Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference
Can quantitative evidence be valuable for qualitative research designs? Here, I first examine recent arguments by qualitative methodologists who challenge the conventional view that quantitative evidence is necessary for explanatory generalization, but note that many qualitative researchers frequent...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative sociology 2014-06, Vol.37 (2), p.189-205 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 205 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 189 |
| container_title | Qualitative sociology |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Spillman, Lyn |
| description | Can quantitative evidence be valuable for qualitative research designs? Here, I first examine recent arguments by qualitative methodologists who challenge the conventional view that quantitative evidence is necessary for explanatory generalization, but note that many qualitative researchers frequently incorporate quantitative evidence in their studies, despite methodological arguments to the contrary. I then extend recent developments in mixed methods research to argue that quantitative evidence offers preliminary description of sociological patterns to be explained by qualitative investigation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531431032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3287757311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-d6a802ceed6f9e77a7a6984f6fb90658db7d83411d063da66a2b746be4ce0be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wN2AGzejeZM0mSyl-FFoEUHXIZO8tFOmMzWZEf33powLEVy9uzjn8riEXAK9AUrlbQQAxnIKPFeFTOGITGCWgiyZPCYTCqLIKWfilJzFuKU0WVxMCF_Vn-iyFfabzsXMtC7rN5gtu3Vts85nL4Np6t709Qdmi9ZjwNbiOTnxpol48XOn5O3h_nX-lC-fHxfzu2VuGVd97oQpaWERnfAKpTTSCFVyL3ylqJiVrpKuZBzAUcGcEcIUleSiQm6RVliyKbkee_ehex8w9npXR4tNY1rshqhhxoAzoKxI6NUfdNsNoU3fJQoUV0wlbkpgpGzoYgzo9T7UOxO-NFB92FGPO-q0oz7sqA9OMToxse0aw6_mf6VvKPZzZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519493910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Spillman, Lyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><description>Can quantitative evidence be valuable for qualitative research designs? Here, I first examine recent arguments by qualitative methodologists who challenge the conventional view that quantitative evidence is necessary for explanatory generalization, but note that many qualitative researchers frequently incorporate quantitative evidence in their studies, despite methodological arguments to the contrary. I then extend recent developments in mixed methods research to argue that quantitative evidence offers preliminary description of sociological patterns to be explained by qualitative investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-0436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Causal inference ; Cross Cultural Psychology ; Generalization ; Methodology ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Research methodology ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Sociological research ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Qualitative sociology, 2014-06, Vol.37 (2), p.189-205</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-d6a802ceed6f9e77a7a6984f6fb90658db7d83411d063da66a2b746be4ce0be83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-d6a802ceed6f9e77a7a6984f6fb90658db7d83411d063da66a2b746be4ce0be83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><title>Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference</title><title>Qualitative sociology</title><addtitle>Qual Sociol</addtitle><description>Can quantitative evidence be valuable for qualitative research designs? Here, I first examine recent arguments by qualitative methodologists who challenge the conventional view that quantitative evidence is necessary for explanatory generalization, but note that many qualitative researchers frequently incorporate quantitative evidence in their studies, despite methodological arguments to the contrary. I then extend recent developments in mixed methods research to argue that quantitative evidence offers preliminary description of sociological patterns to be explained by qualitative investigation.</description><subject>Causal inference</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Psychology</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociological research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0162-0436</issn><issn>1573-7837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wN2AGzejeZM0mSyl-FFoEUHXIZO8tFOmMzWZEf33powLEVy9uzjn8riEXAK9AUrlbQQAxnIKPFeFTOGITGCWgiyZPCYTCqLIKWfilJzFuKU0WVxMCF_Vn-iyFfabzsXMtC7rN5gtu3Vts85nL4Np6t709Qdmi9ZjwNbiOTnxpol48XOn5O3h_nX-lC-fHxfzu2VuGVd97oQpaWERnfAKpTTSCFVyL3ylqJiVrpKuZBzAUcGcEcIUleSiQm6RVliyKbkee_ehex8w9npXR4tNY1rshqhhxoAzoKxI6NUfdNsNoU3fJQoUV0wlbkpgpGzoYgzo9T7UOxO-NFB92FGPO-q0oz7sqA9OMToxse0aw6_mf6VvKPZzZQ</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Spillman, Lyn</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference</title><author>Spillman, Lyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-d6a802ceed6f9e77a7a6984f6fb90658db7d83411d063da66a2b746be4ce0be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Causal inference</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Psychology</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociological research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spillman, Lyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative sociology</jtitle><stitle>Qual Sociol</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>189-205</pages><issn>0162-0436</issn><eissn>1573-7837</eissn><abstract>Can quantitative evidence be valuable for qualitative research designs? Here, I first examine recent arguments by qualitative methodologists who challenge the conventional view that quantitative evidence is necessary for explanatory generalization, but note that many qualitative researchers frequently incorporate quantitative evidence in their studies, despite methodological arguments to the contrary. I then extend recent developments in mixed methods research to argue that quantitative evidence offers preliminary description of sociological patterns to be explained by qualitative investigation.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0162-0436 |
| ispartof | Qualitative sociology, 2014-06, Vol.37 (2), p.189-205 |
| issn | 0162-0436 1573-7837 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531431032 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Causal inference Cross Cultural Psychology Generalization Methodology Personality and Social Psychology Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Research methodology Social research Social Sciences Sociological research Sociology |
| title | Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A43%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mixed%20Methods%20and%20the%20Logic%20of%20Qualitative%20Inference&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20sociology&rft.au=Spillman,%20Lyn&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=189-205&rft.issn=0162-0436&rft.eissn=1573-7837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11133-014-9273-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3287757311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519493910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |