Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes
A cognitive control unit (CCU) for automated assembly systems aims to simulate human information processing at a rule‐based level of cognitive control. Focusing on the subtask of monitoring, a cognitive engineering approach for the design of the procedural knowledge base of the CCU is presented and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries 2014-05, Vol.24 (3), p.348-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 348 |
container_title | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Mayer, Marcel Ph Odenthal, Barbara Faber, Marco Winkelholz, Carsten Schlick, Christopher M. |
description | A cognitive control unit (CCU) for automated assembly systems aims to simulate human information processing at a rule‐based level of cognitive control. Focusing on the subtask of monitoring, a cognitive engineering approach for the design of the procedural knowledge base of the CCU is presented and a human‐centered simulation model of assembly processes on the basis of the cognitive architecture SOAR is introduced. The overall objective is to design and develop the system to conform to operators' expectations. To identify human assembly strategies to be included in the CCU, an empirical study with n = 16 participants was conducted and validated by an independent investigation with n = 25 persons. Furthermore, simulation models incorporating certain subsets of production rules were developed and evaluated regarding their goodness of prediction of human assembly behavior. The results show that the rule sets have a significant effect on the predictive power. The highest prediction accuracy was obtained with all identified assembly rules integrated. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hfm.20390 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524433748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1524433748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3680-6f0070579f9f5ccc094c751b9efdc0ac01163b5726996d7183f795337765e9f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBuAIgUQpDLxBJBYY0h7Ht3isKtIilcsA6milrl1ccil2AvTtcSkwIDHZlr7fPv6j6BzBAAGkw2dTDVLAAg6iHqIpJIwychj2ICDJCEfH0Yn3awDACPFeRMfNqratfdPxdb2ytdbO1qu4MfGoa5uqaPUyHnmvq0W5jR9co3Q4-NPoyBSl12ffaz96yq8fx9Nkdj-5GY9micIsC28bAA6UCyMMVUqBIIpTtBDaLBUUChBieEF5yoRgS44ybLigGHPOqBYG4X50ub9345rXTvtWVtYrXZZFrZvOy_BDQoInWaAXf-i66Vwdptsp4ALjjAR1tVfKNd47beTG2apwW4lA7gqUoUD5VWCww719t6Xe_g_lNL_9SST7hPWt_vhNFO5FMo45lfO7icxEDnNCqczxJ-XAfd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520793384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Mayer, Marcel Ph ; Odenthal, Barbara ; Faber, Marco ; Winkelholz, Carsten ; Schlick, Christopher M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Marcel Ph ; Odenthal, Barbara ; Faber, Marco ; Winkelholz, Carsten ; Schlick, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><description>A cognitive control unit (CCU) for automated assembly systems aims to simulate human information processing at a rule‐based level of cognitive control. Focusing on the subtask of monitoring, a cognitive engineering approach for the design of the procedural knowledge base of the CCU is presented and a human‐centered simulation model of assembly processes on the basis of the cognitive architecture SOAR is introduced. The overall objective is to design and develop the system to conform to operators' expectations. To identify human assembly strategies to be included in the CCU, an empirical study with n = 16 participants was conducted and validated by an independent investigation with n = 25 persons. Furthermore, simulation models incorporating certain subsets of production rules were developed and evaluated regarding their goodness of prediction of human assembly behavior. The results show that the rule sets have a significant effect on the predictive power. The highest prediction accuracy was obtained with all identified assembly rules integrated. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-8471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Assembly ; Behavior ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive automation ; Human factors research ; Information processing ; Joint cognitive systems ; MTM ; Simulation ; Supervisory control</subject><ispartof>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2014-05, Vol.24 (3), p.348-368</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. May/Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3680-6f0070579f9f5ccc094c751b9efdc0ac01163b5726996d7183f795337765e9f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3680-6f0070579f9f5ccc094c751b9efdc0ac01163b5726996d7183f795337765e9f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhfm.20390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhfm.20390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Marcel Ph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odenthal, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelholz, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlick, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes</title><title>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</title><addtitle>Hum. Factors Man</addtitle><description>A cognitive control unit (CCU) for automated assembly systems aims to simulate human information processing at a rule‐based level of cognitive control. Focusing on the subtask of monitoring, a cognitive engineering approach for the design of the procedural knowledge base of the CCU is presented and a human‐centered simulation model of assembly processes on the basis of the cognitive architecture SOAR is introduced. The overall objective is to design and develop the system to conform to operators' expectations. To identify human assembly strategies to be included in the CCU, an empirical study with n = 16 participants was conducted and validated by an independent investigation with n = 25 persons. Furthermore, simulation models incorporating certain subsets of production rules were developed and evaluated regarding their goodness of prediction of human assembly behavior. The results show that the rule sets have a significant effect on the predictive power. The highest prediction accuracy was obtained with all identified assembly rules integrated. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Assembly</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive automation</subject><subject>Human factors research</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Joint cognitive systems</subject><subject>MTM</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Supervisory control</subject><issn>1090-8471</issn><issn>1520-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LtOwzAUBuAIgUQpDLxBJBYY0h7Ht3isKtIilcsA6milrl1ccil2AvTtcSkwIDHZlr7fPv6j6BzBAAGkw2dTDVLAAg6iHqIpJIwychj2ICDJCEfH0Yn3awDACPFeRMfNqratfdPxdb2ytdbO1qu4MfGoa5uqaPUyHnmvq0W5jR9co3Q4-NPoyBSl12ffaz96yq8fx9Nkdj-5GY9micIsC28bAA6UCyMMVUqBIIpTtBDaLBUUChBieEF5yoRgS44ybLigGHPOqBYG4X50ub9345rXTvtWVtYrXZZFrZvOy_BDQoInWaAXf-i66Vwdptsp4ALjjAR1tVfKNd47beTG2apwW4lA7gqUoUD5VWCww719t6Xe_g_lNL_9SST7hPWt_vhNFO5FMo45lfO7icxEDnNCqczxJ-XAfd4</recordid><startdate>201405</startdate><enddate>201405</enddate><creator>Mayer, Marcel Ph</creator><creator>Odenthal, Barbara</creator><creator>Faber, Marco</creator><creator>Winkelholz, Carsten</creator><creator>Schlick, Christopher M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201405</creationdate><title>Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes</title><author>Mayer, Marcel Ph ; Odenthal, Barbara ; Faber, Marco ; Winkelholz, Carsten ; Schlick, Christopher M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3680-6f0070579f9f5ccc094c751b9efdc0ac01163b5726996d7183f795337765e9f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Assembly</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive automation</topic><topic>Human factors research</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Joint cognitive systems</topic><topic>MTM</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Supervisory control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Marcel Ph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odenthal, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelholz, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlick, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayer, Marcel Ph</au><au>Odenthal, Barbara</au><au>Faber, Marco</au><au>Winkelholz, Carsten</au><au>Schlick, Christopher M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes</atitle><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle><addtitle>Hum. Factors Man</addtitle><date>2014-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>348-368</pages><issn>1090-8471</issn><eissn>1520-6564</eissn><abstract>A cognitive control unit (CCU) for automated assembly systems aims to simulate human information processing at a rule‐based level of cognitive control. Focusing on the subtask of monitoring, a cognitive engineering approach for the design of the procedural knowledge base of the CCU is presented and a human‐centered simulation model of assembly processes on the basis of the cognitive architecture SOAR is introduced. The overall objective is to design and develop the system to conform to operators' expectations. To identify human assembly strategies to be included in the CCU, an empirical study with n = 16 participants was conducted and validated by an independent investigation with n = 25 persons. Furthermore, simulation models incorporating certain subsets of production rules were developed and evaluated regarding their goodness of prediction of human assembly behavior. The results show that the rule sets have a significant effect on the predictive power. The highest prediction accuracy was obtained with all identified assembly rules integrated. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/hfm.20390</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-8471 |
ispartof | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2014-05, Vol.24 (3), p.348-368 |
issn | 1090-8471 1520-6564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524433748 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Assembly Behavior Cognition & reasoning Cognitive automation Human factors research Information processing Joint cognitive systems MTM Simulation Supervisory control |
title | Cognitive Engineering of Automated Assembly Processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20Engineering%20of%20Automated%20Assembly%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors%20and%20ergonomics%20in%20manufacturing%20&%20service%20industries&rft.au=Mayer,%20Marcel%20Ph&rft.date=2014-05&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=348-368&rft.issn=1090-8471&rft.eissn=1520-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hfm.20390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524433748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520793384&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |