Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCAG) alone or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). CAV limits long-term survival after he...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014-05, Vol.63 (19), p.1992-2004 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2004 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 19 |
| container_start_page | 1992 |
| container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | WEVER-PINZON, Omar ROMERO, Jorge STEHLIK, Josef KELESIDIS, Iosif WEVER-PINZON, James MANRIQUE, Carlos BUDGE, Deborah DRAKOS, Stavros G PINA, Ileana L KFOURY, Abdallah G GARCIA, Mario J |
| description | This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCAG) alone or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
CAV limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, and screening for CAV is performed on annual basis. CCTA is currently not recommended for CAV screening due to the limited accuracy reported by early studies. Technological advances, however, might have resulted in improved test performance and might justify re-evaluation of this recommendation.
A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for all prospective trials assessing CAV using CCTA was performed using a standard approach for meta-analysis for diagnostic test and a bivariate analysis.
Thirteen studies evaluating 615 patients (mean age 52 years, 83% male) and 9,481 segments fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patient-based analyses comparing CCTA versus CCAG for the detection of any CAV (> luminal irregularities) and significant CAV (stenosis ≥50%), showed mean weighted sensitivities of 97% and 94%, specificities of 81% and 92%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and 99%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and 67%, and diagnostic accuracies of 88% and 94%, respectively. There was a strong trend toward improved sensitivity (97% vs. 91%, p = 0.06) and NPV (99% vs. 97%, p = 0.06) to detect significant CAV with 64-slice compared with 16-slice CCTA. A patient-based analysis of 64-slice CCTA versus IVUS showed a mean weighted sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 75% to detect CAV (intimal thickening >0.5 mm), whereas the PPV and NPV were 93% and 50%, respectively.
CCTA using currently available technology is a reliable noninvasive imaging alternative to coronary angiography with an excellent sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for the detection of CAV. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.071 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525763354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1525763354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p311t-4b23cb0fdb6785f229bdd49c32d1b03f9fbcebb93d10fa872a227bcdd5d52f4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAAhC0EgvL4AwzICxJLgh9x47BF4SkVwVBYKz_bVEkcbAepM3-cVLRiuhu-O-kOgEuMUozw9HadroVSKUE4SxFOUY4PwAQzxhPKivwQTFBOWYJRkZ-A0xDWCKEpx8UxOCHZaHDGJ-Cnct51wm9g5dp-iEbDuWvd0ot-tYFlt6z33joP48rAexONirXroLOwEl7XQsGyabacjfBTBDU0rhdxtbmDJXw1USRlJ5pNqMM28u5d6LcN3wbOfS2acA6O7CjmYqdn4OPxYV49J7O3p5eqnCU9xTgmmSRUSWS1nOacWUIKqXVWKEo0lojawkplpCyoxsgKnhNBSC6V1kwzYjNBz8DNX2_v3ddgQly0dVCmaURn3BAWmBGWTyll2Yhe7dBBtkYvel-340mL_XEjcL0Dxr2isV50qg7_HGcZZ5zTX0UJgL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525763354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WEVER-PINZON, Omar ; ROMERO, Jorge ; STEHLIK, Josef ; KELESIDIS, Iosif ; WEVER-PINZON, James ; MANRIQUE, Carlos ; BUDGE, Deborah ; DRAKOS, Stavros G ; PINA, Ileana L ; KFOURY, Abdallah G ; GARCIA, Mario J</creator><creatorcontrib>WEVER-PINZON, Omar ; ROMERO, Jorge ; STEHLIK, Josef ; KELESIDIS, Iosif ; WEVER-PINZON, James ; MANRIQUE, Carlos ; BUDGE, Deborah ; DRAKOS, Stavros G ; PINA, Ileana L ; KFOURY, Abdallah G ; GARCIA, Mario J</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCAG) alone or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
CAV limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, and screening for CAV is performed on annual basis. CCTA is currently not recommended for CAV screening due to the limited accuracy reported by early studies. Technological advances, however, might have resulted in improved test performance and might justify re-evaluation of this recommendation.
A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for all prospective trials assessing CAV using CCTA was performed using a standard approach for meta-analysis for diagnostic test and a bivariate analysis.
Thirteen studies evaluating 615 patients (mean age 52 years, 83% male) and 9,481 segments fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patient-based analyses comparing CCTA versus CCAG for the detection of any CAV (> luminal irregularities) and significant CAV (stenosis ≥50%), showed mean weighted sensitivities of 97% and 94%, specificities of 81% and 92%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and 99%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and 67%, and diagnostic accuracies of 88% and 94%, respectively. There was a strong trend toward improved sensitivity (97% vs. 91%, p = 0.06) and NPV (99% vs. 97%, p = 0.06) to detect significant CAV with 64-slice compared with 16-slice CCTA. A patient-based analysis of 64-slice CCTA versus IVUS showed a mean weighted sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 75% to detect CAV (intimal thickening >0.5 mm), whereas the PPV and NPV were 93% and 50%, respectively.
CCTA using currently available technology is a reliable noninvasive imaging alternative to coronary angiography with an excellent sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for the detection of CAV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24681148</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allografts - diagnostic imaging ; Allografts - pathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular system ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Angiography - standards ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - standards ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014-05, Vol.63 (19), p.1992-2004</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28548588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24681148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WEVER-PINZON, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMERO, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEHLIK, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELESIDIS, Iosif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEVER-PINZON, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANRIQUE, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUDGE, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRAKOS, Stavros G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINA, Ileana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KFOURY, Abdallah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARCIA, Mario J</creatorcontrib><title>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCAG) alone or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
CAV limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, and screening for CAV is performed on annual basis. CCTA is currently not recommended for CAV screening due to the limited accuracy reported by early studies. Technological advances, however, might have resulted in improved test performance and might justify re-evaluation of this recommendation.
A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for all prospective trials assessing CAV using CCTA was performed using a standard approach for meta-analysis for diagnostic test and a bivariate analysis.
Thirteen studies evaluating 615 patients (mean age 52 years, 83% male) and 9,481 segments fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patient-based analyses comparing CCTA versus CCAG for the detection of any CAV (> luminal irregularities) and significant CAV (stenosis ≥50%), showed mean weighted sensitivities of 97% and 94%, specificities of 81% and 92%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and 99%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and 67%, and diagnostic accuracies of 88% and 94%, respectively. There was a strong trend toward improved sensitivity (97% vs. 91%, p = 0.06) and NPV (99% vs. 97%, p = 0.06) to detect significant CAV with 64-slice compared with 16-slice CCTA. A patient-based analysis of 64-slice CCTA versus IVUS showed a mean weighted sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 75% to detect CAV (intimal thickening >0.5 mm), whereas the PPV and NPV were 93% and 50%, respectively.
CCTA using currently available technology is a reliable noninvasive imaging alternative to coronary angiography with an excellent sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for the detection of CAV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allografts - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Allografts - pathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - standards</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAAhC0EgvL4AwzICxJLgh9x47BF4SkVwVBYKz_bVEkcbAepM3-cVLRiuhu-O-kOgEuMUozw9HadroVSKUE4SxFOUY4PwAQzxhPKivwQTFBOWYJRkZ-A0xDWCKEpx8UxOCHZaHDGJ-Cnct51wm9g5dp-iEbDuWvd0ot-tYFlt6z33joP48rAexONirXroLOwEl7XQsGyabacjfBTBDU0rhdxtbmDJXw1USRlJ5pNqMM28u5d6LcN3wbOfS2acA6O7CjmYqdn4OPxYV49J7O3p5eqnCU9xTgmmSRUSWS1nOacWUIKqXVWKEo0lojawkplpCyoxsgKnhNBSC6V1kwzYjNBz8DNX2_v3ddgQly0dVCmaURn3BAWmBGWTyll2Yhe7dBBtkYvel-340mL_XEjcL0Dxr2isV50qg7_HGcZZ5zTX0UJgL4</recordid><startdate>20140520</startdate><enddate>20140520</enddate><creator>WEVER-PINZON, Omar</creator><creator>ROMERO, Jorge</creator><creator>STEHLIK, Josef</creator><creator>KELESIDIS, Iosif</creator><creator>WEVER-PINZON, James</creator><creator>MANRIQUE, Carlos</creator><creator>BUDGE, Deborah</creator><creator>DRAKOS, Stavros G</creator><creator>PINA, Ileana L</creator><creator>KFOURY, Abdallah G</creator><creator>GARCIA, Mario J</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140520</creationdate><title>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials</title><author>WEVER-PINZON, Omar ; ROMERO, Jorge ; STEHLIK, Josef ; KELESIDIS, Iosif ; WEVER-PINZON, James ; MANRIQUE, Carlos ; BUDGE, Deborah ; DRAKOS, Stavros G ; PINA, Ileana L ; KFOURY, Abdallah G ; GARCIA, Mario J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p311t-4b23cb0fdb6785f229bdd49c32d1b03f9fbcebb93d10fa872a227bcdd5d52f4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allografts - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Allografts - pathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - standards</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WEVER-PINZON, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROMERO, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEHLIK, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELESIDIS, Iosif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEVER-PINZON, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANRIQUE, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUDGE, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRAKOS, Stavros G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINA, Ileana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KFOURY, Abdallah G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARCIA, Mario J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WEVER-PINZON, Omar</au><au>ROMERO, Jorge</au><au>STEHLIK, Josef</au><au>KELESIDIS, Iosif</au><au>WEVER-PINZON, James</au><au>MANRIQUE, Carlos</au><au>BUDGE, Deborah</au><au>DRAKOS, Stavros G</au><au>PINA, Ileana L</au><au>KFOURY, Abdallah G</au><au>GARCIA, Mario J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2014-05-20</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>1992</spage><epage>2004</epage><pages>1992-2004</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><coden>JACCDI</coden><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in comparison with conventional coronary angiography (CCAG) alone or with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
CAV limits long-term survival after heart transplantation, and screening for CAV is performed on annual basis. CCTA is currently not recommended for CAV screening due to the limited accuracy reported by early studies. Technological advances, however, might have resulted in improved test performance and might justify re-evaluation of this recommendation.
A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for all prospective trials assessing CAV using CCTA was performed using a standard approach for meta-analysis for diagnostic test and a bivariate analysis.
Thirteen studies evaluating 615 patients (mean age 52 years, 83% male) and 9,481 segments fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patient-based analyses comparing CCTA versus CCAG for the detection of any CAV (> luminal irregularities) and significant CAV (stenosis ≥50%), showed mean weighted sensitivities of 97% and 94%, specificities of 81% and 92%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and 99%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and 67%, and diagnostic accuracies of 88% and 94%, respectively. There was a strong trend toward improved sensitivity (97% vs. 91%, p = 0.06) and NPV (99% vs. 97%, p = 0.06) to detect significant CAV with 64-slice compared with 16-slice CCTA. A patient-based analysis of 64-slice CCTA versus IVUS showed a mean weighted sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 75% to detect CAV (intimal thickening >0.5 mm), whereas the PPV and NPV were 93% and 50%, respectively.
CCTA using currently available technology is a reliable noninvasive imaging alternative to coronary angiography with an excellent sensitivity, specificity, and NPV for the detection of CAV.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>24681148</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.071</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014-05, Vol.63 (19), p.1992-2004 |
| issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1525763354 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Allografts - diagnostic imaging Allografts - pathology Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Cardiovascular system Coronary Angiography - methods Coronary Angiography - standards Female Heart Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Multidetector Computed Tomography - methods Multidetector Computed Tomography - standards Prospective Studies Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards |
| title | Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronary%20Computed%20Tomography%20Angiography%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20Cardiac%20Allograft%20Vasculopathy:%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Prospective%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=WEVER-PINZON,%20Omar&rft.date=2014-05-20&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=1992&rft.epage=2004&rft.pages=1992-2004&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.coden=JACCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1525763354%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525763354&rft_id=info:pmid/24681148&rfr_iscdi=true |