From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power

The business systems approach holds considerable promise for improving our understanding of the relations between societal institutions and technological and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, there have been surprisingly few attempts to validate its proposed typology of business system types. In this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organization studies 2014-05, Vol.35 (5), p.671-702
1. Verfasser: Hotho, Jasper J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 702
container_issue 5
container_start_page 671
container_title Organization studies
container_volume 35
creator Hotho, Jasper J.
description The business systems approach holds considerable promise for improving our understanding of the relations between societal institutions and technological and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, there have been surprisingly few attempts to validate its proposed typology of business system types. In this paper, I take up this issue and conduct a large-scale empirical assessment of the national business systems typology. I use data on 30 OECD countries from 2000 and 2011 to assess the validity of the typology, and explore its value for comparative institutional analysis through a fuzzy-set analysis of innovation specialization patterns. The findings illustrate that while the national business systems typology needs to be extended, it remains relevant for describing variety in national institutional frameworks. In addition, the detail it adds may provide the nuance needed for exploring more complex relations between institutions and technological and economic outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0170840613502767
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1528877811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0170840613502767</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3574338901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cdfbe8dc6cbd5feea715e15e9bbfcedef0ebc2204ff4ae3d0f501bd929bd13563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9LwzAQx4MoOKfvPgZ88aWa9Fc63-bYVBgqOJ9LmlxmR9vUXIvrf2_GFGQgHHdw97kv94OQS85uOBfilnHBspilPEpYKFJxREZcxDyIWBwfk9GuHOzqp-QMccMYizhPR6RZOFvT1dDayq4H2lm6klvb2Hq4o1M6s40p172TXWkbWdGpdwOWSK2hz7_J-x7LBhDp24Ad1Ehlo2n3AaWj821byUZ21g301X6BOycnRlYIFz9xTN4X89XsMVi-PDzNpstARSLqAqVNAZlWqSp0YgCk4Al4mxSFUaDBMChUGLLYmFhCpJlJGC_0JJwU2h8gjcbkeq_bOvvZA3Z5XaKCyk8DtsecJ2GWCZFx7tGrA3Rje-cX81QaT8IkSwTzFNtTyllEByZvXVlLN-Sc5bsH5IcP8C3BvgXlGv6I_sd_A8UOh7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1649258570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Hotho, Jasper J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hotho, Jasper J.</creatorcontrib><description>The business systems approach holds considerable promise for improving our understanding of the relations between societal institutions and technological and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, there have been surprisingly few attempts to validate its proposed typology of business system types. In this paper, I take up this issue and conduct a large-scale empirical assessment of the national business systems typology. I use data on 30 OECD countries from 2000 and 2011 to assess the validity of the typology, and explore its value for comparative institutional analysis through a fuzzy-set analysis of innovation specialization patterns. The findings illustrate that while the national business systems typology needs to be extended, it remains relevant for describing variety in national institutional frameworks. In addition, the detail it adds may provide the nuance needed for exploring more complex relations between institutions and technological and economic outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0170-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0170840613502767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ORGSDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business ; Business models ; Comparative analysis ; Evaluation ; Fuzzy sets ; International ; Multinational enterprises ; OECD ; Studies ; Taxonomy ; Technology ; Typology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Organization studies, 2014-05, Vol.35 (5), p.671-702</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cdfbe8dc6cbd5feea715e15e9bbfcedef0ebc2204ff4ae3d0f501bd929bd13563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cdfbe8dc6cbd5feea715e15e9bbfcedef0ebc2204ff4ae3d0f501bd929bd13563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0170840613502767$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840613502767$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hotho, Jasper J.</creatorcontrib><title>From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power</title><title>Organization studies</title><description>The business systems approach holds considerable promise for improving our understanding of the relations between societal institutions and technological and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, there have been surprisingly few attempts to validate its proposed typology of business system types. In this paper, I take up this issue and conduct a large-scale empirical assessment of the national business systems typology. I use data on 30 OECD countries from 2000 and 2011 to assess the validity of the typology, and explore its value for comparative institutional analysis through a fuzzy-set analysis of innovation specialization patterns. The findings illustrate that while the national business systems typology needs to be extended, it remains relevant for describing variety in national institutional frameworks. In addition, the detail it adds may provide the nuance needed for exploring more complex relations between institutions and technological and economic outcomes.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>Multinational enterprises</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0170-8406</issn><issn>1741-3044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9LwzAQx4MoOKfvPgZ88aWa9Fc63-bYVBgqOJ9LmlxmR9vUXIvrf2_GFGQgHHdw97kv94OQS85uOBfilnHBspilPEpYKFJxREZcxDyIWBwfk9GuHOzqp-QMccMYizhPR6RZOFvT1dDayq4H2lm6klvb2Hq4o1M6s40p172TXWkbWdGpdwOWSK2hz7_J-x7LBhDp24Ad1Ehlo2n3AaWj821byUZ21g301X6BOycnRlYIFz9xTN4X89XsMVi-PDzNpstARSLqAqVNAZlWqSp0YgCk4Al4mxSFUaDBMChUGLLYmFhCpJlJGC_0JJwU2h8gjcbkeq_bOvvZA3Z5XaKCyk8DtsecJ2GWCZFx7tGrA3Rje-cX81QaT8IkSwTzFNtTyllEByZvXVlLN-Sc5bsH5IcP8C3BvgXlGv6I_sd_A8UOh7Q</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Hotho, Jasper J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power</title><author>Hotho, Jasper J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-cdfbe8dc6cbd5feea715e15e9bbfcedef0ebc2204ff4ae3d0f501bd929bd13563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>Multinational enterprises</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hotho, Jasper J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organization studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hotho, Jasper J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power</atitle><jtitle>Organization studies</jtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>671-702</pages><issn>0170-8406</issn><eissn>1741-3044</eissn><coden>ORGSDM</coden><abstract>The business systems approach holds considerable promise for improving our understanding of the relations between societal institutions and technological and economic outcomes. Nonetheless, there have been surprisingly few attempts to validate its proposed typology of business system types. In this paper, I take up this issue and conduct a large-scale empirical assessment of the national business systems typology. I use data on 30 OECD countries from 2000 and 2011 to assess the validity of the typology, and explore its value for comparative institutional analysis through a fuzzy-set analysis of innovation specialization patterns. The findings illustrate that while the national business systems typology needs to be extended, it remains relevant for describing variety in national institutional frameworks. In addition, the detail it adds may provide the nuance needed for exploring more complex relations between institutions and technological and economic outcomes.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0170840613502767</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0170-8406
ispartof Organization studies, 2014-05, Vol.35 (5), p.671-702
issn 0170-8406
1741-3044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1528877811
source Access via SAGE
subjects Business
Business models
Comparative analysis
Evaluation
Fuzzy sets
International
Multinational enterprises
OECD
Studies
Taxonomy
Technology
Typology
Validity
title From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A47%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Typology%20to%20Taxonomy:%20A%20Configurational%20Analysis%20of%20National%20Business%20Systems%20and%20their%20Explanatory%20Power&rft.jtitle=Organization%20studies&rft.au=Hotho,%20Jasper%20J.&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=671-702&rft.issn=0170-8406&rft.eissn=1741-3044&rft.coden=ORGSDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0170840613502767&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3574338901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1649258570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0170840613502767&rfr_iscdi=true