A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage

The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474
Hauptverfasser: Stanfield, G., Irving, T.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 474
container_issue 4
container_start_page 469
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 15
creator Stanfield, G.
Irving, T.E.
description The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15296023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043135481900579</els_id><sourcerecordid>15296023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEURUVJoI7Tf9CFViVZTCKNPkbaBExIm4Ihm3QtNJqnRq1m5EqyTf59x3HJMulK8Dj3Iu5B6DMlV5RQeU0IZw1lgl8oeqkJEV2jP6AFVZ1uWs7VCVq8Ih_RWSm_CCFty_QC_V7hsg3V9hFwhk20DkaYKvYp4wqwSRFLSnCYcH0CXCCCq2EHOJQUbQ1pwsljl2KYA2PBPqcRjzaHCfDeVsgF22mYc3v7E87RqbexwKd_7xL9-Hr3eHvfrB--fb9drRvHdFcbbYehE74Hrzx4OngvgfOBWCckI9Ry4W2veyrUfJY9a6nupXJS6d5p2Wm2RF-OvZuc_myhVDOG4iBGO0HaFkNFqyVp2f-AXLBWvA8yPfcRNYP8CLqcSsngzSaHeY9nQ4k5uDIHEeYgwihqXlyZw49vjjGYZ9kFyKa4AJODIeR5cDOk8HbBXyNhm8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13902308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><description>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</description><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEURUVJoI7Tf9CFViVZTCKNPkbaBExIm4Ihm3QtNJqnRq1m5EqyTf59x3HJMulK8Dj3Iu5B6DMlV5RQeU0IZw1lgl8oeqkJEV2jP6AFVZ1uWs7VCVq8Ih_RWSm_CCFty_QC_V7hsg3V9hFwhk20DkaYKvYp4wqwSRFLSnCYcH0CXCCCq2EHOJQUbQ1pwsljl2KYA2PBPqcRjzaHCfDeVsgF22mYc3v7E87RqbexwKd_7xL9-Hr3eHvfrB--fb9drRvHdFcbbYehE74Hrzx4OngvgfOBWCckI9Ry4W2veyrUfJY9a6nupXJS6d5p2Wm2RF-OvZuc_myhVDOG4iBGO0HaFkNFqyVp2f-AXLBWvA8yPfcRNYP8CLqcSsngzSaHeY9nQ4k5uDIHEeYgwihqXlyZw49vjjGYZ9kFyKa4AJODIeR5cDOk8HbBXyNhm8s</recordid><startdate>1981</startdate><enddate>1981</enddate><creator>Stanfield, G.</creator><creator>Irving, T.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1981</creationdate><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><author>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanfield, G.</au><au>Irving, T.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1981</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>469-474</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15296023
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20suitable%20replacement%20for%20teepol%20610%20in%20the%20selective%20isolation%20of%20coliforms%20from%20marine%20waters%20and%20sewage&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Stanfield,%20G.&rft.date=1981&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=469-474&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15296023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13902308&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043135481900579&rfr_iscdi=true