THE SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was causing a stir in the courtroom. It was on Feb 27, 2013, and the justices were hearing oral argument in Shelby County v Holder, a test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr told the Court that by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Judicature 2013-07, Vol.97 (1), p.57-60
1. Verfasser: Mauro, Tony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Judicature
container_volume 97
creator Mauro, Tony
description Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was causing a stir in the courtroom. It was on Feb 27, 2013, and the justices were hearing oral argument in Shelby County v Holder, a test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr told the Court that by renewing the act in 2006 by an overwhelming majority, Congress was making the judgment that the law was still needed, in spite of increases in minority voting. Similar and yet very distinct, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are Pres Barack Obama's first term legacy on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, nominated in 2009, and Kagan, named in 2010, are the first appointees of a Democratic president since Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer in 1994. When Sotomayor was first nominated, some liberals were concerned that her background as a prosecutor in New York would make her unsympathetic toward the rights of criminal defendants. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531929686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1531929686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15319296863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy0jW1MDDgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrA042QQDPFwVQgODQhy9XVVcPYPDQrhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMGm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhqbGhpZGlmYWZsYkKAUAvnspOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1531929686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE SUPREME COURT</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Mauro, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Mauro, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was causing a stir in the courtroom. It was on Feb 27, 2013, and the justices were hearing oral argument in Shelby County v Holder, a test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr told the Court that by renewing the act in 2006 by an overwhelming majority, Congress was making the judgment that the law was still needed, in spite of increases in minority voting. Similar and yet very distinct, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are Pres Barack Obama's first term legacy on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, nominated in 2009, and Kagan, named in 2010, are the first appointees of a Democratic president since Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer in 1994. When Sotomayor was first nominated, some liberals were concerned that her background as a prosecutor in New York would make her unsympathetic toward the rights of criminal defendants. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5800</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JUDIEC</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Defendants ; Justice ; Legislative Bodies ; New York ; Nomination ; Presidents ; Prosecutors ; Supreme Courts ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Judicature, 2013-07, Vol.97 (1), p.57-60</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mauro, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>THE SUPREME COURT</title><title>Judicature</title><description>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was causing a stir in the courtroom. It was on Feb 27, 2013, and the justices were hearing oral argument in Shelby County v Holder, a test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr told the Court that by renewing the act in 2006 by an overwhelming majority, Congress was making the judgment that the law was still needed, in spite of increases in minority voting. Similar and yet very distinct, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are Pres Barack Obama's first term legacy on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, nominated in 2009, and Kagan, named in 2010, are the first appointees of a Democratic president since Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer in 1994. When Sotomayor was first nominated, some liberals were concerned that her background as a prosecutor in New York would make her unsympathetic toward the rights of criminal defendants. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Nomination</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Prosecutors</subject><subject>Supreme Courts</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0022-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy0jW1MDDgYOAqLs4yMDA0MrA042QQDPFwVQgODQhy9XVVcPYPDQrhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMGm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhqbGhpZGlmYWZsYkKAUAvnspOg</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Mauro, Tony</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>THE SUPREME COURT</title><author>Mauro, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_15319296863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Nomination</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Prosecutors</topic><topic>Supreme Courts</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mauro, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mauro, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE SUPREME COURT</atitle><jtitle>Judicature</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>57-60</pages><issn>0022-5800</issn><coden>JUDIEC</coden><abstract>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was causing a stir in the courtroom. It was on Feb 27, 2013, and the justices were hearing oral argument in Shelby County v Holder, a test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr told the Court that by renewing the act in 2006 by an overwhelming majority, Congress was making the judgment that the law was still needed, in spite of increases in minority voting. Similar and yet very distinct, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are Pres Barack Obama's first term legacy on the Supreme Court. Sotomayor, nominated in 2009, and Kagan, named in 2010, are the first appointees of a Democratic president since Bill Clinton picked Stephen Breyer in 1994. When Sotomayor was first nominated, some liberals were concerned that her background as a prosecutor in New York would make her unsympathetic toward the rights of criminal defendants. Adapted from the source document.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5800
ispartof Judicature, 2013-07, Vol.97 (1), p.57-60
issn 0022-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531929686
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Defendants
Justice
Legislative Bodies
New York
Nomination
Presidents
Prosecutors
Supreme Courts
Voting
title THE SUPREME COURT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20SUPREME%20COURT&rft.jtitle=Judicature&rft.au=Mauro,%20Tony&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=57-60&rft.issn=0022-5800&rft.coden=JUDIEC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1531929686%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1531929686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true