buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators

Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.280-286
Hauptverfasser: Cocucci, Andrea A, Marino, Salvador, Baranzelli, Matías, Wiemer, Ana P, Sérsic, Alicia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 1
container_start_page 280
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 203
creator Cocucci, Andrea A
Marino, Salvador
Baranzelli, Matías
Wiemer, Ana P
Sérsic, Alicia
description Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds may physically compete for access to attachment points on the pollinators' body, and occasionally pollinaria may link onto pre‐existing pollinaria on a pollinator resulting in concatenation. We hypothesized that concatenation may result in interference between proximal and distal pollinaria, and that features of nonconcatenating pollinaria might be attributed to prevention of concatenation. We tested this by analyzing pollen donation efficiency, experimental manipulation of the phenotype and the phylogenetic patterns of co‐occurrence of traits. It is shown that concatenation was able to diminish the reproductive performance of proximal pollinaria, that horns on pollinaria prevented concatenation, and that horn acquisition was correlated with a loss of concatenation. The experimental removal of horns in species that did not concatenate caused reversion to concatenation. The present work could be the first evidence of male physical struggles and of the acquisition of weapons related to these struggles, that are analogous to those known in animals.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nph.12766
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1532479148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>newphytologist.203.1.280</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>newphytologist.203.1.280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5446-3ea7ad50ddf6232f6140be2f18ca61c597e35dbd29d6a8607d8747bbe859c7c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCgReASFzgkNZ2bMfpDVVAK1WABJUQF8uJJ7veOnGwE1Z74x14wz5JvU23BySYy2g03_wa_T9CLwg-JqlO-mF1TGgpxCO0IExUuSRF-RgtMKYyF0x8P0RPY1xjjCsu6BN0SJlgXFK6QD_qqbnObJ-NK8g66643AOY0g1_WQN9A5tus0w5ufv_ZtQSOEFoIdzvd-X6ZDd452-tgdeb7_TT6EJ-hg1a7CM_v-xG6-vD-29l5fvn548XZu8u84YyJvABdasOxMa2gBW0FYbgG2hLZaEEaXpVQcFMbWhmhpcClkSUr6xokr5qywcURejPrDsH_nCCOqrOxAed0D36KivCCsrIiTCb09V_o2k-hT98pyklBq0oy_j8qaeFEEkIT9XammuBjDNCqIdhOh60iWO1iUSkWdRdLYl_eK051B-aB3OeQgJMZ2FgH238rqU9fzveS-Xyxjsnsh4seNsNqO3rnlzY9TnGhiKJy59KrmW-1V3oZbFRXXylOZmOCMWO0uAVQULA7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1530251112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><creator>Cocucci, Andrea A ; Marino, Salvador ; Baranzelli, Matías ; Wiemer, Ana P ; Sérsic, Alicia</creator><creatorcontrib>Cocucci, Andrea A ; Marino, Salvador ; Baranzelli, Matías ; Wiemer, Ana P ; Sérsic, Alicia</creatorcontrib><description>Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds may physically compete for access to attachment points on the pollinators' body, and occasionally pollinaria may link onto pre‐existing pollinaria on a pollinator resulting in concatenation. We hypothesized that concatenation may result in interference between proximal and distal pollinaria, and that features of nonconcatenating pollinaria might be attributed to prevention of concatenation. We tested this by analyzing pollen donation efficiency, experimental manipulation of the phenotype and the phylogenetic patterns of co‐occurrence of traits. It is shown that concatenation was able to diminish the reproductive performance of proximal pollinaria, that horns on pollinaria prevented concatenation, and that horn acquisition was correlated with a loss of concatenation. The experimental removal of horns in species that did not concatenate caused reversion to concatenation. The present work could be the first evidence of male physical struggles and of the acquisition of weapons related to these struggles, that are analogous to those known in animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.12766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24645822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: William Wesley and Son</publisher><subject>Access ; Animals ; Asclepias ; competitive rivalry ; Conspecifics ; Donations ; Evolution ; Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology ; Horns ; Interference ; male struggle ; Males ; milkweed ; phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Phylogeny ; Plants ; Pollen ; pollinarium ; Pollinating insects ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Pollinia ; Reproduction ; reproductive performance ; Reversion ; Sexual selection ; Weapons</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.280-286</ispartof><rights>2014 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2014 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2014 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 New Phytologist Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5446-3ea7ad50ddf6232f6140be2f18ca61c597e35dbd29d6a8607d8747bbe859c7c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5446-3ea7ad50ddf6232f6140be2f18ca61c597e35dbd29d6a8607d8747bbe859c7c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/newphytologist.203.1.280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.203.1.280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24645822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cocucci, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranzelli, Matías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemer, Ana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sérsic, Alicia</creatorcontrib><title>buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds may physically compete for access to attachment points on the pollinators' body, and occasionally pollinaria may link onto pre‐existing pollinaria on a pollinator resulting in concatenation. We hypothesized that concatenation may result in interference between proximal and distal pollinaria, and that features of nonconcatenating pollinaria might be attributed to prevention of concatenation. We tested this by analyzing pollen donation efficiency, experimental manipulation of the phenotype and the phylogenetic patterns of co‐occurrence of traits. It is shown that concatenation was able to diminish the reproductive performance of proximal pollinaria, that horns on pollinaria prevented concatenation, and that horn acquisition was correlated with a loss of concatenation. The experimental removal of horns in species that did not concatenate caused reversion to concatenation. The present work could be the first evidence of male physical struggles and of the acquisition of weapons related to these struggles, that are analogous to those known in animals.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Asclepias</subject><subject>competitive rivalry</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Horns</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>male struggle</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>milkweed</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollinarium</subject><subject>Pollinating insects</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Pollinia</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>reproductive performance</subject><subject>Reversion</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCgReASFzgkNZ2bMfpDVVAK1WABJUQF8uJJ7veOnGwE1Z74x14wz5JvU23BySYy2g03_wa_T9CLwg-JqlO-mF1TGgpxCO0IExUuSRF-RgtMKYyF0x8P0RPY1xjjCsu6BN0SJlgXFK6QD_qqbnObJ-NK8g66643AOY0g1_WQN9A5tus0w5ufv_ZtQSOEFoIdzvd-X6ZDd452-tgdeb7_TT6EJ-hg1a7CM_v-xG6-vD-29l5fvn548XZu8u84YyJvABdasOxMa2gBW0FYbgG2hLZaEEaXpVQcFMbWhmhpcClkSUr6xokr5qywcURejPrDsH_nCCOqrOxAed0D36KivCCsrIiTCb09V_o2k-hT98pyklBq0oy_j8qaeFEEkIT9XammuBjDNCqIdhOh60iWO1iUSkWdRdLYl_eK051B-aB3OeQgJMZ2FgH238rqU9fzveS-Xyxjsnsh4seNsNqO3rnlzY9TnGhiKJy59KrmW-1V3oZbFRXXylOZmOCMWO0uAVQULA7</recordid><startdate>201407</startdate><enddate>201407</enddate><creator>Cocucci, Andrea A</creator><creator>Marino, Salvador</creator><creator>Baranzelli, Matías</creator><creator>Wiemer, Ana P</creator><creator>Sérsic, Alicia</creator><general>William Wesley and Son</general><general>New Phytologist Trust</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201407</creationdate><title>buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators</title><author>Cocucci, Andrea A ; Marino, Salvador ; Baranzelli, Matías ; Wiemer, Ana P ; Sérsic, Alicia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5446-3ea7ad50ddf6232f6140be2f18ca61c597e35dbd29d6a8607d8747bbe859c7c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Asclepias</topic><topic>competitive rivalry</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Horns</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>male struggle</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>milkweed</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollinarium</topic><topic>Pollinating insects</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Pollinia</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>reproductive performance</topic><topic>Reversion</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cocucci, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranzelli, Matías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiemer, Ana P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sérsic, Alicia</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cocucci, Andrea A</au><au>Marino, Salvador</au><au>Baranzelli, Matías</au><au>Wiemer, Ana P</au><au>Sérsic, Alicia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2014-07</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>203</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>280-286</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Direct physical confrontation among conspecifics for access to mates is a form of sexual selection well known among animals, but not thought to take place in plants. Consequently, no structures are known that can be considered as weapons that evolved under such confrontation. Pollinaria of milkweeds may physically compete for access to attachment points on the pollinators' body, and occasionally pollinaria may link onto pre‐existing pollinaria on a pollinator resulting in concatenation. We hypothesized that concatenation may result in interference between proximal and distal pollinaria, and that features of nonconcatenating pollinaria might be attributed to prevention of concatenation. We tested this by analyzing pollen donation efficiency, experimental manipulation of the phenotype and the phylogenetic patterns of co‐occurrence of traits. It is shown that concatenation was able to diminish the reproductive performance of proximal pollinaria, that horns on pollinaria prevented concatenation, and that horn acquisition was correlated with a loss of concatenation. The experimental removal of horns in species that did not concatenate caused reversion to concatenation. The present work could be the first evidence of male physical struggles and of the acquisition of weapons related to these struggles, that are analogous to those known in animals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>William Wesley and Son</pub><pmid>24645822</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.12766</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 2014-07, Vol.203 (1), p.280-286
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1532479148
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals
subjects Access
Animals
Asclepias
competitive rivalry
Conspecifics
Donations
Evolution
Flowers - anatomy & histology
Horns
Interference
male struggle
Males
milkweed
phenotype
Phenotypes
Phylogeny
Plants
Pollen
pollinarium
Pollinating insects
Pollination
Pollinators
Pollinia
Reproduction
reproductive performance
Reversion
Sexual selection
Weapons
title buck in the milkweed: evidence of male–male interference among pollinaria on pollinators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A41%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=buck%20in%20the%20milkweed:%20evidence%20of%20male%E2%80%93male%20interference%20among%20pollinaria%20on%20pollinators&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Cocucci,%20Andrea%20A&rft.date=2014-07&rft.volume=203&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=280-286&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.12766&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Enewphytologist.203.1.280%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1530251112&rft_id=info:pmid/24645822&rft_jstor_id=newphytologist.203.1.280&rfr_iscdi=true