A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage
The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 469 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Stanfield, G. Irving, T.E. |
description | The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15296023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0043135481900579</els_id><sourcerecordid>15296023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEURUVJoI7Tf9CFViVZTCKNPkbaBExIm4Ihm3QtNJqnRq1m5EqyTf59x3HJMulK8Dj3Iu5B6DMlV5RQeU0IZw1lgl8oeqkJEV2jP6AFVZ1uWs7VCVq8Ih_RWSm_CCFty_QC_V7hsg3V9hFwhk20DkaYKvYp4wqwSRFLSnCYcH0CXCCCq2EHOJQUbQ1pwsljl2KYA2PBPqcRjzaHCfDeVsgF22mYc3v7E87RqbexwKd_7xL9-Hr3eHvfrB--fb9drRvHdFcbbYehE74Hrzx4OngvgfOBWCckI9Ry4W2veyrUfJY9a6nupXJS6d5p2Wm2RF-OvZuc_myhVDOG4iBGO0HaFkNFqyVp2f-AXLBWvA8yPfcRNYP8CLqcSsngzSaHeY9nQ4k5uDIHEeYgwihqXlyZw49vjjGYZ9kFyKa4AJODIeR5cDOk8HbBXyNhm8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13902308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><description>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</description><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEURUVJoI7Tf9CFViVZTCKNPkbaBExIm4Ihm3QtNJqnRq1m5EqyTf59x3HJMulK8Dj3Iu5B6DMlV5RQeU0IZw1lgl8oeqkJEV2jP6AFVZ1uWs7VCVq8Ih_RWSm_CCFty_QC_V7hsg3V9hFwhk20DkaYKvYp4wqwSRFLSnCYcH0CXCCCq2EHOJQUbQ1pwsljl2KYA2PBPqcRjzaHCfDeVsgF22mYc3v7E87RqbexwKd_7xL9-Hr3eHvfrB--fb9drRvHdFcbbYehE74Hrzx4OngvgfOBWCckI9Ry4W2veyrUfJY9a6nupXJS6d5p2Wm2RF-OvZuc_myhVDOG4iBGO0HaFkNFqyVp2f-AXLBWvA8yPfcRNYP8CLqcSsngzSaHeY9nQ4k5uDIHEeYgwihqXlyZw49vjjGYZ9kFyKa4AJODIeR5cDOk8HbBXyNhm8s</recordid><startdate>1981</startdate><enddate>1981</enddate><creator>Stanfield, G.</creator><creator>Irving, T.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1981</creationdate><title>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</title><author>Stanfield, G. ; Irving, T.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-9add75fbef8fef1dff6e44d0ac56301a45fab9b158e446b3219b68c689bc96793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanfield, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irving, T.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanfield, G.</au><au>Irving, T.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>1981</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>469-474</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>The standard British culture medium for the enumeration of coliform bacteria by the membrane-filter technique is 0.4% enriched Teepol broth. However, Teepol 610, the selective agent used in this medium, is no longer commercially available. Sodium lauryl sulphate, at a concentration of 0.1% w/v, has been shown to be a suitable alternative selective agent, in the same basal medium, for the analysis of sewage and polluted marine water. Presumptive counts, and percentages of colonies confirmed as coliforms, were very similar in all trials where 0.4% Teepol and 0.1% lauryl sulphate media were compared. The new medium can easily be prepared using the same Oxoid dehydrated broth base used to prepare 0.4% Teepol medium.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 1981, Vol.15 (4), p.469-474 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15296023 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
title | A suitable replacement for teepol 610 in the selective isolation of coliforms from marine waters and sewage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20suitable%20replacement%20for%20teepol%20610%20in%20the%20selective%20isolation%20of%20coliforms%20from%20marine%20waters%20and%20sewage&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Stanfield,%20G.&rft.date=1981&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=469-474&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90057-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15296023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13902308&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0043135481900579&rfr_iscdi=true |