research</title><description>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality. •Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</description><subject>Forest disturbance</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Great Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mixed effects model</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0380-1330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhXNQcF39A55y9NKaNO02FUFkUVeoeFDPIU2mu6ndppu0Lnvzp5ulnoVhHgzzPWYeQleUxJTQxU0TN-vWxQmhLCahaHKCZoRxElHGyBk6974hhKVFns3QTyk77ZXsIQq9Bby1GlrTrbGt8V4O4PBulK0ZDth0uJRfgN_HHpyxDgdymrwatTFr2U2A34D2t3hl93j0UI8tlg5wbR34IaqkBx2stFFysM7fX6DTWrYeLv90jj6fHj-Wq6h8e35ZPpSRYowFLi2KioAq0iJVleQ1Z1pmGlRa1cBzzhRPYJFwSougSuX1Qlc8S2ku8yzPGJuj68m3d3Y3hlPE1ngFbSs7sKMXNGMpJzkp8rCaTKvKWe8d1KJ3ZivdQVAijhGLRhwjFseIBQlFkwDdTRCEJ74NOOGVgU6BNg7UILQ1_-G_0d6I-A</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creator><creator>Stueve, Kirk M.</creator><creator>Perry, Charles H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><author>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Forest disturbance</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Great Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mixed effects model</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueve, Kirk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seilheimer, Titus S.</au><au>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</au><au>Stueve, Kirk M.</au><au>Perry, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>211-223</pages><issn>0380-1330</issn><abstract>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality. •Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0380-1330
ispartof Journal of Great Lakes research, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223
issn 0380-1330
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534807097
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Forest disturbance
Freshwater
Great Lakes
Landscape
Mixed effects model
Water quality
title Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape-scale%20modeling%20of%20water%20quality%20in%20Lake%20Superior%20and%20Lake%20Michigan%20watersheds:%20How%20useful%20are%20forest-based%20indicators?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Great%20Lakes%20research&rft.au=Seilheimer,%20Titus%20S.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=211-223&rft.issn=0380-1330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534807097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534807097&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0380133013000452&rfr_iscdi=true