Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines
The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids Eucidaris metularia , Phyllacanthus imperialis , Plococidaris vert...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoomorphology 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Zoomorphology |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Grossmann, Jan Nils Nebelsick, James H. |
description | The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids
Eucidaris metularia
,
Phyllacanthus imperialis
,
Plococidaris verticillata
and
Prionocidaris baculosa
as well as the camarodont
Heterocentrotus mammillatus
(Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate.
H. mammillatus
spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524414153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261518955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wN2AGzejuXlNZynFFxTcKHQX0iTTpkwnY-6M0H9vagVBcHG5HPjOgXMIuQJ6C5RWd0ip4LKkwPPVrJRHZAKCs5JxsTgmE1oxWjLgi1NyhrihFIQSfEJWs7jtTTJD-PTFNqZ-Hdu4Cta0helcgUMa7TCmb2naHQYsYlOgb70dvCtscCbF4L5ha7ZZuNgNGTDFmOw6dAX2ofN4QU4a06K__Pnn5P3x4W32XM5fn15m9_PSclEPpads6tkSoPFOClBSSlcrNa24U94oMaVO1tYwKqziUlVNRmrKeAOVXSpp-Dm5OeT2KX6MHge9DWh925rOxxE1SCYECJA8o9d_0E0cU26JmjEFEqa1lJmCA2VTREy-0X0KuedOA9X76fVhep2n1_vp9d7DDh7MbLfy6Tf5f9MXKBiGtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261518955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids
Eucidaris metularia
,
Phyllacanthus imperialis
,
Plococidaris verticillata
and
Prionocidaris baculosa
as well as the camarodont
Heterocentrotus mammillatus
(Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate.
H. mammillatus
spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-213X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-234X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Computed tomography ; Deformation ; Developmental Biology ; Echinodermata ; Echinoidea ; Electron microscopy ; Environmental factors ; Eucidaris ; Evolutionary Biology ; Histology ; Life Sciences ; Marine ; Marine invertebrates ; Medulla oblongata ; Microstructure ; Morphology ; Original Paper ; Phyllacanthus imperialis ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Spine ; Spines ; Structural analysis ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Zoomorphology, 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013</rights><rights>Zoomorphology is a copyright of Springer, (2013). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><title>Zoomorphology</title><addtitle>Zoomorphology</addtitle><description>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids
Eucidaris metularia
,
Phyllacanthus imperialis
,
Plococidaris verticillata
and
Prionocidaris baculosa
as well as the camarodont
Heterocentrotus mammillatus
(Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate.
H. mammillatus
spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Echinodermata</subject><subject>Echinoidea</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Eucidaris</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Medulla oblongata</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phyllacanthus imperialis</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spines</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0720-213X</issn><issn>1432-234X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_wN2AGzejuXlNZynFFxTcKHQX0iTTpkwnY-6M0H9vagVBcHG5HPjOgXMIuQJ6C5RWd0ip4LKkwPPVrJRHZAKCs5JxsTgmE1oxWjLgi1NyhrihFIQSfEJWs7jtTTJD-PTFNqZ-Hdu4Cta0helcgUMa7TCmb2naHQYsYlOgb70dvCtscCbF4L5ha7ZZuNgNGTDFmOw6dAX2ofN4QU4a06K__Pnn5P3x4W32XM5fn15m9_PSclEPpads6tkSoPFOClBSSlcrNa24U94oMaVO1tYwKqziUlVNRmrKeAOVXSpp-Dm5OeT2KX6MHge9DWh925rOxxE1SCYECJA8o9d_0E0cU26JmjEFEqa1lJmCA2VTREy-0X0KuedOA9X76fVhep2n1_vp9d7DDh7MbLfy6Tf5f9MXKBiGtg</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creator><creator>Nebelsick, James H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</title><author>Grossmann, Jan Nils ; Nebelsick, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-e028e2b11fed5416555d966873d6ea6480d59ca204c63567f1659023f17cb65a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Echinodermata</topic><topic>Echinoidea</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Eucidaris</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Medulla oblongata</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phyllacanthus imperialis</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spines</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Jan Nils</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nebelsick, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grossmann, Jan Nils</au><au>Nebelsick, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines</atitle><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle><stitle>Zoomorphology</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>301-315</pages><issn>0720-213X</issn><eissn>1432-234X</eissn><abstract>The external and internal morphologies of cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin primary spines are investigated giving an overview of the internal microstructure and structural properties. The investigated species comprise the cidaroids
Eucidaris metularia
,
Phyllacanthus imperialis
,
Plococidaris verticillata
and
Prionocidaris baculosa
as well as the camarodont
Heterocentrotus mammillatus
(Echinodermata: Class Echinoidea), and morphological descriptions are based on scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Stereom types and densities are differentiated using pore and trabecular diameter measurements. Structural analysis was performed using three point bending tests resulting in the calculation of force, deflection and stress, strain relationships. All studied species possess primary spines with a medulla consisting of laminar stereom regardless of the age and position of the spine on the tests. Differences in stereom morphology occur in the radiating layer and the surface of the spines. Material densities and stereom types differ with respect to growth lines when present and the radiating layer. The primary spines also show large differences in their outer morphologies ranging from smooth, striated to tuberculate.
H. mammillatus
spines are shown to bear more stress resistance than those of the cidaroids. Differences in spine morphologies and reaction to stress are interpreted with respect to functional morphological response, to ambient environmental parameters and their strategies between and within evolutionary stages.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-213X |
ispartof | Zoomorphology, 2013-09, Vol.132 (3), p.301-315 |
issn | 0720-213X 1432-234X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524414153 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal Anatomy Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Biomedical and Life Sciences Computed tomography Deformation Developmental Biology Echinodermata Echinoidea Electron microscopy Environmental factors Eucidaris Evolutionary Biology Histology Life Sciences Marine Marine invertebrates Medulla oblongata Microstructure Morphology Original Paper Phyllacanthus imperialis Scanning electron microscopy Spine Spines Structural analysis Tomography |
title | Comparative morphological and structural analysis of selected cidaroid and camarodont sea urchin spines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20morphological%20and%20structural%20analysis%20of%20selected%20cidaroid%20and%20camarodont%20sea%20urchin%20spines&rft.jtitle=Zoomorphology&rft.au=Grossmann,%20Jan%20Nils&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=301-315&rft.issn=0720-213X&rft.eissn=1432-234X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00435-013-0192-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261518955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261518955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |