Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT
It has become clear in current scientific pedagogy that the emersion of students in the scientific process in terms of designing, implementing, and analyzing experiments is imperative for their education; as such, it has been our goal to model this active learning process in the classroom and labora...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochemistry and molecular biology education 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.16-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Biochemistry and molecular biology education |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Ditty, Jayna L. Williams, Kayla M. Keller, Megan M. Chen, Grischa Y. Liu, Xianxian Parales, Rebecca E. |
description | It has become clear in current scientific pedagogy that the emersion of students in the scientific process in terms of designing, implementing, and analyzing experiments is imperative for their education; as such, it has been our goal to model this active learning process in the classroom and laboratory in the context of a genuine scientific question. Toward this objective, the National Science Foundation funded a collaborative research grant between a primarily undergraduate institution and a research‐intensive institution to study the chemotactic responses of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida F1. As part of the project, a new Bioinformatics course was developed in which undergraduates annotate relevant regions of the P. putida F1 genome using Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit, a bioinformatics interface specifically developed for undergraduate programs by the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Based on annotations of putative chemotaxis genes in P. putida F1 and comparative genomics studies, undergraduate students from both institutions developed functional genomics research projects that evolved from the annotations. The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of the NSF grant, the development of the Bioinformatics lecture and wet laboratory course, and how undergraduate student involvement in the project that was initiated in the classroom has served as a springboard for independent undergraduate research projects. © 2012 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(1):16–23, 2013 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bmb.20662 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524406444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1009852</ericid><sourcerecordid>1524406444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-47a49ed775da85efa46b126cb9849d97de0d70494bc01f50bb0e4299083d79083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAUhUVIyc-0izxAgiGbdOGJJMuWtZwZptMpGQolsyxGtq4nDv5JJIsyuz5CnjFP0us6zaIQspGEzsc53HsIOWN0yijl13mTTzlNEn5ATlgcqTASXB3iW0gapkzGx-TUuXuKbCLkETnmUZRyxvkJ-blue9hZ3VftLlhZ3fbPv59K3xowwQ9woG1xF1Rt3wX9HQRb_LdIG697COZVV3e7fbDw1laFr30TbN3gs96s0GW2uP1IPpS6dvDp5Z6Q7Zfl7eJrePN9tV7MbsJCiIiHQmqhwEgZG53GUGqR5IwnRa5SoYySBqiRVCiRF5SVMc1zCjihomlk5HBOyNXo-2C7Rw-uz5rKFVDXuoXOu4zFXAiaCEx7F-WpSHA_kiN6-R9633nb4iADxTE3iilSn0eqsJ1zFsrswVaNtvuM0WyoJ8N6sr_1IHvx4ujzBswr-a8PBM5HAHCjr_LyG_qoNB7061H_VdWwfzspm2_mY-Qf_I6iFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282083350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ditty, Jayna L. ; Williams, Kayla M. ; Keller, Megan M. ; Chen, Grischa Y. ; Liu, Xianxian ; Parales, Rebecca E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ditty, Jayna L. ; Williams, Kayla M. ; Keller, Megan M. ; Chen, Grischa Y. ; Liu, Xianxian ; Parales, Rebecca E.</creatorcontrib><description>It has become clear in current scientific pedagogy that the emersion of students in the scientific process in terms of designing, implementing, and analyzing experiments is imperative for their education; as such, it has been our goal to model this active learning process in the classroom and laboratory in the context of a genuine scientific question. Toward this objective, the National Science Foundation funded a collaborative research grant between a primarily undergraduate institution and a research‐intensive institution to study the chemotactic responses of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida F1. As part of the project, a new Bioinformatics course was developed in which undergraduates annotate relevant regions of the P. putida F1 genome using Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit, a bioinformatics interface specifically developed for undergraduate programs by the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Based on annotations of putative chemotaxis genes in P. putida F1 and comparative genomics studies, undergraduate students from both institutions developed functional genomics research projects that evolved from the annotations. The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of the NSF grant, the development of the Bioinformatics lecture and wet laboratory course, and how undergraduate student involvement in the project that was initiated in the classroom has served as a springboard for independent undergraduate research projects. © 2012 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(1):16–23, 2013</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-8175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-3429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23382122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academies and Institutes ; Active Learning ; Bioinformatics ; Biology ; Biology - education ; California ; College Science ; Computational Biology - education ; Computer Uses in Education ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Documentation ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Status ; Educational Technology ; Financing, Organized ; functional genomics ; Genetics ; Genomics ; Genomics - education ; Grants ; Humans ; Learning Processes ; Minnesota ; Molecular Biology ; Pseudomonas putida ; Research Projects ; Science Curriculum ; Science education ; Science Laboratories ; Science Process Skills ; Student Participation ; Student Research ; Students ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.16-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-47a49ed775da85efa46b126cb9849d97de0d70494bc01f50bb0e4299083d79083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-47a49ed775da85efa46b126cb9849d97de0d70494bc01f50bb0e4299083d79083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbmb.20662$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbmb.20662$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,4026,27930,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1009852$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23382122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ditty, Jayna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kayla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Grischa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parales, Rebecca E.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT</title><title>Biochemistry and molecular biology education</title><addtitle>Biochem Mol Biol Educ</addtitle><description>It has become clear in current scientific pedagogy that the emersion of students in the scientific process in terms of designing, implementing, and analyzing experiments is imperative for their education; as such, it has been our goal to model this active learning process in the classroom and laboratory in the context of a genuine scientific question. Toward this objective, the National Science Foundation funded a collaborative research grant between a primarily undergraduate institution and a research‐intensive institution to study the chemotactic responses of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida F1. As part of the project, a new Bioinformatics course was developed in which undergraduates annotate relevant regions of the P. putida F1 genome using Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit, a bioinformatics interface specifically developed for undergraduate programs by the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Based on annotations of putative chemotaxis genes in P. putida F1 and comparative genomics studies, undergraduate students from both institutions developed functional genomics research projects that evolved from the annotations. The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of the NSF grant, the development of the Bioinformatics lecture and wet laboratory course, and how undergraduate student involvement in the project that was initiated in the classroom has served as a springboard for independent undergraduate research projects. © 2012 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(1):16–23, 2013</description><subject>Academies and Institutes</subject><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biology - education</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Computational Biology - education</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Financing, Organized</subject><subject>functional genomics</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genomics - education</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas putida</subject><subject>Research Projects</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Laboratories</subject><subject>Science Process Skills</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Student Research</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1470-8175</issn><issn>1539-3429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAUhUVIyc-0izxAgiGbdOGJJMuWtZwZptMpGQolsyxGtq4nDv5JJIsyuz5CnjFP0us6zaIQspGEzsc53HsIOWN0yijl13mTTzlNEn5ATlgcqTASXB3iW0gapkzGx-TUuXuKbCLkETnmUZRyxvkJ-blue9hZ3VftLlhZ3fbPv59K3xowwQ9woG1xF1Rt3wX9HQRb_LdIG697COZVV3e7fbDw1laFr30TbN3gs96s0GW2uP1IPpS6dvDp5Z6Q7Zfl7eJrePN9tV7MbsJCiIiHQmqhwEgZG53GUGqR5IwnRa5SoYySBqiRVCiRF5SVMc1zCjihomlk5HBOyNXo-2C7Rw-uz5rKFVDXuoXOu4zFXAiaCEx7F-WpSHA_kiN6-R9633nb4iADxTE3iilSn0eqsJ1zFsrswVaNtvuM0WyoJ8N6sr_1IHvx4ujzBswr-a8PBM5HAHCjr_LyG_qoNB7061H_VdWwfzspm2_mY-Qf_I6iFQ</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Ditty, Jayna L.</creator><creator>Williams, Kayla M.</creator><creator>Keller, Megan M.</creator><creator>Chen, Grischa Y.</creator><creator>Liu, Xianxian</creator><creator>Parales, Rebecca E.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT</title><author>Ditty, Jayna L. ; Williams, Kayla M. ; Keller, Megan M. ; Chen, Grischa Y. ; Liu, Xianxian ; Parales, Rebecca E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-47a49ed775da85efa46b126cb9849d97de0d70494bc01f50bb0e4299083d79083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academies and Institutes</topic><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biology - education</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Computational Biology - education</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Financing, Organized</topic><topic>functional genomics</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genomics - education</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas putida</topic><topic>Research Projects</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Laboratories</topic><topic>Science Process Skills</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Student Research</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ditty, Jayna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kayla M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Megan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Grischa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xianxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parales, Rebecca E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biochemistry and molecular biology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ditty, Jayna L.</au><au>Williams, Kayla M.</au><au>Keller, Megan M.</au><au>Chen, Grischa Y.</au><au>Liu, Xianxian</au><au>Parales, Rebecca E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1009852</ericid><atitle>Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT</atitle><jtitle>Biochemistry and molecular biology education</jtitle><addtitle>Biochem Mol Biol Educ</addtitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>16-23</pages><issn>1470-8175</issn><eissn>1539-3429</eissn><abstract>It has become clear in current scientific pedagogy that the emersion of students in the scientific process in terms of designing, implementing, and analyzing experiments is imperative for their education; as such, it has been our goal to model this active learning process in the classroom and laboratory in the context of a genuine scientific question. Toward this objective, the National Science Foundation funded a collaborative research grant between a primarily undergraduate institution and a research‐intensive institution to study the chemotactic responses of the bacterium Pseudomonas putida F1. As part of the project, a new Bioinformatics course was developed in which undergraduates annotate relevant regions of the P. putida F1 genome using Integrated Microbial Genomes Annotation Collaboration Toolkit, a bioinformatics interface specifically developed for undergraduate programs by the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Based on annotations of putative chemotaxis genes in P. putida F1 and comparative genomics studies, undergraduate students from both institutions developed functional genomics research projects that evolved from the annotations. The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of the NSF grant, the development of the Bioinformatics lecture and wet laboratory course, and how undergraduate student involvement in the project that was initiated in the classroom has served as a springboard for independent undergraduate research projects. © 2012 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 41(1):16–23, 2013</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>23382122</pmid><doi>10.1002/bmb.20662</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-8175 |
ispartof | Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 2013-01, Vol.41 (1), p.16-23 |
issn | 1470-8175 1539-3429 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1524406444 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Education Source; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Academies and Institutes Active Learning Bioinformatics Biology Biology - education California College Science Computational Biology - education Computer Uses in Education Curricula Curriculum Documentation Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Status Educational Technology Financing, Organized functional genomics Genetics Genomics Genomics - education Grants Humans Learning Processes Minnesota Molecular Biology Pseudomonas putida Research Projects Science Curriculum Science education Science Laboratories Science Process Skills Student Participation Student Research Students Undergraduate Students Undergraduate Study |
title | Integrating Grant‐funded Research into the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum Using IMG‐ACT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T18%3A10%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Grant%E2%80%90funded%20Research%20into%20the%20Undergraduate%20Biology%20Curriculum%20Using%20IMG%E2%80%90ACT&rft.jtitle=Biochemistry%20and%20molecular%20biology%20education&rft.au=Ditty,%20Jayna%20L.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=16-23&rft.issn=1470-8175&rft.eissn=1539-3429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bmb.20662&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524406444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282083350&rft_id=info:pmid/23382122&rft_ericid=EJ1009852&rfr_iscdi=true |