Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes
The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tree physiology 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 533 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 524 |
container_title | Tree physiology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Quambusch, Mona Pirttilä, Anna Maria Tejesvi, Mysore V Winkelmann, Traud Bartsch, Melanie |
description | The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/treephys/tpu027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534466006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1534466006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EoqVw5oZ85BJqO5vDDVVlkSrBASRukZdxMUqT4AXIvyelhdMc5s2n-R5C55RcUVKl8-AA-rfBz0MfCSsP0JSWOU-yrKgO0ZRwViUp5a8TdOL9OyE057w6RhOWccpIRqboe9nqbkwIVmEpVABnBbYt7hvRBhys9xGwik2IDq6xtsaAg1aBxxLCF0CLQfghwaLVv1u7ZZPQJb3rerEWAfCTi230WHzauMFraLsw9OBP0ZERjYez_Zyhl9vl8-I-WT3ePSxuVonKyiwkXJmcMVlVeUFULk2mKbBSs0JnhSw1lTnTTEua5qYcW2nDU84MANCUSMVMOkOXu9zxoY8IPtQb6xU0Yz_ooq9pno62CkKKEZ3vUOU67x2Yund2I9xQU1Jvddd_uuud7vHiYh8e5Qb0P__nN_0BrFiCBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534466006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0829-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24812040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacterial Physiological Phenomena ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Endophytes - classification ; Endophytes - genetics ; Endophytes - isolation & purification ; Endophytes - physiology ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Phylogeny ; Prunus - genetics ; Prunus - growth & development ; Prunus - microbiology ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Tree physiology, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><title>Tree physiology</title><addtitle>Tree Physiol</addtitle><description>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</description><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Endophytes - classification</subject><subject>Endophytes - genetics</subject><subject>Endophytes - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Endophytes - physiology</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Prunus - genetics</subject><subject>Prunus - growth & development</subject><subject>Prunus - microbiology</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0829-318X</issn><issn>1758-4469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EoqVw5oZ85BJqO5vDDVVlkSrBASRukZdxMUqT4AXIvyelhdMc5s2n-R5C55RcUVKl8-AA-rfBz0MfCSsP0JSWOU-yrKgO0ZRwViUp5a8TdOL9OyE057w6RhOWccpIRqboe9nqbkwIVmEpVABnBbYt7hvRBhys9xGwik2IDq6xtsaAg1aBxxLCF0CLQfghwaLVv1u7ZZPQJb3rerEWAfCTi230WHzauMFraLsw9OBP0ZERjYez_Zyhl9vl8-I-WT3ePSxuVonKyiwkXJmcMVlVeUFULk2mKbBSs0JnhSw1lTnTTEua5qYcW2nDU84MANCUSMVMOkOXu9zxoY8IPtQb6xU0Yz_ooq9pno62CkKKEZ3vUOU67x2Yund2I9xQU1Jvddd_uuud7vHiYh8e5Qb0P__nN_0BrFiCBQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Quambusch, Mona</creator><creator>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creator><creator>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creator><creator>Winkelmann, Traud</creator><creator>Bartsch, Melanie</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><author>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Endophytes - classification</topic><topic>Endophytes - genetics</topic><topic>Endophytes - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Endophytes - physiology</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Prunus - genetics</topic><topic>Prunus - growth & development</topic><topic>Prunus - microbiology</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quambusch, Mona</au><au>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</au><au>Tejesvi, Mysore V</au><au>Winkelmann, Traud</au><au>Bartsch, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Tree Physiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>524-533</pages><issn>0829-318X</issn><eissn>1758-4469</eissn><abstract>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>24812040</pmid><doi>10.1093/treephys/tpu027</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0829-318X |
ispartof | Tree physiology, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533 |
issn | 0829-318X 1758-4469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534466006 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bacteria - classification Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacterial Physiological Phenomena DNA, Bacterial - genetics Endophytes - classification Endophytes - genetics Endophytes - isolation & purification Endophytes - physiology Molecular Sequence Data Phylogeny Prunus - genetics Prunus - growth & development Prunus - microbiology RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Sequence Analysis, DNA |
title | Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endophytic%20bacteria%20in%20plant%20tissue%20culture:%20differences%20between%20easy-%20and%20difficult-to-propagate%20Prunus%20avium%20genotypes&rft.jtitle=Tree%20physiology&rft.au=Quambusch,%20Mona&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=524-533&rft.issn=0829-318X&rft.eissn=1758-4469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/treephys/tpu027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534466006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534466006&rft_id=info:pmid/24812040&rfr_iscdi=true |