Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines

The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris vert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoomorphology 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315
Hauptverfasser: Grossmann, Jan Nils, Nebelsick, James H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Zoomorphology
container_volume 132
creator Grossmann, Jan Nils
Nebelsick, James H.
description The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris verticillata and Prionocidaris baculosa as well as the camarodont Heterocentrotus mammillatus (Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate. H. mammillatus spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524414153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261518955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wN2AGzejuXlNZynFFxTcKHQX0iTTpkwnY-6M0H9vagVBcHG5HPjOgXMIuQJ6C5RWd0ip4LKkwPPVrJRHZAKCs5JxsTgmE1oxWjLgi1NyhrihFIQSfEJWs7jtTTJD-PTFNqZ-Hdu4Cta0helcgUMa7TCmb2naHQYsYlOgb70dvCtscCbF4L5ha7ZZuNgNGTDFmOw6dAX2ofN4QU4a06K__Pnn5P3x4W32XM5fn15m9_PSclEPpads6tkSoPFOClBSSlcrNa24U94oMaVO1tYwKqziUlVNRmrKeAOVXSpp-Dm5OeT2KX6MHge9DWh925rOxxE1SCYECJA8o9d_0E0cU26JmjEFEqa1lJmCA2VTREy-0X0KuedOA9X76fVhep2n1_vp9d7DDh7MbLfy6Tf5f9MXKBiGtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261518955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris verticillata and Prionocidaris baculosa as well as the camarodont Heterocentrotus mammillatus (Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate. H. mammillatus spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-213X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-234X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computed tomography ; Deformation ; Developmental Biology ; Echinodermata ; Echinoidea ; Electron microscopy ; Environmental factors ; Eucidaris ; Evolutionary Biology ; Histology ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine invertebrates ; Medulla oblongata ; Microstructure ; Morphology ; Original Paper ; Phyllacanthus imperialis ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Spine ; Spines ; Structural analysis ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Zoomorphology, 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Zoomorphology is a copyright of Springer, (2013). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><title>Zoomorphology</title><addtitle>Zoomorphology</addtitle><description>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris verticillata and Prionocidaris baculosa as well as the camarodont Heterocentrotus mammillatus (Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate. H. mammillatus spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Echinodermata</subject><subject>Echinoidea</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Eucidaris</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Medulla oblongata</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phyllacanthus imperialis</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spines</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0720-213X</issn><issn>1432-234X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wN2AGzejuXlNZynFFxTcKHQX0iTTpkwnY-6M0H9vagVBcHG5HPjOgXMIuQJ6C5RWd0ip4LKkwPPVrJRHZAKCs5JxsTgmE1oxWjLgi1NyhrihFIQSfEJWs7jtTTJD-PTFNqZ-Hdu4Cta0helcgUMa7TCmb2naHQYsYlOgb70dvCtscCbF4L5ha7ZZuNgNGTDFmOw6dAX2ofN4QU4a06K__Pnn5P3x4W32XM5fn15m9_PSclEPpads6tkSoPFOClBSSlcrNa24U94oMaVO1tYwKqziUlVNRmrKeAOVXSpp-Dm5OeT2KX6MHge9DWh925rOxxE1SCYECJA8o9d_0E0cU26JmjEFEqa1lJmCA2VTREy-0X0KuedOA9X76fVhep2n1_vp9d7DDh7MbLfy6Tf5f9MXKBiGtg</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creator><creator>Nebelsick, James H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><author>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Echinodermata</topic><topic>Echinoidea</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Eucidaris</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Medulla oblongata</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phyllacanthus imperialis</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spines</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grossmann, Jan Nils</au><au>Nebelsick, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</atitle><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle><stitle>Zoomorphology</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>301-315</pages><issn>0720-213X</issn><eissn>1432-234X</eissn><abstract>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris verticillata and Prionocidaris baculosa as well as the camarodont Heterocentrotus mammillatus (Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate. H. mammillatus spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-213X
ispartof Zoomorphology, 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315
issn 0720-213X
1432-234X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524414153
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal Anatomy
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Computed tomography
Deformation
Developmental Biology
Echinodermata
Echinoidea
Electron microscopy
Environmental factors
Eucidaris
Evolutionary Biology
Histology
Life Sciences
Marine
Marine invertebrates
Medulla oblongata
Microstructure
Morphology
Original Paper
Phyllacanthus imperialis
Scanning electron microscopy
Spine
Spines
Structural analysis
Tomography
title Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20morphological%20and%20structural%20analysis%20of%20selected%20cidaroid%20and%20camarodont%20sea%20urchin%20spines&rft.jtitle=Zoomorphology&rft.au=Grossmann,%20Jan%20Nils&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=301-315&rft.issn=0720-213X&rft.eissn=1432-234X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261518955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261518955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true