Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea
Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The di...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Comparative Physiology 2014-04, Vol.200 (4), p.311-316 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 316 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 311 |
| container_title | Journal of Comparative Physiology |
| container_volume | 200 |
| creator | Liu, Wei-Rong Shen, Jun-Xian Zhang, Yu-Jiao Xu, Zhi-Min Qi, Zhi Xue, Mao-Qiang |
| description | Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The difference in hearing between two sexes of the frog is unknown. We recorded auditory evoked near-field potentials and single-unit responses from the auditory midbrain (the torus semicircularis) to determine auditory frequency sensitivity and threshold. The results show that males have the upper frequency limit at 24 kHz and females have the upper limit at 16 kHz. The more sensitive frequency range is 3–15 kHz for males and 1–8 kHz for females. Males have the minimum threshold at 11 kHz (58 dB SPL), higher about 5 dB than that at 3 kHz for females. The best excitatory frequencies of single units are mostly between 3 and 5 kHz in females and at 7–8 kHz in males. The underlying mechanism of auditory sexual differences is discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524417835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1509409075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3d01dac6f6a60cc7d8826e9400080a150e330c0ef3d34fcef46a4adb980a66133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9AG404MbNtPfmz0xmWYpVodCF7Tqkyc04Zd6kJm_AfnszTBVxIV2FcH_nnJscxt4inCBAd1oApO4bQNWAMbqRz9gOlRQNSo3P2Q6kgqbTvTpir0q5AwCBAl-yI6E0ggCzYxdnSxgPKT_wQj8XN_EwxkiZZk98nPnhO_HJ5YF4CimnpfCY08Cv6iW72fEhu_04k3vNXkQ3FXrzeB6zm4tP1-dfmsurz1_Pzy4br0R_aGQADM63sXUteN8FY0RLvaqbGXCogaQEDxRlkCp6iqp1yoXbvk7bFqU8Zh833_ucfixUDnY_Fk_T5Gaq21nUQinsjNRPQKEG99Ct6Id_0Lu05Lk-ZKVMK6Hv12zcKJ9TKZmivc_j3uUHi2DXPuzWh6192LUPu2rePTovt3sKfxS_C6iA2IBSR_NA-a_o_7i-30TRJeuGPBZ7801UAKD-kdEofwHNo5yZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508630993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Liu, Wei-Rong ; Shen, Jun-Xian ; Zhang, Yu-Jiao ; Xu, Zhi-Min ; Qi, Zhi ; Xue, Mao-Qiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei-Rong ; Shen, Jun-Xian ; Zhang, Yu-Jiao ; Xu, Zhi-Min ; Qi, Zhi ; Xue, Mao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><description>Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The difference in hearing between two sexes of the frog is unknown. We recorded auditory evoked near-field potentials and single-unit responses from the auditory midbrain (the torus semicircularis) to determine auditory frequency sensitivity and threshold. The results show that males have the upper frequency limit at 24 kHz and females have the upper limit at 16 kHz. The more sensitive frequency range is 3–15 kHz for males and 1–8 kHz for females. Males have the minimum threshold at 11 kHz (58 dB SPL), higher about 5 dB than that at 3 kHz for females. The best excitatory frequencies of single units are mostly between 3 and 5 kHz in females and at 7–8 kHz in males. The underlying mechanism of auditory sexual differences is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-7594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24510208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; acoustics ; Animal Physiology ; Animals ; Anura ; Anura - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; courtship ; ears ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology ; Female ; females ; frogs ; hearing ; Life Sciences ; Male ; males ; Mesencephalon - physiology ; Microelectrodes ; Neurosciences ; Odorrana ; Original Paper ; Sex Factors ; Time Factors ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2014-04, Vol.200 (4), p.311-316</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3d01dac6f6a60cc7d8826e9400080a150e330c0ef3d34fcef46a4adb980a66133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3d01dac6f6a60cc7d8826e9400080a150e330c0ef3d34fcef46a4adb980a66133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24510208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jun-Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu-Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhi-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Mao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><title>Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea</title><title>Journal of Comparative Physiology</title><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A</addtitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><description>Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The difference in hearing between two sexes of the frog is unknown. We recorded auditory evoked near-field potentials and single-unit responses from the auditory midbrain (the torus semicircularis) to determine auditory frequency sensitivity and threshold. The results show that males have the upper frequency limit at 24 kHz and females have the upper limit at 16 kHz. The more sensitive frequency range is 3–15 kHz for males and 1–8 kHz for females. Males have the minimum threshold at 11 kHz (58 dB SPL), higher about 5 dB than that at 3 kHz for females. The best excitatory frequencies of single units are mostly between 3 and 5 kHz in females and at 7–8 kHz in males. The underlying mechanism of auditory sexual differences is discussed.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>acoustics</subject><subject>Animal Physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Anura - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>courtship</subject><subject>ears</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>frogs</subject><subject>hearing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>males</subject><subject>Mesencephalon - physiology</subject><subject>Microelectrodes</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Odorrana</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-7594</issn><issn>1432-1351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9rFTEUxYMo9ln9AG404MbNtPfmz0xmWYpVodCF7Tqkyc04Zd6kJm_AfnszTBVxIV2FcH_nnJscxt4inCBAd1oApO4bQNWAMbqRz9gOlRQNSo3P2Q6kgqbTvTpir0q5AwCBAl-yI6E0ggCzYxdnSxgPKT_wQj8XN_EwxkiZZk98nPnhO_HJ5YF4CimnpfCY08Cv6iW72fEhu_04k3vNXkQ3FXrzeB6zm4tP1-dfmsurz1_Pzy4br0R_aGQADM63sXUteN8FY0RLvaqbGXCogaQEDxRlkCp6iqp1yoXbvk7bFqU8Zh833_ucfixUDnY_Fk_T5Gaq21nUQinsjNRPQKEG99Ct6Id_0Lu05Lk-ZKVMK6Hv12zcKJ9TKZmivc_j3uUHi2DXPuzWh6192LUPu2rePTovt3sKfxS_C6iA2IBSR_NA-a_o_7i-30TRJeuGPBZ7801UAKD-kdEofwHNo5yZ</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Liu, Wei-Rong</creator><creator>Shen, Jun-Xian</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu-Jiao</creator><creator>Xu, Zhi-Min</creator><creator>Qi, Zhi</creator><creator>Xue, Mao-Qiang</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea</title><author>Liu, Wei-Rong ; Shen, Jun-Xian ; Zhang, Yu-Jiao ; Xu, Zhi-Min ; Qi, Zhi ; Xue, Mao-Qiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3d01dac6f6a60cc7d8826e9400080a150e330c0ef3d34fcef46a4adb980a66133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>acoustics</topic><topic>Animal Physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Anura - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>courtship</topic><topic>ears</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>frogs</topic><topic>hearing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>males</topic><topic>Mesencephalon - physiology</topic><topic>Microelectrodes</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Odorrana</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wei-Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jun-Xian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu-Jiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhi-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Mao-Qiang</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Wei-Rong</au><au>Shen, Jun-Xian</au><au>Zhang, Yu-Jiao</au><au>Xu, Zhi-Min</au><au>Qi, Zhi</au><au>Xue, Mao-Qiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle><stitle>J Comp Physiol A</stitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>200</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>311-316</pages><issn>0340-7594</issn><eissn>1432-1351</eissn><abstract>Acoustic communication is an important behavior in frog courtship. Male and female frogs of most species, except the concave-eared torrent frog Odorrana tormota, have largely similar audiograms. The large odorous frogs (Odorrana graminea) are sympatric with O. tormota, but have no ear canals. The difference in hearing between two sexes of the frog is unknown. We recorded auditory evoked near-field potentials and single-unit responses from the auditory midbrain (the torus semicircularis) to determine auditory frequency sensitivity and threshold. The results show that males have the upper frequency limit at 24 kHz and females have the upper limit at 16 kHz. The more sensitive frequency range is 3–15 kHz for males and 1–8 kHz for females. Males have the minimum threshold at 11 kHz (58 dB SPL), higher about 5 dB than that at 3 kHz for females. The best excitatory frequencies of single units are mostly between 3 and 5 kHz in females and at 7–8 kHz in males. The underlying mechanism of auditory sexual differences is discussed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24510208</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-7594 |
| ispartof | Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2014-04, Vol.200 (4), p.311-316 |
| issn | 0340-7594 1432-1351 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524417835 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation acoustics Animal Physiology Animals Anura Anura - physiology Auditory Perception - physiology Auditory Threshold - physiology Biomedical and Life Sciences courtship ears Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology Female females frogs hearing Life Sciences Male males Mesencephalon - physiology Microelectrodes Neurosciences Odorrana Original Paper Sex Factors Time Factors Zoology |
| title | Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditory%20sexual%20difference%20in%20the%20large%20odorous%20frog%20Odorrana%20graminea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Comparative%20Physiology&rft.au=Liu,%20Wei-Rong&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=200&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=311-316&rft.issn=0340-7594&rft.eissn=1432-1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00359-014-0885-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1509409075%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508630993&rft_id=info:pmid/24510208&rfr_iscdi=true |