Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes

The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tree physiology 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533
Hauptverfasser: Quambusch, Mona, Pirttilä, Anna Maria, Tejesvi, Mysore V, Winkelmann, Traud, Bartsch, Melanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 533
container_issue 5
container_start_page 524
container_title Tree physiology
container_volume 34
creator Quambusch, Mona
Pirttilä, Anna Maria
Tejesvi, Mysore V
Winkelmann, Traud
Bartsch, Melanie
description The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/treephys/tpu027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534466006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1534466006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EoqVw5oZ85BJqO5vDDVVlkSrBASRukZdxMUqT4AXIvyelhdMc5s2n-R5C55RcUVKl8-AA-rfBz0MfCSsP0JSWOU-yrKgO0ZRwViUp5a8TdOL9OyE057w6RhOWccpIRqboe9nqbkwIVmEpVABnBbYt7hvRBhys9xGwik2IDq6xtsaAg1aBxxLCF0CLQfghwaLVv1u7ZZPQJb3rerEWAfCTi230WHzauMFraLsw9OBP0ZERjYez_Zyhl9vl8-I-WT3ePSxuVonKyiwkXJmcMVlVeUFULk2mKbBSs0JnhSw1lTnTTEua5qYcW2nDU84MANCUSMVMOkOXu9zxoY8IPtQb6xU0Yz_ooq9pno62CkKKEZ3vUOU67x2Yund2I9xQU1Jvddd_uuud7vHiYh8e5Qb0P__nN_0BrFiCBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534466006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><description>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0829-318X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24812040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacterial Physiological Phenomena ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Endophytes - classification ; Endophytes - genetics ; Endophytes - isolation &amp; purification ; Endophytes - physiology ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Phylogeny ; Prunus - genetics ; Prunus - growth &amp; development ; Prunus - microbiology ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Tree physiology, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24812040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><title>Tree physiology</title><addtitle>Tree Physiol</addtitle><description>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</description><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Endophytes - classification</subject><subject>Endophytes - genetics</subject><subject>Endophytes - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Endophytes - physiology</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Prunus - genetics</subject><subject>Prunus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Prunus - microbiology</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>0829-318X</issn><issn>1758-4469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kElPwzAQRi0EoqVw5oZ85BJqO5vDDVVlkSrBASRukZdxMUqT4AXIvyelhdMc5s2n-R5C55RcUVKl8-AA-rfBz0MfCSsP0JSWOU-yrKgO0ZRwViUp5a8TdOL9OyE057w6RhOWccpIRqboe9nqbkwIVmEpVABnBbYt7hvRBhys9xGwik2IDq6xtsaAg1aBxxLCF0CLQfghwaLVv1u7ZZPQJb3rerEWAfCTi230WHzauMFraLsw9OBP0ZERjYez_Zyhl9vl8-I-WT3ePSxuVonKyiwkXJmcMVlVeUFULk2mKbBSs0JnhSw1lTnTTEua5qYcW2nDU84MANCUSMVMOkOXu9zxoY8IPtQb6xU0Yz_ooq9pno62CkKKEZ3vUOU67x2Yund2I9xQU1Jvddd_uuud7vHiYh8e5Qb0P__nN_0BrFiCBQ</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Quambusch, Mona</creator><creator>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creator><creator>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creator><creator>Winkelmann, Traud</creator><creator>Bartsch, Melanie</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</title><author>Quambusch, Mona ; Pirttilä, Anna Maria ; Tejesvi, Mysore V ; Winkelmann, Traud ; Bartsch, Melanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8cf522b99560c5bf4d1e27d26d46b7d1b52d2db135f7248df8382feee130bc2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Endophytes - classification</topic><topic>Endophytes - genetics</topic><topic>Endophytes - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Endophytes - physiology</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Prunus - genetics</topic><topic>Prunus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Prunus - microbiology</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quambusch, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejesvi, Mysore V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Traud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Melanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quambusch, Mona</au><au>Pirttilä, Anna Maria</au><au>Tejesvi, Mysore V</au><au>Winkelmann, Traud</au><au>Bartsch, Melanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes</atitle><jtitle>Tree physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Tree Physiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>524-533</pages><issn>0829-318X</issn><eissn>1758-4469</eissn><abstract>The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>24812040</pmid><doi>10.1093/treephys/tpu027</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0829-318X
ispartof Tree physiology, 2014-05, Vol.34 (5), p.524-533
issn 0829-318X
1758-4469
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534466006
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacterial Physiological Phenomena
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
Endophytes - classification
Endophytes - genetics
Endophytes - isolation & purification
Endophytes - physiology
Molecular Sequence Data
Phylogeny
Prunus - genetics
Prunus - growth & development
Prunus - microbiology
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
title Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endophytic%20bacteria%20in%20plant%20tissue%20culture:%20differences%20between%20easy-%20and%20difficult-to-propagate%20Prunus%20avium%20genotypes&rft.jtitle=Tree%20physiology&rft.au=Quambusch,%20Mona&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=524-533&rft.issn=0829-318X&rft.eissn=1758-4469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/treephys/tpu027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534466006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534466006&rft_id=info:pmid/24812040&rfr_iscdi=true