Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics

MAC (minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anaesthetic) and CP50i (minimum plasma concentration of i.v. anaesthetics) are well-established measures to compare potencies of anaesthetics. The underlying clinical endpoint immobility reflects mainly effects of anaesthetics on the spinal cord, whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2014-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1067-1074
Hauptverfasser: Pilge, S., Jordan, D., Kreuzer, M., Kochs, E.F., Schneider, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1074
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1067
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 112
creator Pilge, S.
Jordan, D.
Kreuzer, M.
Kochs, E.F.
Schneider, G.
description MAC (minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anaesthetic) and CP50i (minimum plasma concentration of i.v. anaesthetics) are well-established measures to compare potencies of anaesthetics. The underlying clinical endpoint immobility reflects mainly effects of anaesthetics on the spinal cord, which limits the use of this measure for comparison of effects on the main target organ of general anaesthesia—the brain. The present study determines the median concentration of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol that induce the onset of electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (‘silent second’): MACBS and CP50BS. Fifty-five unpremedicated patients (ASA physical status of I or II) undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol. A two-channel EEG was continuously recorded to identify ‘silent second’. Independent cross-over pairs were analysed using the ‘Dixon’s up-and-down’ method, and MACBS/CP50BS values were calculated by logistic regression. CP50BS was 4.9 µg ml−1 for propofol. MACBS was 2.9 vol% for sevoflurane and 1.5 vol% for isoflurane. CP50BS of propofol was less than one-third of CP50i, whereas MACBS of sevoflurane was >1.4-fold of MAC; MACBS of isoflurane was 1.3-fold of MAC. Immobility and cerebral effects reflect different entities of anaesthetic action. The median concentration of anaesthetic drug (volatile or i.v. agent) required to induce ‘silent second’ might be a more useful metric than the median concentration required to prevent movement in response to a surgical stimulus in order to compare relative potencies of anaesthetic agents on the brain. Advantage of the ‘silent second’ is an easy identification of this endpoint, while such a deep level is not required for clinical anaesthesia.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aeu016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525765920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aeu016</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217307948</els_id><sourcerecordid>1525765920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9608c87ef90f0f3ced9b6294942219d3d19f1e96b89fdf350da81ddaa7fcd3703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68QdIL4IIdSfpR5rjWvyCFT3oOabJBLt025q0gv_erl29KJ4GZp55h3kIOaZwQUFE82Kl5gp7oOkOmdKY0zDlnO6SKQDwEARlE3Lg_QqAciaSfTJhcZpkwNiUvFz2zneB79vWofdlU4f3izxQtQmKX5P8MYFA-WCNyvdDM2hsoNFh4VQVoLWou6-eqhX67hW7UvtDsmdV5fFoW2fk-frqKb8Nlw83d_liGepIZF0oUsh0xtEKsGAjjUYUKROxiBmjwkSGCktRpEUmrLFRAkZl1BiluNUm4hDNyNmY27rmrR_Oy3XpNVaVqrHpvaQJS3iaCLZBz0dUu8Z7h1a2rlwr9yEpyI1RORiVo9EBPtnm9sUazQ_6rXAATkeg6dv_g-KRw8HCe4lOel1iPXxaukGcNE3519onBkaRyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525765920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Pilge, S. ; Jordan, D. ; Kreuzer, M. ; Kochs, E.F. ; Schneider, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilge, S. ; Jordan, D. ; Kreuzer, M. ; Kochs, E.F. ; Schneider, G.</creatorcontrib><description>MAC (minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anaesthetic) and CP50i (minimum plasma concentration of i.v. anaesthetics) are well-established measures to compare potencies of anaesthetics. The underlying clinical endpoint immobility reflects mainly effects of anaesthetics on the spinal cord, which limits the use of this measure for comparison of effects on the main target organ of general anaesthesia—the brain. The present study determines the median concentration of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol that induce the onset of electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (‘silent second’): MACBS and CP50BS. Fifty-five unpremedicated patients (ASA physical status of I or II) undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol. A two-channel EEG was continuously recorded to identify ‘silent second’. Independent cross-over pairs were analysed using the ‘Dixon’s up-and-down’ method, and MACBS/CP50BS values were calculated by logistic regression. CP50BS was 4.9 µg ml−1 for propofol. MACBS was 2.9 vol% for sevoflurane and 1.5 vol% for isoflurane. CP50BS of propofol was less than one-third of CP50i, whereas MACBS of sevoflurane was &gt;1.4-fold of MAC; MACBS of isoflurane was 1.3-fold of MAC. Immobility and cerebral effects reflect different entities of anaesthetic action. The median concentration of anaesthetic drug (volatile or i.v. agent) required to induce ‘silent second’ might be a more useful metric than the median concentration required to prevent movement in response to a surgical stimulus in order to compare relative potencies of anaesthetic agents on the brain. Advantage of the ‘silent second’ is an easy identification of this endpoint, while such a deep level is not required for clinical anaesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24658022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; anaesthetics, inhalation ; anaesthetics, intravenous ; Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage ; Brain - drug effects ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; electroencephalography ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Isoflurane - administration &amp; dosage ; Male ; Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage ; Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2014-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1067-1074</ispartof><rights>2014 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2014</rights><rights>The Author [2014]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9608c87ef90f0f3ced9b6294942219d3d19f1e96b89fdf350da81ddaa7fcd3703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9608c87ef90f0f3ced9b6294942219d3d19f1e96b89fdf350da81ddaa7fcd3703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilge, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochs, E.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>MAC (minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anaesthetic) and CP50i (minimum plasma concentration of i.v. anaesthetics) are well-established measures to compare potencies of anaesthetics. The underlying clinical endpoint immobility reflects mainly effects of anaesthetics on the spinal cord, which limits the use of this measure for comparison of effects on the main target organ of general anaesthesia—the brain. The present study determines the median concentration of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol that induce the onset of electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (‘silent second’): MACBS and CP50BS. Fifty-five unpremedicated patients (ASA physical status of I or II) undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol. A two-channel EEG was continuously recorded to identify ‘silent second’. Independent cross-over pairs were analysed using the ‘Dixon’s up-and-down’ method, and MACBS/CP50BS values were calculated by logistic regression. CP50BS was 4.9 µg ml−1 for propofol. MACBS was 2.9 vol% for sevoflurane and 1.5 vol% for isoflurane. CP50BS of propofol was less than one-third of CP50i, whereas MACBS of sevoflurane was &gt;1.4-fold of MAC; MACBS of isoflurane was 1.3-fold of MAC. Immobility and cerebral effects reflect different entities of anaesthetic action. The median concentration of anaesthetic drug (volatile or i.v. agent) required to induce ‘silent second’ might be a more useful metric than the median concentration required to prevent movement in response to a surgical stimulus in order to compare relative potencies of anaesthetic agents on the brain. Advantage of the ‘silent second’ is an easy identification of this endpoint, while such a deep level is not required for clinical anaesthesia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anaesthetics, inhalation</subject><subject>anaesthetics, intravenous</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Brain - drug effects</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoflurane - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68QdIL4IIdSfpR5rjWvyCFT3oOabJBLt025q0gv_erl29KJ4GZp55h3kIOaZwQUFE82Kl5gp7oOkOmdKY0zDlnO6SKQDwEARlE3Lg_QqAciaSfTJhcZpkwNiUvFz2zneB79vWofdlU4f3izxQtQmKX5P8MYFA-WCNyvdDM2hsoNFh4VQVoLWou6-eqhX67hW7UvtDsmdV5fFoW2fk-frqKb8Nlw83d_liGepIZF0oUsh0xtEKsGAjjUYUKROxiBmjwkSGCktRpEUmrLFRAkZl1BiluNUm4hDNyNmY27rmrR_Oy3XpNVaVqrHpvaQJS3iaCLZBz0dUu8Z7h1a2rlwr9yEpyI1RORiVo9EBPtnm9sUazQ_6rXAATkeg6dv_g-KRw8HCe4lOel1iPXxaukGcNE3519onBkaRyw</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Pilge, S.</creator><creator>Jordan, D.</creator><creator>Kreuzer, M.</creator><creator>Kochs, E.F.</creator><creator>Schneider, G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics</title><author>Pilge, S. ; Jordan, D. ; Kreuzer, M. ; Kochs, E.F. ; Schneider, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-9608c87ef90f0f3ced9b6294942219d3d19f1e96b89fdf350da81ddaa7fcd3703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anaesthetics, inhalation</topic><topic>anaesthetics, intravenous</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Brain - drug effects</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoflurane - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methyl Ethers - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilge, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochs, E.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilge, S.</au><au>Jordan, D.</au><au>Kreuzer, M.</au><au>Kochs, E.F.</au><au>Schneider, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1067</spage><epage>1074</epage><pages>1067-1074</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>MAC (minimum alveolar concentration of an inhaled anaesthetic) and CP50i (minimum plasma concentration of i.v. anaesthetics) are well-established measures to compare potencies of anaesthetics. The underlying clinical endpoint immobility reflects mainly effects of anaesthetics on the spinal cord, which limits the use of this measure for comparison of effects on the main target organ of general anaesthesia—the brain. The present study determines the median concentration of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol that induce the onset of electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (‘silent second’): MACBS and CP50BS. Fifty-five unpremedicated patients (ASA physical status of I or II) undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol. A two-channel EEG was continuously recorded to identify ‘silent second’. Independent cross-over pairs were analysed using the ‘Dixon’s up-and-down’ method, and MACBS/CP50BS values were calculated by logistic regression. CP50BS was 4.9 µg ml−1 for propofol. MACBS was 2.9 vol% for sevoflurane and 1.5 vol% for isoflurane. CP50BS of propofol was less than one-third of CP50i, whereas MACBS of sevoflurane was &gt;1.4-fold of MAC; MACBS of isoflurane was 1.3-fold of MAC. Immobility and cerebral effects reflect different entities of anaesthetic action. The median concentration of anaesthetic drug (volatile or i.v. agent) required to induce ‘silent second’ might be a more useful metric than the median concentration required to prevent movement in response to a surgical stimulus in order to compare relative potencies of anaesthetic agents on the brain. Advantage of the ‘silent second’ is an easy identification of this endpoint, while such a deep level is not required for clinical anaesthesia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24658022</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aeu016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2014-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1067-1074
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525765920
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
anaesthetics, inhalation
anaesthetics, intravenous
Anesthetics, Inhalation - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Brain - drug effects
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
electroencephalography
Electroencephalography - drug effects
Female
Humans
Isoflurane - administration & dosage
Male
Methyl Ethers - administration & dosage
Propofol - administration & dosage
title Burst suppression-MAC and burst suppression-CP50 as measures of cerebral effects of anaesthetics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T16%3A39%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Burst%20suppression-MAC%20and%20burst%20suppression-CP50%20as%20measures%20of%20cerebral%20effects%20of%20anaesthetics&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Pilge,%20S.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1067&rft.epage=1074&rft.pages=1067-1074&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aeu016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1525765920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525765920&rft_id=info:pmid/24658022&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aeu016&rft_els_id=S0007091217307948&rfr_iscdi=true