Unsulfated CCK-8 not blocked by proglumide or CR 1409 in the mouse abdominal irritant-induced stretching assay: Possible central site of action

Previous studies have shown that unsulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8-U) shares with the sulfated octapeptide (CCK-8-S) and the carboxyl-terminal tetrapeptide (CCK-4) the ability to block abdominal irritant-induced stretching when administered intracerebroventricularly. The effects of CCK-8...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Peptides (New York, N.Y. : 1980) N.Y. : 1980), 1989, Vol.10 (1), p.31-34
Hauptverfasser: Ambrose, F.G., Barbaz, B.S., Autry, W.L., Browne, R.G., Liebman, J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous studies have shown that unsulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8-U) shares with the sulfated octapeptide (CCK-8-S) and the carboxyl-terminal tetrapeptide (CCK-4) the ability to block abdominal irritant-induced stretching when administered intracerebroventricularly. The effects of CCK-8-U, however, are not naloxone-reversible and do not appear upon systemic administration. To assess the hypothesis that the antistretching effects of CCK-8-U are mediated by central-type (CCK-B), rather than peripheral-type (CCK-A) receptors, the present experiments examined the reversal of these effects by CR 1409, a CCK receptor antagonist with in vitro selectivity for CCK-A receptors, and by proglumide. Both antagonists, when administered ICV, blocked the antistretching effects of CCK-8-S and CCK-4 (ICV), but not those of CCK-8-U. CR 1409 was approximately 40 times more potent against CCK-8-S by the ICV route than subcutaneously, indicating a likely action on CCK-A receptors in the brain. The effects of morphine, bombesin and neurotensin (ICV) were not blocked by CR 1409, indicating specificity for CCK receptor-mediated effects. The antistretching effects of CCK-8-U do not appear to be mediated by CCK-A receptors, and the possibility of a CCK-B receptor site of action must be considered.
ISSN:0196-9781
1873-5169
DOI:10.1016/0196-9781(89)90071-5