Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment

To enhance local water security, the Singapore government promotes two water conservation policies: the use of eco-friendly toilets to reduce yellow water (YW) disposal and the installation of water efficient devices to minimize gray water (GW) discharge. The proposed water conservation policies hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2014-07, Vol.140, p.60-68
Hauptverfasser: Ng, Bernard J.H., Zhou, Jin, Giannis, Apostolos, Chang, Victor W.-C., Wang, Jing-Yuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 140
creator Ng, Bernard J.H.
Zhou, Jin
Giannis, Apostolos
Chang, Victor W.-C.
Wang, Jing-Yuan
description To enhance local water security, the Singapore government promotes two water conservation policies: the use of eco-friendly toilets to reduce yellow water (YW) disposal and the installation of water efficient devices to minimize gray water (GW) discharge. The proposed water conservation policies have different impacts on the environmental performance of local wastewater management. The main purpose of this study is to examine and compare the impacts of different domestic wastewater streams and the effectiveness of two water conservation policies by means of life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is used to compare three scenarios, including a baseline scenario (BL), YW-reduced scenario (YWR) and GW-reduced scenario (GWR). The BL is designed based on the current wastewater management system, whereas the latter two scenarios are constructed according to the two water conservation policies that are proposed by the Singapore government. The software SIMPARO 7.3 with local data and an eco-invent database is used to build up the model, and the functional unit is defined as the daily wastewater disposal of a Singapore resident. Due to local water supply characteristics, the system boundary is extended to include the sewage sludge management and tap water production processes. The characterization results indicate that the GWR has a significant impact reduction (22–25%) while the YWR has only a 2–4% impact reduction compared with the BL. The contribution analysis reveals that the GW dominates many impact categories except eutrophication potential. The tap water production is identified as the most influential process due to its high embodied energy demand in a local context. Life cycle costing analysis shows that both YWR and GWR are financially favorable. It is also revealed that the current water conservation policies could only achieve Singapore's short-term targets. Therefore, two additional strategies are recommended for achieving long-term goals. This study provides a comprehensive and reliable environmental profile of Singapore's wastewater management with the help of extended system boundary and local data. This work also fills the research gap of previous studies by identifying the contribution of different wastewater streams, which would serve as a good reference for source-separating sanitation system design. •Both yellow and gray water reduction policies help relieve environmental impacts.•Gray water carries more environmental burdens due to its large volume
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1526732383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479714001431</els_id><sourcerecordid>3314700651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-da20c24ef9ce6b0ba3c1987fcead06df1e754cf27b243eabd56c70f1847a7fcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMozpvRj6AERHDTmn9NWjeDDDMqDOhC1yFNbyClTZ5J-4a39ZOb8p4OuHF1yeV3z705B6FXlNSUUPl-rEcIh9mEmhEqakJr0rAnaEdJ11St5OQp2hFOaCVUpy7QZc4jIYQzqp6jCyYUk52UO_TrNhx8imGGsJgJT94Btkc7ATY5Q85bH0eHB-8cpO0xxBny4i1-MHmBB7NAwnlJYOb8AX-Lk7dHDAW2iz9AKBLYB2zwkuLe27JiTb0JGB7XvkDPnJkyvDzXK_Tj7vb7zefq_uunLzcf7ysrFFmqwTBimQDXWZA96Q23tGuVs2AGIgdHQTXCOqZ6JjiYfmikVcTRVihTKMuv0LuT7j7Fn2v5g559tjBNJkBcs6YNk4oz3vKCvvkHHeOaQrluo1pe7BW0UM2JsinmnMDpffKzSUdNid5C0qM-h6S3kDShuoRU5l6f1dd-huHv1J9UCvD2DJhcLHPJBOvzI9c2VDEqCnd94qDYdvCQdLYegoXBp-K_HqL_zym_AeqztmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1528363041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ng, Bernard J.H. ; Zhou, Jin ; Giannis, Apostolos ; Chang, Victor W.-C. ; Wang, Jing-Yuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ng, Bernard J.H. ; Zhou, Jin ; Giannis, Apostolos ; Chang, Victor W.-C. ; Wang, Jing-Yuan</creatorcontrib><description>To enhance local water security, the Singapore government promotes two water conservation policies: the use of eco-friendly toilets to reduce yellow water (YW) disposal and the installation of water efficient devices to minimize gray water (GW) discharge. The proposed water conservation policies have different impacts on the environmental performance of local wastewater management. The main purpose of this study is to examine and compare the impacts of different domestic wastewater streams and the effectiveness of two water conservation policies by means of life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is used to compare three scenarios, including a baseline scenario (BL), YW-reduced scenario (YWR) and GW-reduced scenario (GWR). The BL is designed based on the current wastewater management system, whereas the latter two scenarios are constructed according to the two water conservation policies that are proposed by the Singapore government. The software SIMPARO 7.3 with local data and an eco-invent database is used to build up the model, and the functional unit is defined as the daily wastewater disposal of a Singapore resident. Due to local water supply characteristics, the system boundary is extended to include the sewage sludge management and tap water production processes. The characterization results indicate that the GWR has a significant impact reduction (22–25%) while the YWR has only a 2–4% impact reduction compared with the BL. The contribution analysis reveals that the GW dominates many impact categories except eutrophication potential. The tap water production is identified as the most influential process due to its high embodied energy demand in a local context. Life cycle costing analysis shows that both YWR and GWR are financially favorable. It is also revealed that the current water conservation policies could only achieve Singapore's short-term targets. Therefore, two additional strategies are recommended for achieving long-term goals. This study provides a comprehensive and reliable environmental profile of Singapore's wastewater management with the help of extended system boundary and local data. This work also fills the research gap of previous studies by identifying the contribution of different wastewater streams, which would serve as a good reference for source-separating sanitation system design. •Both yellow and gray water reduction policies help relieve environmental impacts.•Gray water carries more environmental burdens due to its large volume.•The tap water supply dominates the overall impact due to its high embodied energy.•Both policies pose no additional financial burdens on users.•Additional strategies are recommended to meet the long-term goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24726966</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cities ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Conventional wastewater management system ; Environmental management ; Environmental Policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle costing ; Pollution ; Singapore ; Software ; Synecology ; Tropical Climate ; Waste disposal ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste Water ; Wastewaters ; Water conservation ; Water conservation policy ; Water Supply ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2014-07, Vol.140, p.60-68</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Jul 1, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-da20c24ef9ce6b0ba3c1987fcead06df1e754cf27b243eabd56c70f1847a7fcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-da20c24ef9ce6b0ba3c1987fcead06df1e754cf27b243eabd56c70f1847a7fcc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28517214$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24726966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ng, Bernard J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannis, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Victor W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing-Yuan</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>To enhance local water security, the Singapore government promotes two water conservation policies: the use of eco-friendly toilets to reduce yellow water (YW) disposal and the installation of water efficient devices to minimize gray water (GW) discharge. The proposed water conservation policies have different impacts on the environmental performance of local wastewater management. The main purpose of this study is to examine and compare the impacts of different domestic wastewater streams and the effectiveness of two water conservation policies by means of life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is used to compare three scenarios, including a baseline scenario (BL), YW-reduced scenario (YWR) and GW-reduced scenario (GWR). The BL is designed based on the current wastewater management system, whereas the latter two scenarios are constructed according to the two water conservation policies that are proposed by the Singapore government. The software SIMPARO 7.3 with local data and an eco-invent database is used to build up the model, and the functional unit is defined as the daily wastewater disposal of a Singapore resident. Due to local water supply characteristics, the system boundary is extended to include the sewage sludge management and tap water production processes. The characterization results indicate that the GWR has a significant impact reduction (22–25%) while the YWR has only a 2–4% impact reduction compared with the BL. The contribution analysis reveals that the GW dominates many impact categories except eutrophication potential. The tap water production is identified as the most influential process due to its high embodied energy demand in a local context. Life cycle costing analysis shows that both YWR and GWR are financially favorable. It is also revealed that the current water conservation policies could only achieve Singapore's short-term targets. Therefore, two additional strategies are recommended for achieving long-term goals. This study provides a comprehensive and reliable environmental profile of Singapore's wastewater management with the help of extended system boundary and local data. This work also fills the research gap of previous studies by identifying the contribution of different wastewater streams, which would serve as a good reference for source-separating sanitation system design. •Both yellow and gray water reduction policies help relieve environmental impacts.•Gray water carries more environmental burdens due to its large volume.•The tap water supply dominates the overall impact due to its high embodied energy.•Both policies pose no additional financial burdens on users.•Additional strategies are recommended to meet the long-term goals.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Conventional wastewater management system</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle costing</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Singapore</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water conservation policy</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMozpvRj6AERHDTmn9NWjeDDDMqDOhC1yFNbyClTZ5J-4a39ZOb8p4OuHF1yeV3z705B6FXlNSUUPl-rEcIh9mEmhEqakJr0rAnaEdJ11St5OQp2hFOaCVUpy7QZc4jIYQzqp6jCyYUk52UO_TrNhx8imGGsJgJT94Btkc7ATY5Q85bH0eHB-8cpO0xxBny4i1-MHmBB7NAwnlJYOb8AX-Lk7dHDAW2iz9AKBLYB2zwkuLe27JiTb0JGB7XvkDPnJkyvDzXK_Tj7vb7zefq_uunLzcf7ysrFFmqwTBimQDXWZA96Q23tGuVs2AGIgdHQTXCOqZ6JjiYfmikVcTRVihTKMuv0LuT7j7Fn2v5g559tjBNJkBcs6YNk4oz3vKCvvkHHeOaQrluo1pe7BW0UM2JsinmnMDpffKzSUdNid5C0qM-h6S3kDShuoRU5l6f1dd-huHv1J9UCvD2DJhcLHPJBOvzI9c2VDEqCnd94qDYdvCQdLYegoXBp-K_HqL_zym_AeqztmI</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Ng, Bernard J.H.</creator><creator>Zhou, Jin</creator><creator>Giannis, Apostolos</creator><creator>Chang, Victor W.-C.</creator><creator>Wang, Jing-Yuan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment</title><author>Ng, Bernard J.H. ; Zhou, Jin ; Giannis, Apostolos ; Chang, Victor W.-C. ; Wang, Jing-Yuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-da20c24ef9ce6b0ba3c1987fcead06df1e754cf27b243eabd56c70f1847a7fcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Conventional wastewater management system</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle costing</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Singapore</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water conservation policy</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ng, Bernard J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannis, Apostolos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Victor W.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing-Yuan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ng, Bernard J.H.</au><au>Zhou, Jin</au><au>Giannis, Apostolos</au><au>Chang, Victor W.-C.</au><au>Wang, Jing-Yuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>140</volume><spage>60</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>60-68</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>To enhance local water security, the Singapore government promotes two water conservation policies: the use of eco-friendly toilets to reduce yellow water (YW) disposal and the installation of water efficient devices to minimize gray water (GW) discharge. The proposed water conservation policies have different impacts on the environmental performance of local wastewater management. The main purpose of this study is to examine and compare the impacts of different domestic wastewater streams and the effectiveness of two water conservation policies by means of life cycle assessment (LCA). LCA is used to compare three scenarios, including a baseline scenario (BL), YW-reduced scenario (YWR) and GW-reduced scenario (GWR). The BL is designed based on the current wastewater management system, whereas the latter two scenarios are constructed according to the two water conservation policies that are proposed by the Singapore government. The software SIMPARO 7.3 with local data and an eco-invent database is used to build up the model, and the functional unit is defined as the daily wastewater disposal of a Singapore resident. Due to local water supply characteristics, the system boundary is extended to include the sewage sludge management and tap water production processes. The characterization results indicate that the GWR has a significant impact reduction (22–25%) while the YWR has only a 2–4% impact reduction compared with the BL. The contribution analysis reveals that the GW dominates many impact categories except eutrophication potential. The tap water production is identified as the most influential process due to its high embodied energy demand in a local context. Life cycle costing analysis shows that both YWR and GWR are financially favorable. It is also revealed that the current water conservation policies could only achieve Singapore's short-term targets. Therefore, two additional strategies are recommended for achieving long-term goals. This study provides a comprehensive and reliable environmental profile of Singapore's wastewater management with the help of extended system boundary and local data. This work also fills the research gap of previous studies by identifying the contribution of different wastewater streams, which would serve as a good reference for source-separating sanitation system design. •Both yellow and gray water reduction policies help relieve environmental impacts.•Gray water carries more environmental burdens due to its large volume.•The tap water supply dominates the overall impact due to its high embodied energy.•Both policies pose no additional financial burdens on users.•Additional strategies are recommended to meet the long-term goals.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24726966</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.052</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2014-07, Vol.140, p.60-68
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1526732383
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Cities
Conservation of Natural Resources
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Conventional wastewater management system
Environmental management
Environmental Policy
Exact sciences and technology
Fresh water ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle costing
Pollution
Singapore
Software
Synecology
Tropical Climate
Waste disposal
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste Water
Wastewaters
Water conservation
Water conservation policy
Water Supply
Water treatment
Water treatment and pollution
title Environmental life cycle assessment of different domestic wastewater streams: Policy effectiveness in a tropical urban environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20life%20cycle%20assessment%20of%20different%20domestic%20wastewater%20streams:%20Policy%20effectiveness%20in%20a%20tropical%20urban%20environment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Ng,%20Bernard%20J.H.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=140&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=60-68&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3314700651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1528363041&rft_id=info:pmid/24726966&rft_els_id=S0301479714001431&rfr_iscdi=true