Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy

We retrospectively reviewed the data from a cohort of 44 patients with one initial negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy who underwent a repeat biopsy from 2006 to 2013. At each biopsy session, we checked patient age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA densi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica 2014-04, Vol.60 (4), p.165-170
Hauptverfasser: Sawazaki, Harutake, Sengiku, Atsushi, Imamura, Masaaki, Takahashi, Takeshi, Ogura, Keiji, Kobayashi, Hisato
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 4
container_start_page 165
container_title Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica
container_volume 60
creator Sawazaki, Harutake
Sengiku, Atsushi
Imamura, Masaaki
Takahashi, Takeshi
Ogura, Keiji
Kobayashi, Hisato
description We retrospectively reviewed the data from a cohort of 44 patients with one initial negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy who underwent a repeat biopsy from 2006 to 2013. At each biopsy session, we checked patient age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, PSA velocity, months from the initial biopsy session, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted, 1.5 Tesla pelvic-phased array) prior to repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy. Mean age was 68.2±8.82 years. PSA was 11.5±7.65 ng/ml before repeat biopsy. Prostate cancer was detected in 15 (34.0%) patients at repeat biopsy. In univariate and multivariate analysis, positive MRI findings before repeat biopsy were significant independent predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6, 68.9, 71.4 and 80.0% for MRI before repeat biopsy. No suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy was relevant to negative biopsy. According to the comparison of MRI findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy, suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy were relevant to a high cancer detection rate (83.3%) at repeat prostate biopsy. These results suggested that the absence of a suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy could guide the avoidance of repeat biopsy and suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy could guide repeat biopsy.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531953895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1531953895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-8560328e88614b14b3bb8547f874414f0f6743f4d236206bc7d6261f8f3c2c633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQzYNiS-0vSB7rw0Jum00fpXgpVASxz0s2O6nB3WTdpEJ_ym80xVWYYThzLgNzgeaEUFXQ9VrM0DJG1xDCiagELa_QjAmlGGPVHH3vI9hj5yFGHCw2oR_06PzhDHp98JCcwSPE4LU3gF3endnV8-v2Flvn24wiHkYXRpxCVg6gE25cGOIJa99iDwed3Fe2epec7v65iDVuwbjogi96_XGO7SG9hxbbHDYlDWOISSeYbNfo0uouwnKaC7R_uH_bPBW7l8ft5m5XDJTJVKhSEs4UKCWpaHLxplGlqKyqhKDCEisrwa1oGZeMyMZUrWSSWmW5YUZyvkCr39x8__MIMdW9iwa6TnsIx1jTktN1yVXuBbqZpMemh7bOv-j1eKr_fsx_ALw_eok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1531953895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Open Access Titles of Japan</source><creator>Sawazaki, Harutake ; Sengiku, Atsushi ; Imamura, Masaaki ; Takahashi, Takeshi ; Ogura, Keiji ; Kobayashi, Hisato</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawazaki, Harutake ; Sengiku, Atsushi ; Imamura, Masaaki ; Takahashi, Takeshi ; Ogura, Keiji ; Kobayashi, Hisato</creatorcontrib><description>We retrospectively reviewed the data from a cohort of 44 patients with one initial negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy who underwent a repeat biopsy from 2006 to 2013. At each biopsy session, we checked patient age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, PSA velocity, months from the initial biopsy session, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted, 1.5 Tesla pelvic-phased array) prior to repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy. Mean age was 68.2±8.82 years. PSA was 11.5±7.65 ng/ml before repeat biopsy. Prostate cancer was detected in 15 (34.0%) patients at repeat biopsy. In univariate and multivariate analysis, positive MRI findings before repeat biopsy were significant independent predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6, 68.9, 71.4 and 80.0% for MRI before repeat biopsy. No suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy was relevant to negative biopsy. According to the comparison of MRI findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy, suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy were relevant to a high cancer detection rate (83.3%) at repeat prostate biopsy. These results suggested that the absence of a suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy could guide the avoidance of repeat biopsy and suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy could guide repeat biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24882227</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Japan</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy - methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica, 2014-04, Vol.60 (4), p.165-170</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24882227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawazaki, Harutake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengiku, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamura, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hisato</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy</title><title>Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica</title><addtitle>Hinyokika Kiyo</addtitle><description>We retrospectively reviewed the data from a cohort of 44 patients with one initial negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy who underwent a repeat biopsy from 2006 to 2013. At each biopsy session, we checked patient age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, PSA velocity, months from the initial biopsy session, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted, 1.5 Tesla pelvic-phased array) prior to repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy. Mean age was 68.2±8.82 years. PSA was 11.5±7.65 ng/ml before repeat biopsy. Prostate cancer was detected in 15 (34.0%) patients at repeat biopsy. In univariate and multivariate analysis, positive MRI findings before repeat biopsy were significant independent predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6, 68.9, 71.4 and 80.0% for MRI before repeat biopsy. No suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy was relevant to negative biopsy. According to the comparison of MRI findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy, suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy were relevant to a high cancer detection rate (83.3%) at repeat prostate biopsy. These results suggested that the absence of a suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy could guide the avoidance of repeat biopsy and suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy could guide repeat biopsy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0018-1994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UNtKAzEQzYNiS-0vSB7rw0Jum00fpXgpVASxz0s2O6nB3WTdpEJ_ym80xVWYYThzLgNzgeaEUFXQ9VrM0DJG1xDCiagELa_QjAmlGGPVHH3vI9hj5yFGHCw2oR_06PzhDHp98JCcwSPE4LU3gF3endnV8-v2Flvn24wiHkYXRpxCVg6gE25cGOIJa99iDwed3Fe2epec7v65iDVuwbjogi96_XGO7SG9hxbbHDYlDWOISSeYbNfo0uouwnKaC7R_uH_bPBW7l8ft5m5XDJTJVKhSEs4UKCWpaHLxplGlqKyqhKDCEisrwa1oGZeMyMZUrWSSWmW5YUZyvkCr39x8__MIMdW9iwa6TnsIx1jTktN1yVXuBbqZpMemh7bOv-j1eKr_fsx_ALw_eok</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Sawazaki, Harutake</creator><creator>Sengiku, Atsushi</creator><creator>Imamura, Masaaki</creator><creator>Takahashi, Takeshi</creator><creator>Ogura, Keiji</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Hisato</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy</title><author>Sawazaki, Harutake ; Sengiku, Atsushi ; Imamura, Masaaki ; Takahashi, Takeshi ; Ogura, Keiji ; Kobayashi, Hisato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-8560328e88614b14b3bb8547f874414f0f6743f4d236206bc7d6261f8f3c2c633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawazaki, Harutake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengiku, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imamura, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hisato</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawazaki, Harutake</au><au>Sengiku, Atsushi</au><au>Imamura, Masaaki</au><au>Takahashi, Takeshi</au><au>Ogura, Keiji</au><au>Kobayashi, Hisato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy</atitle><jtitle>Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica</jtitle><addtitle>Hinyokika Kiyo</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>165-170</pages><issn>0018-1994</issn><abstract>We retrospectively reviewed the data from a cohort of 44 patients with one initial negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy who underwent a repeat biopsy from 2006 to 2013. At each biopsy session, we checked patient age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, PSA velocity, months from the initial biopsy session, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted, 1.5 Tesla pelvic-phased array) prior to repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy. Mean age was 68.2±8.82 years. PSA was 11.5±7.65 ng/ml before repeat biopsy. Prostate cancer was detected in 15 (34.0%) patients at repeat biopsy. In univariate and multivariate analysis, positive MRI findings before repeat biopsy were significant independent predictors of a positive repeat biopsy. At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6, 68.9, 71.4 and 80.0% for MRI before repeat biopsy. No suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy was relevant to negative biopsy. According to the comparison of MRI findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy, suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy were relevant to a high cancer detection rate (83.3%) at repeat prostate biopsy. These results suggested that the absence of a suspicious lesion on MRI before repeat biopsy could guide the avoidance of repeat biopsy and suspicious MRI findings at the peripheral zone before repeat biopsy and initial negative biopsy could guide repeat biopsy.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pmid>24882227</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-1994
ispartof Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica, 2014-04, Vol.60 (4), p.165-170
issn 0018-1994
language jpn
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531953895
source MEDLINE; Open Access Titles of Japan
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy - methods
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography
title Usefulness of comparing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings prior to repeat biopsy and negative initial biopsy as a decision-making method for repeat prostate biopsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20comparing%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20(MRI)%20findings%20prior%20to%20repeat%20biopsy%20and%20negative%20initial%20biopsy%20as%20a%20decision-making%20method%20for%20repeat%20prostate%20biopsy&rft.jtitle=Hinyokika%20kiyo.%20Acta%20urologica%20Japonica&rft.au=Sawazaki,%20Harutake&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=165-170&rft.issn=0018-1994&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1531953895%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1531953895&rft_id=info:pmid/24882227&rfr_iscdi=true