Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD
•22–26 aroma-active volatiles from 3 fragrant rice types identified and compared.•Sulfur volatile PCA patterns were unique for each rice type.•Five aroma-active volatiles were sulfur-based. Aroma volatiles from three cooked fragrant rice types (Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati) were characterised and id...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food chemistry 2014-07, Vol.154, p.1-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Food chemistry |
container_volume | 154 |
creator | Mahattanatawee, Kanjana Rouseff, Russell L. |
description | •22–26 aroma-active volatiles from 3 fragrant rice types identified and compared.•Sulfur volatile PCA patterns were unique for each rice type.•Five aroma-active volatiles were sulfur-based.
Aroma volatiles from three cooked fragrant rice types (Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati) were characterised and identified using SPME GC–O, GC–PFPD and confirmed using GC–MS. A total of 26, 23, and 22 aroma active volatiles were observed in Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati cooked rice samples. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline was aroma active in all three rice types, but the sulphur-based, cooked rice character impact volatile, 2-acetyl-2-thiazoline was aroma active only in Jasmine rice. Five additional sulphur volatiles were found to have aroma activity: dimethyl sulphide, 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol, 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, dimethyl trisulphide, and methional. Other newly-reported aroma active rice volatiles were geranyl acetate, β-damascone, β-damascenone, and ɑ-ionone, contributing nutty, sweet floral attributes to the aroma of cooked aromatic rice. The first two principal components from the principal component analysis of sulphur volatiles explained 60% of the variance. PC1 separated Basmati from the other two cultivars and PC2 completely separated Jasmine from Jasmati cultivars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524415610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030881461400003X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499145203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6920e9bbfb3bb6aff6e897c03774e5f35f59d88c61258be2462ce4e280de0fa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u3CAUhVHUKpn8vELEplI3ngIGjHetJk1aKVKyaNcI40vCCJsp2CNl13foG_ZJwmQm7TIrpMN3zr26B6FLSpaUUPlpvXQx9vYRhiUjtF5SVnRxhBZUNXXVkIa9QwtSE1UpyuUJOs15TQgprDpGJ4wLqsrnAm1XcdiY5HMccXTYpDgYbOzkt4DN2OM8BzcnvI3BTD5Axn7E02MCwC6Zh2TGCSdvAds5FI9JGc_Zjw_4ZvX395-74EpUHGBKTy9pL-r99f3VOXrvTMhwcXjP0M_rrz9W36rbu5vvqy-3leVtM1WyZQTarnNd3XXSOCdBtY0lddNwEK4WTrS9UlZSJlQHjEtmgQNTpAfiDKvP0Md97ibFXzPkSQ8-WwjBjBDnrKlgnFMhKXkb5W1LuWCkLqjcozbFnBM4vUl-MOlJU6J39ei1fq1H7-rRlBVdFOPlYcbcDdD_s732UYAPB8Bka0K58Wh9_s8pTlqpdtznPQfleFsPSWfrYbTQ-wR20n30b-3yDK6ds8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499145203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana ; Rouseff, Russell L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana ; Rouseff, Russell L.</creatorcontrib><description>•22–26 aroma-active volatiles from 3 fragrant rice types identified and compared.•Sulfur volatile PCA patterns were unique for each rice type.•Five aroma-active volatiles were sulfur-based.
Aroma volatiles from three cooked fragrant rice types (Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati) were characterised and identified using SPME GC–O, GC–PFPD and confirmed using GC–MS. A total of 26, 23, and 22 aroma active volatiles were observed in Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati cooked rice samples. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline was aroma active in all three rice types, but the sulphur-based, cooked rice character impact volatile, 2-acetyl-2-thiazoline was aroma active only in Jasmine rice. Five additional sulphur volatiles were found to have aroma activity: dimethyl sulphide, 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol, 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, dimethyl trisulphide, and methional. Other newly-reported aroma active rice volatiles were geranyl acetate, β-damascone, β-damascenone, and ɑ-ionone, contributing nutty, sweet floral attributes to the aroma of cooked aromatic rice. The first two principal components from the principal component analysis of sulphur volatiles explained 60% of the variance. PC1 separated Basmati from the other two cultivars and PC2 completely separated Jasmine from Jasmati cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24518308</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FOCHDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cooked rice ; Food toxicology ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Headspace SPME ; Jasminum ; Medical sciences ; Odorants - analysis ; Olfactometry ; Oryza - chemistry ; Oryza - classification ; Oryza sativa ; PCA ; Principal Component Analysis ; Sulfur - analysis ; Toxicology ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><ispartof>Food chemistry, 2014-07, Vol.154, p.1-6</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6920e9bbfb3bb6aff6e897c03774e5f35f59d88c61258be2462ce4e280de0fa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6920e9bbfb3bb6aff6e897c03774e5f35f59d88c61258be2462ce4e280de0fa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030881461400003X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28409688$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24518308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouseff, Russell L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD</title><title>Food chemistry</title><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><description>•22–26 aroma-active volatiles from 3 fragrant rice types identified and compared.•Sulfur volatile PCA patterns were unique for each rice type.•Five aroma-active volatiles were sulfur-based.
Aroma volatiles from three cooked fragrant rice types (Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati) were characterised and identified using SPME GC–O, GC–PFPD and confirmed using GC–MS. A total of 26, 23, and 22 aroma active volatiles were observed in Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati cooked rice samples. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline was aroma active in all three rice types, but the sulphur-based, cooked rice character impact volatile, 2-acetyl-2-thiazoline was aroma active only in Jasmine rice. Five additional sulphur volatiles were found to have aroma activity: dimethyl sulphide, 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol, 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, dimethyl trisulphide, and methional. Other newly-reported aroma active rice volatiles were geranyl acetate, β-damascone, β-damascenone, and ɑ-ionone, contributing nutty, sweet floral attributes to the aroma of cooked aromatic rice. The first two principal components from the principal component analysis of sulphur volatiles explained 60% of the variance. PC1 separated Basmati from the other two cultivars and PC2 completely separated Jasmine from Jasmati cultivars.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cooked rice</subject><subject>Food toxicology</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Headspace SPME</subject><subject>Jasminum</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Odorants - analysis</subject><subject>Olfactometry</subject><subject>Oryza - chemistry</subject><subject>Oryza - classification</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>PCA</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Sulfur - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><issn>0308-8146</issn><issn>1873-7072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u3CAUhVHUKpn8vELEplI3ngIGjHetJk1aKVKyaNcI40vCCJsp2CNl13foG_ZJwmQm7TIrpMN3zr26B6FLSpaUUPlpvXQx9vYRhiUjtF5SVnRxhBZUNXXVkIa9QwtSE1UpyuUJOs15TQgprDpGJ4wLqsrnAm1XcdiY5HMccXTYpDgYbOzkt4DN2OM8BzcnvI3BTD5Axn7E02MCwC6Zh2TGCSdvAds5FI9JGc_Zjw_4ZvX395-74EpUHGBKTy9pL-r99f3VOXrvTMhwcXjP0M_rrz9W36rbu5vvqy-3leVtM1WyZQTarnNd3XXSOCdBtY0lddNwEK4WTrS9UlZSJlQHjEtmgQNTpAfiDKvP0Md97ibFXzPkSQ8-WwjBjBDnrKlgnFMhKXkb5W1LuWCkLqjcozbFnBM4vUl-MOlJU6J39ei1fq1H7-rRlBVdFOPlYcbcDdD_s732UYAPB8Bka0K58Wh9_s8pTlqpdtznPQfleFsPSWfrYbTQ-wR20n30b-3yDK6ds8o</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana</creator><creator>Rouseff, Russell L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD</title><author>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana ; Rouseff, Russell L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-6920e9bbfb3bb6aff6e897c03774e5f35f59d88c61258be2462ce4e280de0fa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cooked rice</topic><topic>Food toxicology</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Headspace SPME</topic><topic>Jasminum</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Odorants - analysis</topic><topic>Olfactometry</topic><topic>Oryza - chemistry</topic><topic>Oryza - classification</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>PCA</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Sulfur - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouseff, Russell L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahattanatawee, Kanjana</au><au>Rouseff, Russell L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD</atitle><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>154</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0308-8146</issn><eissn>1873-7072</eissn><coden>FOCHDJ</coden><abstract>•22–26 aroma-active volatiles from 3 fragrant rice types identified and compared.•Sulfur volatile PCA patterns were unique for each rice type.•Five aroma-active volatiles were sulfur-based.
Aroma volatiles from three cooked fragrant rice types (Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati) were characterised and identified using SPME GC–O, GC–PFPD and confirmed using GC–MS. A total of 26, 23, and 22 aroma active volatiles were observed in Jasmine, Basmati and Jasmati cooked rice samples. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline was aroma active in all three rice types, but the sulphur-based, cooked rice character impact volatile, 2-acetyl-2-thiazoline was aroma active only in Jasmine rice. Five additional sulphur volatiles were found to have aroma activity: dimethyl sulphide, 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol, 2-methyl-3-furanthiol, dimethyl trisulphide, and methional. Other newly-reported aroma active rice volatiles were geranyl acetate, β-damascone, β-damascenone, and ɑ-ionone, contributing nutty, sweet floral attributes to the aroma of cooked aromatic rice. The first two principal components from the principal component analysis of sulphur volatiles explained 60% of the variance. PC1 separated Basmati from the other two cultivars and PC2 completely separated Jasmine from Jasmati cultivars.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24518308</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.105</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-8146 |
ispartof | Food chemistry, 2014-07, Vol.154, p.1-6 |
issn | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524415610 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cooked rice Food toxicology Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Headspace SPME Jasminum Medical sciences Odorants - analysis Olfactometry Oryza - chemistry Oryza - classification Oryza sativa PCA Principal Component Analysis Sulfur - analysis Toxicology Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis |
title | Comparison of aroma active and sulfur volatiles in three fragrant rice cultivars using GC–Olfactometry and GC–PFPD |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A10%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20aroma%20active%20and%20sulfur%20volatiles%20in%20three%20fragrant%20rice%20cultivars%20using%20GC%E2%80%93Olfactometry%20and%20GC%E2%80%93PFPD&rft.jtitle=Food%20chemistry&rft.au=Mahattanatawee,%20Kanjana&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=154&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0308-8146&rft.eissn=1873-7072&rft.coden=FOCHDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499145203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499145203&rft_id=info:pmid/24518308&rft_els_id=S030881461400003X&rfr_iscdi=true |