A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive
In this paper, we propose a unified account of the semantics of the English present progressive in the form of a semantic network, basing ourselves on the theoretical principles and analytical tools offered by the theory of Cognitive Grammar, as laid out by Langacker (1987, 1991). The core meaning o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of linguistics 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.49-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Journal of linguistics |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | DE WIT, ASTRID BRISARD, FRANK |
description | In this paper, we propose a unified account of the semantics of the English present progressive in the form of a semantic network, basing ourselves on the theoretical principles and analytical tools offered by the theory of Cognitive Grammar, as laid out by Langacker (1987, 1991). The core meaning of the English present progressive, we claim, is to indicate EPISTEMIC CONTINGENCY in the speaker's immediate reality. It thus contrasts with the simple present, which is associated with situations that are construed as STRUCTURALLY belonging to reality. On the basis of a study of the Santa Barbara Corpus of spoken American English, an inventory has been made of the more specific uses of the present progressive, temporal as well as modal. It is shown that each of these uses can be derived from this basic meaning of contingency in immediate reality via a set of conceptual branching principles, in interaction with elements in the context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022226713000169 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534261416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24583342</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24583342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2abe2e10990d4db24c1e78ffb65ad0113b9bb65ccb45d1eac20e8dce41dc77fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PwzAMhiMEEmPwAzggVeLCpWAn6UeO0zQGEtIOwLlKU3fr1DYjaZH492QacIALudiKn_d1HDN2iXCLgNndMwAPJ81QAACm6ohNUKYqzjLJj9lkX4739VN25v02IAJUPmGrWTS3674ZmneKlk53nXaRNsaO_RDZOho2FHnqdD80xn9fLPp12_hNtHPkKXA7Z9ch9cHjnJ3UuvV08RWn7PV-8TJ_iJ9Wy8f57Ck2IsUh5rokTghKQSWrkkuDlOV1XaaJrgBRlKoMuTGlTCokbThQXhmSWJksq42YspuDb-j9NpIfiq7xhtpW92RHX2AiJE9RYvofFCTyPFcBvf6Fbu3o-jBIgVLlPLgBDxQeKOOs947qYuea8G8fBUKx30bxZxtBc3XQbP1g3Y-AyyQX4aXiEwhHhaM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1498216302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>DE WIT, ASTRID ; BRISARD, FRANK</creator><creatorcontrib>DE WIT, ASTRID ; BRISARD, FRANK</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we propose a unified account of the semantics of the English present progressive in the form of a semantic network, basing ourselves on the theoretical principles and analytical tools offered by the theory of Cognitive Grammar, as laid out by Langacker (1987, 1991). The core meaning of the English present progressive, we claim, is to indicate EPISTEMIC CONTINGENCY in the speaker's immediate reality. It thus contrasts with the simple present, which is associated with situations that are construed as STRUCTURALLY belonging to reality. On the basis of a study of the Santa Barbara Corpus of spoken American English, an inventory has been made of the more specific uses of the present progressive, temporal as well as modal. It is shown that each of these uses can be derived from this basic meaning of contingency in immediate reality via a set of conceptual branching principles, in interaction with elements in the context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022226713000169</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLINAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS</publisher><subject>American English ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive grammar ; Coincidence ; English language ; Epistemology ; Grammar ; Grammatical aspect ; Grammatical constructions ; Grammatical tenses ; Linguistics ; Meaning ; Present tense ; Semantic analysis ; Semantics ; Tree structures ; U.S.A ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Journal of linguistics, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.49-90</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2abe2e10990d4db24c1e78ffb65ad0113b9bb65ccb45d1eac20e8dce41dc77fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2abe2e10990d4db24c1e78ffb65ad0113b9bb65ccb45d1eac20e8dce41dc77fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24583342$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24583342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE WIT, ASTRID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRISARD, FRANK</creatorcontrib><title>A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive</title><title>Journal of linguistics</title><description>In this paper, we propose a unified account of the semantics of the English present progressive in the form of a semantic network, basing ourselves on the theoretical principles and analytical tools offered by the theory of Cognitive Grammar, as laid out by Langacker (1987, 1991). The core meaning of the English present progressive, we claim, is to indicate EPISTEMIC CONTINGENCY in the speaker's immediate reality. It thus contrasts with the simple present, which is associated with situations that are construed as STRUCTURALLY belonging to reality. On the basis of a study of the Santa Barbara Corpus of spoken American English, an inventory has been made of the more specific uses of the present progressive, temporal as well as modal. It is shown that each of these uses can be derived from this basic meaning of contingency in immediate reality via a set of conceptual branching principles, in interaction with elements in the context.</description><subject>American English</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive grammar</subject><subject>Coincidence</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical aspect</subject><subject>Grammatical constructions</subject><subject>Grammatical tenses</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Present tense</subject><subject>Semantic analysis</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Tree structures</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0022-2267</issn><issn>1469-7742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PwzAMhiMEEmPwAzggVeLCpWAn6UeO0zQGEtIOwLlKU3fr1DYjaZH492QacIALudiKn_d1HDN2iXCLgNndMwAPJ81QAACm6ohNUKYqzjLJj9lkX4739VN25v02IAJUPmGrWTS3674ZmneKlk53nXaRNsaO_RDZOho2FHnqdD80xn9fLPp12_hNtHPkKXA7Z9ch9cHjnJ3UuvV08RWn7PV-8TJ_iJ9Wy8f57Ck2IsUh5rokTghKQSWrkkuDlOV1XaaJrgBRlKoMuTGlTCokbThQXhmSWJksq42YspuDb-j9NpIfiq7xhtpW92RHX2AiJE9RYvofFCTyPFcBvf6Fbu3o-jBIgVLlPLgBDxQeKOOs947qYuea8G8fBUKx30bxZxtBc3XQbP1g3Y-AyyQX4aXiEwhHhaM</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>DE WIT, ASTRID</creator><creator>BRISARD, FRANK</creator><general>Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive</title><author>DE WIT, ASTRID ; BRISARD, FRANK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2abe2e10990d4db24c1e78ffb65ad0113b9bb65ccb45d1eac20e8dce41dc77fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>American English</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive grammar</topic><topic>Coincidence</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical aspect</topic><topic>Grammatical constructions</topic><topic>Grammatical tenses</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Present tense</topic><topic>Semantic analysis</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Tree structures</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE WIT, ASTRID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRISARD, FRANK</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE WIT, ASTRID</au><au>BRISARD, FRANK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive</atitle><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>49-90</pages><issn>0022-2267</issn><eissn>1469-7742</eissn><coden>JLINAJ</coden><abstract>In this paper, we propose a unified account of the semantics of the English present progressive in the form of a semantic network, basing ourselves on the theoretical principles and analytical tools offered by the theory of Cognitive Grammar, as laid out by Langacker (1987, 1991). The core meaning of the English present progressive, we claim, is to indicate EPISTEMIC CONTINGENCY in the speaker's immediate reality. It thus contrasts with the simple present, which is associated with situations that are construed as STRUCTURALLY belonging to reality. On the basis of a study of the Santa Barbara Corpus of spoken American English, an inventory has been made of the more specific uses of the present progressive, temporal as well as modal. It is shown that each of these uses can be derived from this basic meaning of contingency in immediate reality via a set of conceptual branching principles, in interaction with elements in the context.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022226713000169</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2267 |
ispartof | Journal of linguistics, 2014-03, Vol.50 (1), p.49-90 |
issn | 0022-2267 1469-7742 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1534261416 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | American English Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive grammar Coincidence English language Epistemology Grammar Grammatical aspect Grammatical constructions Grammatical tenses Linguistics Meaning Present tense Semantic analysis Semantics Tree structures U.S.A Verbs |
title | A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cognitive%20Grammar%20account%20of%20the%20semantics%20of%20the%20English%20present%20progressive&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20linguistics&rft.au=DE%20WIT,%20ASTRID&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=49-90&rft.issn=0022-2267&rft.eissn=1469-7742&rft.coden=JLINAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022226713000169&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24583342%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1498216302&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24583342&rfr_iscdi=true |