Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria
Anthropogenic climate change is a key threat to global biodiversity. To inform strategic actions aimed at conserving biodiversity as climate changes, conservation planners need early warning of the risks faced by different species. The IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species are widely acknowl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2014-06, Vol.28 (3), p.810-819 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 819 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 810 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | KEITH, DAVID A MAHONY, MICHAEL HINES, HARRY ELITH, JANE REGAN, TRACEY J BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B HUNTER, DAVID HEARD, GEOFFREY W MITCHELL, NICOLA J PARRIS, KIRSTEN M PENMAN, TRENT SCHEELE, BEN SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C TINGLEY, REID TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R WEST, MATT AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT |
description | Anthropogenic climate change is a key threat to global biodiversity. To inform strategic actions aimed at conserving biodiversity as climate changes, conservation planners need early warning of the risks faced by different species. The IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species are widely acknowledged as useful risk assessment tools for informing conservation under constraints imposed by limited data. However, doubts have been expressed about the ability of the criteria to detect risks imposed by potentially slow‐acting threats such as climate change, particularly because criteria addressing rates of population decline are assessed over time scales as short as 10 years. We used spatially explicit stochastic population models and dynamic species distribution models projected to future climates to determine how long before extinction a species would become eligible for listing as threatened based on the IUCN Red List criteria. We focused on a short‐lived frog species (Assa darlingtoni) chosen specifically to represent potential weaknesses in the criteria to allow detailed consideration of the analytical issues and to develop an approach for wider application. The criteria were more sensitive to climate change than previously anticipated; lead times between initial listing in a threatened category and predicted extinction varied from 40 to 80 years, depending on data availability. We attributed this sensitivity primarily to the ensemble properties of the criteria that assess contrasting symptoms of extinction risk. Nevertheless, we recommend the robustness of the criteria warrants further investigation across species with contrasting life histories and patterns of decline. The adequacy of these lead times for early warning depends on practicalities of environmental policy and management, bureaucratic or political inertia, and the anticipated species response times to management actions. Detección del Riesgo de Extinción a partir del Cambio Climático por medio del Criterio de la Lista Roja de la UICNKeith et al. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.12234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529934210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24480343</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24480343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-9881624250dc184d70af8bcd46436012668af77c1688c47894f9da140749b89a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxYMobq2--K4GRBBh1nx_POrsWgulC6vFx5DJZGq605ndZIrb_97U6a7ig5iXGzi_3Jt7DgDPMTrF-bx3fRVOMSGUPQATzAktsKT6IZggpVShlCYn4ElKG4SQ5pg9BieEcUwo1RMwO_ODd0Po1vD8Npd87Tt4GdIVbGK_hWUbtnbwsPxuu7WH1R7OV-USXvoaLkIaYBnD4GOwT8GjxrbJPzvWKVh9Ov9afi4WF7N5-WFROM4QK7RSWBBGOKodVqyWyDaqcjUTjAqEiRDKNlI6LJRyTCrNGl1bzJBkulLa0il4O_a9jv3NzqfBbENyvm1t5_tdMnl9rSkjGP0PyqXgMps1Ba__Qjf9LnZ5kQPFiGBE80y9GykX-5Sib8x1zO7EvcHIHJIwhyTMryQy_PLYcldtfX2P3lmfgTdHwCZn2ybazoX0m1OcKiJo5vDI_Qit3_9jpCkvPs7vhr8Y32zS0Mc_ZjOFspz1YtRzhP72XrfxyghJJTffljOjZ6VibLk0Z5l_NfKN7Y1dx_zP1ReCci4oG02koD8B5PG8vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524264295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>KEITH, DAVID A ; MAHONY, MICHAEL ; HINES, HARRY ; ELITH, JANE ; REGAN, TRACEY J ; BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B ; HUNTER, DAVID ; HEARD, GEOFFREY W ; MITCHELL, NICOLA J ; PARRIS, KIRSTEN M ; PENMAN, TRENT ; SCHEELE, BEN ; SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C ; TINGLEY, REID ; TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R ; WEST, MATT ; AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</creator><creatorcontrib>KEITH, DAVID A ; MAHONY, MICHAEL ; HINES, HARRY ; ELITH, JANE ; REGAN, TRACEY J ; BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B ; HUNTER, DAVID ; HEARD, GEOFFREY W ; MITCHELL, NICOLA J ; PARRIS, KIRSTEN M ; PENMAN, TRENT ; SCHEELE, BEN ; SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C ; TINGLEY, REID ; TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R ; WEST, MATT ; AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropogenic climate change is a key threat to global biodiversity. To inform strategic actions aimed at conserving biodiversity as climate changes, conservation planners need early warning of the risks faced by different species. The IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species are widely acknowledged as useful risk assessment tools for informing conservation under constraints imposed by limited data. However, doubts have been expressed about the ability of the criteria to detect risks imposed by potentially slow‐acting threats such as climate change, particularly because criteria addressing rates of population decline are assessed over time scales as short as 10 years. We used spatially explicit stochastic population models and dynamic species distribution models projected to future climates to determine how long before extinction a species would become eligible for listing as threatened based on the IUCN Red List criteria. We focused on a short‐lived frog species (Assa darlingtoni) chosen specifically to represent potential weaknesses in the criteria to allow detailed consideration of the analytical issues and to develop an approach for wider application. The criteria were more sensitive to climate change than previously anticipated; lead times between initial listing in a threatened category and predicted extinction varied from 40 to 80 years, depending on data availability. We attributed this sensitivity primarily to the ensemble properties of the criteria that assess contrasting symptoms of extinction risk. Nevertheless, we recommend the robustness of the criteria warrants further investigation across species with contrasting life histories and patterns of decline. The adequacy of these lead times for early warning depends on practicalities of environmental policy and management, bureaucratic or political inertia, and the anticipated species response times to management actions. Detección del Riesgo de Extinción a partir del Cambio Climático por medio del Criterio de la Lista Roja de la UICNKeith et al.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24512339</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Science, Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia ; amphibian ; anfibio ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Anura ; Applied ecology ; Assa ; Australia ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Climate Change ; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Contributed Papers ; dynamic models ; Earth, ocean, space ; Endangered & extinct species ; Endangered Species ; Environmental Policy ; especies amenazadas ; estudio de riesgo ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Extinct species ; extinction ; Extinction, Biological ; frog ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Meteorology ; modelo de distribución de especies ; modelo de población ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; population dynamics ; Population estimates ; population model ; Population size ; rana ; risk ; Risk Assessment ; species distribution model ; Species extinction ; Taxa ; Threatened species ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2014-06, Vol.28 (3), p.810-819</ispartof><rights>2014 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2014 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2014, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-9881624250dc184d70af8bcd46436012668af77c1688c47894f9da140749b89a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-9881624250dc184d70af8bcd46436012668af77c1688c47894f9da140749b89a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24480343$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24480343$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28538263$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24512339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KEITH, DAVID A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHONY, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINES, HARRY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELITH, JANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REGAN, TRACEY J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEARD, GEOFFREY W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, NICOLA J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARRIS, KIRSTEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENMAN, TRENT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEELE, BEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TINGLEY, REID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEST, MATT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>Anthropogenic climate change is a key threat to global biodiversity. To inform strategic actions aimed at conserving biodiversity as climate changes, conservation planners need early warning of the risks faced by different species. The IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species are widely acknowledged as useful risk assessment tools for informing conservation under constraints imposed by limited data. However, doubts have been expressed about the ability of the criteria to detect risks imposed by potentially slow‐acting threats such as climate change, particularly because criteria addressing rates of population decline are assessed over time scales as short as 10 years. We used spatially explicit stochastic population models and dynamic species distribution models projected to future climates to determine how long before extinction a species would become eligible for listing as threatened based on the IUCN Red List criteria. We focused on a short‐lived frog species (Assa darlingtoni) chosen specifically to represent potential weaknesses in the criteria to allow detailed consideration of the analytical issues and to develop an approach for wider application. The criteria were more sensitive to climate change than previously anticipated; lead times between initial listing in a threatened category and predicted extinction varied from 40 to 80 years, depending on data availability. We attributed this sensitivity primarily to the ensemble properties of the criteria that assess contrasting symptoms of extinction risk. Nevertheless, we recommend the robustness of the criteria warrants further investigation across species with contrasting life histories and patterns of decline. The adequacy of these lead times for early warning depends on practicalities of environmental policy and management, bureaucratic or political inertia, and the anticipated species response times to management actions. Detección del Riesgo de Extinción a partir del Cambio Climático por medio del Criterio de la Lista Roja de la UICNKeith et al.</description><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia</subject><subject>amphibian</subject><subject>anfibio</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Assa</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Contributed Papers</subject><subject>dynamic models</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>especies amenazadas</subject><subject>estudio de riesgo</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>frog</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>modelo de distribución de especies</subject><subject>modelo de población</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>population model</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>rana</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>species distribution model</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxYMobq2--K4GRBBh1nx_POrsWgulC6vFx5DJZGq605ndZIrb_97U6a7ig5iXGzi_3Jt7DgDPMTrF-bx3fRVOMSGUPQATzAktsKT6IZggpVShlCYn4ElKG4SQ5pg9BieEcUwo1RMwO_ODd0Po1vD8Npd87Tt4GdIVbGK_hWUbtnbwsPxuu7WH1R7OV-USXvoaLkIaYBnD4GOwT8GjxrbJPzvWKVh9Ov9afi4WF7N5-WFROM4QK7RSWBBGOKodVqyWyDaqcjUTjAqEiRDKNlI6LJRyTCrNGl1bzJBkulLa0il4O_a9jv3NzqfBbENyvm1t5_tdMnl9rSkjGP0PyqXgMps1Ba__Qjf9LnZ5kQPFiGBE80y9GykX-5Sib8x1zO7EvcHIHJIwhyTMryQy_PLYcldtfX2P3lmfgTdHwCZn2ybazoX0m1OcKiJo5vDI_Qit3_9jpCkvPs7vhr8Y32zS0Mc_ZjOFspz1YtRzhP72XrfxyghJJTffljOjZ6VibLk0Z5l_NfKN7Y1dx_zP1ReCci4oG02koD8B5PG8vw</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>KEITH, DAVID A</creator><creator>MAHONY, MICHAEL</creator><creator>HINES, HARRY</creator><creator>ELITH, JANE</creator><creator>REGAN, TRACEY J</creator><creator>BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B</creator><creator>HUNTER, DAVID</creator><creator>HEARD, GEOFFREY W</creator><creator>MITCHELL, NICOLA J</creator><creator>PARRIS, KIRSTEN M</creator><creator>PENMAN, TRENT</creator><creator>SCHEELE, BEN</creator><creator>SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C</creator><creator>TINGLEY, REID</creator><creator>TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R</creator><creator>WEST, MATT</creator><creator>AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</creator><general>Blackwell Science, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria</title><author>KEITH, DAVID A ; MAHONY, MICHAEL ; HINES, HARRY ; ELITH, JANE ; REGAN, TRACEY J ; BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B ; HUNTER, DAVID ; HEARD, GEOFFREY W ; MITCHELL, NICOLA J ; PARRIS, KIRSTEN M ; PENMAN, TRENT ; SCHEELE, BEN ; SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C ; TINGLEY, REID ; TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R ; WEST, MATT ; AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-9881624250dc184d70af8bcd46436012668af77c1688c47894f9da140749b89a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Amphibia. Reptilia</topic><topic>amphibian</topic><topic>anfibio</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Assa</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Contributed Papers</topic><topic>dynamic models</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>especies amenazadas</topic><topic>estudio de riesgo</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>frog</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>modelo de distribución de especies</topic><topic>modelo de población</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>population model</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>rana</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>species distribution model</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KEITH, DAVID A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHONY, MICHAEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINES, HARRY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELITH, JANE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REGAN, TRACEY J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEARD, GEOFFREY W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MITCHELL, NICOLA J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARRIS, KIRSTEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENMAN, TRENT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEELE, BEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TINGLEY, REID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEST, MATT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KEITH, DAVID A</au><au>MAHONY, MICHAEL</au><au>HINES, HARRY</au><au>ELITH, JANE</au><au>REGAN, TRACEY J</au><au>BAUMGARTNER, JOHN B</au><au>HUNTER, DAVID</au><au>HEARD, GEOFFREY W</au><au>MITCHELL, NICOLA J</au><au>PARRIS, KIRSTEN M</au><au>PENMAN, TRENT</au><au>SCHEELE, BEN</au><au>SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER C</au><au>TINGLEY, REID</au><au>TRACY, CHRISTOPHER R</au><au>WEST, MATT</au><au>AKÇAKAYA, H. RESIT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>819</epage><pages>810-819</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>Anthropogenic climate change is a key threat to global biodiversity. To inform strategic actions aimed at conserving biodiversity as climate changes, conservation planners need early warning of the risks faced by different species. The IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species are widely acknowledged as useful risk assessment tools for informing conservation under constraints imposed by limited data. However, doubts have been expressed about the ability of the criteria to detect risks imposed by potentially slow‐acting threats such as climate change, particularly because criteria addressing rates of population decline are assessed over time scales as short as 10 years. We used spatially explicit stochastic population models and dynamic species distribution models projected to future climates to determine how long before extinction a species would become eligible for listing as threatened based on the IUCN Red List criteria. We focused on a short‐lived frog species (Assa darlingtoni) chosen specifically to represent potential weaknesses in the criteria to allow detailed consideration of the analytical issues and to develop an approach for wider application. The criteria were more sensitive to climate change than previously anticipated; lead times between initial listing in a threatened category and predicted extinction varied from 40 to 80 years, depending on data availability. We attributed this sensitivity primarily to the ensemble properties of the criteria that assess contrasting symptoms of extinction risk. Nevertheless, we recommend the robustness of the criteria warrants further investigation across species with contrasting life histories and patterns of decline. The adequacy of these lead times for early warning depends on practicalities of environmental policy and management, bureaucratic or political inertia, and the anticipated species response times to management actions. Detección del Riesgo de Extinción a partir del Cambio Climático por medio del Criterio de la Lista Roja de la UICNKeith et al.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Science, Inc</pub><pmid>24512339</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12234</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2014-06, Vol.28 (3), p.810-819 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529934210 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Amphibia. Reptilia amphibian anfibio Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Anura Applied ecology Assa Australia Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation biogeography Biological and medical sciences Climate Change Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Contributed Papers dynamic models Earth, ocean, space Endangered & extinct species Endangered Species Environmental Policy especies amenazadas estudio de riesgo Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Extinct species extinction Extinction, Biological frog Frogs Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Meteorology modelo de distribución de especies modelo de población Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking population dynamics Population estimates population model Population size rana risk Risk Assessment species distribution model Species extinction Taxa Threatened species Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Wildlife conservation |
title | Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A19%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20Extinction%20Risk%20from%20Climate%20Change%20by%20IUCN%20Red%20List%20Criteria&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=KEITH,%20DAVID%20A&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=819&rft.pages=810-819&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12234&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24480343%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524264295&rft_id=info:pmid/24512339&rft_jstor_id=24480343&rfr_iscdi=true |