Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat
The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative effectiveness of stimulation of different sensory modalities in eliciting Type 2 theta in the rat in the presence or absence of a ferret. Visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli were presented to rats in both conditions. Tactile stimulation...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral neuroscience 1989-02, Vol.103 (1), p.106-111 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 111 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 106 |
| container_title | Behavioral neuroscience |
| container_volume | 103 |
| creator | Montoya, Christopher P Heynen, Arnold J Faris, Peter D Sainsbury, Robert S |
| description | The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative effectiveness of stimulation of different sensory modalities in eliciting Type 2 theta in the rat in the presence or absence of a ferret. Visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli were presented to rats in both conditions. Tactile stimulation produced more movement than either visual or auditory stimuli when the ferret was present. In both conditions, however, more Type 2 theta was observed in response to tactile or visual stimulation than to auditory stimulation. In the arousal condition, stimulation of tactile and auditory modalities resulted in significant increases in the amount of Type 2 theta produced. Input to the visual modality produced high levels of Type 2 theta production in both low- and high-arousal conditions. It is argued that Type 2 theta is not necessarily a precursor to movement but rather sensory processing while in a high state of arousal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0735-7044.103.1.106 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15256119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614305770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-33a45b770074e002289e9d290534b1d12ed7b760df7f3b98195288d5b59af7863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSDeb_oJSECXpzcno2zrkEJa0WUhIaLdnIcsyUfBXJfvgfx-bXZbSQy4zDPPMzDsvQl8IXBFg6hoUE5kCzpfyisxRfkAropnOAHL-Ea2OxCd0ltIrAHDg4hSdUk2ZlGyFbh670tZhmPDv3rtQBYd3U-8xxbsXP1j8HLtydEPoWhxaPLx4vG2argi1x7_scI5OKlsn__mQ1-jPj7vd5j57ePq53dw-ZJYTNmSMWS4KpQAU9wCU5trrkmoQjBekJNSXqlASykpVrNA50YLmeSkKoW2lcsnW6Pt-bx-7v6NPg2lCcr6ubeu7MRkiqJBk_nyNvv0HvnZjbGdtRhLOQMwi3oMosFwrodUMsT3kYpdS9JXpY2hsnAwBs9hvFnPNYu5SGjLHRejXw-qxaHx5nDn4PfcvDn2bnK2raFsX0hGTWgpGluOXe8z21vRpcjYOwdU-maL1_5x7A2gBlMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614305770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Montoya, Christopher P ; Heynen, Arnold J ; Faris, Peter D ; Sainsbury, Robert S</creator><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Christopher P ; Heynen, Arnold J ; Faris, Peter D ; Sainsbury, Robert S</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative effectiveness of stimulation of different sensory modalities in eliciting Type 2 theta in the rat in the presence or absence of a ferret. Visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli were presented to rats in both conditions. Tactile stimulation produced more movement than either visual or auditory stimuli when the ferret was present. In both conditions, however, more Type 2 theta was observed in response to tactile or visual stimulation than to auditory stimulation. In the arousal condition, stimulation of tactile and auditory modalities resulted in significant increases in the amount of Type 2 theta produced. Input to the visual modality produced high levels of Type 2 theta production in both low- and high-arousal conditions. It is argued that Type 2 theta is not necessarily a precursor to movement but rather sensory processing while in a high state of arousal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7044</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.1.106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2923663</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BENEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Arousal - physiology ; Atropine - pharmacology ; Auditory Pathways ; Auditory Stimulation ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electroencephalography ; Fear ; Ferrets ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hippocampus ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Male ; Physical Stimulation ; Physiological Correlates ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rats ; Rats - physiology ; Senses ; Tactual Stimulation ; Theta Rhythm ; Tonic Immobility ; Visual Pathways ; Visual Stimulation</subject><ispartof>Behavioral neuroscience, 1989-02, Vol.103 (1), p.106-111</ispartof><rights>1989 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 1989</rights><rights>1989, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-33a45b770074e002289e9d290534b1d12ed7b760df7f3b98195288d5b59af7863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6965317$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2923663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heynen, Arnold J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, Robert S</creatorcontrib><title>Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat</title><title>Behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative effectiveness of stimulation of different sensory modalities in eliciting Type 2 theta in the rat in the presence or absence of a ferret. Visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli were presented to rats in both conditions. Tactile stimulation produced more movement than either visual or auditory stimuli when the ferret was present. In both conditions, however, more Type 2 theta was observed in response to tactile or visual stimulation than to auditory stimulation. In the arousal condition, stimulation of tactile and auditory modalities resulted in significant increases in the amount of Type 2 theta produced. Input to the visual modality produced high levels of Type 2 theta production in both low- and high-arousal conditions. It is argued that Type 2 theta is not necessarily a precursor to movement but rather sensory processing while in a high state of arousal.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arousal - physiology</subject><subject>Atropine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Auditory Pathways</subject><subject>Auditory Stimulation</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Ferrets</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physical Stimulation</subject><subject>Physiological Correlates</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats - physiology</subject><subject>Senses</subject><subject>Tactual Stimulation</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm</subject><subject>Tonic Immobility</subject><subject>Visual Pathways</subject><subject>Visual Stimulation</subject><issn>0735-7044</issn><issn>1939-0084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpSDeb_oJSECXpzcno2zrkEJa0WUhIaLdnIcsyUfBXJfvgfx-bXZbSQy4zDPPMzDsvQl8IXBFg6hoUE5kCzpfyisxRfkAropnOAHL-Ea2OxCd0ltIrAHDg4hSdUk2ZlGyFbh670tZhmPDv3rtQBYd3U-8xxbsXP1j8HLtydEPoWhxaPLx4vG2argi1x7_scI5OKlsn__mQ1-jPj7vd5j57ePq53dw-ZJYTNmSMWS4KpQAU9wCU5trrkmoQjBekJNSXqlASykpVrNA50YLmeSkKoW2lcsnW6Pt-bx-7v6NPg2lCcr6ubeu7MRkiqJBk_nyNvv0HvnZjbGdtRhLOQMwi3oMosFwrodUMsT3kYpdS9JXpY2hsnAwBs9hvFnPNYu5SGjLHRejXw-qxaHx5nDn4PfcvDn2bnK2raFsX0hGTWgpGluOXe8z21vRpcjYOwdU-maL1_5x7A2gBlMY</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>Montoya, Christopher P</creator><creator>Heynen, Arnold J</creator><creator>Faris, Peter D</creator><creator>Sainsbury, Robert S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat</title><author>Montoya, Christopher P ; Heynen, Arnold J ; Faris, Peter D ; Sainsbury, Robert S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-33a45b770074e002289e9d290534b1d12ed7b760df7f3b98195288d5b59af7863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arousal - physiology</topic><topic>Atropine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Auditory Pathways</topic><topic>Auditory Stimulation</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Ferrets</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physical Stimulation</topic><topic>Physiological Correlates</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats - physiology</topic><topic>Senses</topic><topic>Tactual Stimulation</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm</topic><topic>Tonic Immobility</topic><topic>Visual Pathways</topic><topic>Visual Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heynen, Arnold J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faris, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, Robert S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montoya, Christopher P</au><au>Heynen, Arnold J</au><au>Faris, Peter D</au><au>Sainsbury, Robert S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>106-111</pages><issn>0735-7044</issn><eissn>1939-0084</eissn><coden>BENEDJ</coden><abstract>The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative effectiveness of stimulation of different sensory modalities in eliciting Type 2 theta in the rat in the presence or absence of a ferret. Visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli were presented to rats in both conditions. Tactile stimulation produced more movement than either visual or auditory stimuli when the ferret was present. In both conditions, however, more Type 2 theta was observed in response to tactile or visual stimulation than to auditory stimulation. In the arousal condition, stimulation of tactile and auditory modalities resulted in significant increases in the amount of Type 2 theta produced. Input to the visual modality produced high levels of Type 2 theta production in both low- and high-arousal conditions. It is argued that Type 2 theta is not necessarily a precursor to movement but rather sensory processing while in a high state of arousal.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>2923663</pmid><doi>10.1037/0735-7044.103.1.106</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-7044 |
| ispartof | Behavioral neuroscience, 1989-02, Vol.103 (1), p.106-111 |
| issn | 0735-7044 1939-0084 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15256119 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Animal Animal behavior Animals Arousal - physiology Atropine - pharmacology Auditory Pathways Auditory Stimulation Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Electroencephalography Fear Ferrets Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hippocampus Hippocampus - physiology Male Physical Stimulation Physiological Correlates Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Rats Rats - physiology Senses Tactual Stimulation Theta Rhythm Tonic Immobility Visual Pathways Visual Stimulation |
| title | Modality Specific Type 2 Theta Production in the Immobile Rat |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modality%20Specific%20Type%202%20Theta%20Production%20in%20the%20Immobile%20Rat&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=Montoya,%20Christopher%20P&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=106-111&rft.issn=0735-7044&rft.eissn=1939-0084&rft.coden=BENEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0735-7044.103.1.106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614305770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614305770&rft_id=info:pmid/2923663&rfr_iscdi=true |