Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism?
Recent disputes over possible state preemption of federal immigration authority reflect the rise of a coalition that has sought to use state policy to restrict immigration nationwide. The advance of this restrictionist agenda, and the potential for conflicts over federalism, primarily reflect advoca...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Publius 2012-07, Vol.42 (3), p.422-448 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 448 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 422 |
| container_title | Publius |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Reich, Gary Barth, Jay |
| description | Recent disputes over possible state preemption of federal immigration authority reflect the rise of a coalition that has sought to use state policy to restrict immigration nationwide. The advance of this restrictionist agenda, and the potential for conflicts over federalism, primarily reflect advocates' ability to wrest control of state Republican parties from interests that favor access to immigrant labor. Direct democracy has played a supportive role by facilitating innovations that could be diffused. Four cases illustrate the restrictionist coalition's influence on state policy, from domination of the policy agenda in Arizona, to more limited influence in North Carolina, Texas, and Florida. These latter three states suggest substantial barriers to the spread of state immigration policies that challenge federal authority. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/publius/pjs025 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534265673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A302108203</galeid><jstor_id>41682895</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A302108203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5a177db404172d6a153954bc8d021d81a366a02d12898f9b33bc3166b30feaa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2L1EAQxRtRcFy9ehMCXrxkt6q_40XWwdWFhQE_zk0n6Yw9JOmxuwP639vZLB686Kma5lfvVdUj5CXCJULDrs5LO_olXZ1PCah4RHaouKoVgnpMdgBc16IR8JQ8S-kEAKzRakcOt9Pkj9FmH-bqs0s5-u7-7ecqf3fVl2yzS2-rfZhLzX4-3n-_D8vc2-hdqsJQ3bjeRTv6NL17Tp4MdkzuxUO9IN9uPnzdf6rvDh9v99d3dcepzLWwqFTfcuCoaC8tCtYI3na6B4q9RsuktEB7pLrRQ9My1nYMpWwZDM5ayS7Im033HMOPpUxmJp86N452dmFJpggWIyEV-zfKaSMFlwz-A0UlKKDGgr7-Cz2FJc5lZ4OwOiNlq3e9UUc7OuPnbj3jz9yFcXRHZ8pJ9gdzzcrSoCms_OXGdzGkFN1gztFPNv4qomZN2TykbLaUS8OrreGUcoh_aI5Sl9MJ9hsWTKOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026561233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Reich, Gary ; Barth, Jay</creator><creatorcontrib>Reich, Gary ; Barth, Jay</creatorcontrib><description>Recent disputes over possible state preemption of federal immigration authority reflect the rise of a coalition that has sought to use state policy to restrict immigration nationwide. The advance of this restrictionist agenda, and the potential for conflicts over federalism, primarily reflect advocates' ability to wrest control of state Republican parties from interests that favor access to immigrant labor. Direct democracy has played a supportive role by facilitating innovations that could be diffused. Four cases illustrate the restrictionist coalition's influence on state policy, from domination of the policy agenda in Arizona, to more limited influence in North Carolina, Texas, and Florida. These latter three states suggest substantial barriers to the spread of state immigration policies that challenge federal authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjs025</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Arizona ; Authority ; Boundaries ; Citizenship ; Coalitions ; Conflict ; Democracy ; Demonstrations and protests ; Direct Democracy ; Dominance ; Emigration and immigration ; Emigration and immigration law ; Federal government ; Federalism ; Florida ; Government initiatives ; Government regulation ; Governors ; Immigrants ; Immigration ; Immigration law ; Immigration legislation ; Immigration Policy ; Labor ; Laws, regulations and rules ; North Carolina ; Political activity ; Political aspects ; Political parties ; Preemption ; Republican parties ; Restrictions ; Social policy ; State government ; State laws ; State politics ; Texas ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2012-07, Vol.42 (3), p.422-448</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 CSF Associates: Publius, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Summer 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5a177db404172d6a153954bc8d021d81a366a02d12898f9b33bc3166b30feaa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5a177db404172d6a153954bc8d021d81a366a02d12898f9b33bc3166b30feaa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41682895$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41682895$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27866,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reich, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth, Jay</creatorcontrib><title>Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism?</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>Recent disputes over possible state preemption of federal immigration authority reflect the rise of a coalition that has sought to use state policy to restrict immigration nationwide. The advance of this restrictionist agenda, and the potential for conflicts over federalism, primarily reflect advocates' ability to wrest control of state Republican parties from interests that favor access to immigrant labor. Direct democracy has played a supportive role by facilitating innovations that could be diffused. Four cases illustrate the restrictionist coalition's influence on state policy, from domination of the policy agenda in Arizona, to more limited influence in North Carolina, Texas, and Florida. These latter three states suggest substantial barriers to the spread of state immigration policies that challenge federal authority.</description><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Demonstrations and protests</subject><subject>Direct Democracy</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Emigration and immigration</subject><subject>Emigration and immigration law</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Government initiatives</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Immigration law</subject><subject>Immigration legislation</subject><subject>Immigration Policy</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Political activity</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Preemption</subject><subject>Republican parties</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>State politics</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2L1EAQxRtRcFy9ehMCXrxkt6q_40XWwdWFhQE_zk0n6Yw9JOmxuwP639vZLB686Kma5lfvVdUj5CXCJULDrs5LO_olXZ1PCah4RHaouKoVgnpMdgBc16IR8JQ8S-kEAKzRakcOt9Pkj9FmH-bqs0s5-u7-7ecqf3fVl2yzS2-rfZhLzX4-3n-_D8vc2-hdqsJQ3bjeRTv6NL17Tp4MdkzuxUO9IN9uPnzdf6rvDh9v99d3dcepzLWwqFTfcuCoaC8tCtYI3na6B4q9RsuktEB7pLrRQ9My1nYMpWwZDM5ayS7Im033HMOPpUxmJp86N452dmFJpggWIyEV-zfKaSMFlwz-A0UlKKDGgr7-Cz2FJc5lZ4OwOiNlq3e9UUc7OuPnbj3jz9yFcXRHZ8pJ9gdzzcrSoCms_OXGdzGkFN1gztFPNv4qomZN2TykbLaUS8OrreGUcoh_aI5Sl9MJ9hsWTKOg</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Reich, Gary</creator><creator>Barth, Jay</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism?</title><author>Reich, Gary ; Barth, Jay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5a177db404172d6a153954bc8d021d81a366a02d12898f9b33bc3166b30feaa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Demonstrations and protests</topic><topic>Direct Democracy</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Emigration and immigration</topic><topic>Emigration and immigration law</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Government initiatives</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Immigration law</topic><topic>Immigration legislation</topic><topic>Immigration Policy</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Political activity</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Preemption</topic><topic>Republican parties</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>State politics</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reich, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth, Jay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reich, Gary</au><au>Barth, Jay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism?</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>448</epage><pages>422-448</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>Recent disputes over possible state preemption of federal immigration authority reflect the rise of a coalition that has sought to use state policy to restrict immigration nationwide. The advance of this restrictionist agenda, and the potential for conflicts over federalism, primarily reflect advocates' ability to wrest control of state Republican parties from interests that favor access to immigrant labor. Direct democracy has played a supportive role by facilitating innovations that could be diffused. Four cases illustrate the restrictionist coalition's influence on state policy, from domination of the policy agenda in Arizona, to more limited influence in North Carolina, Texas, and Florida. These latter three states suggest substantial barriers to the spread of state immigration policies that challenge federal authority.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/publius/pjs025</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-5950 |
| ispartof | Publius, 2012-07, Vol.42 (3), p.422-448 |
| issn | 0048-5950 1747-7107 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534265673 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Arizona Authority Boundaries Citizenship Coalitions Conflict Democracy Demonstrations and protests Direct Democracy Dominance Emigration and immigration Emigration and immigration law Federal government Federalism Florida Government initiatives Government regulation Governors Immigrants Immigration Immigration law Immigration legislation Immigration Policy Labor Laws, regulations and rules North Carolina Political activity Political aspects Political parties Preemption Republican parties Restrictions Social policy State government State laws State politics Texas U.S.A |
| title | Immigration Restriction in the States: Contesting the Boundaries of Federalism? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A43%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immigration%20Restriction%20in%20the%20States:%20Contesting%20the%20Boundaries%20of%20Federalism?&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Reich,%20Gary&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=448&rft.pages=422-448&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/publius/pjs025&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA302108203%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026561233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A302108203&rft_jstor_id=41682895&rfr_iscdi=true |