Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition

•The Brundtland Commission defines the necessity of justice for sustainable development.•Rawls developed the ethical background for the distribution analysis.•The epsilon parameter of the Atkinson index can take up these ideas and society’s view of justice.•Our distribution analysis contributes to t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2013-12, Vol.112, p.1493-1499
Hauptverfasser: Schlör, Holger, Fischer, Wolfgang, Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1499
container_issue
container_start_page 1493
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 112
creator Schlör, Holger
Fischer, Wolfgang
Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich
description •The Brundtland Commission defines the necessity of justice for sustainable development.•Rawls developed the ethical background for the distribution analysis.•The epsilon parameter of the Atkinson index can take up these ideas and society’s view of justice.•Our distribution analysis contributes to the social debate about social distributional justice.•The analysis elucidates the distributional consequences of increasing energy prices. The transformation of the energy sector in Germany is associated with a considerable increase in prices, especially for electricity, which places different burdens on households depending on income. This conflicts with the idea of a fair distribution of burdens arising from the transformation of the energy sector and might endanger the acceptance of this transformation. For methodological reasons, we do not apply the GINI index in our analysis, instead we use the Atkinson index for the first time in the energy sector to quantitatively measure the distribution of energy consumption. Furthermore, we place the epsilon parameter of this index in the context of the discussion on sustainable development and justice. The epsilon parameter gives society the opportunity to make explicit what it implicitly considers to be “just” and this concept can, if necessary, be corrected by a different choice of epsilon. If society chooses a higher epsilon value because it makes higher demands on a “just” distribution of burdens and costs then the index can identify a gap between the normative goal and societal reality. This permits the authorities to implement economic policy measures to close this gap. From our point of view, the Atkinson index is an instrument that can be used to operationalize Rawls’ theory of justice against the background of the social theory of sustainable development. For our analysis, we used the example of the burdens of transforming the energy sector in Germany. Our data basis is the German Household Expenditure Survey (EVS).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261913003140</els_id><sourcerecordid>1524408810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ef0c5d187544dd6cfb622ea8226e72b916684647adc06a83239fd6a9b6b816533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1uFDEURi0EEkvgFcAlBTNce2a9HiqiiCRIQSmS1JbHvl68zNqL7YlIkXePNwM11S2-c_8OIe8ZtAyY-Lxr9QEDpu1Dy4F1LfQtcHhBVkxueDMwJl-SFXQgGi7Y8Jq8yXkHAJxxWJHHmzkX7YMeJ6QW73GKhz2G8onuauANUh0sLT-RnpZfPuQYqA8W_3yhP1DnOfmwfU6tzyX5cS4-Bj1RdA5NyTS65_QC014HulxJS9Ih-yP5lrxyesr47m89IXfn327PLpur64vvZ6dXjenEUBp0YNa2vrPue2uFcaPgHLXkXOCGjwMTQvai32hrQGjZ8W5wVuhhFKNkYt11J-TjMveQ4u8Zc1F7nw1Okw4Y56zYmvc9SMmgomJBTYo5J3TqkPxepwfFQB19q53651sdfSvoVfVdGz8sjU5HpbfJZ3V3UwFxdN1tJK_E14XA-uq9x6Sy8RgMWp-qLWWj_9-SJ9s_mDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524408810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schlör, Holger ; Fischer, Wolfgang ; Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlör, Holger ; Fischer, Wolfgang ; Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</creatorcontrib><description>•The Brundtland Commission defines the necessity of justice for sustainable development.•Rawls developed the ethical background for the distribution analysis.•The epsilon parameter of the Atkinson index can take up these ideas and society’s view of justice.•Our distribution analysis contributes to the social debate about social distributional justice.•The analysis elucidates the distributional consequences of increasing energy prices. The transformation of the energy sector in Germany is associated with a considerable increase in prices, especially for electricity, which places different burdens on households depending on income. This conflicts with the idea of a fair distribution of burdens arising from the transformation of the energy sector and might endanger the acceptance of this transformation. For methodological reasons, we do not apply the GINI index in our analysis, instead we use the Atkinson index for the first time in the energy sector to quantitatively measure the distribution of energy consumption. Furthermore, we place the epsilon parameter of this index in the context of the discussion on sustainable development and justice. The epsilon parameter gives society the opportunity to make explicit what it implicitly considers to be “just” and this concept can, if necessary, be corrected by a different choice of epsilon. If society chooses a higher epsilon value because it makes higher demands on a “just” distribution of burdens and costs then the index can identify a gap between the normative goal and societal reality. This permits the authorities to implement economic policy measures to close this gap. From our point of view, the Atkinson index is an instrument that can be used to operationalize Rawls’ theory of justice against the background of the social theory of sustainable development. For our analysis, we used the example of the burdens of transforming the energy sector in Germany. Our data basis is the German Household Expenditure Survey (EVS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>distribution ; economic policy ; electricity ; Energy ; energy conversion ; household expenditure ; households ; income ; Justice ; prices ; social justice ; surveys ; Sustainable development ; transformation</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2013-12, Vol.112, p.1493-1499</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ef0c5d187544dd6cfb622ea8226e72b916684647adc06a83239fd6a9b6b816533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ef0c5d187544dd6cfb622ea8226e72b916684647adc06a83239fd6a9b6b816533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913003140$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlör, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>•The Brundtland Commission defines the necessity of justice for sustainable development.•Rawls developed the ethical background for the distribution analysis.•The epsilon parameter of the Atkinson index can take up these ideas and society’s view of justice.•Our distribution analysis contributes to the social debate about social distributional justice.•The analysis elucidates the distributional consequences of increasing energy prices. The transformation of the energy sector in Germany is associated with a considerable increase in prices, especially for electricity, which places different burdens on households depending on income. This conflicts with the idea of a fair distribution of burdens arising from the transformation of the energy sector and might endanger the acceptance of this transformation. For methodological reasons, we do not apply the GINI index in our analysis, instead we use the Atkinson index for the first time in the energy sector to quantitatively measure the distribution of energy consumption. Furthermore, we place the epsilon parameter of this index in the context of the discussion on sustainable development and justice. The epsilon parameter gives society the opportunity to make explicit what it implicitly considers to be “just” and this concept can, if necessary, be corrected by a different choice of epsilon. If society chooses a higher epsilon value because it makes higher demands on a “just” distribution of burdens and costs then the index can identify a gap between the normative goal and societal reality. This permits the authorities to implement economic policy measures to close this gap. From our point of view, the Atkinson index is an instrument that can be used to operationalize Rawls’ theory of justice against the background of the social theory of sustainable development. For our analysis, we used the example of the burdens of transforming the energy sector in Germany. Our data basis is the German Household Expenditure Survey (EVS).</description><subject>distribution</subject><subject>economic policy</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy conversion</subject><subject>household expenditure</subject><subject>households</subject><subject>income</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>prices</subject><subject>social justice</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>transformation</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1uFDEURi0EEkvgFcAlBTNce2a9HiqiiCRIQSmS1JbHvl68zNqL7YlIkXePNwM11S2-c_8OIe8ZtAyY-Lxr9QEDpu1Dy4F1LfQtcHhBVkxueDMwJl-SFXQgGi7Y8Jq8yXkHAJxxWJHHmzkX7YMeJ6QW73GKhz2G8onuauANUh0sLT-RnpZfPuQYqA8W_3yhP1DnOfmwfU6tzyX5cS4-Bj1RdA5NyTS65_QC014HulxJS9Ih-yP5lrxyesr47m89IXfn327PLpur64vvZ6dXjenEUBp0YNa2vrPue2uFcaPgHLXkXOCGjwMTQvai32hrQGjZ8W5wVuhhFKNkYt11J-TjMveQ4u8Zc1F7nw1Okw4Y56zYmvc9SMmgomJBTYo5J3TqkPxepwfFQB19q53651sdfSvoVfVdGz8sjU5HpbfJZ3V3UwFxdN1tJK_E14XA-uq9x6Sy8RgMWp-qLWWj_9-SJ9s_mDU</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Schlör, Holger</creator><creator>Fischer, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition</title><author>Schlör, Holger ; Fischer, Wolfgang ; Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ef0c5d187544dd6cfb622ea8226e72b916684647adc06a83239fd6a9b6b816533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>distribution</topic><topic>economic policy</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy conversion</topic><topic>household expenditure</topic><topic>households</topic><topic>income</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>prices</topic><topic>social justice</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>transformation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlör, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlör, Holger</au><au>Fischer, Wolfgang</au><au>Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>1493</spage><epage>1499</epage><pages>1493-1499</pages><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>•The Brundtland Commission defines the necessity of justice for sustainable development.•Rawls developed the ethical background for the distribution analysis.•The epsilon parameter of the Atkinson index can take up these ideas and society’s view of justice.•Our distribution analysis contributes to the social debate about social distributional justice.•The analysis elucidates the distributional consequences of increasing energy prices. The transformation of the energy sector in Germany is associated with a considerable increase in prices, especially for electricity, which places different burdens on households depending on income. This conflicts with the idea of a fair distribution of burdens arising from the transformation of the energy sector and might endanger the acceptance of this transformation. For methodological reasons, we do not apply the GINI index in our analysis, instead we use the Atkinson index for the first time in the energy sector to quantitatively measure the distribution of energy consumption. Furthermore, we place the epsilon parameter of this index in the context of the discussion on sustainable development and justice. The epsilon parameter gives society the opportunity to make explicit what it implicitly considers to be “just” and this concept can, if necessary, be corrected by a different choice of epsilon. If society chooses a higher epsilon value because it makes higher demands on a “just” distribution of burdens and costs then the index can identify a gap between the normative goal and societal reality. This permits the authorities to implement economic policy measures to close this gap. From our point of view, the Atkinson index is an instrument that can be used to operationalize Rawls’ theory of justice against the background of the social theory of sustainable development. For our analysis, we used the example of the burdens of transforming the energy sector in Germany. Our data basis is the German Household Expenditure Survey (EVS).</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2013-12, Vol.112, p.1493-1499
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524408810
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects distribution
economic policy
electricity
Energy
energy conversion
household expenditure
households
income
Justice
prices
social justice
surveys
Sustainable development
transformation
title Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: Measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A00%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20development,%20justice%20and%20the%20Atkinson%20index:%20Measuring%20the%20distributional%20effects%20of%20the%20German%20energy%20transition&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Schl%C3%B6r,%20Holger&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=1493&rft.epage=1499&rft.pages=1493-1499&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524408810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524408810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261913003140&rfr_iscdi=true