Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig

Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non‐invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied toxicology 1989-06, Vol.9 (3), p.145-153
Hauptverfasser: Gerlach, Robert F., Medinsky, Michele A., Hobbs, Charles H., Bice, David E., Bechtold, William E., Cheng, Yung-Sung, Gillett, Nancy A., Birnbaum, Linda S., Mauderly, Joe L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 3
container_start_page 145
container_title Journal of applied toxicology
container_volume 9
creator Gerlach, Robert F.
Medinsky, Michele A.
Hobbs, Charles H.
Bice, David E.
Bechtold, William E.
Cheng, Yung-Sung
Gillett, Nancy A.
Birnbaum, Linda S.
Mauderly, Joe L.
description Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non‐invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of unconjugated ADA to cause specific or non‐specific pulmonary sensitization in the guinea pig. Two groups of male Hartley guinea pigs were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks to aerosolized ADA at 51 or 200 mg/m3, or to filtered air as controls. One group was tested for specific sensitization to ADA by measuring specific airway conductance during inhalation challenge with ADA before and on the third day after the 4‐week ADA exposure. The ADA concentrations for the challenges were identical to the repeated exposure concentrations (51 or 200 mg/m3, 200 mg/m3 for controls). The other group was tested for non‐specific airway sensitization by inhalation challenge with aerosolized histamine before and after the 4‐week ADA exposure. Histamine was administered in stepwise increasing concentrations to elicit an airway response in each guinea pig. Skin tests for immunological responses to ADA, body weight and histopathology of the respiratory tract and skin test sites were also evaluated. The 4‐week exposure to ADA did not result in either specific or non‐specific airway sensitization. The ADA exposure did not induce positive skin reactions, influence body weight or cause histopathological responses. These results indicate that ADA, acting alone (i.e. not conjugated to a protein), is not a pulmonary sensitizer in the guinea pig exposed repeatedly for 4 weeks and challenged to simulate a ‘Monday morning’ exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jat.2550090303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15306363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15306363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3843-2520b8957583ceb04602ca8660af47d14b331d40ee8538c644ac959bf3438923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EKqWwZYfkBeoug1-xk2VV9UFVAYuRithYjnM99TRjBzthOvwN_jAZZjQVq66udO93zrnSQeg9JTNKCPu0NMOMlSUhNeGEv0DHlNR1QZnkL9ExYZIUgqvvr9GbnJdkompWHaEjpkRZM3aM_lw4B3bA0WEXx1SsAR5wgh7MAC324d50ZvAxYHjsYx4T4CHiMdgYluPiH2N-x9Zbk5oYzMq3gCc492C98xab0OIQQ_G08GltNjhDyH7wv_yw2UYP94AXow9gcO8Xb9ErZ7oM7_bzBM0vL-bn18Xt16vP52e3heWV4AUrGWmqulRlxS00REjCrKmkJMYJ1VLRcE5bQQCqkldWCmFsXdaN44JXNeMn6HRn26f4c4Q86JXPFrrOBIhj1rTkRHLJnwcFY4pTOoGzHWhTzDmB033yK5M2mhK9bUtPbemntibBh73z2KygPeD7eqb7x_3dZGs6l0ywPh8wxaWq5Da33mFr38HmmVB9czb_74Vip_V5gMeD1qQHLRVXpb77cqW_XV9K9eNmru_4X3Krvrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14227311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Gerlach, Robert F. ; Medinsky, Michele A. ; Hobbs, Charles H. ; Bice, David E. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Cheng, Yung-Sung ; Gillett, Nancy A. ; Birnbaum, Linda S. ; Mauderly, Joe L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Robert F. ; Medinsky, Michele A. ; Hobbs, Charles H. ; Bice, David E. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Cheng, Yung-Sung ; Gillett, Nancy A. ; Birnbaum, Linda S. ; Mauderly, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><description>Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non‐invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of unconjugated ADA to cause specific or non‐specific pulmonary sensitization in the guinea pig. Two groups of male Hartley guinea pigs were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks to aerosolized ADA at 51 or 200 mg/m3, or to filtered air as controls. One group was tested for specific sensitization to ADA by measuring specific airway conductance during inhalation challenge with ADA before and on the third day after the 4‐week ADA exposure. The ADA concentrations for the challenges were identical to the repeated exposure concentrations (51 or 200 mg/m3, 200 mg/m3 for controls). The other group was tested for non‐specific airway sensitization by inhalation challenge with aerosolized histamine before and after the 4‐week ADA exposure. Histamine was administered in stepwise increasing concentrations to elicit an airway response in each guinea pig. Skin tests for immunological responses to ADA, body weight and histopathology of the respiratory tract and skin test sites were also evaluated. The 4‐week exposure to ADA did not result in either specific or non‐specific airway sensitization. The ADA exposure did not induce positive skin reactions, influence body weight or cause histopathological responses. These results indicate that ADA, acting alone (i.e. not conjugated to a protein), is not a pulmonary sensitizer in the guinea pig exposed repeatedly for 4 weeks and challenged to simulate a ‘Monday morning’ exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-437X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jat.2550090303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2745922</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JJATDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Animals ; Azo Compounds - administration &amp; dosage ; Azo Compounds - toxicity ; azodicarbonamide ; Biological and medical sciences ; bronchoprovocation ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; guinea pig ; Guinea Pigs ; Histamine ; In Vitro Techniques ; inhalation ; lung ; Lung - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metals and various inorganic compounds ; Respiratory Function Tests ; Respiratory System - drug effects ; Respiratory System - pathology ; sensitization ; Skin Tests ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied toxicology, 1989-06, Vol.9 (3), p.145-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1989 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3843-2520b8957583ceb04602ca8660af47d14b331d40ee8538c644ac959bf3438923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3843-2520b8957583ceb04602ca8660af47d14b331d40ee8538c644ac959bf3438923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjat.2550090303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjat.2550090303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7367861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2745922$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medinsky, Michele A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bice, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtold, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yung-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillett, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauderly, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig</title><title>Journal of applied toxicology</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Toxicol</addtitle><description>Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non‐invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of unconjugated ADA to cause specific or non‐specific pulmonary sensitization in the guinea pig. Two groups of male Hartley guinea pigs were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks to aerosolized ADA at 51 or 200 mg/m3, or to filtered air as controls. One group was tested for specific sensitization to ADA by measuring specific airway conductance during inhalation challenge with ADA before and on the third day after the 4‐week ADA exposure. The ADA concentrations for the challenges were identical to the repeated exposure concentrations (51 or 200 mg/m3, 200 mg/m3 for controls). The other group was tested for non‐specific airway sensitization by inhalation challenge with aerosolized histamine before and after the 4‐week ADA exposure. Histamine was administered in stepwise increasing concentrations to elicit an airway response in each guinea pig. Skin tests for immunological responses to ADA, body weight and histopathology of the respiratory tract and skin test sites were also evaluated. The 4‐week exposure to ADA did not result in either specific or non‐specific airway sensitization. The ADA exposure did not induce positive skin reactions, influence body weight or cause histopathological responses. These results indicate that ADA, acting alone (i.e. not conjugated to a protein), is not a pulmonary sensitizer in the guinea pig exposed repeatedly for 4 weeks and challenged to simulate a ‘Monday morning’ exposure.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Azo Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Azo Compounds - toxicity</subject><subject>azodicarbonamide</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bronchoprovocation</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>guinea pig</subject><subject>Guinea Pigs</subject><subject>Histamine</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>inhalation</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metals and various inorganic compounds</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests</subject><subject>Respiratory System - drug effects</subject><subject>Respiratory System - pathology</subject><subject>sensitization</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0260-437X</issn><issn>1099-1263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EKqWwZYfkBeoug1-xk2VV9UFVAYuRithYjnM99TRjBzthOvwN_jAZZjQVq66udO93zrnSQeg9JTNKCPu0NMOMlSUhNeGEv0DHlNR1QZnkL9ExYZIUgqvvr9GbnJdkompWHaEjpkRZM3aM_lw4B3bA0WEXx1SsAR5wgh7MAC324d50ZvAxYHjsYx4T4CHiMdgYluPiH2N-x9Zbk5oYzMq3gCc492C98xab0OIQQ_G08GltNjhDyH7wv_yw2UYP94AXow9gcO8Xb9ErZ7oM7_bzBM0vL-bn18Xt16vP52e3heWV4AUrGWmqulRlxS00REjCrKmkJMYJ1VLRcE5bQQCqkldWCmFsXdaN44JXNeMn6HRn26f4c4Q86JXPFrrOBIhj1rTkRHLJnwcFY4pTOoGzHWhTzDmB033yK5M2mhK9bUtPbemntibBh73z2KygPeD7eqb7x_3dZGs6l0ywPh8wxaWq5Da33mFr38HmmVB9czb_74Vip_V5gMeD1qQHLRVXpb77cqW_XV9K9eNmru_4X3Krvrg</recordid><startdate>198906</startdate><enddate>198906</enddate><creator>Gerlach, Robert F.</creator><creator>Medinsky, Michele A.</creator><creator>Hobbs, Charles H.</creator><creator>Bice, David E.</creator><creator>Bechtold, William E.</creator><creator>Cheng, Yung-Sung</creator><creator>Gillett, Nancy A.</creator><creator>Birnbaum, Linda S.</creator><creator>Mauderly, Joe L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198906</creationdate><title>Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig</title><author>Gerlach, Robert F. ; Medinsky, Michele A. ; Hobbs, Charles H. ; Bice, David E. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Cheng, Yung-Sung ; Gillett, Nancy A. ; Birnbaum, Linda S. ; Mauderly, Joe L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3843-2520b8957583ceb04602ca8660af47d14b331d40ee8538c644ac959bf3438923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Azo Compounds - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Azo Compounds - toxicity</topic><topic>azodicarbonamide</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bronchoprovocation</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>guinea pig</topic><topic>Guinea Pigs</topic><topic>Histamine</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>inhalation</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metals and various inorganic compounds</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests</topic><topic>Respiratory System - drug effects</topic><topic>Respiratory System - pathology</topic><topic>sensitization</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medinsky, Michele A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bice, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtold, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yung-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillett, Nancy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauderly, Joe L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerlach, Robert F.</au><au>Medinsky, Michele A.</au><au>Hobbs, Charles H.</au><au>Bice, David E.</au><au>Bechtold, William E.</au><au>Cheng, Yung-Sung</au><au>Gillett, Nancy A.</au><au>Birnbaum, Linda S.</au><au>Mauderly, Joe L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Appl. Toxicol</addtitle><date>1989-06</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>145-153</pages><issn>0260-437X</issn><eissn>1099-1263</eissn><coden>JJATDK</coden><abstract>Reports of respiratory problems among industrial workers exposed repeatedly by inhalation to azodicarbonamide (ADA) raised concern that ADA might be a pulmonary sensitizer. We used a non‐invasive method for measuring specific airway conductance to evaluate the potential for repeated inhalation of unconjugated ADA to cause specific or non‐specific pulmonary sensitization in the guinea pig. Two groups of male Hartley guinea pigs were exposed 6 h/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks to aerosolized ADA at 51 or 200 mg/m3, or to filtered air as controls. One group was tested for specific sensitization to ADA by measuring specific airway conductance during inhalation challenge with ADA before and on the third day after the 4‐week ADA exposure. The ADA concentrations for the challenges were identical to the repeated exposure concentrations (51 or 200 mg/m3, 200 mg/m3 for controls). The other group was tested for non‐specific airway sensitization by inhalation challenge with aerosolized histamine before and after the 4‐week ADA exposure. Histamine was administered in stepwise increasing concentrations to elicit an airway response in each guinea pig. Skin tests for immunological responses to ADA, body weight and histopathology of the respiratory tract and skin test sites were also evaluated. The 4‐week exposure to ADA did not result in either specific or non‐specific airway sensitization. The ADA exposure did not induce positive skin reactions, influence body weight or cause histopathological responses. These results indicate that ADA, acting alone (i.e. not conjugated to a protein), is not a pulmonary sensitizer in the guinea pig exposed repeatedly for 4 weeks and challenged to simulate a ‘Monday morning’ exposure.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>2745922</pmid><doi>10.1002/jat.2550090303</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-437X
ispartof Journal of applied toxicology, 1989-06, Vol.9 (3), p.145-153
issn 0260-437X
1099-1263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15306363
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Animals
Azo Compounds - administration & dosage
Azo Compounds - toxicity
azodicarbonamide
Biological and medical sciences
bronchoprovocation
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
guinea pig
Guinea Pigs
Histamine
In Vitro Techniques
inhalation
lung
Lung - pathology
Male
Medical sciences
Metals and various inorganic compounds
Respiratory Function Tests
Respiratory System - drug effects
Respiratory System - pathology
sensitization
Skin Tests
Toxicology
title Effect of four-week repeated inhalation exposure to unconjugated azodicarbonamide on specific and non-specific airway sensitivity of the guinea pig
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A10%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20four-week%20repeated%20inhalation%20exposure%20to%20unconjugated%20azodicarbonamide%20on%20specific%20and%20non-specific%20airway%20sensitivity%20of%20the%20guinea%20pig&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20toxicology&rft.au=Gerlach,%20Robert%20F.&rft.date=1989-06&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=145-153&rft.issn=0260-437X&rft.eissn=1099-1263&rft.coden=JJATDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jat.2550090303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15306363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14227311&rft_id=info:pmid/2745922&rfr_iscdi=true