Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies
Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were enrolled in four randomized, double-blind, parallel studies. Patients were treated with trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate (TP) or chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointments, four times a day for seven days in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 1989-02, Vol.23 (2), p.261-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 261 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Booth, K F Calthrop, J G Cox, E Davies, J G Donnachie, H Frood, RAW Gibson, J R Gordon, J S Graham, A A |
description | Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were enrolled in four randomized, double-blind, parallel studies. Patients were treated with trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate (TP) or chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointments, four times a day for seven days in three studies, and three times a day for five days in one. Data suitable for evaluation of efficacy and safety were obtained from 448 patients. The results of each study were analysed separately and indicated that both treatments were effective and well tolerated and that there were no statistically significant differences between them. However, in three studies, efficacy trends generally favoured TP ophthalmic ointment and in one study efficacy trends favoured chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment. A wide range of pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms was isolated, with Haemophilus influenzae being the most prevalent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/23.2.261 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15280760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15280760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-43504a2ffc93853d791d14432c9de3433c2ff451831f3623a2ac4f88c7aaf7c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU2OEzEQhVsIJMLAjgN4gVjRGdvl_ltCxMwgIrHJSKNsrMKx1Q7udmO7w2Q3h-AiXImT4CijWbF6Ur2vnlT1iuIto0tGO7jco7rksORLXrNnxYKJmpacdux5saBAq7IRFbwsXsW4p5TWVd0uij-bYAedej9lLSfvjsPx3o7kE4mzm3pMmvipTz26wSri7ZgGPSZy0CHOkaje-YDD1OvRKu_-i-aw1GuSgsbzwBvyHVXSwaIjyo_7eVTJHmyy8e_DbyRBH6z-dcKMnwNRzubwjMY076yOr4sXBl3Ubx71ori9-rxZ3ZTrb9dfVh_XpeKiTqWAigrkxqgO2gp2Tcd2TAjgqttpEAAqe6JiLTADNQfkqIRpW9UgmkYxuCjen3On4H_OOiY52Ki0czhqP0fJKt7SpqYZ_HAGVfAxBm3k6ZcYjpJReepF5l4kB8ll7iXj7x5zMeazTMBR2fi00_DcTAMZK8-YjUnfP9kYfsi6gaaSN3dbuVl31-3261au4B800KQH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15280760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Booth, K F ; Calthrop, J G ; Cox, E ; Davies, J G ; Donnachie, H ; Frood, RAW ; Gibson, J R ; Gordon, J S ; Graham, A A</creator><creatorcontrib>Booth, K F ; Calthrop, J G ; Cox, E ; Davies, J G ; Donnachie, H ; Frood, RAW ; Gibson, J R ; Gordon, J S ; Graham, A A</creatorcontrib><description>Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were enrolled in four randomized, double-blind, parallel studies. Patients were treated with trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate (TP) or chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointments, four times a day for seven days in three studies, and three times a day for five days in one. Data suitable for evaluation of efficacy and safety were obtained from 448 patients. The results of each study were analysed separately and indicated that both treatments were effective and well tolerated and that there were no statistically significant differences between them. However, in three studies, efficacy trends generally favoured TP ophthalmic ointment and in one study efficacy trends favoured chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment. A wide range of pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms was isolated, with Haemophilus influenzae being the most prevalent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/23.2.261</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1989-02, Vol.23 (2), p.261-266</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-43504a2ffc93853d791d14432c9de3433c2ff451831f3623a2ac4f88c7aaf7c13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7206573$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Booth, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calthrop, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnachie, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frood, RAW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, A A</creatorcontrib><title>Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><description>Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were enrolled in four randomized, double-blind, parallel studies. Patients were treated with trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate (TP) or chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointments, four times a day for seven days in three studies, and three times a day for five days in one. Data suitable for evaluation of efficacy and safety were obtained from 448 patients. The results of each study were analysed separately and indicated that both treatments were effective and well tolerated and that there were no statistically significant differences between them. However, in three studies, efficacy trends generally favoured TP ophthalmic ointment and in one study efficacy trends favoured chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment. A wide range of pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms was isolated, with Haemophilus influenzae being the most prevalent.</description><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkU2OEzEQhVsIJMLAjgN4gVjRGdvl_ltCxMwgIrHJSKNsrMKx1Q7udmO7w2Q3h-AiXImT4CijWbF6Ur2vnlT1iuIto0tGO7jco7rksORLXrNnxYKJmpacdux5saBAq7IRFbwsXsW4p5TWVd0uij-bYAedej9lLSfvjsPx3o7kE4mzm3pMmvipTz26wSri7ZgGPSZy0CHOkaje-YDD1OvRKu_-i-aw1GuSgsbzwBvyHVXSwaIjyo_7eVTJHmyy8e_DbyRBH6z-dcKMnwNRzubwjMY076yOr4sXBl3Ubx71ori9-rxZ3ZTrb9dfVh_XpeKiTqWAigrkxqgO2gp2Tcd2TAjgqttpEAAqe6JiLTADNQfkqIRpW9UgmkYxuCjen3On4H_OOiY52Ki0czhqP0fJKt7SpqYZ_HAGVfAxBm3k6ZcYjpJReepF5l4kB8ll7iXj7x5zMeazTMBR2fi00_DcTAMZK8-YjUnfP9kYfsi6gaaSN3dbuVl31-3261au4B800KQH</recordid><startdate>198902</startdate><enddate>198902</enddate><creator>Booth, K F</creator><creator>Calthrop, J G</creator><creator>Cox, E</creator><creator>Davies, J G</creator><creator>Donnachie, H</creator><creator>Frood, RAW</creator><creator>Gibson, J R</creator><creator>Gordon, J S</creator><creator>Graham, A A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198902</creationdate><title>Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies</title><author>Booth, K F ; Calthrop, J G ; Cox, E ; Davies, J G ; Donnachie, H ; Frood, RAW ; Gibson, J R ; Gordon, J S ; Graham, A A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-43504a2ffc93853d791d14432c9de3433c2ff451831f3623a2ac4f88c7aaf7c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Booth, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calthrop, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnachie, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frood, RAW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, A A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Booth, K F</au><au>Calthrop, J G</au><au>Cox, E</au><au>Davies, J G</au><au>Donnachie, H</au><au>Frood, RAW</au><au>Gibson, J R</au><au>Gordon, J S</au><au>Graham, A A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><date>1989-02</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>261-266</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis were enrolled in four randomized, double-blind, parallel studies. Patients were treated with trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate (TP) or chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointments, four times a day for seven days in three studies, and three times a day for five days in one. Data suitable for evaluation of efficacy and safety were obtained from 448 patients. The results of each study were analysed separately and indicated that both treatments were effective and well tolerated and that there were no statistically significant differences between them. However, in three studies, efficacy trends generally favoured TP ophthalmic ointment and in one study efficacy trends favoured chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment. A wide range of pathogenic or potentially pathogenic organisms was isolated, with Haemophilus influenzae being the most prevalent.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jac/23.2.261</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1989-02, Vol.23 (2), p.261-266 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15280760 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
subjects | Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Biological and medical sciences Medical sciences Pharmacology. Drug treatments |
title | Trimethoprim-polymyxin B sulphate ophthalmic ointment versus chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis—a review of four clinical studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trimethoprim-polymyxin%20B%20sulphate%20ophthalmic%20ointment%20versus%20chloramphenicol%20ophthalmic%20ointment%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20bacterial%20conjunctivitis%E2%80%94a%20review%20of%20four%20clinical%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Booth,%20K%20F&rft.date=1989-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=261-266&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/23.2.261&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15280760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15280760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |