Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty

Objectives/Hypothesis Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy improves outcomes over tympanoplasty in repairing tympanic membrane perforations in the presence of unfavorable risk factors. Study Design Retrospective review of 67 subjects' 87 operations. Methods Interventions were tympanoplasty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2014-06, Vol.124 (S3), p.S1-S13
1. Verfasser: Redleaf, Miriam I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S13
container_issue S3
container_start_page S1
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 124
creator Redleaf, Miriam I.
description Objectives/Hypothesis Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy improves outcomes over tympanoplasty in repairing tympanic membrane perforations in the presence of unfavorable risk factors. Study Design Retrospective review of 67 subjects' 87 operations. Methods Interventions were tympanoplasty versus air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy. Risk factors were contracted mastoid air cells, previous failed operations, descent from the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and middle/ear mastoid volumes l
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.23599
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1530320922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1530320922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4289-72f853281bc9bf1cd5b6f24d8b3c74894811b257c08510020b149a05c1962ac83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAU3IhQzaWZJsthvMKgeENdhTRNMZpOatKifXtTR2fhwtVZnO__OOcHYBfBIwQhPrbS90eYUM5XwAhRgtKMc7oKRnFJUkbx0wbYDOEVQpQTCtfBRoQjlsMReJkYn4RGKp14XXaqNW6etH3dyLmrZWidKbVqXd3HdSOND0lpqsqozrZJo33lvBwiIamdHxTWyML2Sfsil5rGRk-_DdYqaYPe-Zlb4OHs9H56kc6uzy-nk1mqMsx4muOKUYIZKhQvKqRKWowrnJWsICrPGM8YQgWmuYKMDs_DAmVcQqoQH2OpGNkCBwtv4917p0MrahOUtlbOteuCiP1AgiHHOKL7f9BX1_l5vC5SOPoxy3ikDheU8i4EryvReFPHygWCYjhBDP2L7_4jvPej7Ipal0v0t_AIoAXwYazu_1GJ2eT2-VeaLjImtPpzmZH-TYxzklPxeHUubu7uTzAdTwUlX257oHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1528512849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Redleaf, Miriam I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redleaf, Miriam I.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy improves outcomes over tympanoplasty in repairing tympanic membrane perforations in the presence of unfavorable risk factors. Study Design Retrospective review of 67 subjects' 87 operations. Methods Interventions were tympanoplasty versus air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy. Risk factors were contracted mastoid air cells, previous failed operations, descent from the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and middle/ear mastoid volumes l&lt;3 CC. Favorable outcomes were closure of the perforation, no decline in hearing, and creation of a self‐cleaning mastoid bowl. Results Five out of 46 air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies failed to close their perforations (11%). Pure‐tone threshold (PTA) worsened in 13/46 ears (28%). Four of 46 required mastoid bowl cleaning (9%). In contrast, 21 of 41 tympanoplasties failed to close (51%). PTA worsened in 9/34 ears (26%). All four tympanoplasty failures treated with an air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy closed. Three of the seven tympanoplasty failures treated with a second tympanoplasty did not close. Statistical analysis found two risk factors more prevalent among the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies: contracted mastoids (P = .019) and middle ear volumes &lt;3 CC (P = .0001). Increased closure of perforations occurring after the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy was also statistically significant (P = .0002). Descendants of indigenous peoples of the Americas trended toward better PTAs after their air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies than their tympanoplasties and showed statistically significant increases in closure of perforation (P = .0046). Conclusions Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy is an effective and safe method for closing tympanic membrane perforations. © 147. Level of Evidence Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 124:S1–S13, 2014</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.23599</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23553170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Mastoid - surgery ; mastoidectomy ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane - surgery ; tympanic membrane perforation ; Tympanic Membrane Perforation - surgery ; tympanoplasty ; Tympanoplasty - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2014-06, Vol.124 (S3), p.S1-S13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4289-72f853281bc9bf1cd5b6f24d8b3c74894811b257c08510020b149a05c1962ac83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4289-72f853281bc9bf1cd5b6f24d8b3c74894811b257c08510020b149a05c1962ac83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.23599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.23599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redleaf, Miriam I.</creatorcontrib><title>Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives/Hypothesis Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy improves outcomes over tympanoplasty in repairing tympanic membrane perforations in the presence of unfavorable risk factors. Study Design Retrospective review of 67 subjects' 87 operations. Methods Interventions were tympanoplasty versus air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy. Risk factors were contracted mastoid air cells, previous failed operations, descent from the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and middle/ear mastoid volumes l&lt;3 CC. Favorable outcomes were closure of the perforation, no decline in hearing, and creation of a self‐cleaning mastoid bowl. Results Five out of 46 air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies failed to close their perforations (11%). Pure‐tone threshold (PTA) worsened in 13/46 ears (28%). Four of 46 required mastoid bowl cleaning (9%). In contrast, 21 of 41 tympanoplasties failed to close (51%). PTA worsened in 9/34 ears (26%). All four tympanoplasty failures treated with an air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy closed. Three of the seven tympanoplasty failures treated with a second tympanoplasty did not close. Statistical analysis found two risk factors more prevalent among the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies: contracted mastoids (P = .019) and middle ear volumes &lt;3 CC (P = .0001). Increased closure of perforations occurring after the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy was also statistically significant (P = .0002). Descendants of indigenous peoples of the Americas trended toward better PTAs after their air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies than their tympanoplasties and showed statistically significant increases in closure of perforation (P = .0046). Conclusions Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy is an effective and safe method for closing tympanic membrane perforations. © 147. Level of Evidence Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 124:S1–S13, 2014</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mastoid - surgery</subject><subject>mastoidectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</subject><subject>tympanic membrane perforation</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane Perforation - surgery</subject><subject>tympanoplasty</subject><subject>Tympanoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAU3IhQzaWZJsthvMKgeENdhTRNMZpOatKifXtTR2fhwtVZnO__OOcHYBfBIwQhPrbS90eYUM5XwAhRgtKMc7oKRnFJUkbx0wbYDOEVQpQTCtfBRoQjlsMReJkYn4RGKp14XXaqNW6etH3dyLmrZWidKbVqXd3HdSOND0lpqsqozrZJo33lvBwiIamdHxTWyML2Sfsil5rGRk-_DdYqaYPe-Zlb4OHs9H56kc6uzy-nk1mqMsx4muOKUYIZKhQvKqRKWowrnJWsICrPGM8YQgWmuYKMDs_DAmVcQqoQH2OpGNkCBwtv4917p0MrahOUtlbOteuCiP1AgiHHOKL7f9BX1_l5vC5SOPoxy3ikDheU8i4EryvReFPHygWCYjhBDP2L7_4jvPej7Ipal0v0t_AIoAXwYazu_1GJ2eT2-VeaLjImtPpzmZH-TYxzklPxeHUubu7uTzAdTwUlX257oHo</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Redleaf, Miriam I.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty</title><author>Redleaf, Miriam I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4289-72f853281bc9bf1cd5b6f24d8b3c74894811b257c08510020b149a05c1962ac83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mastoid - surgery</topic><topic>mastoidectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</topic><topic>tympanic membrane perforation</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane Perforation - surgery</topic><topic>tympanoplasty</topic><topic>Tympanoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redleaf, Miriam I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redleaf, Miriam I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>S3</issue><spage>S1</spage><epage>S13</epage><pages>S1-S13</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy improves outcomes over tympanoplasty in repairing tympanic membrane perforations in the presence of unfavorable risk factors. Study Design Retrospective review of 67 subjects' 87 operations. Methods Interventions were tympanoplasty versus air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy. Risk factors were contracted mastoid air cells, previous failed operations, descent from the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and middle/ear mastoid volumes l&lt;3 CC. Favorable outcomes were closure of the perforation, no decline in hearing, and creation of a self‐cleaning mastoid bowl. Results Five out of 46 air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies failed to close their perforations (11%). Pure‐tone threshold (PTA) worsened in 13/46 ears (28%). Four of 46 required mastoid bowl cleaning (9%). In contrast, 21 of 41 tympanoplasties failed to close (51%). PTA worsened in 9/34 ears (26%). All four tympanoplasty failures treated with an air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy closed. Three of the seven tympanoplasty failures treated with a second tympanoplasty did not close. Statistical analysis found two risk factors more prevalent among the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies: contracted mastoids (P = .019) and middle ear volumes &lt;3 CC (P = .0001). Increased closure of perforations occurring after the air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy was also statistically significant (P = .0002). Descendants of indigenous peoples of the Americas trended toward better PTAs after their air space reduction tympanomastoidectomies than their tympanoplasties and showed statistically significant increases in closure of perforation (P = .0046). Conclusions Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy is an effective and safe method for closing tympanic membrane perforations. © 147. Level of Evidence Level of Evidence: 2b Laryngoscope, 124:S1–S13, 2014</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23553170</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.23599</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2014-06, Vol.124 (S3), p.S1-S13
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1530320922
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Mastoid - surgery
mastoidectomy
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tympanic Membrane - surgery
tympanic membrane perforation
Tympanic Membrane Perforation - surgery
tympanoplasty
Tympanoplasty - methods
Young Adult
title Air space reduction tympanomastoidectomy repairs difficult perforations more reliably than tympanoplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A53%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Air%20space%20reduction%20tympanomastoidectomy%20repairs%20difficult%20perforations%20more%20reliably%20than%20tympanoplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Redleaf,%20Miriam%20I.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=S3&rft.spage=S1&rft.epage=S13&rft.pages=S1-S13&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.23599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1530320922%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1528512849&rft_id=info:pmid/23553170&rfr_iscdi=true