Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?
The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Great Lakes research 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 223 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Journal of Great Lakes research |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Seilheimer, Titus S. Zimmerman, Patrick L. Stueve, Kirk M. Perry, Charles H. |
description | The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality.
•Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534807097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0380133013000452</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534807097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhXNQcF39A55y9NKaNO02FUFkUVeoeFDPIU2mu6ndppu0Lnvzp5ulnoVhHgzzPWYeQleUxJTQxU0TN-vWxQmhLCahaHKCZoRxElHGyBk6974hhKVFns3QTyk77ZXsIQq9Bby1GlrTrbGt8V4O4PBulK0ZDth0uJRfgN_HHpyxDgdymrwatTFr2U2A34D2t3hl93j0UI8tlg5wbR34IaqkBx2stFFysM7fX6DTWrYeLv90jj6fHj-Wq6h8e35ZPpSRYowFLi2KioAq0iJVleQ1Z1pmGlRa1cBzzhRPYJFwSougSuX1Qlc8S2ku8yzPGJuj68m3d3Y3hlPE1ngFbSs7sKMXNGMpJzkp8rCaTKvKWe8d1KJ3ZivdQVAijhGLRhwjFseIBQlFkwDdTRCEJ74NOOGVgU6BNg7UILQ1_-G_0d6I-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534807097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality.
•Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0380-1330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Forest disturbance ; Freshwater ; Great Lakes ; Landscape ; Mixed effects model ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of Great Lakes research, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueve, Kirk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><title>Journal of Great Lakes research</title><description>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality.
•Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</description><subject>Forest disturbance</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Great Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mixed effects model</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0380-1330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLxDAQhXNQcF39A55y9NKaNO02FUFkUVeoeFDPIU2mu6ndppu0Lnvzp5ulnoVhHgzzPWYeQleUxJTQxU0TN-vWxQmhLCahaHKCZoRxElHGyBk6974hhKVFns3QTyk77ZXsIQq9Bby1GlrTrbGt8V4O4PBulK0ZDth0uJRfgN_HHpyxDgdymrwatTFr2U2A34D2t3hl93j0UI8tlg5wbR34IaqkBx2stFFysM7fX6DTWrYeLv90jj6fHj-Wq6h8e35ZPpSRYowFLi2KioAq0iJVleQ1Z1pmGlRa1cBzzhRPYJFwSougSuX1Qlc8S2ku8yzPGJuj68m3d3Y3hlPE1ngFbSs7sKMXNGMpJzkp8rCaTKvKWe8d1KJ3ZivdQVAijhGLRhwjFseIBQlFkwDdTRCEJ74NOOGVgU6BNg7UILQ1_-G_0d6I-A</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creator><creator>Stueve, Kirk M.</creator><creator>Perry, Charles H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</title><author>Seilheimer, Titus S. ; Zimmerman, Patrick L. ; Stueve, Kirk M. ; Perry, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-b499b0ec9494cba8f83da5dec4bfe8783c82e6281192e6cc7f6db85417a757533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Forest disturbance</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Great Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mixed effects model</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seilheimer, Titus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stueve, Kirk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seilheimer, Titus S.</au><au>Zimmerman, Patrick L.</au><au>Stueve, Kirk M.</au><au>Perry, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>211-223</pages><issn>0380-1330</issn><abstract>The Great Lakes watersheds have an important influence on the water quality of the nearshore environment, therefore, watershed characteristics can be used to predict what will be observed in the streams. We used novel landscape information describing the forest cover change, along with forest census data and established land cover data to predict total phosphorus and turbidity in Great Lakes streams. In Lake Superior, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and agricultural land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of the increase in the proportion of persisting forest, forest disturbed during 2000–2009, agricultural land, and urban land. In Lake Michigan, we modeled increased phosphorus as a function of ecoregion, decrease in the proportion of forest disturbed during 1984–1999 and watershed storage, and increase in the proportion of urban land, and we modeled increased turbidity as a function of ecoregion, increase in the proportion of forest disturbed during 2000–2009, and decrease in the proportion softwood forest. We used these relationships to identify priority areas for restoration in the Lake Superior basin in the southwestern watersheds, and in west central and southwest watersheds of the Lake Michigan basin. We then used the models to estimate water quality in watersheds without observed instream data to prioritize those areas for management. Prioritizing watersheds will aid effective management of the Great Lakes watershed and result in efficient use of restoration funds, which will lead to improved nearshore water quality.
•Linked landscape to water quality in Lake Superior and Michigan watersheds.•Modeled total phosphorus and turbidity using only landscape predictors.•Models predicted 50–80% of variation in water quality data.•Key predictors: forest persistence and disturbance, urban land, and agriculture.•Provide managers with tool for increased efficiency in watershed management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0380-1330 |
ispartof | Journal of Great Lakes research, 2013-06, Vol.39 (2), p.211-223 |
issn | 0380-1330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534807097 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Forest disturbance Freshwater Great Lakes Landscape Mixed effects model Water quality |
title | Landscape-scale modeling of water quality in Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds: How useful are forest-based indicators? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape-scale%20modeling%20of%20water%20quality%20in%20Lake%20Superior%20and%20Lake%20Michigan%20watersheds:%20How%20useful%20are%20forest-based%20indicators?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Great%20Lakes%20research&rft.au=Seilheimer,%20Titus%20S.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=211-223&rft.issn=0380-1330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jglr.2013.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534807097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534807097&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0380133013000452&rfr_iscdi=true |