Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo
Subject specific musculoskeletal models typically base some or all of their parameters on a source other than the subject being modeled. Evidence demonstrates that cadaveric measurements do not always scale appropriately to every subject, yet many musculoskeletal models still rely heavily on cadaver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of biomedical engineering 2014-06, Vol.42 (6), p.1331-1339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1331 |
container_title | Annals of biomedical engineering |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Infantolino, Benjamin W. Challis, John H. |
description | Subject specific musculoskeletal models typically base some or all of their parameters on a source other than the subject being modeled. Evidence demonstrates that cadaveric measurements do not always scale appropriately to every subject, yet many musculoskeletal models still rely heavily on cadaveric based data. This study focused on the First Dorsal interosseous (FDI) given its unique function as the sole abductor of the second metacarpophalangeal joint. There were two purposes to this study: (1) to describe the procedures that can be used
in vivo
to determine the properties of a model of the FDI. (2). To determine the model parameters required to characterize the FDI for a group of four subjects. Parameters were determined using ultrasound imaging and a custom-built finger dynamometer. Some parameters were measured directly while other parameters had to be estimated using a least-squares criterion. For example, the parameters for the force–length properties were determined by fitting a model to experimentally determined data, with maximum isometric force values ranging from 86 to 102 N, and optimum lengths from 41 to 53 mm. It was shown that full characterization is possible for the FDI with parameters that are physiologically reasonable, but which showed variability between subjects. This model and approach for parameter identification will allow for more detailed analysis of the function of the FDI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524419556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1524419556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-32eb6d24ccc79b4ceb6f9976215b291dafe4dd7968d904fad9a22b0cff22b4103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFLwzAUhYMobk5_gC8S8MWXam6atMujqNOBQ2Hqiw8lTW-0o1tn0gru15uyKSIIkofLId89yeEQcgjsFBhLzzwwEauIgYiC5tFqi_RBpnGkkmGyTfqMKRYlKhE9suf9jDGAYSx3SY-LlA-HieiT5wlq37py8UKnbT5D09DpEk1pS0MnrTcV0kldYEXvtdNzbNB5WlvavCIdlc439LJ2Xld0vAhXtfdYtz4I-lS-1_tkx-rK48FmDsjj6Orh4ia6vbseX5zfRkYw2UQxxzwpuDDGpCoXJiirVJpwkDlXUGiLoijSkKlQTFhdKM15zoy1YQhg8YCcrH2Xrn5r0TfZvPQGq0ovuu9kILkQoKRM_oNCHEM4AT3-hc7q1i1CkI5iUirgIlCwpkyX3qHNlq6ca_eRAcu6krJ1SVkoqdM8W4Wdo41zm8-x-N74aiUAfA34ZdcMuh9P_-n6Cf9anEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520559124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Infantolino, Benjamin W. ; Challis, John H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Infantolino, Benjamin W. ; Challis, John H.</creatorcontrib><description>Subject specific musculoskeletal models typically base some or all of their parameters on a source other than the subject being modeled. Evidence demonstrates that cadaveric measurements do not always scale appropriately to every subject, yet many musculoskeletal models still rely heavily on cadaveric based data. This study focused on the First Dorsal interosseous (FDI) given its unique function as the sole abductor of the second metacarpophalangeal joint. There were two purposes to this study: (1) to describe the procedures that can be used
in vivo
to determine the properties of a model of the FDI. (2). To determine the model parameters required to characterize the FDI for a group of four subjects. Parameters were determined using ultrasound imaging and a custom-built finger dynamometer. Some parameters were measured directly while other parameters had to be estimated using a least-squares criterion. For example, the parameters for the force–length properties were determined by fitting a model to experimentally determined data, with maximum isometric force values ranging from 86 to 102 N, and optimum lengths from 41 to 53 mm. It was shown that full characterization is possible for the FDI with parameters that are physiologically reasonable, but which showed variability between subjects. This model and approach for parameter identification will allow for more detailed analysis of the function of the FDI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24728864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics ; Classical Mechanics ; Fingers - physiopathology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle Strength Dynamometer ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of biomedical engineering, 2014-06, Vol.42 (6), p.1331-1339</ispartof><rights>Biomedical Engineering Society 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-32eb6d24ccc79b4ceb6f9976215b291dafe4dd7968d904fad9a22b0cff22b4103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-32eb6d24ccc79b4ceb6f9976215b291dafe4dd7968d904fad9a22b0cff22b4103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24728864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Infantolino, Benjamin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challis, John H.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo</title><title>Annals of biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>Subject specific musculoskeletal models typically base some or all of their parameters on a source other than the subject being modeled. Evidence demonstrates that cadaveric measurements do not always scale appropriately to every subject, yet many musculoskeletal models still rely heavily on cadaveric based data. This study focused on the First Dorsal interosseous (FDI) given its unique function as the sole abductor of the second metacarpophalangeal joint. There were two purposes to this study: (1) to describe the procedures that can be used
in vivo
to determine the properties of a model of the FDI. (2). To determine the model parameters required to characterize the FDI for a group of four subjects. Parameters were determined using ultrasound imaging and a custom-built finger dynamometer. Some parameters were measured directly while other parameters had to be estimated using a least-squares criterion. For example, the parameters for the force–length properties were determined by fitting a model to experimentally determined data, with maximum isometric force values ranging from 86 to 102 N, and optimum lengths from 41 to 53 mm. It was shown that full characterization is possible for the FDI with parameters that are physiologically reasonable, but which showed variability between subjects. This model and approach for parameter identification will allow for more detailed analysis of the function of the FDI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Fingers - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Strength Dynamometer</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><issn>0090-6964</issn><issn>1573-9686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFLwzAUhYMobk5_gC8S8MWXam6atMujqNOBQ2Hqiw8lTW-0o1tn0gru15uyKSIIkofLId89yeEQcgjsFBhLzzwwEauIgYiC5tFqi_RBpnGkkmGyTfqMKRYlKhE9suf9jDGAYSx3SY-LlA-HieiT5wlq37py8UKnbT5D09DpEk1pS0MnrTcV0kldYEXvtdNzbNB5WlvavCIdlc439LJ2Xld0vAhXtfdYtz4I-lS-1_tkx-rK48FmDsjj6Orh4ia6vbseX5zfRkYw2UQxxzwpuDDGpCoXJiirVJpwkDlXUGiLoijSkKlQTFhdKM15zoy1YQhg8YCcrH2Xrn5r0TfZvPQGq0ovuu9kILkQoKRM_oNCHEM4AT3-hc7q1i1CkI5iUirgIlCwpkyX3qHNlq6ca_eRAcu6krJ1SVkoqdM8W4Wdo41zm8-x-N74aiUAfA34ZdcMuh9P_-n6Cf9anEU</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Infantolino, Benjamin W.</creator><creator>Challis, John H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo</title><author>Infantolino, Benjamin W. ; Challis, John H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-32eb6d24ccc79b4ceb6f9976215b291dafe4dd7968d904fad9a22b0cff22b4103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Fingers - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Strength Dynamometer</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Infantolino, Benjamin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Challis, John H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Infantolino, Benjamin W.</au><au>Challis, John H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo</atitle><jtitle>Annals of biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>Ann Biomed Eng</stitle><addtitle>Ann Biomed Eng</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1331</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1331-1339</pages><issn>0090-6964</issn><eissn>1573-9686</eissn><abstract>Subject specific musculoskeletal models typically base some or all of their parameters on a source other than the subject being modeled. Evidence demonstrates that cadaveric measurements do not always scale appropriately to every subject, yet many musculoskeletal models still rely heavily on cadaveric based data. This study focused on the First Dorsal interosseous (FDI) given its unique function as the sole abductor of the second metacarpophalangeal joint. There were two purposes to this study: (1) to describe the procedures that can be used
in vivo
to determine the properties of a model of the FDI. (2). To determine the model parameters required to characterize the FDI for a group of four subjects. Parameters were determined using ultrasound imaging and a custom-built finger dynamometer. Some parameters were measured directly while other parameters had to be estimated using a least-squares criterion. For example, the parameters for the force–length properties were determined by fitting a model to experimentally determined data, with maximum isometric force values ranging from 86 to 102 N, and optimum lengths from 41 to 53 mm. It was shown that full characterization is possible for the FDI with parameters that are physiologically reasonable, but which showed variability between subjects. This model and approach for parameter identification will allow for more detailed analysis of the function of the FDI.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24728864</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-6964 |
ispartof | Annals of biomedical engineering, 2014-06, Vol.42 (6), p.1331-1339 |
issn | 0090-6964 1573-9686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524419556 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult Biochemistry Biological and Medical Physics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Biophysics Classical Mechanics Fingers - physiopathology Humans Isometric Contraction - physiology Male Models, Biological Muscle Strength - physiology Muscle Strength Dynamometer Muscle, Skeletal - physiology |
title | Measuring Subject Specific Muscle Model Parameters of the First Dorsal Interosseous In Vivo |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T02%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Subject%20Specific%20Muscle%20Model%20Parameters%20of%20the%20First%20Dorsal%20Interosseous%20In%20Vivo&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Infantolino,%20Benjamin%20W.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1331&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1331-1339&rft.issn=0090-6964&rft.eissn=1573-9686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10439-014-1002-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524419556%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520559124&rft_id=info:pmid/24728864&rfr_iscdi=true |