Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices
A variety of methodological paradigms, including dot probe and eye movement tasks, have been used to examine attentional biases to threat in anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, little attention has been devoted to the psychometric properties of measures from these paradigms. In the current study, part...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive therapy and research 2014-06, Vol.38 (3), p.313-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Cognitive therapy and research |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Waechter, Stephanie Nelson, Andrea L. Wright, Caitlin Hyatt, Ashley Oakman, Jonathan |
description | A variety of methodological paradigms, including dot probe and eye movement tasks, have been used to examine attentional biases to threat in anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, little attention has been devoted to the psychometric properties of measures from these paradigms. In the current study, participants selected for high and low social anxiety completed a dot probe and eye movement task using angry, disgust and happy facial expressions paired with neutral expressions. Results indicated that dot probe bias scores, eye movement first fixation indices, and eye movement proportions of viewing time in the first 1,500 ms had unacceptably low reliability. However, eye movement indices of attentional bias over the full 5,000 ms time course had excellent reliability. Individuals’ dot probe and eye movement biases were largely uncorrelated across the two tasks and demonstrated little relation with social anxiety scores. Implications for future research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529929670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1529929670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-14b9100176440aafbc40f046894b4874caf718b91fc662d56b52c1a6eab43aba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFqGzEURUVIIY7bD-hOUALdTKonS5pRdm6SpoGYhuDSpXgja1KZ8ciR5ID_vnJsQgh09TbnXu47hHwGdg6M1d8SMMWaisGk0rJpKn5ERiDrScUb0MdkxEDUldSgTshpSkvGmJJcjsifmcO0iX54pNOc3ZB9GLCn3z0mmgOd_40O8wV9cL3H1vc-b2no6FXI9D6G1lEcFvR66-gsPLtVidPbYeGtSx_Jhw775D4d7pj8_nE9v_xZ3f26ub2c3lVWCJkrEK0u-6FWQjDErrWCdUyoRotWNLWw2NXQFKazSvGFVK3kFlA5bMUEW5yMydd97zqGp41L2ax8sq7vcXBhkwxIrjXXqmYF_fIOXYZNLN--UMA1k6AKBXvKxpBSdJ1ZR7_CuDXAzE612as2RbXZqTa8ZM4OzZgs9l3Ewfr0GuSNVBK0KBzfc2m9M-7imwX_Lf8HTWCMVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521290516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Waechter, Stephanie ; Nelson, Andrea L. ; Wright, Caitlin ; Hyatt, Ashley ; Oakman, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Waechter, Stephanie ; Nelson, Andrea L. ; Wright, Caitlin ; Hyatt, Ashley ; Oakman, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>A variety of methodological paradigms, including dot probe and eye movement tasks, have been used to examine attentional biases to threat in anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, little attention has been devoted to the psychometric properties of measures from these paradigms. In the current study, participants selected for high and low social anxiety completed a dot probe and eye movement task using angry, disgust and happy facial expressions paired with neutral expressions. Results indicated that dot probe bias scores, eye movement first fixation indices, and eye movement proportions of viewing time in the first 1,500 ms had unacceptably low reliability. However, eye movement indices of attentional bias over the full 5,000 ms time course had excellent reliability. Individuals’ dot probe and eye movement biases were largely uncorrelated across the two tasks and demonstrated little relation with social anxiety scores. Implications for future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CTHRD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Anxiety disorders ; Anxiety disorders. Neuroses ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Eye movements ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Paradigms ; Phobia ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Quality of Life Research ; Social anxiety ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Cognitive therapy and research, 2014-06, Vol.38 (3), p.313-333</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-14b9100176440aafbc40f046894b4874caf718b91fc662d56b52c1a6eab43aba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-14b9100176440aafbc40f046894b4874caf718b91fc662d56b52c1a6eab43aba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28565194$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waechter, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyatt, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakman, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices</title><title>Cognitive therapy and research</title><addtitle>Cogn Ther Res</addtitle><description>A variety of methodological paradigms, including dot probe and eye movement tasks, have been used to examine attentional biases to threat in anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, little attention has been devoted to the psychometric properties of measures from these paradigms. In the current study, participants selected for high and low social anxiety completed a dot probe and eye movement task using angry, disgust and happy facial expressions paired with neutral expressions. Results indicated that dot probe bias scores, eye movement first fixation indices, and eye movement proportions of viewing time in the first 1,500 ms had unacceptably low reliability. However, eye movement indices of attentional bias over the full 5,000 ms time course had excellent reliability. Individuals’ dot probe and eye movement biases were largely uncorrelated across the two tasks and demonstrated little relation with social anxiety scores. Implications for future research are discussed.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders. Neuroses</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Phobia</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social anxiety</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0147-5916</issn><issn>1573-2819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFqGzEURUVIIY7bD-hOUALdTKonS5pRdm6SpoGYhuDSpXgja1KZ8ciR5ID_vnJsQgh09TbnXu47hHwGdg6M1d8SMMWaisGk0rJpKn5ERiDrScUb0MdkxEDUldSgTshpSkvGmJJcjsifmcO0iX54pNOc3ZB9GLCn3z0mmgOd_40O8wV9cL3H1vc-b2no6FXI9D6G1lEcFvR66-gsPLtVidPbYeGtSx_Jhw775D4d7pj8_nE9v_xZ3f26ub2c3lVWCJkrEK0u-6FWQjDErrWCdUyoRotWNLWw2NXQFKazSvGFVK3kFlA5bMUEW5yMydd97zqGp41L2ax8sq7vcXBhkwxIrjXXqmYF_fIOXYZNLN--UMA1k6AKBXvKxpBSdJ1ZR7_CuDXAzE612as2RbXZqTa8ZM4OzZgs9l3Ewfr0GuSNVBK0KBzfc2m9M-7imwX_Lf8HTWCMVg</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Waechter, Stephanie</creator><creator>Nelson, Andrea L.</creator><creator>Wright, Caitlin</creator><creator>Hyatt, Ashley</creator><creator>Oakman, Jonathan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices</title><author>Waechter, Stephanie ; Nelson, Andrea L. ; Wright, Caitlin ; Hyatt, Ashley ; Oakman, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-14b9100176440aafbc40f046894b4874caf718b91fc662d56b52c1a6eab43aba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders. Neuroses</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Phobia</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social anxiety</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waechter, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyatt, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakman, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive therapy and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waechter, Stephanie</au><au>Nelson, Andrea L.</au><au>Wright, Caitlin</au><au>Hyatt, Ashley</au><au>Oakman, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive therapy and research</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Ther Res</stitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>313-333</pages><issn>0147-5916</issn><eissn>1573-2819</eissn><coden>CTHRD8</coden><abstract>A variety of methodological paradigms, including dot probe and eye movement tasks, have been used to examine attentional biases to threat in anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, little attention has been devoted to the psychometric properties of measures from these paradigms. In the current study, participants selected for high and low social anxiety completed a dot probe and eye movement task using angry, disgust and happy facial expressions paired with neutral expressions. Results indicated that dot probe bias scores, eye movement first fixation indices, and eye movement proportions of viewing time in the first 1,500 ms had unacceptably low reliability. However, eye movement indices of attentional bias over the full 5,000 ms time course had excellent reliability. Individuals’ dot probe and eye movement biases were largely uncorrelated across the two tasks and demonstrated little relation with social anxiety scores. Implications for future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-5916 |
ispartof | Cognitive therapy and research, 2014-06, Vol.38 (3), p.313-333 |
issn | 0147-5916 1573-2819 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1529929670 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Anxiety disorders Anxiety disorders. Neuroses Bias Biological and medical sciences Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Eye movements Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Paradigms Phobia Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Quality of Life Research Social anxiety Threats |
title | Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T12%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Attentional%20Bias%20to%20Threat:%20Reliability%20of%20Dot%20Probe%20and%20Eye%20Movement%20Indices&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20therapy%20and%20research&rft.au=Waechter,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=313-333&rft.issn=0147-5916&rft.eissn=1573-2819&rft.coden=CTHRD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1529929670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521290516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |