The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling

Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2014-06, Vol.123 (6), p.1335-1338
Hauptverfasser: Minkoff, Howard, Berkowitz, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1338
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1335
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 123
creator Minkoff, Howard
Berkowitz, Richard
description Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis screening, and new technologies including microarray analysis, cell-free fetal DNA, and carrier gene panels have become available. Obstetrics is at a crossroads, which requires consideration of new ways of providing genetic counseling. Currently a two-tiered process is used. Specific tests such as first- or second-trimester screening for aneuploidy are offered to virtually all women by a clinician who provides counseling and who may offer additional tests to patients in particular ethnic groups and those with unique obstetric or family histories. Frequently only this latter group and those who “screen positive” on the universally offered tests are sent to a genetic counselor. This approach worked well when screening focused on a relatively small number of diagnoses, but that is no longer the case. We argue that obstetricians, who were able to maintain mastery over the content of counseling when aneuploidies and karyotype analysis were the essential diagnoses and diagnostic tools available, are rarely able to offer the same level of expertise regarding the chromosomal, genomic, and genetic diseases now diagnosable and the newest available diagnostic methodologies. Therefore, all women, not just those surpassing some poorly defined level of risk, deserve genetic counseling. Approaches for achieving this goal are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000267
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1528335388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1528335388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-5140bdc6956940356f0ca4776527821cd89b74d699fce8450bcf840e73b46b8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk6_gUiPXjrzr0l6lKJTGMzDBt5Cmr511a6dSevw25u5KeJBc0nel-f3CzwInRM8JjiVV9ezyRj_PFTIAzQkSrKYMvZ4iIZhl8ZScT5AJ94_B4aIlB2jAeUKS0bJENH5EqLMeIjK1kWLpnoD500dPThoTBceE2igq2yUtX3joa6ap1N0VJraw9n-HqHF7c08u4uns8l9dj2NLcdExgnhOC-sSBORcswSUWJruJQioVJRYguV5pIXIk1LC4onOLel4hgky7nIVc5G6HLXu3btaw--06vKW6hr00Dbe00SqhhLmFIB5TvUutZ7B6Veu2pl3LsmWG9t6WBL_7YVYhf7H_p8BcV36EtPANQO2LR1F8S81P0GnF6Cqbvlf938j-iWEjTBMcVBkwhT_JljH94Dgwo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1528335388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Minkoff, Howard ; Berkowitz, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Minkoff, Howard ; Berkowitz, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis screening, and new technologies including microarray analysis, cell-free fetal DNA, and carrier gene panels have become available. Obstetrics is at a crossroads, which requires consideration of new ways of providing genetic counseling. Currently a two-tiered process is used. Specific tests such as first- or second-trimester screening for aneuploidy are offered to virtually all women by a clinician who provides counseling and who may offer additional tests to patients in particular ethnic groups and those with unique obstetric or family histories. Frequently only this latter group and those who “screen positive” on the universally offered tests are sent to a genetic counselor. This approach worked well when screening focused on a relatively small number of diagnoses, but that is no longer the case. We argue that obstetricians, who were able to maintain mastery over the content of counseling when aneuploidies and karyotype analysis were the essential diagnoses and diagnostic tools available, are rarely able to offer the same level of expertise regarding the chromosomal, genomic, and genetic diseases now diagnosable and the newest available diagnostic methodologies. Therefore, all women, not just those surpassing some poorly defined level of risk, deserve genetic counseling. Approaches for achieving this goal are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24807321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Directive Counseling ; Female ; Genetic Counseling - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Services Accessibility - standards ; Humans ; Obstetrics ; Physician's Role ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2014-06, Vol.123 (6), p.1335-1338</ispartof><rights>by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2014 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-5140bdc6956940356f0ca4776527821cd89b74d699fce8450bcf840e73b46b8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-5140bdc6956940356f0ca4776527821cd89b74d699fce8450bcf840e73b46b8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24807321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minkoff, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis screening, and new technologies including microarray analysis, cell-free fetal DNA, and carrier gene panels have become available. Obstetrics is at a crossroads, which requires consideration of new ways of providing genetic counseling. Currently a two-tiered process is used. Specific tests such as first- or second-trimester screening for aneuploidy are offered to virtually all women by a clinician who provides counseling and who may offer additional tests to patients in particular ethnic groups and those with unique obstetric or family histories. Frequently only this latter group and those who “screen positive” on the universally offered tests are sent to a genetic counselor. This approach worked well when screening focused on a relatively small number of diagnoses, but that is no longer the case. We argue that obstetricians, who were able to maintain mastery over the content of counseling when aneuploidies and karyotype analysis were the essential diagnoses and diagnostic tools available, are rarely able to offer the same level of expertise regarding the chromosomal, genomic, and genetic diseases now diagnosable and the newest available diagnostic methodologies. Therefore, all women, not just those surpassing some poorly defined level of risk, deserve genetic counseling. Approaches for achieving this goal are discussed.</description><subject>Directive Counseling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Counseling - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAYh4Mobk6_gUiPXjrzr0l6lKJTGMzDBt5Cmr511a6dSevw25u5KeJBc0nel-f3CzwInRM8JjiVV9ezyRj_PFTIAzQkSrKYMvZ4iIZhl8ZScT5AJ94_B4aIlB2jAeUKS0bJENH5EqLMeIjK1kWLpnoD500dPThoTBceE2igq2yUtX3joa6ap1N0VJraw9n-HqHF7c08u4uns8l9dj2NLcdExgnhOC-sSBORcswSUWJruJQioVJRYguV5pIXIk1LC4onOLel4hgky7nIVc5G6HLXu3btaw--06vKW6hr00Dbe00SqhhLmFIB5TvUutZ7B6Veu2pl3LsmWG9t6WBL_7YVYhf7H_p8BcV36EtPANQO2LR1F8S81P0GnF6Cqbvlf938j-iWEjTBMcVBkwhT_JljH94Dgwo</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Minkoff, Howard</creator><creator>Berkowitz, Richard</creator><general>by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling</title><author>Minkoff, Howard ; Berkowitz, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-5140bdc6956940356f0ca4776527821cd89b74d699fce8450bcf840e73b46b8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Directive Counseling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Counseling - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minkoff, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkowitz, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minkoff, Howard</au><au>Berkowitz, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1335</spage><epage>1338</epage><pages>1335-1338</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>Recent scientific advances in human genetics and prenatal diagnostic technologies challenge the counseling infrastructure of most obstetric services. In just the past several years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines on fragile X, spinal muscular atrophy, and cystic fibrosis screening, and new technologies including microarray analysis, cell-free fetal DNA, and carrier gene panels have become available. Obstetrics is at a crossroads, which requires consideration of new ways of providing genetic counseling. Currently a two-tiered process is used. Specific tests such as first- or second-trimester screening for aneuploidy are offered to virtually all women by a clinician who provides counseling and who may offer additional tests to patients in particular ethnic groups and those with unique obstetric or family histories. Frequently only this latter group and those who “screen positive” on the universally offered tests are sent to a genetic counselor. This approach worked well when screening focused on a relatively small number of diagnoses, but that is no longer the case. We argue that obstetricians, who were able to maintain mastery over the content of counseling when aneuploidies and karyotype analysis were the essential diagnoses and diagnostic tools available, are rarely able to offer the same level of expertise regarding the chromosomal, genomic, and genetic diseases now diagnosable and the newest available diagnostic methodologies. Therefore, all women, not just those surpassing some poorly defined level of risk, deserve genetic counseling. Approaches for achieving this goal are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>24807321</pmid><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000000267</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2014-06, Vol.123 (6), p.1335-1338
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1528335388
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Directive Counseling
Female
Genetic Counseling - statistics & numerical data
Health Services Accessibility - standards
Humans
Obstetrics
Physician's Role
Risk Assessment
title The Case for Universal Prenatal Genetic Counseling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A01%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Case%20for%20Universal%20Prenatal%20Genetic%20Counseling&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Minkoff,%20Howard&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1335&rft.epage=1338&rft.pages=1335-1338&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1528335388%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1528335388&rft_id=info:pmid/24807321&rfr_iscdi=true