Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)

Summary Objective To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for follow-up of knee cartilage repair procedures integrating assessment of the repair site and the whole joint called Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS), and to assess its reliability. Design MRI examina...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2014-06, Vol.22 (6), p.779-799
Hauptverfasser: Roemer, F.W, Guermazi, A, Trattnig, S, Apprich, S, Marlovits, S, Niu, J, Hunter, D.J, Welsch, G.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 799
container_issue 6
container_start_page 779
container_title Osteoarthritis and cartilage
container_volume 22
creator Roemer, F.W
Guermazi, A
Trattnig, S
Apprich, S
Marlovits, S
Niu, J
Hunter, D.J
Welsch, G.H
description Summary Objective To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for follow-up of knee cartilage repair procedures integrating assessment of the repair site and the whole joint called Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS), and to assess its reliability. Design MRI examinations of 20 patients that had undergone matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee 12 months before were semi-quantitatively assessed for the repair site using features of the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) system and for the whole joint based on experiences with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated using weighted ( w ) kappa statistics for plates (medial/lateral tibia, medial/lateral femur, trochlea, patella), compartments (medial tibio-femoral, lateral tibio-femoral, patello-femoral) and the whole joint. For certain features with low prevalence the overall percent agreement was calculated in addition. Results For cartilage, reliability on a plate level ranged between 0.48 (lateral femur) and 1.00 (medial femur). BML assessment showed comparable results ranging on a plate level between 0.46 and 1.00 with overall percent agreement between 83.3% and 100%. Meniscal morphology assessment ranged between 0.62 and 0.94. For repair site assessment reliability ranged from 0.41 (signal intensity inter-observer) to 1.00 (several features). Overall percent agreement was above 80% for 17 of 22 features assessed (intra- and inter-observer results combined). Conclusions Combined scoring of the repair site and whole joint assessment for common osteoarthritis features using CROAKS, which is based on experience with two established semi-quantitative scoring tools, is feasible and may be performed with good to excellent reliability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534474240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1063458414010188</els_id><sourcerecordid>1534474240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8947e8504870ff2c658aae498c51a2e9fb6f7bccbfc03f55c78b298f7120d2e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIPuAHWCAvyyLBduzEQajSaMSjatFIMyCWluO57jjNxIPtoPbvcTSlCxasjq3zkO45CL2hpKSE1u_7svdGl4xQXpKqzPAMnVLBWNHWonqe36SuCi4kP0FnMfaEkIpS8hKdMF5LIZg4Rfc_d34A3Hs3JvxtfYV1jBDjHvLXWxyncOuMHrDRIblB3wIOcNAuzGTaAb4bAT7g5RO7PrKrmMAvQtoFl1zE11mFN8YHwBfL9WpxvXn3Cr2weojw-hHP0Y_Pn74vvxY3qy9Xy8VNYTilqZAtb0AKwmVDrGWmFlJr4K00gmoGre1q23TGdNaQygphGtmxVtqGMrJlIKtzdHHMPQT_a4KY1N5FA8OgR_BTVFRUnDeccZKl7Cg1wccYwKpDcHsdHhQlam5c9WpuXM2NK1KpDNn09jF_6vawfbL8rTgLPh4FkK_87SCoaByMBrYugElq693_8y__sZvBjfMmd_AAsfdTGHN_iqrIFFGbefN5cspJjpSy-gN-8aZ1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534474240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Roemer, F.W ; Guermazi, A ; Trattnig, S ; Apprich, S ; Marlovits, S ; Niu, J ; Hunter, D.J ; Welsch, G.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Roemer, F.W ; Guermazi, A ; Trattnig, S ; Apprich, S ; Marlovits, S ; Niu, J ; Hunter, D.J ; Welsch, G.H</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objective To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for follow-up of knee cartilage repair procedures integrating assessment of the repair site and the whole joint called Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS), and to assess its reliability. Design MRI examinations of 20 patients that had undergone matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee 12 months before were semi-quantitatively assessed for the repair site using features of the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) system and for the whole joint based on experiences with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated using weighted ( w ) kappa statistics for plates (medial/lateral tibia, medial/lateral femur, trochlea, patella), compartments (medial tibio-femoral, lateral tibio-femoral, patello-femoral) and the whole joint. For certain features with low prevalence the overall percent agreement was calculated in addition. Results For cartilage, reliability on a plate level ranged between 0.48 (lateral femur) and 1.00 (medial femur). BML assessment showed comparable results ranging on a plate level between 0.46 and 1.00 with overall percent agreement between 83.3% and 100%. Meniscal morphology assessment ranged between 0.62 and 0.94. For repair site assessment reliability ranged from 0.41 (signal intensity inter-observer) to 1.00 (several features). Overall percent agreement was above 80% for 17 of 22 features assessed (intra- and inter-observer results combined). Conclusions Combined scoring of the repair site and whole joint assessment for common osteoarthritis features using CROAKS, which is based on experience with two established semi-quantitative scoring tools, is feasible and may be performed with good to excellent reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24685525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cartilage repair ; Cartilage, Articular - pathology ; Cartilage, Articular - surgery ; Chondrocytes - transplantation ; Cohort Studies ; CROAKS ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rheumatology ; Risk Assessment ; Scoring ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2014-06, Vol.22 (6), p.779-799</ispartof><rights>Osteoarthritis Research Society International</rights><rights>2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8947e8504870ff2c658aae498c51a2e9fb6f7bccbfc03f55c78b298f7120d2e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8947e8504870ff2c658aae498c51a2e9fb6f7bccbfc03f55c78b298f7120d2e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458414010188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24685525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roemer, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guermazi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trattnig, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apprich, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlovits, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsch, G.H</creatorcontrib><title>Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)</title><title>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</title><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><description>Summary Objective To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for follow-up of knee cartilage repair procedures integrating assessment of the repair site and the whole joint called Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS), and to assess its reliability. Design MRI examinations of 20 patients that had undergone matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee 12 months before were semi-quantitatively assessed for the repair site using features of the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) system and for the whole joint based on experiences with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated using weighted ( w ) kappa statistics for plates (medial/lateral tibia, medial/lateral femur, trochlea, patella), compartments (medial tibio-femoral, lateral tibio-femoral, patello-femoral) and the whole joint. For certain features with low prevalence the overall percent agreement was calculated in addition. Results For cartilage, reliability on a plate level ranged between 0.48 (lateral femur) and 1.00 (medial femur). BML assessment showed comparable results ranging on a plate level between 0.46 and 1.00 with overall percent agreement between 83.3% and 100%. Meniscal morphology assessment ranged between 0.62 and 0.94. For repair site assessment reliability ranged from 0.41 (signal intensity inter-observer) to 1.00 (several features). Overall percent agreement was above 80% for 17 of 22 features assessed (intra- and inter-observer results combined). Conclusions Combined scoring of the repair site and whole joint assessment for common osteoarthritis features using CROAKS, which is based on experience with two established semi-quantitative scoring tools, is feasible and may be performed with good to excellent reliability.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cartilage repair</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Chondrocytes - transplantation</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>CROAKS</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1063-4584</issn><issn>1522-9653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUtRCIPuAHWCAvyyLBduzEQajSaMSjatFIMyCWluO57jjNxIPtoPbvcTSlCxasjq3zkO45CL2hpKSE1u_7svdGl4xQXpKqzPAMnVLBWNHWonqe36SuCi4kP0FnMfaEkIpS8hKdMF5LIZg4Rfc_d34A3Hs3JvxtfYV1jBDjHvLXWxyncOuMHrDRIblB3wIOcNAuzGTaAb4bAT7g5RO7PrKrmMAvQtoFl1zE11mFN8YHwBfL9WpxvXn3Cr2weojw-hHP0Y_Pn74vvxY3qy9Xy8VNYTilqZAtb0AKwmVDrGWmFlJr4K00gmoGre1q23TGdNaQygphGtmxVtqGMrJlIKtzdHHMPQT_a4KY1N5FA8OgR_BTVFRUnDeccZKl7Cg1wccYwKpDcHsdHhQlam5c9WpuXM2NK1KpDNn09jF_6vawfbL8rTgLPh4FkK_87SCoaByMBrYugElq693_8y__sZvBjfMmd_AAsfdTGHN_iqrIFFGbefN5cspJjpSy-gN-8aZ1</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Roemer, F.W</creator><creator>Guermazi, A</creator><creator>Trattnig, S</creator><creator>Apprich, S</creator><creator>Marlovits, S</creator><creator>Niu, J</creator><creator>Hunter, D.J</creator><creator>Welsch, G.H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)</title><author>Roemer, F.W ; Guermazi, A ; Trattnig, S ; Apprich, S ; Marlovits, S ; Niu, J ; Hunter, D.J ; Welsch, G.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-8947e8504870ff2c658aae498c51a2e9fb6f7bccbfc03f55c78b298f7120d2e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cartilage repair</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - pathology</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Chondrocytes - transplantation</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>CROAKS</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roemer, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guermazi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trattnig, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apprich, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marlovits, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsch, G.H</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roemer, F.W</au><au>Guermazi, A</au><au>Trattnig, S</au><au>Apprich, S</au><au>Marlovits, S</au><au>Niu, J</au><au>Hunter, D.J</au><au>Welsch, G.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)</atitle><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>779</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>779-799</pages><issn>1063-4584</issn><eissn>1522-9653</eissn><abstract>Summary Objective To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system for follow-up of knee cartilage repair procedures integrating assessment of the repair site and the whole joint called Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS), and to assess its reliability. Design MRI examinations of 20 patients that had undergone matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee 12 months before were semi-quantitatively assessed for the repair site using features of the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) system and for the whole joint based on experiences with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated using weighted ( w ) kappa statistics for plates (medial/lateral tibia, medial/lateral femur, trochlea, patella), compartments (medial tibio-femoral, lateral tibio-femoral, patello-femoral) and the whole joint. For certain features with low prevalence the overall percent agreement was calculated in addition. Results For cartilage, reliability on a plate level ranged between 0.48 (lateral femur) and 1.00 (medial femur). BML assessment showed comparable results ranging on a plate level between 0.46 and 1.00 with overall percent agreement between 83.3% and 100%. Meniscal morphology assessment ranged between 0.62 and 0.94. For repair site assessment reliability ranged from 0.41 (signal intensity inter-observer) to 1.00 (several features). Overall percent agreement was above 80% for 17 of 22 features assessed (intra- and inter-observer results combined). Conclusions Combined scoring of the repair site and whole joint assessment for common osteoarthritis features using CROAKS, which is based on experience with two established semi-quantitative scoring tools, is feasible and may be performed with good to excellent reliability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24685525</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.014</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-4584
ispartof Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2014-06, Vol.22 (6), p.779-799
issn 1063-4584
1522-9653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534474240
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Cartilage repair
Cartilage, Articular - pathology
Cartilage, Articular - surgery
Chondrocytes - transplantation
Cohort Studies
CROAKS
Databases, Factual
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis
Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Pain Measurement
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Rheumatology
Risk Assessment
Scoring
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Whole joint MRI assessment of surgical cartilage repair of the knee: Cartilage Repair OsteoArthritis Knee Score (CROAKS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A14%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole%20joint%20MRI%20assessment%20of%20surgical%20cartilage%20repair%20of%20the%20knee:%20Cartilage%20Repair%20OsteoArthritis%20Knee%20Score%20(CROAKS)&rft.jtitle=Osteoarthritis%20and%20cartilage&rft.au=Roemer,%20F.W&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=779&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=779-799&rft.issn=1063-4584&rft.eissn=1522-9653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534474240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534474240&rft_id=info:pmid/24685525&rft_els_id=S1063458414010188&rfr_iscdi=true