A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec
The economic literature has been investigating the positive relation between public infrastructure spending and the productivity of the private sector since Munnell (1992). We have introduced this relationship into a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the Quebec economy to inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied economics 2014-08, Vol.46 (22), p.2653-2664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 2653 |
container_title | Applied economics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Boccanfuso, Dorothée Joanis, Marcelin Richard, Patrick Savard, Luc |
description | The economic literature has been investigating the positive relation between public infrastructure spending and the productivity of the private sector since Munnell (1992). We have introduced this relationship into a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the Quebec economy to investigate various funding schemes to scale up infrastructure spending in the province. We draw our assumptions from Estache et al. (2010) combined with sectoral elasticity parameters. We conduct a comparative analysis where the funding comes from debt alone, and debt with sales tax, income tax and business tax. Our main finding is that the income tax seems to produce the most positive effects and the businesses tax the most negative effects, though differences are small. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00036846.2014.909576 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531430990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1531430990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3fbd56d0477e27762be53e133fa745e54b3d111db9bb85934864d71ef81c523c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1r3DAQgGFRGug26T_oQdBLLt5oJNmSTyWEfBQCpZDkKmR51GqxLVeyE_bfx8btJYecxMAzA3oJ-QpsD0yzC8aYqLSs9pyB3NesLlX1gexAVlUhuRYfyW4lxWo-kc85H5YRuFA78nRJXexHm-wUnpHawXbHHDKNnvp5aMPwm2b3B3vM1MdEx7npgqNh8MnmKc1umhPSPOJGw0B_zdigOyMn3nYZv_x7T8njzfXD1V1x__P2x9XlfeGk0lMhfNOWVcukUsiVqniDpUAQwlslSyxlI1oAaJu6aXRZC6kr2SpAr8GVXDhxSs63u2OKf2fMk-lDdth1dsA4ZwOlAClYXbOFfntDD3FOy39XxQE4aM0XJTflUsw5oTdjCr1NRwPMrLHN_9hmjW222Mva921tKRNTb19i6loz2WMX05JqcCEb8e6FVxfJhSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521121882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Boccanfuso, Dorothée ; Joanis, Marcelin ; Richard, Patrick ; Savard, Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Boccanfuso, Dorothée ; Joanis, Marcelin ; Richard, Patrick ; Savard, Luc</creatorcontrib><description>The economic literature has been investigating the positive relation between public infrastructure spending and the productivity of the private sector since Munnell (1992). We have introduced this relationship into a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the Quebec economy to investigate various funding schemes to scale up infrastructure spending in the province. We draw our assumptions from Estache et al. (2010) combined with sectoral elasticity parameters. We conduct a comparative analysis where the funding comes from debt alone, and debt with sales tax, income tax and business tax. Our main finding is that the income tax seems to produce the most positive effects and the businesses tax the most negative effects, though differences are small.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.909576</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APPEBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Applied economics ; Applied general equilibrium models ; Canada ; CGE model ; Comparative analysis ; Elasticity ; Funding ; Government spending ; Income tax ; Income taxes ; Infrastructure ; Productivity ; Public infrastructure ; Quebec ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Applied economics, 2014-08, Vol.46 (22), p.2653-2664</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3fbd56d0477e27762be53e133fa745e54b3d111db9bb85934864d71ef81c523c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3fbd56d0477e27762be53e133fa745e54b3d111db9bb85934864d71ef81c523c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boccanfuso, Dorothée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Marcelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec</title><title>Applied economics</title><description>The economic literature has been investigating the positive relation between public infrastructure spending and the productivity of the private sector since Munnell (1992). We have introduced this relationship into a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the Quebec economy to investigate various funding schemes to scale up infrastructure spending in the province. We draw our assumptions from Estache et al. (2010) combined with sectoral elasticity parameters. We conduct a comparative analysis where the funding comes from debt alone, and debt with sales tax, income tax and business tax. Our main finding is that the income tax seems to produce the most positive effects and the businesses tax the most negative effects, though differences are small.</description><subject>Applied economics</subject><subject>Applied general equilibrium models</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>CGE model</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Income tax</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public infrastructure</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0003-6846</issn><issn>1466-4283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1r3DAQgGFRGug26T_oQdBLLt5oJNmSTyWEfBQCpZDkKmR51GqxLVeyE_bfx8btJYecxMAzA3oJ-QpsD0yzC8aYqLSs9pyB3NesLlX1gexAVlUhuRYfyW4lxWo-kc85H5YRuFA78nRJXexHm-wUnpHawXbHHDKNnvp5aMPwm2b3B3vM1MdEx7npgqNh8MnmKc1umhPSPOJGw0B_zdigOyMn3nYZv_x7T8njzfXD1V1x__P2x9XlfeGk0lMhfNOWVcukUsiVqniDpUAQwlslSyxlI1oAaJu6aXRZC6kr2SpAr8GVXDhxSs63u2OKf2fMk-lDdth1dsA4ZwOlAClYXbOFfntDD3FOy39XxQE4aM0XJTflUsw5oTdjCr1NRwPMrLHN_9hmjW222Mva921tKRNTb19i6loz2WMX05JqcCEb8e6FVxfJhSI</recordid><startdate>20140803</startdate><enddate>20140803</enddate><creator>Boccanfuso, Dorothée</creator><creator>Joanis, Marcelin</creator><creator>Richard, Patrick</creator><creator>Savard, Luc</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140803</creationdate><title>A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec</title><author>Boccanfuso, Dorothée ; Joanis, Marcelin ; Richard, Patrick ; Savard, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3fbd56d0477e27762be53e133fa745e54b3d111db9bb85934864d71ef81c523c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied economics</topic><topic>Applied general equilibrium models</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>CGE model</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Income tax</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public infrastructure</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boccanfuso, Dorothée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joanis, Marcelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Applied economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boccanfuso, Dorothée</au><au>Joanis, Marcelin</au><au>Richard, Patrick</au><au>Savard, Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec</atitle><jtitle>Applied economics</jtitle><date>2014-08-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2653</spage><epage>2664</epage><pages>2653-2664</pages><issn>0003-6846</issn><eissn>1466-4283</eissn><coden>APPEBP</coden><abstract>The economic literature has been investigating the positive relation between public infrastructure spending and the productivity of the private sector since Munnell (1992). We have introduced this relationship into a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the Quebec economy to investigate various funding schemes to scale up infrastructure spending in the province. We draw our assumptions from Estache et al. (2010) combined with sectoral elasticity parameters. We conduct a comparative analysis where the funding comes from debt alone, and debt with sales tax, income tax and business tax. Our main finding is that the income tax seems to produce the most positive effects and the businesses tax the most negative effects, though differences are small.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00036846.2014.909576</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6846 |
ispartof | Applied economics, 2014-08, Vol.46 (22), p.2653-2664 |
issn | 0003-6846 1466-4283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1531430990 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Applied economics Applied general equilibrium models Canada CGE model Comparative analysis Elasticity Funding Government spending Income tax Income taxes Infrastructure Productivity Public infrastructure Quebec Studies |
title | A comparative analysis of funding schemes for public infrastructure spending in Quebec |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20funding%20schemes%20for%20public%20infrastructure%20spending%20in%20Quebec&rft.jtitle=Applied%20economics&rft.au=Boccanfuso,%20Doroth%C3%A9e&rft.date=2014-08-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2653&rft.epage=2664&rft.pages=2653-2664&rft.issn=0003-6846&rft.eissn=1466-4283&rft.coden=APPEBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00036846.2014.909576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1531430990%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521121882&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |